Re: Amiga connects..none.. very different histories..
Not just for their multimedia capabilities:
Even NASA used Amigas (5:30)
15450 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
Not just for their multimedia capabilities:
Even NASA used Amigas (5:30)
You've got it back to front. AmigaOS was developed in the US even though it found success in Europe, however many BeOS developers were European.
I actually had one of the first BeBoxes at home in Stockholm
There was only a small circle of developers then, many of them from France where Be got much of their initial capital.
And Amiga developers asked Be for AmigaOS-like features and they were written into the BeOS:
A case in point is Datatypes.lib, a generic data translation service much like EasyOpen on the Mac, except with an API mere mortals can understand. It started as a request to Be from some old Amiga developers to adopt the Amiga "datatypes" system service, which apparently is a very basic way of identifying and loading the contents of a disk file into an application. Many people liked the idea, but thought the Amiga implementation was flawed, and a lot of discussion ensued. To cut down on the clutter and flames, I decided one weekend to take the best of the discussion and just implement it. I did, and posted the result for comments. The first round was pretty harsh (and rightly so) but version 1.1 really had everything you'd need in a basic data translation package, including identification, import, export, making it easy to write add-on translators, and abstracting translation from storage so you could use any translator going to/from any source (such as disk, memory, or a network connection). Judicious use of C++ abstract base classes made this both forward compatible and easy to implement.
And finally, it really wasn't really an Apple/BeOS land, as in the end we all know which OS Apple chose.
Reminded me about a lecture on where we might have gone wrong since then:
The Thirty Million Line Problem (1:48:54)
Perhaps it's because Twitter didn't consult within the required timeframe first and is offering less than 90 day's pay? See section 3 here.
Also, Twitter seem to have fired the person in charge of filing accounts with Companies House.
The smoke and mirrors of unlimited paid time off
Yet there are also a number of companies that have experimented with UPTO only to end the policy and pronounce it a failure. Workers often end up taking less time off than they did with a fixed policy. A 2018 survey showed workers with UPTO took fewer holidays than those with a fixed allocation; according to another poll, one-third of US workers with UPTO always work on holiday.
US-based networking company Facet is one company that abandoned UPTO after it found its workers were taking fewer holidays. The CEO of London-based recruiting company Unknown, meanwhile, went viral in a LinkedIn post that explained the firm cancelled its UPTO scheme after people felt guilty and never took time off. (They’ve instead transitioned to giving 32 paid days off, universally across the ranks.)
Microsoft also said that for users who implemented the workaround, it recommended they "continue using the configuration in the workaround."
So... what about future patches?
Or maybe they've decided as most people will have worked around the problem two months later, it means they don't need to update it any more.
Hey, valued customer - because we know your time is money, you like to plan ahead, and we're confident we'll be first in any cost/feature comparison you make, we'll only tell you the price after we launch the changes to the product you're already using. Screw you! MS x x x
And so the usual WEF, gender, environment, and climate conspiracies are channeled together, dressed up with a veneer of concern for the children, and barfed onto the Internet. Well done you.
No, it's a problem with social media networks, that's why I said "social media networks". Where did you get "internet service providers" from?
You may even be aware that a social media account can be accessed from many devices and the account's settings and associated parental controls (or lack of them) have little to do with the device its accessed from.
And yes there is also responsibility by the user or their parents.
Until recently no social media network had built-in parental controls. Now some claim they have parental controls but that usually means a pointless parent guide explaining what the settings page does. In other words parents are stopped from taking responsibility by the social media network while their children get hooked on the dopamine hits.
At a guess that's something to do with the social media addling half the students' brains or the chance of getting shot being pretty high, and no politician doing a thing about it for years because they like the money from lobbying and are scared of the Freeze Peach and Freedumb mobs. If schools didn't have those things to contend with then they could be a lot less dreadful.
Page sizes on x86, x64, MIPS, and ARM are 4K, not 64K. You appear to be arguing that there aren't many structures > 64K so it doesn't matter as it'll segfault anyway, there are many more structures > 4K.
Really not a good advert for your supposedly memory safe language.
This is not guaranteed to fail and C/C++ leaves the behaviour up to the platform.
*NULL will SIGSEGV on OSes which don't assign a physical address to virtual memory location 0, but NULL->weight, i.e. *(0 + offsetof(P, weight)), could point to a virtual memory location which is mapped to a physical address and if it does the assignment would work.
Then there are old and embedded platforms which do no virtual to physical memory mapping. If you dereference NULL, you dereference address 0, no problem.
Surely someone who wrote a supposedly memory safe language on top of C++ should know this?
From Wikipedia:
WEF chief executive officer Klaus Schwab described three core components of the Great Reset: creating conditions for a "stakeholder economy"; building in a more "resilient, equitable, and sustainable" way, utilising environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics; and "harness[ing] the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution."
Why is this so terrible?
That's what they're still saying in the 23rd century.
Can't park your starship anywhere these days.
Yeah, but then you're dealing with bugs and customer service even worse than Samsung's.
If you want a fairly untouched Android then try a Sony Xperia or Nokia.
Tesla’s Claim That Cybertruck Can Pull “Near Infinite Mass” Is Hilarious Bullshit
... like most things Musk's companies claim I think.
If Apple does move to a black monolith without any ports, it's because they think there's more money in it for them, not because of how good or bad USB-C or Lightning are or are perceived to be.
Meanwhile, in the real world, what exactly is wrong with USB-C that means it's good enough for laptops and tablets but not good enough for phones? USB-C is better in every way that counts - USB-C's better for charging than Lightning and is faster at data transfer than Lightning.
How does this artificial divide benefit the people who have bought an iPhone? No idea. I'd need to be some Apple fanboy to understand why.
This means "We, a corporation still making billions a year, are going to dump other people's workload on the remaining employees. Suck it up or you'll be in the next round of layoffs for complaining or just working your contracted hours".
No, if you need a miniature nuclear reactor to prop it up then it isn't sustainable.
Most of the stuff that huge MS, Google, or AWS datacentres do could have been done locally on each site, PC, or mobile where any outage affects relatively few people and not everyone. Only artificial centralisation brought about by the push to move to a subscription model has made datacentre outages such a hair-on-fire disaster when they happen because centralisation means everyone is affected.
Gmail service is way more interesting for smartphone only users because the easy to use app. Telco email has to be used with a separate mail client and you have to setup arcane parameters for IMAP and POP3 and TLS.
That's very much by design. Thunderbird automatically figures it out based on the domain in the e-mail address.
So we are looking at their entire active user list plus a bit more, because Twitter has 368m monthly active users.
Tizen is an utter car crash, and this sounds like it's continuing in the fine tradition of software development at Samsung.