The "Internet of Shit"
Or as we prefer to call it, "Fox News"
587 posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
The "Internet of Shit"
Or as we prefer to call it, "Fox News"
Did you choke on your free range organic soya latte with grated quinoa topping at the thought of being labeled a guardian reader?
I thought he was offering them a lentil casserole!
Given most fanboi seem to be tree hugging, sandal wearing Guardian readers that seemed far more obvious to me.
The same Dr Liam who resigned in disgrace after giving access to his mate the lobbyist when he was defence secretary?
And we are expected to take his call for all our data at face value?
You sound like one of those Treasonous hacktivist weirdos.....
By pointing out the fud and smokescreen from the NSA, and that's before you add in something as simple as ip spoofing
"Re: Same old arrogance
Except that end users of the data will never see the NHS Number, just as they don't when they analyse Hospital Episode Statistics.
Nice try at an uninformed rebuttal of a rebuttal though."
Because of course those are the only two datasets they will ever look at.........
With date of birth, postcode and gender its possible to cross match data sets and get a good level of accuracy and in less populous areas you can do it with even less specific data. I can pretty much guarantee that I am the only male born in my year of birth in my postcode so cross referencing from just that data would be simple.
Actually having my NHS number is pretty irrelevent as its rarely if ever used outside the NHS but if you where an insurer and held my car or life insurance it would be simple to match that to my medical data with those "anonymous" data points.
You might be vaguely anonymous in dense areas of population but out in the sticks with 1 or 2 houses per postcode its a different story.
In my youth we used to fit a sparkplug to the backbox of a mini with a coil and a switch, drive down the road, pull out the choke and hit the switch.
This resulted in a massive backfire, flames and occassionaly the death of the exhaust.
And thats before he meets his new cell mate Big Dave and discovers a whole new meaning to the term "backdoor"
Was the TV spokestool, he apparently snapchatted the search warrant and expressed suprise that they took everything!
How he thought he wouldnt get his collar felt going on the TV is bizarre.
Yes by simply not buying services or contracting from that supplier.
The problem with the term "consent to process data" is that it is really broad whereas the article 29 working party is more focussed on specific types of processing such as marketing and communications to the data subject and the specifc and freely informed opt in given by the subject.
You know the rest
Worst they could probably do was chuck some empty pizza boxes or squeeze some zits in the general direction of the cinema goers.
One swift wedgie would make them skulk back to mum
If you want the best, well motivated people working for local authorities then the first step would probably be to sack around 90% of the long serving incumbents and replace them with competent, well trained people.
Once you see from the inside just how badly local authorities are run, the waste, the corruption and the inept nature of the people you will understand why so many council and local government projects fail dismally, go over budget or get quietly scrapped.
The issue with data protection in the EU is one of proportionality and necessity,
When the data controller is collecting data for the purposes they are registered for and an employee has been signed off for a defined period by a Doctor then it would not be proportionate to spy on the employeee during that period without any direct evidence of wrongdoing, it would also not be meet any of the general tests within the DPA guidance.
The issue for this council was that they had no evidence of wrongdoing and therefore the collection of sensitive personal information was neither reasonable or proportionate.
And the taxpayer will foot the bill for the fine in the classic Local Gov to ICO to Central Gov back to local gov circle jerk of money.
Its time the law was changed to make the individuals who screw up like this responsible so the fine is in fact loss of pension in its entirety and loss of job with the pension pot divided between the victims of these gaffes. Once a couple of senior uncivil servants get the shaft we would see a massive change in the way local authorities take privacy and data protection.
Didn't they try this with Easynet way back in the day and fail dismally.
That should set the precedent for anyone else who is threatened by Easy Group.
Than the gang fuck that was CSA 1 and 2?
" Glad to see your grasp of anatomy extends further than that of your computing knowledge, nsld."
I still have some way to go to achieve your dizzying lows Matt. I am trying though, got an Apple device recently in my quest to dumb down to your level.
They do say that opinions are like arseholes, everyone has one. Except for Matt who has clearly been blessed with a veritable plethora of said sphincters from which he spouts forth.
The plod are bound under CPIA 1996 to retain any and all information they recieve in relation to an investigation for the purposes of both prosecution and defence disclosure, regardless of the source. That doesnt mean they wont do there best to try and hide it, deny its existence, or as in this case spend three months trawling through it before advising anyone of the error. Those rules on timely disclosure of a data breach that apply to the average man in the street are clearly being ignored by the Plod.
So Vodafone's cock up is an issue for Vodafone, once the plod have the excess information they have to process it and also they would be bound to disclose it on request to the defence. The danger of the extra data is that it may work against the prosecution.
What it also throws into the works is that the "witness" (Vodafone) have said the data is crap which is again useful to the defence and a problem for the prosecution, especially if the case against the journalist is heavily supported by this data. I do wonder if Vodafone's admission on the data quality is as a result of conversations with its customer as it clearly doesn't help the Plod.
I googled him and the top result was an interesting facebook page.
Its not an easy read as the poster claims that English is not his native language.
Seems odd to put the resources into fighting one search engine in one part of the world when you can sit in that part of the world and just use the .com extension and the material seems to be all over the web.
"But imagine that somebody killed your relative and you have an IP which might lead to a killer."
I can't ever recall reading about a murder where someone was beaten to death with a router on a static IP address!
UK police can request the connection data for any ISP currently and they will get something, the grim reality is that the something they get may not yield anything for a variety of reasons. This new law doesn't change that in the slightest.
What Treasonous May is moving towards is wholesale collection and retention for extended periods, something the European court declared illegal last year and led to the rushed emergency legislation for DRIP.
As for your opening comments many of us are old enough to remember the threats and attacks from the medieval terror bastards IRA long before the events of 11/9 and we didn't need our privacy and liberty destroyed to deal with them.
Is an open wifi network of which you will find plenty and Tor running and you are good to go, use a dumb terminal with no hard drive and an OS on a stick and what will they have?
This is really aimed at the man/woman in the street so that the mission creep we saw with RIPA can be enhanced so they know what episode of strictly you watched when you put the wrong bin out.
And that's before we get people spoofing IP address details or cloning kit to make it look like someone else is up to no good.
If the route has multiple stops and people alight and board for partial journeys it will increase the total number of "journeys"
Such classics as:
Barbie the mumsnetter - an everyday tale of a toxic life in nappy valley punctuated with lattes and deep conversations with other barbies about how awful ken is.
Barbie the career women - nothing gets in the way of her flight to the top, so Ken ends up banging the nanny, his personal trainer and barbies best friend
Budget approval time
Wheel out the can of fear and feel the pounds/dollars roll in.
Given how totally incompetent our Police are at managing anything cyber related unless its dealing with copyright infringement why is anyone even giving these muppets airtime?
Joe48 what you are missing is that we do have mass surveillance, its been ongoing for some considerable time and given its success in averting the attacks of the 7th of July and the murder of Lee Rigby it clearly works really well. </irony>
All that is currently happening is the home secretary and the new GCHQ bod are trying to put a positive spin on something they did illegaly for years that the public is now wise to and that consumer demand is making harder for them to do.
Its actually not a hard balance to get right, we have the necessary judicial checks and balances available but successive governments havent applied them as they know that an application for mass survelliance would never get through. Instead they opted to do it and hope they didnt get caught out, now they have been caught they are crying about it.
So Joe48 when they ask you to decrypt the messages you have written in "code" and you can't they can simply imprison you until you do under RIPA.
Welcome to our brave new world
Force feed them bacon?
And apparently Hannah Thompson was in a relationship with someone who ran a blog of a sexual nature and discovered pictures from when she was 18 etc etc.
That doesnt sound like the traditional approach to revenge porn and reads to me more like regret porn.
And as we know the interwebs are forever so I guess the only solution is not to make porn if you dont want to risk others seeing it.
but it relies too heavily on "encryption" without really defining what the acceptable minimums are or what it considers to be "encryption"
After all adding a password to an excel spreadsheet makes it harder to access but its not exactly secure or encrypted. To the average non IT savvy small business owner a password is about as far as they will go with "encryption".
Without a clear definition and some standards its going to fall at the first hurdle.
as they can always turn to Luxembourg for a little bit of light royalty transfer tax "management" if the double Irish isn't replaced in 6 years time.
Going to be a lot of happy accounting firms working out the next bit of tax planning wizardry.
If only the UK government would come up with some competitive tax rates they could bring in so much more money than the current mantra of higher taxes which bring in less.
Antactica is melting too
Antactica is a continent. Water ice is draining off the land, and the salinity of the southern ocean is dropping.Water with lower salinity is quicker to freeze, hence the increase in sea ice.
What a load of bollocks.
To have any significant effect on the salinity of the water you would have to add a massive volume of water which itself would need to contain no salt at all.
Exactly how much water is running off the land into the sea? and have you considered the issues with evaporation from the sea removing water?
So unless the land has just turned into an arid desert and you have no evaporation it sounds to me like you are looking for a job in climate science at UEA!
I believe that's outsourced to "management consultants"
If they used real names to register companies? After all Patel isn't a common Polish name! He should have added ski on the end, that would have flummoxed the plod
"Autocarrot is the bane of my fucking life"
Indeed a switch to manual carrots is the answer........
"I can only imagine that these trolls are blessed with the similar good looks and intelligence as other, recently convicted, internet trolls such as John Nimmo and Isabella Sorley.
Always nice to see equality in action with 50% of the people convicted of sending malicious communications to the feminist campaigner being women.
In fact this goes to the heart of the demands for equality when you have an equal gender distribution in the dock.
"Hey Apple, here is your royalty cheque, its for 0.15c, unfortunately no one seems to be using apple pay!"
And therein lies your first problem, do you really think Apple will just accept a payment with no audit trail?
There is also a world of difference between not handling the tokenisation and not tracking the activity, the two are not one and the same.
Given that iPhones track when the charger is plugged in they are already able to track when the NFC is used.
At the very least there will be aggregate data collection, which can be used to identify people through comparison with other collected data.
Mike, sorry to burst the bubble but if Apple don't know the transaction values then they cannot audit for the 0.15% fee.
Applepay links back to which card? The one in the iTunes store? Plenty of tracking opportunities there.
Pretty much all closed systems take a cut of the transaction fee to increase ARPS. Its been common practice for years.
Of course apple won't track the actual payment but it will track the activity either side to analyse shopping habits and that data is valuable, again they have been doing that for years as does everyone else.
It will be interesting to see if acquirers place a per transaction limit as they do with contactless payments 0.15% of £20 is a lot less exciting than an open limit.
I was hoping to get blood pressure readings of the various slebs after they found out that the Apples sieve like security had spaffed their norks all over the interwebs.
Its for medical research, honest guv......
"You have 20 seconds to comply ... I am now authorised to use extreme suction."
Said no married women anywhere.........
Flood this particular network with pictures of Beer, Fry ups and Bacon sarnies?
Thats one way to piss off that particular brand of sky fairy worshipping bacon dodger (as well as several others)
I thought you where talking about the Labour party......
I believe they all share the same magic elephant and pull the numbers out of its arse.
You need to go north of the elbow to get the bigger numbers.
The IRIS system worked really well, was apparently under budget and made travelling through airports a lot swifter.
Given its success it was canned as the unions feared it would replace the joyous individuals that are employed to sit in booths and welcome visitors to the UK with a smile and a wave.
As the Home secretary is so keen to retain all our communications, and as the internet purely exists for the propogation of cat pictures perhaps we should all send emails to our elected representatives with those lovely, large HD pics of kittens as attachments to ensure they have all the data they need?
"Ego ex officio" - "I am out of the office" according to the oompa loompas
Of course it is because every mugger tweets about it first before they go and mug a granny!
And it was overwhelmingly successful in averting the bombings on the 7th of July and in stopping the murder of Lee RIgby, except it wasnt and it didnt despite the fact the people involved where all on the watch lists and well known to the security services and police.
Sucide bombers dont care if the data is retained, what are you to do with it? prosecute the crater they leave?