Grandstanding, as ever
"More effective controls"........Really? Well, good luck with that one. One has to ask just what suggestions Camerloon has to actually implement said controls. Man's a fool.
547 posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
"More effective controls"........Really? Well, good luck with that one. One has to ask just what suggestions Camerloon has to actually implement said controls. Man's a fool.
This is excellent news. Plucky little blighter lives to fight another day!
"It's not unknown to have to crank up the volume to be able to make out what people are saying and then feel like the plaster is coming off the walls when something loud happens a second later."
Dunno about yours but my kit has independent channel level controls (as all have) but only accessible from an initial set-up menu. Not really practical to try and adjust levels, such as the centre dialogue, "on-the-fly" whilst watching anything, which I think is what is being said here. It's only the master volume control that is easily adjustable once the others are set. I would concur that sound editors seem to have different ideas as to what should be up-front, volume-wise. I've also noticed a distinct lack of clarity on dialogue at times on certain films.
I can sympathise with this. A friend of mine is qualified to teach English as a foreign language and does so in her home, accepting students from abroad who also "live-in" for the course, which, hopefully, also gives them a feel for the country. She has been tearing her hair out of late because students have actually used their phones on calls and texts whilst she is trying to teach on a one-to-one basis! One particular young female student recently decided she was "homesick" after only one day in the UK, after incessantly texting her boyfriend morning, noon and night (or so it seemed!) and suddenly deciding that she wanted to go back home, thereby depriving my friend of most of her income for the week. This probably wouldn't have happened had the student not been perpetually glued to her phone for what seemed like 24 hours a day, including far into the night and the early hours when she should have been asleep. I called in on the first day and she was trying to do a large-size jigsaw puzzle, still holding her phone in one hand, valiantly texting away! As my friend said, how can she possibly teach English all the while the student is distracted by making calls and texting in her own language? I suggested that, in future, some sort of stipulation be made to the company that organises the courses to the effect that phones are NOT to be used in what is supposed to be teaching time. Perhaps an additional deposit to be forfeited if it happens. Mobile phones have got a lot to answer for.
Yup - very good.......if you like that sort of thing! Loads of stuff being put out that was originally stereo though! Satellite is the way to go for the best quality, for what it's worth with the hideous compression still being applied. I once asked the now defunct Radio Authority why this technology (Optimod, I believe it was called), originally designed for AM, medium wave and brought in from America by the sixties off-shore pirate stations, had been allowed on FM. The reply was a joke, stating something like that there are many situations (such as in a car and noisy areas) where the majority of people would be listening (huh?) and the transmissions were adjusted for this so-called majority. You certainly wouldn't be listening to a satellite transmission in a moving vehicle, so why use compression on that medium? It's only to try and make the audio sound louder than anybody else's, the consequence being that most transmissions ALL sound as rough and as hideous as each other!
I have said this elsewhere and on many occasions. DAB was the biggest con trick ever foisted on to the great UK wireless-listening public, with their empty promises of "near-CD" quality and user-switchable compression (or did I dream that last bit?). I was an early adopter with a Technics tuner and what, eventually, did I get? Unreliable burbling signals (even in a supposedly good area with a half-decent external aerial; more and more stations squeezed in at ever-decreasing bit-rates plus MONO thrown into the mix, for goodness' sake on Radio 4 Extra (previously 7)! All this, together with the obvious butchering of the audio by compression and processing makes the output (for me, at any rate) almost painful to try and listen to. I have some old reel-to-reel tapes from ancient FM music broadcasts and the sound quality (even on pop from the era) knocks spots off current day offerings. If I load them into an audio editor like Audacity, the dynamics are there, plain to see. Try doing that with modern broadcasts (or even some CD's) and the waveform almost flat-lines - such is the complete lack of dynamic range. I despair with what's happening to both broadcast and recorded audio these days.
At least Musk has a decent sense of humour chip implanted!
Interesting rave review but I still have niggling reservations about the range - AND the price! As has been said (and inferred) elsewhere, there needs to be a battery break-through that is nothing short of miraculous.
Not had anything dubious here on my alternative address that they have. Seems to be a lot of panic floating about!
I expect Google Street View to be up there soon.
Well.......he WOULD say that, wouldn't he?
I too am pretty much ambivalent about MS. They're BIG CORP, after all with all BIG CORP'S tendencies, foibles and alleged ruthlessness. However, this situation needs resisting and who better do do it? As they seem so inclined, good luck on this one, even if it is a PR exercise.
Having closely followed many cases where police (and others) have illegally ordered people to stop videoing or taking photographs in a public place, followed up with an equally illegal confiscation of equipment and/or wiping of a memory card, it's my understanding that if GCHQ staff are on the public highway, then it is perfectly legal to photograph them. Of course, police may trump up other charges to try and justify an arrest but photography is not a crime.
Don't cross the beams!
I can't understand why ANYBODY would want to watch a version of a film obtained by cam-cording a cinema screen. The picture quality must be absolutely foul, not to mention extraneous noises on the soundtrack made by other patrons (crunching popcorn perhaps?). I'm guessing that the sort of person who would watch something like that would possess very little in the brain-power department.
My super-dooper internet-connected so-called smart telly was still having intermittent problems getting to the Beeb player as of yesterday (Sunday) evening. Endless rotating circle and odd messages. Sometimes worked but most times not.
As I am fond of saying, these jokers aren't in the real world. I'm sure they would be only too pleased to let me have sight of all the meta data of their own mails, so I could deduce what skeletons they have in their closets or what dirty washing they would like aired in public. This brazen abuse of the parliamentary process is totally despicable and just why did so many MP's vote for it? Can we please have a role of shame?
When will these clowns learn that they are supposed to be in office to serve us, the people and not the other way round? They seem to merrily go about their own agendas without so much as a by-your-leave or a nod to Joe public who might just possibly want some sort of say in what's happening to the country and where the taxes are being spent. I have no faith in the b*gg*rs whatsoever, having had a load of boiler plate waffle come back to me on the only two occasions I have contacted my MP on issues that I felt were important. Nest-featherers all, methinks, not to mention this paranoia about terrorists, who would probably use some sort of closed communication system or encryption anyway. It's just an excuse to spy on the populace at large for anything that the government doesn't like.
Agree entirely, especially where radio is concerned. The compression and jiggery-pokery that is applied these days sounds almost painful to my ears. DAB was supposed to be the be-all and end-all with the promise of "near-CD quality" and user-adjustable compression (THAT fell by the wayside), and what do we get? More and more stations shoe-horned in at ever-decreasing bit-rates, hideous audio processing to boot (with Radio 4 Extra in glorious MONO, for pity's sake!) with the resultant sound as flat as the proverbial pancake. Why stations also find the need to compress their satellite feeds is beyond me, although they seem to be the best quality available at the moment (for what it's worth). I complained bitterly to to the late Radio Authority about excessive compression and processing some years ago and got back some waffle about catering for the majority of people who would be listening on portable radios or in the car. Poppycock, I say! I have some very old analogue reel-to-reel recordings of good old Alan Freeman doing "Pick of the Pops" on a Sunday afternoon, pre Optimod (or what ever they use now) and and they sound fine. Likewise, very early Capital Radio stuff. Put current offerings into an audio editing program like Audacity and all you get from the waveform is virtually a straight line! No dynamics at all. Absolutely appalling sound. So-called "re-mastered" re-issues seem to have suffered the same fate of heavy-handed compression. Nothing like the originals. Why should classical music be singled out for the non-compression treatment? This all makes a mockery of using high-end audio equipment if the input has been trashed to start off with.
Just who, exactly, is she trying to kid? Must think we were all born yesterday!
Hardly the same, is it? Chalk and cheese come to mind. Next time, make sure there is a valid comparison. I won't waste my time explaining if you can't see the difference. Doesn't take much intelligence.
It's a very small start I suppose. It that might show the NSA and politicians that they are supposed to be serving the populace and not going about their own agenda for their own ends.
Well - what did they expect? Seems the most logical outcome to me!
Er, speaking as an ex-BT engineer........try "Finger-stop" !!!
I expect GCHQ (not to mention the local plod) would be jolly interested in all this shenanigans. They would probably spy just because they can.
Satire, sarcasm - or what? Difficult to tell.
Well - they WOULD say that, wouldn't they! Surprised they even attempted that angle after all the devious shenanigans and antics they've allegedly been up to in the past. Who's going to believe anything they say now?
As per. my title - just who the hell do the police think they are? There's a little thing called due process which, strangely enough, appears to involve judges and courts, which I believe are supposed to decide what is, or is not, legal. Has this age-old tradition suddenly gone out of the window? Has there been some super-secret law made that now facilitates the police arbitrarily deciding the legality of people's actions? Obviously the police think they have no need of such niceties as a court order and are deciding to go it alone, without any decision from a judge. Is this, in itself, legal? Looks like the first run-up to a police state here.
Oi reckons we had it in the UK first! So there - with brass knobs on! The latest wheeze is to find a building site with a digger stored there that just happens to be near an ATM. Bloody great stolen JCB comes along and virtually demolishes front of building to get at ATM, which lends a new meaning to the phrase "hole in the wall". They normally have a get-away car or pick-up truck stashed nearby but recent attempts near me have failed due to the somewhat unusual sound and sight of a digger trundling around at about two in the morning, which does seem to attract some attention from residents and the local constabulary.
Thank goodness I only use the web-mail page to check the junk folder. Everything else arrives via Thunderbird.
Can't see this "deja vu" happening.......er........happening. How many so-called super high quality formats have been tried in the past and failed? The majority of folk are not audio buffs - hence their apparent satisfaction with the foul, highly compressed processed sound emerging from most radio stations these days - even digital ones that mutilate the sound beyond belief. Painful. Even so-called re-mastered CD's are manipulated to iron out a lot of the dynamics and sound pretty flat, instead of actually producing a sound more like the original master tape, or whatever medium was used. Can't see even the most dyed-in-the-wool audio enthusiast forking out for yet another system that can maybe live up to Philips' original inflated claim of "perfect sound for ever".
I can see a "cease and desist" popping up in fairly short order here!
Agreed. You were ahead of me there! Typical of anything IT-connected that has anything remotely to do with government or politicians. Haven't got a clue have they?
This could prove interesting, bearing in mind that Russia's soft landing record on other planets is not exactly spectacular. I wonder if they really have the technology to pull this off or have THEY been spying on the Yanks?
Bring back the quill pen, parchment and abacus, I say!
And this will, of course, save all Australians from the same number of forestalled terrorist attacks as has happened in the USA - probably a grand total of nil. Governments are elected by the populace at large to serve those who actually took the trouble to vote, NOT to go around conjuring up half-baked laws which either don't work or serve their own interests. All the recent Snowden spying reports show, without a shadow of a doubt, that so-called democratically elected representatives are just working to their own agenda, with absolutely no consultation with the people who put them in power. Depressing, ain't it?
By whom, I might ask? Is this the police acting as judge and jury again, as per. the City Of London police not too long ago? Due process, anyone? On the face of it, looks like an attempt to by-pass the courts yet again.
This is obviously what 3D printing is REALLY for! Great stuff to use it to save a life. Presumably the scalp, complete with hair is somehow reinstated? It would have been good to have a bit more in-depth information in a separate article or video, as this type of pioneering work (though possibly a tad gruesome in parts!) fascinates me.
Is GCHQ going to be cut back as well?
I expect the rent is calculated in groats (look it up!).
Short-sighted attitude, my good man. Keeping a steady trickle going keeps a bit of public interest going in the case. People (and I include myself in this) just would not want to wade through a huge data dump released in one enormous pile. I would suggest that folks would rapidly lose interest and the publicity value would be lost. At least this inspires interest from non-nerds/geeks and keeps the general public informed about the devious NSA/GCHQ antics that they might not otherwise have known about.
Oh no - they couldn't possibly implement a simple plan that requires more than a couple of brain cells. Besides, then they couldn't exert any control or censorship over the net itself, which is what it's REALLY all about! Nothing to do with kiddie protection in the long run, methinks.
As has been inferred (and I have posted a similar thought elsewhere in the past) encryption has to be somehow seamless. I've played around with it for e-mail, and it's too complicated at present for the average user in my opinion. This is always assuming that world governments don't promptly pass laws making encryption, VPN's, etc. illegal! Nothing would surprise me, looking at the antics of the NSA and GCHQ of late.
"Dim, moving star"?
Must disagree there! I also signed up for the alerts and have seen it loads of times here in SE UK and on every occasion it's been extremely bright. Goes across very rapidly, so have to be quick! Must just have been lucky that it reflected so much light.
Yup - their boiler-plate statement in response to virtually anything and everything that's thrown at them is getting more than a little tiresome. We need a UK equivalent of Snowden here to get the real deal as to what they're actually up to, although it doesn't take too much guesswork to fathom.
"Apple has become the biggest, most important technology company on the planet".
Can't make up my mind whether this is for real. My sarcasm antennae are twitching but, knowing the attitude of dyed-in-the-wool, poor misguided and brainwashed Apple fanbois, nothing would surprise me!
Will this be used for the conventional overhead or face shot, or is there an ulterior motive for some......er.......ground level vertical titillation?
Huh? Can somebody translate this into recognisable English? Sounds like some ostentatious and pompous art critic!
Blimey - the ICO actually producing something useful for a change. I have queried things with them in the past that I thought were clear-cut (e.g. a company that I used to drive for passing on my personal details to a third party, namely one of those nasty so-called private parking enforcement outfits) and got pretty well nowhere. Perhaps they have got a new set of teeth at last.
Oh, for goodness' sake! Not only is his former boyhood home being turned into some sort of shrine, but now his face on a stamp? Blimey - the bloke was only the boss of a company, not some sort of messiah who (allegedly) saved the world! This really will get the fanbois' hearts a-fluttering.