Looking at this from the other side - if there is a particularly strong emanation from space, will it allow all of these robots to break free?
Or does it take a deliberate 'third party' transmission on this frequency to do that?
1589 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Jun 2009
Please remind me, when was the last time that shutting down a cryogenic booster during the boost phase saved a rocket? They do tend to need them to keep flying, unless you have quite a few of them. Since this appears to have three nozzles in total, shutting down one is not going to magically save anyone.
Shooters at Bisley will have adjusted their sights for many reasons, but if any of them can prove it was the coriolis effect I would be more than impressed. For most shooters, adjustment consists purely of "which side did I miss?", with a bit of "which way is the wind blowing?" thrown in.
As the owner of a very small website that just about covers its costs by running Google adverts, I'm not at all impressed.
_I_ don't set any cookies at all - no tracking etc. - but Google does, as part of showing adverts.Personally I'd rather turn off their cookies, even if it cost me a little money, but instead I'm being told that unless I put up a message on my site I may be chased by both Google and by the EU
But neither side will tell me what that message needs to say...
I've seen loads of comments blaming the pilot for unlocking the lever, but very few have picked up on the fact that this was done eleven seconds too early.
That is a tiny amount of time, under the circumstances.
The pilot may have triggered this crash, but the only real cause was bad design.
Given that they are sending the power back to the phone via wireless charging, I would seriously doubt that it can get more than 30% of _harvested_ power back into the phone once all of those losses are dealt with.
I would doubt that the phone is using as much as 30% of its power for its radios - the display is usually a bigger drain than the processor, and that is bad enough.
And, of course, I doubt that anything of that sort of size can harvest more than 30% of the RF in the air.
So, what is 30% of 30% of 30% ?
Oh, and what is the efficiency of the battery?
* Protection from alteration
* Protection from interception
HTTPS provides minimal protection against either of these - I've never come across a case of HTTP content being altered in transit, and analysis of HTTPS content is still possible, just not very easy.
To be accurate, this has nothing (directly) to do with the Government. The police are basically not accountable to Gov., and the Courts are officially not accountable either. Technically, the Gov should, and should already have, written legislation that prevented this, but plod would just have ignored it anyway.
Really?
So there are no rural areas of the UK without mains water? (Such as around half of the Scottish Highlands)
And there are no rural areas without access to mains electricity? (Such as around half of the Hebridean Islands)
Partly, of course, because of the difficulties due to being unable to stop along the motorway that leads to every house in those areas...
I'm not an expert, but my understanding is that it is generally accepted that _any_ image of a natural object (flowers, animals) counts as "copying God's work" and is therefore unacceptable. This is why mosques can easily be identified by the somewhat abstract decorations, and complete lack of anything recognisable.
(Not quite sure where TV fits in...)