417 posts • joined 12 Jun 2009
Re: limiting passwords
Verified by visa wasn't implemented to increase your security.
(If I kept going, the rest of this post would be functionally equivalent to booing in the direction of the Visa headquarters)
Re: I know it's contentious in a free internet
The governments requirements are "filter things well enough that Mumsnet will leave us alone", backed up by the threat of legislation
...and moustache differential makes four.
Wasn't this story around a while ago, just with a slightly bigger number? And a while before that with a still bigger number and the word radio?
BBC4 and Radio 6 are still around. I suspect Little Lord Fondleboys will still have a place to Badly Educate or the foreseeable future.
Re: And nothing of value was lost...
There's a few shows in there I really enjoy, interspersed with a large amount of feculence. If someone saw me watch BBC3 for a whole night they'd probably think I was a frequently bemused manic depressive.
"the development of a product which does not yet exist".
I know what they mean, and based on the article I probably agree with them, but that could have been phrased a lot better.
The HSCIC work from the same offices as the NHSCIC, and have most of the same personnel. Why are they being allowed to pretend they are a different body?
They could store the old data in a not-readily-readable form
That way it is available for the lawsuit, but not available for day-to-day overspying.
Of course they won't, but it was a nice thought. (And takes away the victim blaming - the lawsuits meanthey have to keep a copy of their records, but in no way compel the NSA to be a dick about it)
Christopher Soghoian, a principal technologist at the ACLU
Did anyone else read this as "a principled technologist at the ACLU"?
It's possible an agency could reenable devices - I believe there was news recently of a cam that could be turned on without your lnowlege - so the software fix isn't perfect.
EDIT: why both? Why not just the masking tape? Well, I don't want GCHQ knowing what masking tape I use, do I? Or maybe I just didn't think things through before posting
25.3 million brits have paid for ransomware? Bloody hell
Maybe your headline writer shouldn't get a raise this year.
Also a sample size of 48 people doesn't tell us much.
Re: @bigtimehustler When Big Brother Is After You
'"take (another person's property) without permission or legal right and without intending to return it".'
Dotcom isn't accused of taking - he is accused of helping others to copy things. But copying isn't the same as taking
"another person's property"
Copyright isn't property. 'Intellectual property' is a horseshit phrase used to justify overreaction
"without intending to return it"
You can't return something that you haven't taken
"without permission or legal right"
Well, at least you got one thing right.
Stealing and copyright infringement are different things. I appreciate "I see, so there is a difference between copyright infringement [...], and the crime of theft." was supposed to be saracstic, but it really shouldn't have been
Re: So, the outcome of this, so far means that...
you should consider wearing a thicker mask, not one of them flimsy Guy Fawkes things.
nine gigabytes = 13 GB
If you hide the corrections link then pedants will put corrections(*) in the comments.
(*) If I have screwed up please read 'corrections' as 'requests for clarification'
Re: Where did they get the numbers?
Empirical testing? As in run a test on a random selection of data and assume if it gives a decent p value then the hypothesis can be considered correct?
That sort of thing doesn't cut it as mathemetical proof.
It might be good enough for sciences less pure than maths (e.g. sociology, physics, all other sciences), but even a a statistical proof - the probability of this being wrong is 0 - isn't enough for a mathematician.
The 1980s called, they said "screeeeeeeeeeeeeeee be-jeeeeee eeeeeeeee"
Re: Matt Bryant is good for a laugh!
It's VDay tomorrow, I could do with some red tape
"Prosecutors have as many as 637 pieces of circumstantial evidence"
And hopefully some pieces of actual evidence? Circumstantial evidence doesn't seem to have served them very well in this case so far.
A simple fit of pique. It was his was of saying "f--- you, woolly jumpers"
I was hoping to see the traditional crudely drawn phalus, like there is on mars, but I'll have to settle for a confused-looking fish called Nicholson (25-55W, 31-49S) and a cartoon man's head called Borsippa (1E, 52S)
I got the leaflet, but not before I had read about it repeatedly on the register and social media, and already printed of the medconfidential.org opt-out
Re: It's not exactly Mission: Impossible is it?
"What can you do though when it's one of your parents...? :/"
Is it definitely too late to have yourself adopted?
Addressing your concerns in the order they were listed:
So's your face; so does your face; your operating system is *made* or poo.
Re: I'm On A Rant!
"The fact that it would be totally illegal and if caught they would face a very substantial custodial sentence......"
Your argument seems to be that people won't do something if it is against the law. If that were the case we wouldn't need security services.
Re: [I]s Cameron a stupid piece of shit or an evil piece of shit?
"Never attribute to malice..."
When you are as stupid as Cameron, making decsions that affect millions of people is a form of malice.
Re: "Handy" - WTF
In typical German fashion, 'handy' was originally a long composite noun. The word is short for Handapparat-GerätfürdieKommunikationmitMenschendieweitweg-wieBarry-HalloBarry-ohnedieNotwendigkeitvonSchreiensind, which roughly translates to "Handset-based device for communicating with people who are far away-like Barry-Hello Barry-without the necessity of shouting"
So who gave the true definition of 'Handy'? - it's got to be there somewhere...
Personal experience tells me that sometimes a company - perhaps a catalogue retailer - will cancel a direct debit and not tell you. And then charge late fees because they didn't take the payment.
If only Holly Willoughby knew what was being done in her name.
Re: Not every household
Write to them and tell them you are removing the implied right of access. It won't stop the letters, but should stop the visits
Missing the point
The point of the BBC isn't to enrich itself, it's to provide quality TV.
Its a bit different when some of the words are "I am going to harm you"
Re: Trademarking words FTW
Or make the background image be an upper-middle class oven and market the game as Sweety Smash Aga
Re: A little sympathy
Candy Crush combines 2 of the worst things to happen to gaming in recent years
Free to play (pay to play well)
Fun cockblocking (play a certain number of times, then pay or sod off)
Re: biz dumps mass email ads
"It beats me how it was *ever* effective"
(Virtually) No costs; Some morons.
"Enterprises that employ digital communications models operate in all sectors of the global economy," the group argued. "That we claim to do almost all of our business in certain areas is neither here nor there"
Re: Seeing the password
It's a lot easier to read a password from a screen, than from someone's finger presses (source: I can only do one of these things)
Showing *s for everything but the last character seems to be becoming more popular, and provides a compromise between the two
unless there's a real government need for secrecy.
Or, more accurately, a claim that there's a government need for secrecy.
Which there always will be.
"hackers descending upon XP's final, never-to-be-patched vulnerabilities "
Is there any reason to think this will actually happen (I don't remember a post-2000 apocalypse, but mayebe I wasn't paying attention)
Re: The EA Car Sales System
I think you may have just described buses
"doesn't work, 1 star"
Seems like a reasonable review to me
Who came up with that name? Are they hiring funky vicars for PR duties now?
The thing I like about this comment is how easily it could be astroturfing by a yelp employee
My guess would be a philiosophyof underpromise and overdeliver.
If you claim a mission is planned to last from 1977 to 1989 it looks very impressive if it is still going in 2014. If you say another mission is supposed to run from 1998 to 2048 it looks like a failure if you wind it up in 2024
Re: GP's Opening Hours
In fairness to Undoctor Andrew Wakefield, his reserach was found to be fraudulent, not incompetent.
That's a pretty tiny giant
"[if republished] the date of original publication would continue to stand"
The old law did need fixing - as things stood if someone looked at a story again it counted as being replublished, which was clearly in[correct|sane].
However, under the new law, if you (*) manage to defame someone without them noticing for a year you can then defame them any time you want, as long as you say the same thing.
It took me about a minute to see that loophole, and I made at least 3 typos writing this little thing. How could the professional drafters have done so badly?
(*), 'you' in this context should not be read in the traditional senses of 'you, the individual' or 'one', but rather 'Paul Dacre'
I give it ten minutes before someone takes this post sincerely
I think the parody needed to be a bit more obvious here.
Re: DOJ and name calling
Department Of Jizzypants, surely
Re: Lazy Parents
If lazy awful parents were saddept at thinking of the consequences of their actions before they took them then they wouldn't be lazy awful parents.
- Fee fie Firefox: Mozilla's lawyers probe Dell over browser install charge
- Did Apple's iOS make you physically SICK? Try swallowing version 7.1
- Pics Indestructible Death Stars blow up planets with glowing KILL RAY
- Video Snowden: You can't trust SPOOKS with your DATA
- Review Distro diaspora: Four flavours of Ubuntu unpacked