Anyone else find it weird that in 2015 such a forward-thinking company is still working in pounds and feet?
34 posts • joined 12 Jun 2009
Anyone else find it weird that in 2015 such a forward-thinking company is still working in pounds and feet?
All this faff took about an hour so it’s really no major hardship and the use of a hacked APK doesn't seem to have raised any security issues.
So you've basically given an app of entirely unknown and frankly dubious provenance pretty much unrestricted access to everything on your phone? How can this not "raise any security issues"?
Did you go through every permission that the APK asked for? Do you know what you can inadvertently allow dodgy apps to do on your phone? Take a look at this list...
To be blunt, I think you might want to consider changing the passwords of any accounts you've logged into on this phone, especially bearing in mind that with incorrectly granted permissions an app could silently bypass two-factor authentication.
If you want a cheap Google phone, I think you'd be better off going for a cheap Nexus n or, if available, reflash with a custom ROM from someone like Paul O'Brien of MoDaCo fame.
Press Windows key, type "p", and Paint is the first entry in the list. The way it's been since Windows 7.
If you've got to go to town on Windows 10 (and I don't blame you), why not mention the half-baked Continuum feature; the fact that nothing actually works quite right; that settings are STILL spread across about six different apps / programs; the lack of Intel display drivers; Cortana being cranky; the half-finished theming etc etc etc.
You could turn your Surface “off” in the approved way, and later find it heating your bag, which is frustrating when battery life is precious. This is fixed, apparently, in Windows 10.
Oh no it isn't...
Windows Phone 8.1 and Windows 10 both use the newer API (the Facebook app handles the messy bit) so aren't affected.
I found it useful as it added contact pictures to the list, but it's hardly a huge loss and there aren't that many people on either Windows Phone 8 or Windows 8.1 that will (a) care or (b) won't get a free update to Windows 10.
And this is probably the best reason for reducing the speed limit to 20 mph in urban areas, since autonomous braking is really only effective up to about 30 kph, at which point it's a mitigation tool at best.
Volvo's camera system will track, spot, and react faster than us in and it's about time such systems are mandatory fit. Sure, you won't prevent or eliminate all accidents, and no doubt the feel-the-road lobby will complain about increased risks from people not paying attention, but the evidence is now there.
My experience with autonomous braking is that it reacts very late, and leaves the smallest gap possible between it and the object it's avoiding. If someone goes into the back of you... well, that's their fault.
I bought a Volvo after the salesman challenged me to run him over in the dealership car park, a task I attempted with gusto but ultimately failed at.
(I would, if running the country, obviously balance out the 20 mph in built up areas with a new 40 mph limit on the quieter main roads).
Fortunately the police aren't in the act of enforcing civil debts (if a parking ticket can be called a debt in the first place).
IE on mobile devices (Windows Phone 8 and upwards) seems comparable to Chrome and Safari for speed and compatibility. The Metro version of IE that shipped with Windows 8 is still one of the nicest touch browsers around.
A few years ago I tried to start up a Toughbook which had been stored overnight in an unheated aircraft at -15C to be greeted by the message, "Too cold to start. Please wait".
My own laptop didn't care (and didn't shred the HDD bearings in the cold either).
This is why IT professionals should stay well clear of offering technical advice to friends and family.
Just because you can't wrap your head around Windows 8.1 doesn't mean your Grandad will struggle with it. Set it up with all the tiles they need on the main screen, for a 70 year old, and they need never go near a Start Menu again.
Windows 8 is only an issue if you're constantly swapping between XP / 7 / 8 / 8.1. But Microsoft are damned if they do and damned if they don't when it comes to consistency. IMHO the 8.1 haters have simply never used it and are parroting the popular press. Which, in some respects, is a bit embarrassing if your job involves computers.
Except... if you have a Opel / GM car with an electronic handbrake you also have hill hold assist as standard, so you don't need to use the handbrake at all.
Take foot of brake, move to accelerator, release clutch, computer releases brake for you.
The electronic handbrake is only practicable when stopped for a long time or parking.
You can understand an operating system requiring a steady stream of security updates over time - it's big and clunky with large chunks of code not revised for many years and written before the idea of exploits really took force.
But Flash? Every bloody month there's some new and exciting vulnerability discovered. It's 0.001% the size of an OS yet it seems to have more vulnerabilities than Windows and OSX put together. Not only that but it's got a crap updater that doesn't follow any style or usability guidelines laid down by Microsoft - hardly surprising it's ignored.
Come on Adobe - (a) consider rewriting it from scratch or open sourcing it and (b) integrate it into Windows updates so that fixes are delivered seamlessly.
"Diesels are just as bad."
Since a diesel has no throttle your comparison isn't valid. The 2 litre lump in the Vauxhall Insignia (weighing, what, maybe twice as much?) can return upwards of 75 mpg when driven like a vicar and even bumbling around town has never gone below 50 mpg.
Admittedly it may be killing us all with its dioxides, but it has a DPF that seems to work. Still think the best solution for the dinky petrol engines is in the hybrid design where their sole job is to generate electricity under perfect load conditions.
The A320 does indeed have mechanical backup but only for the rudder and horizontal stabilizer. It's designed to allow stable flight during a complete electrical loss or simultaneous failure of all five flight control computers.
In reality, this situation is so spectacularly unlikely it's a largely pointless enterprise and has been ditched on the newer Airbus models.
The A320 will fly perfectly happily and land safely with just one computer functional.
Doctor F****** Who?
Scroll down a bit, see if it looks familiar to you... You almost have to feel sorry for Microsoft here.
Yeah, it's expensive - but no more so than your typical Ultrabook. I think it's always going to fall down if you compare it directly to the iPad, but it's like comparing apples and... cats.
David Pogue sums it up quite nicely in his article...
It's running in a virtualised environment, according to Microsoft.
I quite like IE11 - it's remarkably nippy compared to Chome, which is now a dog on slower machines, and I've not hit anything that renders incorrectly. If only it had AdBlock.
I played with one in a shop last week. Flicking through homescreens is still laggy (albeit barely noticeable), just like in the early days of Android tablets.
Yeah, there are a lot of pixels to throw around but my [insert Apple or Microsoft product here] doesn't seem to struggle.
Of course, since the Lumia series with its brightly coloured cases was released six months prior to the iPhone 5C, your argument stands on thin ground.
"Apathetic bloody planet..."
>> Typically, NIST explains, quantum entanglement experiments do whatever they can to avoid
>> noise, because noise can destroy entangled states (or, The Register supposes, can make
>> it impossible to measure the entangled state, but don't hold us to this).
Noise would effectively perform an independent, random, measurement on the system, making the carefully designed one you were about to do to pointless. The measurement both simultaneously performs the calculation and reveals the result, so in the "noisy" case, there is no entangled state to measure at all.
Ahem. Quite a few of these around on The Reg this morning...
Error 324 (net::ERR_EMPTY_RESPONSE): The server closed the connection without sending any data.
“Which is why EE, when it launched its 4G proposition two weeks ago, also said it would offer fibre optic connections to 11 million UK properties by the end of 2013."
I suspect this is more a case of LLU BT Infinity and not actually dong the hard work of laying cable.
Nearly £600 and they don't even include a Thunderbolt cable?
I've returned printers costing a tenth of that because the manufacturers are too cheap to chuck a cable in the box.
I have three Jogglers (bought when they were £50) and they're used exclusively with the excellent SqueezePlay app running on them. This is getting even better with what the developer calls "Squeeze OS", which is a bare-bones Ubuntu installation that does nothing but fire up into SqueezePlay.
"...user reluctance (or ignorance) which is preventing more-widespread use."
REALLLY? More likely the fact that despite what Visa says, not all that many cards actually support the contactless feature (ref: Nationwide, Santander etc) and it's still not 100% reliable. Most retailers still tuck away the contactless component of the reader (lookin' at you, Caffe Nero) and the look of utter surprise on the face of the cashiers suggest that they very rarely see contactless payments.
So, basically, this is £410 for a DVR that doesn't play most video types; has broken DLNA support, shows adverts in the EPG, and only has 320GB of disk space?
And Panasonic are at a loss to explain why they're about to go under. *slow clap*
No doubt the proverbial would hit the fan in America if the whole EU made a similar charge in return. After all, all's fair in love and war... :-)
Android Market feels like a pet project by Google engineers. As a software developer, I don't see why I should have to suffer Market bugs such as my apps randomly not appearing in the Market. It's intensely frustrating for both developers and consumers, and right now the overwhelming feeling is that Google just doesn't care.
It's the other way round with Apple - the App Store is EVERYTHING to them and issues aren't fixed fast enough. Until Google gives me the impression that my time is more than second class (even though they're creaming the profits from the Market), my time is better spent developing apps for iOS.
I should think that since it's not approved for navigation, you couldn't sue the manufacturer even if you trundled into the Heathrow Class A zone, for example. Like most things, it's designed to supplement the traditional map, compass, and stopwatch approach.
IMHO the biggest issue in the UK is actually the lack of TCAS, and even transponders, on light aircraft. ATC do a sterling job offering radar information (sorry, "traffic") service, but it's a constant stream of alerts and it only takes one to get through the net. Some people shouldn't be flying in cloud but do, and there's nothing worse than knowing there's something in your proximity and not knowing where it is.
In the US my GNS430 picked up radar data from the ground and overlaid it on the map, which was damned handy.
Bet she didn't see that one coming.
The rest of the world who doesn't want to read a book on an iPhone or laptop (ie, everyone).
There are perfectly good formats out there which can be read on the vast majority of both computers AND eBook readers such as the Sony Reader. Even better, Adobe Digital Editions can be, uh, "unlocked" quickly allowing you to make a safe and permanent copy of your book.
If Windows is provided sans-browser, how is one supposed to get onto the internet to download Firefox / IE / Chrome etc in the first place?
I said years ago, with Vista, that all MS needed to do is offer a choice between browsers at installation. If I pick, say, Firefox, the installer will dash off to get the latest version and seamlessly install it behind the scenes.