1046 posts • joined 11 Jun 2009
Re: Re: Mahatma
"I do think it would be somewhat odd for someone who works for Dell, for example, to be carting around an HP laptop just the same as I would think it is odd for someone who works for Ubuntu to do his work on Windows or OSX - that's all."
Upon reflection it's not that odd. Back in the early 80s I recall talking to a senior Rank Xerox exec who told me he had a tiny Canon personal photocopier in his office to remind him of how good the competition is. Having said that, he did only have one. Mr Assay has six Macs so my original post stating my puzzlement still stands :-)
In reply to all the above comments
You seem to think or imply that Matt Assay uses Ubuntu on Mac hardware. The article said:
"I'm not a fan of Windows as a technology, being a longtime Mac user"
The clear implication there is that he's talking about Microsoft vs Apple operating systems. He's not comparing hardware. This should be obvious enough for anyone that has mastered basic English.
Let the fanboism and downvoting continue. I am indeed the Spawn of Satan (language comprehension department).
Re: the key word
The key word is "reading" the article:
"being a longtime Mac user"
Matt Assay is Mac user?
"was formerly chief operating officer of Ubuntu commercial operation Canonical."
Not quite sure what to make of that.
Recommendations and Big Media
Hmmm, not much of a trust problem there, eh?
But, but, but...
...Susan in Accounts really needs all her email in pink Comic Sans with a 100kb animated gif in the sig. She insists life as we know it would end.
Someone isn't happy...
...my very good friend Mr Reginald Security is mightily pissed off that you stole his Twatter account.
Re: not "much of the world"
I think you may be making a bit of maths error there.
I believe there are at least four iPhone models and two iPad models. Many Apple fanbois will have owned more than one of each model and possibly a Mac too so the total number of humans is likely to be far fewer than you think.
And even if I'm wrong, which I doubt, a mere 2% is not "much of the world" in the slightest. I'm sure a considerably larger group of people discovered via TV or radio news that Big Jobby had died. A larger group doesn't give a flying f**k and an even larger group still probably has no idea who he was.
The latter two groups are made up of people more worried where their next meal is coming from, concerned that they may get shot for belonging to the wrong social/religious minority or whether they'll ever get electricity and fresh water in their village.
But hey, don't let me ruin the enjoyment you get from owning your precious shiny toys.
Obama needs new research staff
Jobs wasn't an innovator. He plagiarised the ideas of others and packaged them in shiny boxes for the gullible. Worse than that, he then sued those companies whose products were too close to Apple stuff for his liking.
Apparently Obama also said "“There may be no greater tribute to Steve's success than the fact much of the world learned of his passing on a device he invented". Er, what? According to the stats I read today there have been 128 million iPhones sold. That's not "much of the world" by any stretch of the imagination and I'm sure Obama learned of Jobs' passing on his BlackBerry.
Someone please wake me up when this madness and hype has subsided or when Jobs resurrects himself in a couple of days.
Baker said that Mozilla "erred on the side of caution".
No, Mozilla didn't err at all. Users err on the side of "What the fuck is that annoying dialogue box doing. Oh fuck, I'll just click it to make it go away. Why do these software companies insist on making me think about important things when all I want to do is update my status on Arsebook?"
Re: Same here
I'm guessing that a fresh installation of Chrome is faster than an ageing installation of Firefox.
I'd also guess that many Firefox users are still using a browser profile first created a few years ago.
I'm guessing too that the aforementioned profile has dozens of extensions running and the detritus of quite a few more that are no longer in use.
I do know that a fresh install of Firefox without extensions runs very quickly indeed.
Oh, and I trust Mozilla. I don't trust Google.
Beer icon because in the browser world there is such a thing as a free beer and it has Firefox on the label.
Yes, I can name another CEO
Simon Hackett, CEO of Internode. Not only did he reply to my email but also did so whilst on holiday. And he solved a pressing problem for me. Top geezer.
They got the wrong day...
...25th of December, surely.
"As for Oz-made tv, "Spirited" is worth checking out though."
I'm a big fan of Aus current affairs programmes made by the ABC but that's about it. As for the commercial channels rehashing American Idol into Australian Idol when the former is a rehash of Pop Idol...just don't get me started :-)
Remakes of UK comedy such as HIGNFY -> Good News Week or Buzzcocks -> Spicks and Specks...words simply fail me (except for the ones I just typed).
The BBC is like Marmite to Pom ex-pats in Aus. You need to know where to get it from under the counter.
"I have to say that although I agree, UK television isn't that much better either"
If it wasn't for the ABC the TV here wouldn't get switched on. There are enough good UK comedies or docos from the BBC or C4 to keep me happy.
And if anyone from the Big Media is reading this, I buy tonnes of TV and film DVDs to assuage my guilt. I even bought Downfall, FFS. I'd just rather have a fair, legal and affordable way to watch TV from the mothership.
"Oh, and I expect Top Gear to be available in HD with 'the news'. Channel 9 hacks the bejesus out of it and makes it near unwatchable, plus they only offer SD."
I timed it once. They cut 26 minutes out for ads and trailers. They should at least make two series out of it instead of losing all that content. Tossers.
The BBC needs a big clue
Much as I love the BBC they really need a serious battering with the Internet clue stick.
I know loads of fellow Pom ex-pats who would happily pay the UK Licence fee each year for full access to the BBC. Australian-made TV is a large pile of steaming poo and mostly unwatchable.
I've seen comments that claim the cost of bandwidth is an issue but surely they just need to come to a peering arrangement with some Aussie ISPs and distribute via torrent locally? I'm sure there are other countries that have an even bigger UK ex-pat audience too.
Until then many Poms will be watching the BBC via various dodgy methods and Aunty will lose out on potential overseas revenue.
"However, the broadcaster says it will be offering access to 70 years’ worth of archival material to subscribers, for any Australians that haven’t had enough of the BBC’s archives already."
Exactly. There are several channels now running very old BBC programmes, the kind I saw when I was a kid.
I can understand the Scots wanting their independence and if they vote for it in a referendum then congratulations and good luck to them.
What I don't understand is why a party like the SNP, a party based on the idea of being independent, wants another country to pay for this new TLD.
MPs label police IT 'not fit for purpose'
Bit of a typo there. Someone added "IT" by accident.
<-- Proper copper.
Yes, Andrew, you did miss something here
"Any blocking can be circumvented fairly easily by tech savvy people."
"The number of people who know how to is small, and will do so is even smaller, though..."
But that number will grow. Only the tech savvy knew how to file share once. Remind us how that stayed a minority pursuit among geeks, please?
"OK, OK, yes, this isn't quite right. There's labour involved in digging up all that copper"
But if you have to dig it up anyway to lay fibre then it becomes a feasible proposition.
I'll get me donkey jacket and shovel.
...but bbc.co.uk and beta.bbc.co.uk are identical when viewed here in Aus. The Beeb do a bit of geo-fiddling for non-UK IP addresses.
Maybe it's because I'm overseas...
...but it looks exactly the same.
"Wikipedia lists him as “musician, entrepreneur and movie producer”."
Re: "private email system"
"What on earth were these idiots thinking?"
And therein lies the problem. Idiots rarely think. Govt idiots think even less.
The safety record is a myth
There are other airlines that have never lost a single plane.
They screwed me after a family death and reduced my wife to tears. JAL came to the rescue and even upgraded me to first class for one leg of the flight back to the UK.
This is their latest stunt:
You can't polish a turd
It doesn't matter what they offer, it's still a shitty airline.
Been there, got the t-shirt...
...Anyone remember "embrace, extend, extinguish"?
<-- Most appropriate icon.
Re: Set them to music
Pure genius. Have you patented that idea yet?
How long before the NoScript devs get busy...
...and release NoNative.
...it'll be added to Google's redundant project list in six months along with Wave, Labs and all the others.
Just a suggestion. Type the words "golden shower" into your favoured image or video search engine.
Only El Reg could use "golden shower" in a science story headline
Keep up the good work.
@ Just Kevin
I was joking, hence the joke icon
Re: What more do you want!
An eye test, methinks.
"If you still see a defaced page, turning your equipment on and off again may help:"
How could I read that if I saw a defaced page?
But seriously, welcome back.
I love Internode. They are *the* best ISP in Aus so I'm somewhat shocked, especially about Mark Newton. He was very much the public face on 'Node in many areas.
The eagles around here are smart
In my part of Aus we often see eagles that swoop and collect highly venomous snakes from cane fields. They then fly a few hundred feet upwards and drop the snakes onto a road to kill it safely. Pretty clever thinking by this magnificent bird.
...what everyone else said. Thanks and good luck.
May be so but...
...go to any .gov.au site or subdomain thereof (qld.gov.au for example) and a cookie is set for .gov.au.
Not just .gov.uk...
...gov.au seems to work in a similar manner.
An incovenient truth
Facts can be annoying to anyone that holds an opposite position to those facts. Did someone really vote me down for stating a fact? I'd have thought people would have appreciated a very pertinent fact that was missing from the original article. All I was pointing out is that the Epoch Times is hardly a neutral news source.
Just in case the down voter doubts that it was a neutral comment I'd like to state that I support neither the fascist government in China nor a bunch of loony religionists. All clear now? Thank you.
Who do I believe?
Neither/both. I have no knowledge and therefore no opinion that is worth anything.
The Epoch Times...
...is a newspaper owned by Falun Gong. Just saying.
They forgot the most important group...
'designed to “gauge the views of key stakeholders” about copyright enforcement in Australia.'
...the most important group of "key stakeholders" is the public. Without them there is no entertainment industry.
A verifed Charles Arthur?
...the real one is beyond parody.
You'd really like to be sloshing around in a bunch of leaked coolant?
Given the choice...
...I'd rather be living near a wind farm than Fukushima.
Re: Guardian: Do as we say, not as we do
I guess you'd rather not have known about the News International stuff then?
You give them too much credit by call them readers...
...they just look at the pictures of lady bumps on Page Three and occasionally grunt.
- Vid Hubble 'scope scans 200000 ton CHUNKY CRUMBLE ENIGMA
- Google offers up its own Googlers in cloud channel chumship trawl
- Bugger the jetpack, where's my 21st-century Psion?
- Interview Global Warming IS REAL, argues sceptic mathematician - it just isn't THERMAGEDDON
- Apple to grieving sons: NO, you cannot have access to your dead mum's iPad