so will he make his health information public?
Like Twitter for medical matters perhaps?
"Blood pressure dropping. Think it's a stroke. Someone call an ambulance."
1)Upvote this 2) Downvote this.
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
Or just good at smoozing the LEA (as was, no idea what the chain of command is now) and getting a death grip on the "preferred suppliers" list?
If the former they might have a bright future both in the UK and even globally
If the former then they are likely to be "Economic roadkill" as Neil Stephenson put it in "Interface."
<assorted examples of US CIA dodgy deals>
You missed the Reagan administrations for bank rolling Afghan rebels back in the late 70's and 80/s
One of their star students was a former Middle Eastern party boy turned holy warrior called Osama bin Laden.
That also worked out so well.
Seriously.
Radio signals to disrupt the flight navigation system is the plot of "Dr No."
It was BS then as well.
AFAIK all the remaining radio nav aids work nowhere near cell phone frequencies.
OTOH as others have pointed out using the ground infrastructure has 2 problems.
1) Modern cells in big cities are small. There range is fairly short.
2) A modern jet moves in and out of individual cell tower range in <1 sec. This will generate a "packet storm" in their back bone management network.
So logically the airlines will set up a picocell in the cabin. Probably in the same way you can make in flight sat phone calls.
Now setting up the link between the aircraft and the ground from that could get tricky.
I will leave the security implications of several hundred airborne "choke points" having access to 1000s of (presumably) premium ticket passengers mobile devices for potentially several hours every day to others better qualified for the subject.
All the peripheral elements that business need (and care) about
What I wonder is how many other Linux infrastructure companies have gone with this model (Ubunto springs to mind but it's obvious there must be more) and how many have made it pay.
I guess the devils in the details. Those back office systems may seem a dull task, but on a large scale they bring in all the issues of concurrency, consistency and reliability of a Big Data or even a real time system.
(Cautious) Thumbs up for them.
With around 600m people that's almost $0.84 per person.
Not really that big an investment.
But keep in mind this is more a portal sites, so lots of data interface to the actual providers of the healthcare (if I'm understanding how PPACA works).
Another perfectly good opportunity for a good backronym lost.
They would have been so much more popular if it was called AlPACA.
Everyone loves alpaca's. They're just so cute.
<sign>
Some years ago JPL were looking at ways to increase the number of probes they could sent out. Mars is a regular target and like all targets outside LEO needs a fair bit of delta v. Serious delta v means a)lots of clever orbital slingshots or b)Big rocket or c) Both (if the payload is big).
That said they were looking at packages that could fit on the secondary payload adaptors of the EELV, up to 6 100Kg packages IIRC, and something similar with Ariane 5.
The worked out that yes it is possible for such a package to do the trip, if it hitches a ride on a comm sat payload to GEO.
Doing it in 2 years OTOH......
"The real problem with encryption is that it's such a wank to set up. And for an encrypted conversation, you need two people to have gone through the same (onerous) process using the same kit. That's why nobody bothers."
Funny you should say that. The whole "negotiating" a crypto method is called a protocol
That's the bit that has not had serious development over the years, which might explain why we use a few of them (like SSL) and have them handle the grunt work.
Except there does not really seem to be one for email (or VoIP). The problem is if it's not widespread you are stuffed and end up talking to yourself.
"a) strong hardware-based protection of the database - think HSMs or single-function appliances in a monitored datacentre that provides no admin or physical access to the database."
Well Intel seem to have taken this function into the microprocessor itself.
Of course you can't be sure how secure that is because what's on the chip is AFAIK a mystery to
everyone without an electron microscope.
It is about about as hard wired as you can get however.
Bottom line.
The internet was designed on the basis that everyone was a "good citizen" and would not peek at packets addressed to others, because they did not need to or want to.
We now know that is no longer the case and all links (including the end points) should be considered suspect. The challenge is to make the metadata IE the address and routing, as secure as the content.
I believe the best defense of both individuals and societies freedom and privacy is to properly implement systems that protect everyone's freedom and privacy. We are adults in an adult world..
A bit sadder but a lot wiser about whose interested in spying on you.
"Of course it won't work!
The Wright brothers took to the air in 1903, achieving what most people said was impossible. 65 years later the first Jumbo Jet flew.
The simple lesson from history is that engineers regularly achieve the impossible."
Actually the story is worse than that.
Around 1890 a (at the time) very famous aerodynamicist said it could be done for about $70 000 (a very big bag of cash back then), hired a team of of the brightest and best and set to work.
5 years later they had failed. :)
Meanwhile 2 brothers running a bicycle shop went back to basics, realized the text books were wrong, identified the core problems and cracked the problem.
The rest is history..
So the ongoing cavalcade of human stupidity that enables most penetrations to succeed (poor patching, executable content, etc) continues unabated.
In fact if sysadmins did their job (or perhaps were allowed to do their job) and all staff were even minimally educated I suspect most of these crews would be history because they'd be blown away. These guys may be prolific but SFW? Do they all have mad skills? I doubt it.
Shock news. Why use a (presumably) undiscovered zero day when Dumbo McStupid will open anything sent to them headed "Dear Colleague?"
"It does sound quite scary to me -- the tools are reminiscent of communist Russia or Nazi Germany. "
Actually they are much better.
But still made by IBM.
"In the US we don't hear about systematic suppression but once the tools are in place, somebody will find a use for them."
To mis quote Mikey boy. "How can you say you are being systematically oppressed if you never hear about it?"
"On that note, if anyone can help me find info on a keyboard driven Morse Keyer with FIFO buffer (to smooth out sending speed), purely mechanical, I'd appreciate it."
"This thing was briefly mentioned in QST in the 1960s or so, and seemed to have implemented the FIFO in some sort of drum, probably like a re-writeable pin-drum (ala music box)."
Weird.
The "drum with pins" calls to mind a controller for complex chemical synthesis I saw in an old Sci Am for the "Merrifield Technique." Essentially an uncommitted cam timer where you set the speed of the drum rotation and programmed it by inserting or removing "plugs" at each location on each control channel, each segment along the drum being a channel.
But doing it mechanically? If the input is Morse it could be using a solenoid to pull or push the pins in or out of the drum. How much store? If the storage is substantial a spiral pattern round the drum would make more sense.
You say a keyboard, do you mean the keyboard writes to the drum in a code like ASCII (or more appropriately Baudot)?
As I pointed out up thread
In the spirit of El Reg headlines the story doesn't really have that much to do with "Steam Punk"
In fact, hardly anything.
Which is also in the spirit of El Reg headlines.
If you read up thread you'd have seen one of my motivations was the idea of a "post WWIII" computer system. One that would not be fried by EMP at any range, because it simply did not use electricity to begin with.
How does that basis work for you?
"My top three sources for this were photography/cinematography, textiles, and printing:-)"
If you were aware of Eidiphor I'd have expected you to draw the comparison yourself.
Don't worry about it. I'm just a mine of odd bits and bobs of engineering knowledge and link things together.
"I sort-of remembered that Doug Engelbart's 1968 NLS demo used a projection system borrowed from NASA involving a surface coated with oil and an electron beam."
That would be an Eidiphor.
"I actually think vibration might be an even worse problem than temperature."
You could be right. Temperature control is small enclosure is pretty well understood. Obviously the wider the range you need to keep it in the easier, but I'd say a couple of degrees would not be too tough. When you want 1/100 of a C then things get tricky.
Vibration on the other hand, Not so easy.
Linotype machines are not desk sized.
What you've missed about Linotype m/cs is they cope with unlimited copies by casting lead copies of the raw font forms.
Consider the proverbial 24 * 80 display.
That's 1920 copies of any character to cover all the possibilities.
That's pretty much the only ground rule.
It's not.
If it helps think of this as re-booting civilization.
For those wanting to go "home brew" semiconductors you'd have to go far to exceed the thin film and thick film transistors of various Sci Am contributors in "The Amateur Scientist" column back in the 60's and 70's.
"I'd imagine you would not add or remove ball bearings from the grid, but just shunt one bearing between a '0' row and an '1' row per bit, with the 0 row not being visible to the user."
I sort of get your idea. The problem then becomes implementing some kind of X, Y mechanism so at the intersection a ball gets moved. Cycling through the X and Y ranges should be (relatively) straight forward.
If you'd read my OP you'd know that idea was to try something resembling Vanavar Bush's "Memex" first described in the Atlantic Monthly in 1945. Well after electricity suppliers were available, but primarily opto-mechanical. Bush's team were quite interested in closed tank liquid processing for microfilm data storage and "dry" film processing (later developed by a different team for the 1960's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission).
The real driver was to do it without electricity. I did not expect any trouble with a keyboard but the display/memory was always going to be the long pole in the tent.
The full origins for this idea (for anyone interested) were:-
Charles Stross's "Laundry" series and the description of a Memex in that.
The UL that DARPA had developed a mechanical computer as part of the contingency planning for WWIII
Sterling & Gibson's "The Difference Engine" and how a society could be run with punch cards, printers and mechanical computers.
The work on fluidic computers for backup flight control on relaxed static stability aircraft.
Gordon Dickson's "Dorsai" trilogy and the idea that in a world of starships, nuclear weapons and (IIRC) suppressor field ground combat had reverted to "spring guns" (no combustion) and close range signalling to whistle codes (EMP can cook any radio system).
S&G describe essentially a 1950's IT environment. I wondered if you could drag it into the 1960's or 70's.
As always the joker in the pack is not the logic devices, the display or the program storage, it's the RAM.
So far the answer is looking like "yes."
Neat. You have roughly described an opt/mechanical eidiphor projection TV system.
Plausible but getting the oil viscosity just right (and either limiting its changes with temperature or temperature compensating the system) will be tricky. Neatly you've got the "display" and the "memory" components combined.
A very steam punk solution.
"(note to SF writers: the sysadmins on this are going to be scarily tough women from Halifax.)"
Yes, I've seen how fit the women in textile factories tend to be. The phrase "fighting for your man" takes on a whole new meaning :) .
"The mechanical data storage consisted of pins in brass tubes near the periphery of a wheel.The pins could be pushed up or down in the tubes mechanically, and were held in place by a spring and ball mechanism. In this system, each position on the wheel corresponded to a module in the process of assembly. If an assembly station failed,e.g.due to no component at that station, the pin was pushed down, and inhibited further operations at that station (by not pushing an actuator lever as it moved into position). The machinery was pneumatic."
OK I think I get roughly what you're talking about. 25 wheels for a line with 7 or 8 bit at each location (IE A row) and 90 locations IE 90 lines, to simplify the indexing problem. With even fairly loose tolerances (say 3-6 thou) this could still be made quite compact.
Note that the classic way to handle this would be a servo valve arrangement that has a sensitive detector (to sense the pin out or in) releasing fluid which then drives a 2nd more powerful valve.
That said a sufficiently sensitive system could probably get away with a single level sense/actuate approach..
It sounds like an adjustable version of the pins in a musical box.
As I noted above pneumatics and hydraulics are fine for this.
Any ideas for what the display would be?
"There's a whole area of projection displays where you have a little wheel containing the symbols and project them into a back-projection screen."
You've half described the core of a photo typesetter, the sort of machine that NROFF & TROFF were written to drive.
Basically the film wheels (there were other architectures) were what we'd today call the font ROM, with an inner and outer ring for lower and upper case characters.
The difference was a single optical path and the stepping across the output (the film for the plate) being optical.
With some work this would illustrate the different trade offs in design when you shift from electronic to opto/mechanical.
Instead of a disk per pixel you could have a smaller number with separate drives and 2 postion mirrors. Effectively if the disks would write every copy of a letter (EG all the T's) across the screen, then all occurrences of the next character on the line until you ran out of disk, by which time the 1st disk had moved to the next Nth unique character on the line. 2 position mirrors should move much faster (and be easier on tolerances) than multi-position systems.
"My father worked with some fluidic computers, albeit typically analog ones."
It's a term with several meanings. Some analog, some digital (in fact most are analog IIRC). There was a (brief) period where TTL logic gates (or more likely custom ASICs for hard wired logic) were just too expensive and fluidics were (in principal) a viable option.
"You'd really want to run any steam-punk fluidics with oil or air, rather than actual steam."
Absolutely correct. That said I have seen some designs for steam plant (Like the kind that powers warships) control elements which were fluidic controls. Also gas turbines, but more likely using oil.
"The FBW controllers you mention sound like a generation or three more advanced/expensive than those."
Old Popular Science I saw in a library, but I can't recall the dates on it. Otherwise you'll need to check http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/ as it'll be buried somewhere in the DoD archive, if they haven't sanitized them (like NASA did :( ).
"Wikipedia says the storage is a shift register, which in principle can be done with things like mercury delay lines and so on, or a collection of basic (fluidic) logic if preferred."
A fluidic shift register should work quite well. You don't have a fan in / fan out problem with that architecture. You just want to make really sure the system stays sealed. The 70psi air in industrial pneumatics makes a lot of noise when it leaks (At > 2 bar the flow can exceed the speed of sound with little or no nozzle) while liquids can be messy. The aircraft system was running at either 3000-4000psi.
"Choosing Intel was another big mistake."
In hindsight.
People forget the originalPC was a 16 bit inside the processor, 8 bit outside, so they could use lots of 8 bit I/O chips as COTS parts.
I don't think Zilog had a 16 bitter chip at that time, Western Digital 16 bit follow up to the 6502 did not turn up int he Apple IIGS till 1987 (manual chip design. Uggh).
The best of them was the Motorola 68000 but I don't know if the 68008 (16, or even 32 bits internally, 8 bit bus) was out then or if Motorola was going with the 16 bit bus version only at that time.
If Motorola had an 8 bit version out a)It could not have run CP/M (as only Intel and Zilog processors could and that was a sort of backup plan) b)Software development would have been a very different environment.
Corporate types like having a plan b a lot.
It does sound like the sort of thing you could do with a couple of cameras and cheap lenses.
Note that word universal as well.
This could be the core for a whole new generation of UAV control systems.
Thumbs up for this.
"You're destroying my idea of strapping bees to the head of UAVs and let them do their beeish things to control the aircraft."
Well there was a project in the 50's for homing pigeons to used for ballistic missile guidance (back when inertial measurement packages weighed several hundred pounds.
"Or rolling them over like they do (allegedly) with sleeping cows..."
Nothing "alleged" about it in the US "cow tipping" is quite well known in the MidWest farming states*
*Where options for night time entertainment among the yoof are limited unless you're a)Look older than 15 b)Have fake ID c)Fancy you're sibling d)Have a crush on some of your livestock.
Actually I don't think this is that bad an idea.
A bit slow and frankly I think 1 person + 30Kg of shopping would have been adequate.
But please for the love of $deity don't paint them White. That looks deeply s88t. :(
BTW. Midlands
I think Milton Keynes is in Bucks.
Does that not make "The Home Counties?"
"So what can civilisation do if one man can REALLY wreck a country, can live within your borders (look at Oklahoma City, done by natural-born Americans), and can conceal his activities until it's too late? "
Let's break this idea down.
He is politicized without looking at websites, without talking to people already being watched for other reasons. IE Motive.
He can do this without requiring materials on any watch list. IE Means
But he communicates electronically with various people and reveals his plans to them (who are also not on any watch list).
Because otherwise how do you find him to justify all that (unwarranted) spying?
<profanity filter off>
This is bullshit. Even Greg Bear could not construct a major threat that needed just 1 man to do it.
</profanity filter off>
No sys admins.
You may not like them.
You may think they are ignorant vermin (and some times you may be right). :(
But they are (substantially) why your role exists.
No one whose as big a control freak as some of you are will like to admit that fact.
But it is a fact.
"Put yourself into their position: Sit behind their desk, learn a little of the "chore" that they have to perform and understand how you as an IT Professional can help alleviate the burden. Solving their problems might cause some new problems for you but it is usually short term."
Hmm. Empathy.
We've heard of that.