So they are paying to use legitimate patents?
Do Foxconn have to pay other companies not directly related to Android OS for their patents/Tech also?
I'm sure they do so where is the issue here?
1833 posts • joined 11 Jun 2009
Do Foxconn have to pay other companies not directly related to Android OS for their patents/Tech also?
I'm sure they do so where is the issue here?
It's like watching someone have a mental breakdown in public.
But it's true we really need an Ignore feature. Most forums in the 21st century offer that so adults can blot out the teens and mentally ill.
I say use the Project Orion system to get a 5000+ ton platform with all the nano tube cables you could ever want into orbit and then you can start to work on it.
I'm sure with modern computer blast modelling we could make cheap powerful enough atomic charges with a radiation half-life of say just a few days/weeks so the environmental risk would be much much lower.
If we could get a few thousand tons of materials into space it really would start the way.
Just one Orion launch is maybe all that's ever needed.
According to sales reports worldwide they aren't.
Plenty of iPads but not the bigger stuff. That's in decline.
Then again 5 years ago, folks were predicting we'd all be using netbooks by now...
A lot of windows nowadays are deeper than 600 pixels. Not fun having to navigate around a 700 pixel deep one when the top and bottom have disappeared.
If a customer comes to me with a broken Netbook I now refuse to fix them. When you can buy a new laptop with 4 times the performance for £260 its really not worth it.
I think MS was behind the scenes/in private, quite aware that Windows 8 wasn't going to be the OS of choice for business as 7 had been chosen already. It goes in pretty rigid cycles, NT then XP then 7.
Hence why MS decided to go with a more domestic orientated OS instead. Essentially they could get the future workforce used to it via the domestic route. So by the time it comes round to 2016 and the corps are looking for the next OS upgrade the changes wont be so drastic.
Probably looking at Windows 7 going for business till Windows 10/11.
MS doesn't really care as it gets paid whether they buy 7 or 8 or 9...
My theory anyway.
Well of the few I've had to work on it was the hair dryer loud grey box power supplies and the bean can strength steel in the chassis that made me feel somewhat less enamoured with them.
I don't trust those £4 power supplies keeping my precious i5 alive for long. I'd buy a Zoostorm on a good deal for the internals and then pay £40 for a new power supply and £40 for a new case. No problem.
They are rough machines but if that's what you want to pay and are happy with it then fine.
The whole CPU bit was due to the age old tradition of PC manufacturers building desktops with good spec CPUs in them but surrounding them with sub par under-performing components. Basically sticking a F1 engine in a 2003 Hyundai Accent Coupe.
Isn't the current downward trend with Macs, that in 5 years no one will be buying them at all?
Exactly. It's not Windows 8. Still a lot of folks out there that don't even know its out. A lot still think Vista is the latest version.
Money is tight and folks are either pushing their old XP/Vista machine longer (because they can) or they are buying cheap laptops. I've shifted plenty £350 laptops in the past 18 months. People are swapping their spare bedroom/study desktops for laptops so they are not stuck the other side of the house. They want to sit in front of the TV. I've sold quite a bit of Windows 8 kit as well. Customers out there really don't seem to care. No one has come back shouting and screaming they can't use it.
Desktops really are becoming a niche product. I really only recommend them if folks want to do video editing or gaming. I sell very few video editing/gaming machines these days either.
Another factor is that a lot of people bought Windows 7 machines in 2010/2011 and they are not going to be replaced for a long time yet.
....to the Reg Journos that it may also be due to the fact that most desktop PCs since 2006 are just fine for doing most tasks except for extreme gaming.
It's only taken what? About 6 versions of this same article over the past 4 months to get there but well done all the same.
If any of my customers call in wanting to buy a new PC and its not a single core running 40GB IDE drives I'll always investigate upgrading their existing dual core machine first. Often that works out better, especially if it was a good quality machine to start with.
Those Zoostorm machines may look super value but take the half decent CPU out and they are as rough as...
Metro apps run in Metro mode.
Desktop/Standard apps run in the Desktop like they have for decades.
It's basically you now have a choice of two kinds of the same app in a way. Metro version or Desktop version.
If you don't want to use the Metro version (for many of us why would we) then you just uninstall it and set your default applications to the Desktop/Standard ones and carry on as normal.
Takes all of 5 minutes.
Ermm no you've kind of all missed the point I was trying to make if you had such tech at home and how it could in a way be devastating if such a situation occurred.
But it doesn't matter, the chances of this tech getting 'domestic' is pretty slim. But it seems some here feel that being diagnosed with HIV is something a bottle of Nightnurse and a johnny will all make it better. "Nothing to worry about, cheer up love, you won't snuff it today! I've got condoms, I'll be okay!"
I guess if you are an IT guy a shag is a shag. I didn't think it had got quite that bad.
I love the sensitivity!
"Oh you didn't know you had HIV! Ah well let's have sex anyway! I don't mind if you're crying while I do it!"
You bring the lady/gent back home to yours after having a so wonderful time spent gazing into each others eyes.
You pour yourselves a glass of wine each, toast the perfect evening and then the night takes it natural course.
He or she is "the one!"
But before you get there, you run the test, "of course I don't mind silly!" they say.
The test comes up 'Positive'
WTF do you do then?
In that case why isn't everyone using Comodo? Oh yes..its no better or worse on average than any other AV solution.
I'll say it again....they all get beat.
As to my advice about not using AV, I would always recommend a user use some form of AV. However, real world experience shows if you are going to get hit, no matter what steps you take you'll get hit. It's luck of the draw.
Plus often its just quicker for the experienced user to rebuild/ghost their build back than spend hours scanning it for malware. Get hit, wipe and reinstall. So in theory for some users who understand the risks, AV might well be a waste of time.
Choice is yours.
I shall give it another go!
I've mentioned it before I find it interesting that we now get a lot of articles slamming MSE/Defender now that its a full part of Windows than when it was a optional extra (and folks raved about it). Could it be the other AV firms are a little concerned at this so a little mud flinging doesn't hurt?
I stopped using that quite a while ago.
On scans it just wasn't finding anything on infected drives. I could then run other products and stuff would appear.
Even when it did find stuff you could then do another scan with it and you would find more stuff it missed first time around.
It really isn't that good a product. It may have been a couple of years ago but tactics and strategies change.
Just be careful if that's all you are using. Oh and never use the infected machine to clean itself, that's a waste of time.
...it's all ransomware/hijack stuff that's written on the hour by the crimegangs and pretty much none of the AV companies can defend against it because its so new.
Basically for most of the nasty stuff out ther, it's so new, you may as well not bother with AV.
I bet the samples that were used in this test were at least a week old and so not really a real world test in my experience.
I've seen all of them beaten.
... then you need to install their Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit. It's a separate application to the AV part.
Everyone seems to keep forgetting this but MS doesn't exactly promote it much. I guess one day they will integrate the two. Odd that a fairly crucial component is kept hidden.
I've been using it for about a year and so far nothing bad has happened. I also install lit on all my customers machines. No bad reports so far. All very quiet in fact.
Thanks for that Buzz Killington.
I always used to love the look of the Apricot F1. They used to have them in Dixons.
Never saw anyone buy one. Was a sexy looking machine.
Yes I was thinking "wow how did I miss this golden age of telecoms?"
I remember BT holding on for dear life to only wanting to push out mega expensive and slow ISDN connections rather than give the masses ADSL.
The whole ADSL thing was done grudgingly by BT. We'd still be paying £150 a month for 128k ISDN or leased lines if they had their way.
Indeed, I was watching a documentary on BBC4 a few months ago about the decline of the British Ship Building industry.
How the bosses knew they had to modernise their factories with new gear and get rid of the Victorian era presses etc. However, when they said they wanted to get rid of the press that required 8 men to operate for one that required only 2, of course the shop steward would call everyone out and the 8 man press that took far longer to use and more expensive to run was kept.
Things just fell further and further behind.
I often wonder what would have happened had Thatcher got into power say 5 years earlier.
It is funny when you get to see a lot of TV and movie props as to how crappy they actually look close up. Even ones from $100 million movies look really nasty under examination.
I mentioned the concept of ADSL only landlines here a few weeks ago but a lot of folks here pooh-poohed it for some reason.
...and as a TalkMobile customer myself...could you please start your own 3G/Mobile Data services rather than using the crumbs left on Vodafones plate?
(Long story but I have one of those legendary 07777 numbers that are impossible to shift from the Vodafone network. I didn't know at the time.)
...then why is it that most of the customers I visit and use TalkTalk have ADSL speeds in the 512k to 1Mb range?
I then advise them to switch and Bingo...6Mbps+ straight away.
And this is after the customer has reported it to TalkTalk and they have said "computer sez no!"
Consistently the worst ISP I come across.
....'financial aid' cheque land on the NK leaders doormat so he can stand down till it's spent?
I wonder if that pack of cards exists already and is kept updated for 'eventual' release?
I enjoyed Channel 4 New's coverage of his Xmas speech from the Embassy balcony by basically taking the piss out of him.
Netbooks died out because once folks got over the rush to own a "small cutesy laptop" they realised, that with crappy 1024x600 screens and pathetic single core 1.6 Atom CPUS, that they had bought a piece of crap.
Whether you run Windows or Linux on a netbook its still a crappy frustrating hardware experience.
Most folks only bought them for email and web on the go and the tablet then came along and pissed all over them. I have a Acer netbook with Ubuntu on it I've used it on holiday a few times but since then I've got a Playbook and a Nexus 4 and both nuke the netbook from a high height. The Acer just gathers dust.
I haven't heard any of my customers say "Oh I love my netbook!" Quite the opposite.
I used to work for one of the very very big financial firms.
I was often asking why our company with its huge buying power (our business was replacing things that got broken or lost) when ordering IT kit would have to pay £300 for 32MB of ram (6 week lead time) from our official supplier, when I could order it from Crucial for £30 (next day delivery)?
Every time I was told to "shut up!"
So I guess it was kickbacks between the IT supplier and the folks that organised the suppliers contracts.
If I hear of someone experiencing them nowadays I ask them to do a Memtest on their ram.
Sure enough its usually faulty ram, if it isn't I then ask them what type of power supply they have in the PC.
"erm well it's grey....says 'Takashonky Power 300 watt' on the side. Is that okay?"
You know what I'm talking about. Problem solved.
You are right it's not unusual but in this instance it does have an air of "Hmmmmm" about it.
The guy was really ill for sometime and no matter what marketing BS they gave I bet his input was minimal for quite a while. If I was terminally ill with a family and several hundred million in the bank I know I'd rather be doing something else than discussing the whatnots of the 2015 iPhone 7. If he was working on that days before he died then that makes it all the sadder and weirder.
The thing is I'm sure I read in a few place that the iPhone 5 was listed as the 'last Jobs mobe' or 'the 5 had little input from Jobs'.
So if the next two STILL have input from him (really) I can only imagine it will be stretched out till at least the iPhone 9 by the time we get to the 7's release.
And maybe even beyond.........
I can just imagine Apple shoving every single design idea they had in front of his face in the last couple of days he was in the office, getting him to sign off every one of them so they could say there was a 'little bit of Steve's input' in them.
...etc. going back to 2010 (i'm sure in the last few months the aesthetics of the iPhone were far from his mind)!
A true visionary!
Anything to keep the devoted thinking there is still a little 'Job's Magic' left in them.
It's like Delboy's stock phrase to Rodney "You mum on her deathbed said to me........"
I'm sure with today's more precise maths modelling and experience a fully nuclear launch out in the pacific would work a treat.
Getting 5000+ tons of building materials and supplies into space in one go, not to mention a fully working factory/workshop would be a huge leap.
Would be a shame to think that in say another 30 years it becomes so cluttered that it gets too dangerous and becomes off limits.
Trapped by our own junk.
....that I see many articles on this topic from tech journos and market analysts as to why corps and companies are not buying PCs like they were 10 years ago.
To them it all seems a big mystery yet we all know the reason and its been mentioned several times in this thread alone.
The kit matured for business (and most of the domestic market) the minute dual core CPUs were introduced.
Why do they continue to write this stuff? PCs are still necessary, not many businesses will be tossing 90% of their computing kit in a skip any time soon. Its just that that old IBM 2GB desktop with the 2Ghz C2D in it is good for another rebuild or two for the new guy in Accounts.
That it appears as a straight white male I am regarded as the greatest force for evil, fear and oppression in the known universe!
Thanks, I really needed that lift!
...in this day and age you can build a career out of purely being 'offended and outraged'.
So many people now have very little to do so they look for things that instead of just tweaking their interest, actually enrages and offends them. Then they can collectively group hug-rage together to make themselves feel better.
Herd-Rage, a great way to find like-minded idiots.
...that escalated quickly!
Well in all fairness when staff asked me to explain them as I was the IT trainer, I just used to say "its magic!"
Surprisingly effective answer it turned out.
Had this been two blokes having a leg pulling session in a pub over a packet of crisps and a couple of pints.....
TL;DR - Leg pulling doesn't really work on the internet.
...I remember them stating a few years ago when asked why the UK/Australian versions cost more then the US versions was due to.....
(and I kid you not)
...all those folks ordering Nexus 4 phones direct from Google then?
An iPhone....oh how ordinary!
...and their dreadful bloated and buggy software the reason a lot of folks stay away from Sony phones?
Only costs £2 for a US TV series season boxset for two weeks from your local lending library.
We've just powered through 4 seasons of Fringe for £8! Bargain!
No advert, no torrents and no waiting.