* Posts by Charles 9

4495 posts • joined 10 Jun 2009

Carriers want 5G to do everything, for anything, anywhere

Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: Lan replacement

US, and most office buildings I've seen feature drop ceilings. While electrical sockets in the outer walls and floors usually have to be built in (due to being set in concrete), network connections tend to be more ephemeral and can come and go as tenants move in and move out. Guess it depends on how the office is setup. If it's mainly sets of cubicles each centered around a column, then it's easy enough to just wire up the column, but if it's more open in nature, then people within won't be as fixed to a single spot, and here properly-secured WiFi would be of benefit.

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: Lan replacement

In an office environment, perhaps cell tech isn't what's called for. WiFi-based tech is and will remain the preferred setup for closed environments (like an office floor). You can set up masts, boosters, and so on, link it to your landline, set up enterprise-grade encryption, certificates, and so on, and with some investment in time and capital come up with something within reason that can perhaps give you a return on not having to run cables and conduits from the drop ceiling.

While 5G may WANT to do everything, to borrow an idiom, not everything is best done with a hammer.

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: Lan replacement

And it's that difficult to get a SECOND mast up compared to rewiring a whole office floor?

0
1
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: Spectrum

Doubt they'll be able to, for the same reason LTE Band III is not used in America: prior commitments, usually at the state level (a chunk of Band III in the US is reserved for the military).

0
0

Netflix: Look folks, it's net neutrality... HA, fooled you

Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: Net neutrality

They do, but they see it as discrimination.

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: Blackmail?

What about taking the ISPs to court for anti-competitive practices and threatening to have any shady business they may have potentially exposed to legal eagles?

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: "VOD pay ISP to exclude traffic from bandwidth cap".

If it requires small print to tell the truth, then they're telling HALF-truths, which according to some is actually lying TWICE. This is precisely the type of bait-and-switch advertising that needs to go...YESTERDAY. So what if customers can't afford what they REALLY want. At least they'll be told that up front like they're supposed to.

1
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: "VOD pay ISP to exclude traffic from bandwidth cap".

"You don't understand how an ISP works. They do not have the capacity to deliver anything like your package speed if everyone used it all the time."

Then YOU don't understand that when the term "Truth in Advertising" is mentioned, it should be THE truth, the WHOLE truth, and NOTHING BUT the truth, so help you $DEITY. IOW, ISPs shouldn't be advertising the rates they're touting unless they can actually deliver it even under the most adverse conditions they may encounter (such as everyone asking for the same thing at the same time).

1
1
Charles 9
Silver badge

The problem is that this amounts to favoritism. Netflix's traffic now has priority over other sources because the latter's data gets metered. The neutrality supporters demand an all-or-nothing stance to non-discrimination. You either throttle/meter ALL the traffic equally (so every bit counts no matter where it comes from) or you throttle/meter NONE of it (making it a flat-rate plan).

2
1

Canadian bloke refuses to hand over phone password, gets cuffed

Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: @Charles 9: This is a trivial 'software requirements' problem

"I should point out that almost always, customs inspection points are in the country concerned¹ so you are already subject to their laws. I found out the hard way."

Although they ARE, strictly speaking, IN the countries in question, as far as inbound people are concerned, you are in a legally-designated Port of Entry. These are subject to special rules which means you are NOT allowed certain protections under the law YET (that's covered by International Law regarding travel).

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: Hummmmmmmmm

"I'd be more interested in not leaving any potentially suspicious setup on my device. If I wanted privacy I'd keep my stuff elsewhere and accessible via VPN on the net. Access or download after I get across the boarder if needed."

And if where you're going has a tight data cap?

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

The trouble with plausible deniability is that the plods won't be satisfied until they're sure they got EVERY password out of you. Which means a system with more than one potential password will call for more than one session with the rubber hoses.

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: @Charles 9: This is a trivial 'software requirements' problem

Actually, because you're not technically IN the country yet, IIRC, international law applies, and that has no presumption one way or the other. The Border Patrol can simply deny you entry, so the ultimate burden of proof is on YOU because they're not REQUIRED to let you in.

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: What's on a phone anyway?

If you swapped in a local SIM, a common budget tactic, the US phone company will be clueless and the foreign one unreachable. Thus the only remaining possibility is the phone itself. Or if you just use WiFi-based tech while you're there, again the phone company's clueless.

As for the breadth of power, remember they're in fear of "The One That Got Away" that then goes on to commit 9/11 Part Two.

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: This is a trivial 'software requirements' problem

One good reason. Unlimited panic PINs means unlimited chances for the border patrol to use the rubber hose.

"What's the REAL password?"

"Now what's the REAL real password?"

"Now what's the REAL real real password?"

Remember, you're not technically IN the country until you pass the border patrol. And they don't run on a time limit.

1
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: This is a trivial 'software requirements' problem

"So, i.a.w. The Art of War, we have yet another false passcode that opens up a stock collection of Granny porn (elderly ladies without clothing)."

While legal, border agents may see it as a deliberate attempt to hide something illegal. And since they're not working with a time limit, they can just slam the lid, confiscate it for further review, and send you to the silent room while they call for the old veteran to take a crack at it (since the veteran is likely an old man himself so wouldn't be so repulsed by granny porn). Well, either him or an astigmatic or far-sighted man (meaning he's wearing glasses to read things up close and can take them off when needed to make everything look like a blur).

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

What if you're up against a tight data cap? And the data's too large to grab online?

1
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: The Law on encryption passwords in the US is well established.

"In the US, the Courts have long held that you can't be compelled to recite the combination of a combination lock as that would violate your 4th Amendment rights, and the Courts have extended that to encryption passwords."

I thought the amendment in question was the 5th. The 4th allows them to seize the safe or drive or whatever, but being compelled to state the means to unlock or decrypt the data can result in an "I plea the 5th."

PS. I looked up In re Boucher and learned the point became moot because he'd already been caught with his hand in the cookie jar, so to speak. He couldn't plea the fifth because he'd already incriminated himself prior to being compelled further.

5
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: This is a trivial 'software requirements' problem

Only trouble is some of the plods aren't stupid. They'll just turn around and go, "OK, now give us the other password. You know, the one that reveals where the REAL contraband is located." Which poses a problem if you're honestly NOT using a hidden volume.

16
0

In assault on American values, Lockheed BLASTS PICKUP with RAYGUN

Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: corner reflector

Shhhh.

Can't tell those "know-it-alls" that optical corner reflectors are only meant to reflect reference beams that, at worst case, rate in the watts at point of impact, meaning the attack laser would be around 1,000+ times its rated capacity. Then you end up just like with the reflective coating: it melts, distorts, and becomes useless.

4
2
Charles 9
Silver badge

Coatings aren't likely to stop a powerful laser for long. The moment it distorts, it creates a vicious cycle. They made that determination when thinking of using a laser to stop a ballistic missile.

As for being on the move, can't computers compensate for various degrees of motion and still be able to keep a bullet-firing gun on target? Against that, a laser shooting at relativistic velocities should be cake.

4
0

‪Obama criticises China's mandatory backdoor tech import rules

Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: Bring back the mouse.

"Do we remember that time when we needed to giggle the mouse in a random pattern to generate entropy to then be used on encryption?"

Quite vividly since TrueCrypt and VeraCrypt STILL use the technique to help stir up their entropy pools.

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: The difference is... (Charles 9)

"Well, those "hatters gonna hate" dudes (and dudettes)(let's call them "sickos" for brevity) have to obtain funding, training, shelter... . "

Well, the Islamic State doesn't seem to be having any difficulty getting men, material, or money. And all for a "Caliphate or Catastrophe" mission, it seems.

1
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: The difference is...

But that leaves the "haters gonna hate" plots that exist for intrinsic reasons that can't be stopped. And given we're getting closer to the point that ONE successful plot can result in Game Over...

3
2

Bad news: Robo-cars will make you work BILLIONS more hours. Good news: In 2040

Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: Job Creation

"In fact a number of businesses operate in exactly that manner and for that exact reason."

How many of them are publicly traded and have managed to convince normally-short-sighted investors to hang in for the long haul?

1
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: You're using your car 1 hour a day

"Driverless is much safer? How do you know? Show me the statistics... oh, wait, there aren't any."

Have you tried asking Google? They've been running real road tests of their driverless cars for years. I'm sure they could provide you with stats a plenty.

2
1
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: Population Growth Rate

So how do you handle a big shopping run without ample trunk/boot space?

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: Take themselves for service?

Until you realize they take this into consideration. One of the things they're working on is obstacle avoidance. Even if a car can't react quickly enough to a box of nails breaking right in front of it, it can at least inform the tow truck, "Beware of road debris!" Then the tow truck can either see it coming and work around it or just drive with puncture-proof tires.

Frankly, the only ways you can perform the cascade you describe is to have a practically invisible obstacle or to be actively sabotaging the stretch of road for an extended period.

1
0

Super SSD tech: Fancy a bonkers 8TB all-flash PC?

Charles 9
Silver badge

The transition will be gradual because the price premium's still too high at present. Meanwhile, 3D Flash foundries are starting to go live for full-scale production and these will be using older chip tech as a base, giving them room to shrink even as they gain room to stack. Road might be a bit rocky at first, I'll grant you, but if the premium lowers itself gradually as economies of scale pick up on 3D Flash, I think desktop systems will become more primarily- or all-Flash within the scale of a decade if not sooner.

1
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

No argument there. I think the price premium factor is still around 10, which tends to call for specific needs to pay the premium. If it can get down to 3, better 2, then consumers will be more inclined to take the hit for a significant loading boost.

0
0

Snowden, NSA spying, hard drive malware ... what we need is a UN privacy watchdog!

Charles 9
Silver badge

"Outside of the "5 eyes" the amount of "slurping, snooping and pooping" by the rest of the world is minuscule in comparison."

I don't recall Russia or China being part of the 5 Eyes, yet we KNOW they have Big Brother ambitions.

"Where countries have signed and ratified international treaties they are expected to be bound by those treaties. So in theory governments have to also answer to those treaties that they have signed up for. In practice the powerful countries have trampled on the sovereign rights of weak countries, and at the same time disregard the international laws to which they have signed."

Those treaties are between sovereign states. And like I said, most of these come after the two-plus countries end up butting heads with each other over some issue. What actually enforces those treaties is the threat of retaliation from the other party. Finally, as noted, the treaty has to be ratified or otherwise accepted by the sovereign state to have any force (IOW, it has to submit to the agreement. And what happens if a country decides to withdraw from or otherwise ignore a treaty as ink on a page?

2
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: Hmmm

"Also, the more times the subject gets mentioned, the more chance that Joe Public will realise there is a problem."

But there's a chance of a backfire. Mention it enough times and Joe Public, just interested in the nightly news and the football game (whichever form it may take), will tune it out and ignore it the next time it's heard. Cry Wolf Syndrome I think it's called?

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: An angry letters and resolutions...

Which is just a load of hot air because all the governments involved carry sovereign power. They are each their own highest authority so answer to no one except another sovereign nature, and only if they butt heads. The UN does not have sovereign authority, and if it did it would by definition usurp sovereign power from everyone else.

IOW, trying to tell a sovereign power what to do is like dictating terms to the landlord.

4
0

Superfish: Lenovo? More like Lolnono – until they get real on privacy

Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: Self-signed certificates are the root of this insanity

So you expect people to spend book bucks every year or so just to maintain a secure local site like an Owncloud? Besides, the big problem wasn't the certificate but the masquerading which can happen regardless of the certificate.

0
0

Nvidia waves 4King big Android Shield at games console warzone

Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: Shame..

"What do you mean? You can use PS3 and PS4 controllers on Android devices."

Last I checked, not without some fiddling, compatibility is not guaranteed, plus if you don't have a Sony phone, you have to pay for the Sixaxis interface app (and it only works on rooted phones). You tend to have better luck with Wiimotes or a dedicated gamepad (they make Bluetooth gamepads with built-in cradles for your phone, and they're not too expensive, either).

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

They can't because they're using ARM, and practically all Steam games these days require an x86/x64 processor. That's why Steam on Android is a portal only and not serving actual games.

0
0

Vint Cerf: Everything we do will be ERASED! You can't even find last 2 times I said this

Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: Turtles all the way down?

Actually, nearly 20 years ago I was able to preserve a lot of C64 and C128 data I had by shuttling the data from the C128 to a nearby 486 using modems and a phone cable. Okay, it was slow and tedious at 1200bps using Xmodem, but at least it worked.

As for the Mac HFS format, I recall there are Windows programs capable of reading them since around 1995.

0
0

SanDisk launches 200GB microSD card

Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: Too Small?

"And as before, the real benefit to having memory cards in those sizes is that they fit into the current generation of electronics. If electronics continue to shrink physically, then we may get to the point where even microSD cards are too big and it's unlikely that we'll reverse course and electronics will get larger."

Except, as the article notes, we're approaching the physical limit of just how small we can pack these things. Think why the device is 200GB and not (as tradition would dictate) 256GB. So IOW we're reaching the point where they couldn't make it smaller even if they wanted to. So an about-face may be forced upon an industry clamoring for more portable storage.

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: What's that in RPs?

"8GB memory card as 8GB with 8GB capacity which I can use to put 8GB of data on. Windows shows the same card incorrectly as 7.4GB when it actually means 7.4GiB."

I've always been of the impression that ANY capacity listed on a package is listed as its RAW capacity (that is, the capacity prior to formatting). After-formatting capacity cannot be used because reformatting it under a different filesystem can change the overhead (and thus the amount of free space on the device afterward).

As for the Windows under-reporting the size, I actually appreciate this since I prefer conservative measurements when calculating "Will It Fit?"

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: SDHC can't read 64GB either

But with a whole bunch of them running at once, can't they run in parallel, aggregating their bandwidth?

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: SDHC can't read 64GB either

Actually, in the SSD sphere, reliability is a key metric, so the manufacturers use more conservative tech and include better redundancy to ensure the SSD lasts for a while. They also include stuff to better manage heat. SSDs are expected to keep running for years, even when at full tilt. Do we expect the same from a high-capacity MicroSD card? I know with my phone I only employ the external SD occasionally.

0
1
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: What's that in RPs?

I don't think it will be easy to envision over 12 million ZX81 RAM packs. Beyond a certain point, the quantity gets lost and just becomes "lots".

2
0

Superfish: Lenovo ditches adware, but that doesn't fix SSL megavuln – researcher

Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: liability...

Assuming it's a crime to begin with. I'd love to hear the relevant section of state or federal law that makes it illegal.

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge
Devil

Well, screw back. You're getting it whether you like it or not, even if we have to clamp you head to the chair.

0
0

WD reveals NASty new boxes for home and small biz use

Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: anti-stylish?

I think they look quite nice actually. Very business-like. Evokes an image of being ready to get to work.

2
0

FCC says cities should be free to run decent ISPs. And Republicans can't stand it

Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: Capitalism is direct democracy.

They might if accepting the contributor pisses off enough voters that the legislator loses his/her seat. Money's one thing, but it's second to power.

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: [Not directed at anyone here]

" it DOESN'T MATTER what bills you pass to undo this, the President owns your ass!"

Unless the Republicans find a way to cajole or blackmail enough Democrats to side with them on an override. OR they attach the proviso to a must-sign bill such as a debt ceiling increase or (like yesterday) a DHS funding bill. If they can achieve the former (odds are slim; if they tried, the Democrats would likely counter), then Obama's powerless. Achieving the latter would put him in a bind, especially if the bill is time-sensitive: he must either sign the bill with the rider or veto it and cause a shutdown which the GOP will harp about.

0
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

"In principle, the threat to the free market is that municipalities will operate the local ISP at a loss, subsidizing it with tax revenues and precluding or destroying competition by private sector companies."

Can not a conglomerate or other large firm be able to perform similar chicanery by using excess revenues from captive markets to offset any losses due to predatory pricing in competitive markets? That's a big problem upstarts have against incumbents: the incumbents can leverage their size to smother the competition.

6
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: They should compromise

Maybe not in ISPs, but I'll give you two concrete examples of the state taking an industry away from the private sector: Police and Firefighting. The reason for both industries were the same: private enterprise found it more lucrative to turn them into protection rackets ("Shame what could happen to your business, eh...?")

IOW, there are somethings for which money is NOT the best angle. When it isn't, then it's a possible thing for the state to run because the state isn't as concerned about money as private enterprise. And the "overhead" we lose becomes the price we pay for, say, a guaranteed minimum level of service.

15
0
Charles 9
Silver badge

Re: They should compromise

If the Tea Party really had its way they'd disband ALL federal facilities, including the military, and have everything done privately by uber-rich megacorps.

13
6

Forums