Re: and 15 minutes after release
I think it takes a GECK to do those mods. I've made stuff of the like for 3 and NV. GECK may be a bit.
5689 posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
I think it takes a GECK to do those mods. I've made stuff of the like for 3 and NV. GECK may be a bit.
Well, that's what you first see when you load Fallout 3 IIRC. Anyway, given there's an ESRB logo on it (albeit Rating Pending), they must have something they're about to submit since, under the rules, once you slap an ESRB rating on your ads, ALL ads going forward MUST sport it, and you MUST have the final rating before you go live.
OK, saw the trailer. Vault 111 will be the initial setting. And it looks like my second guess was right. If the Paul Revere statue (and retrofitted USS Constitution) is any indication, we're talking Boston here. Which means we're definitely talking the Commonwealth. Also the Brotherhood of Steel, IINM by one of the powered armor shots.
That now leaves the question on the identity of the Player. For the record, here's the list of past IDs:
1 - Vault Dweller
2 - Chosen One
3 - Lone Wanderer (NV didn't have a vault dweller, so was instead just called "Courier")
I'm still banking on "Sole Survivor".
Most companies are savvy enough not to switch engines unless there's a big reason to (ex. GTA4 switched engines due to Renderware being bought by a rival). Since Gamebryo fully supports HD (as it's used in the PC version) and is cross-platform (if you can code for the PS3, the PS4's pretty easy, especially if you already have the PC and Xbox One as another target), there should be little reason to switch. Plus, even if you switch engines, most of the assets (basic textures, models, etc.) can usually be converted with a lot less effort then it would've taken to make them from scratch (which had to be done for 3).
Fallout: New Vegas didn't take nearly so long from first news to final release, last I recall. I suspect most of the time delay for 3 was because it was the first 3D Fallout and a lot of things had to be built from scratch or changed vs. the isometric world of 1 and 2. Plus there was the need to get used to the Gamebryo engine.
Plus note, the article notes a countdown. They wouldn't put one up without something to show at zero time, wouldn't they?
It's also worth noting (and this didn't get fixed) that one early Fallout 3 quest couldn't be completed negatively in Japan (the quest's name, "Power of the Atom," should give a clue why).
Don't know about Philly since 3's The Pitt was set in nearby Pittsburgh.
Boston I'll give you since it would provide a canon tie to the Commonwealth, mentioned in 3, especially since we need a new adversarial power if we assume the Enclave is not a significant force in this area after its collapse in Washington.
PS. As for New Orleans, perhaps not as a mainline setting but a prime candidate for an expansion.
Consider the developers and the setting. All the settings so far have been in America. 1 and 2 were on the west coast, 3 in Washington (with DLCs set in Pittsburgh and Maryland), and New Vegas in the Mojave desert around Las Vegas and surrounding. A non-canon spinoff IIRC was set in Texas.
Anyway, consider this will be a prime candidate for an expanded game world compared to 3 and New Vegas. That's why I figured New York would be a prime candidate. Other major cities like Chicago could also work. Boston's another candidate. New York and Boston would make sense canon-wise because of 3's mention of the Commonwealth, which canon notes is centered in New England (meaning around Boston, and New York's close enough to be under its influence).
Anyone know the setting? I'm betting on New York: the Rotten Apple, as I think of it in that kind of setting. As for the player character, perhaps a Sole Survivor (from a Vault, that is) this time.
"The only way to be secure is to give no one the keys and have no backdoors."
And even that isn't proof against strategically-placed explosives...
"The only thing that will is "If you try to push this through, I won't vote for you again"."
That won't work, either. They'll counter, "One smart vote against ten stupid votes. YOU LOSE."
Some people are willing to go that far by using networks of PEOPLE (as in a spy network like an enemy state, a crime syndicate like the Mafia, or a terrorist group like Al-Queda). Which means odds are there's a LOCAL guy SOMEWHERE.
"Watch how fast the bastard backpeddles on wanting that backdoor installed & try not to laugh too hard at the smoke blowing, hand waving, "That'll never happen! We're the Government & we're Secure!" style bullshit starts to flow out their mouths."
They'll add, "If that were true, you can do it with physical keys, too. Why aren't we seeing a rash of break-ins into high-security sites courtesy of copied keys, hmm?" And any argument you put against it will be applied to the crypto argument. You need an argument that has no physical analogue.
"I have (amongst other) a simple site, mostly static content, no logins or confidential stuff. Have it hosted on the cheap, yet those cheap hosts get very expensive when the word 'SSL' drops."
And without SSL, your content can be MITM'd. If for no other reason than because it's being transmitted in the clear so can be altered mid-flight.
Well then, we're screwed, because Trent can ALWAYS be subverted by Mallory or Gene. And without Trent, we can't trust anyone, which means we can't talk to anyone in a paranoid world. We're either going to have to take a leap of faith or shut ourselves off, including physically since one can demonstrate that first contact is the most vulnerable phase of communication and the one that's impossible to fully secure due to lack of prior information (I suspect a paradox can be applied to this but I can't recall any specifics—trying to use a Trent brings up the "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" problem).
I'm talking about the the DHCP connection your router makes to the ISP. If it's hijacked, it can be poisoned with bad DNS settings and so on.
You may wish to consider abandoning the Internet entirely. Chrome seems to be approaching this as well but from a different angle. Plus it's Google we're talking about. And IE means submitting to Microsoft, so you're screwed everywhere you turn.
And without an encrypted connection, how do you stop your connection (even the DHCP exchange) from being poisoned by a man in the middle? That's the kind of world we're living in today. That's why things like SSH are in place instead of telnet and rlogin.
Why not? Sometimes you gotta drag people kicking and screaming. Like with vaccines.
You can fix the caching with hashing. Request the hash first then compare with the hash of your cached copy. Easy to implement for static content (dynamic content you can't cache anyway). And as for ISP caching, screw them as they can alter those copies and produce false pages AND hashes. You want something, go to the source; it's the only way to be sure.
That won't work in a corporate setting since they typically use an HTTPS proxy, meaning they can read even your HTTPS traffic.
"The benefits of HTTP-ES would be: no broken bookmarks, lower overhead when all you need is cookie or header obfuscation, increased protection against MitM attacks and some compatibility with external cache servers."
The big drawback, as some ISPs have shown, is that even this initial handshake can be exploited to man-in-the-middle the connection BEFORE the secure phase can take place. About the only way you can prevent this is to start the connection with the key exchange and don't continue without it being complete; otherwise, that crack in the door is enough to get the proverbial foot in. IOW, don't do ANYTHING in the clear, not even a request to go secure; you MUST go secure from the get-go.
It means the stuff can't be altered in transit by an ISP or a malicious party. Think Verizon's client ID or the Chinese Cannon. Encrypted EVERYTHING is the most practical way to deal with these kinds of man-in-the-middle alterations, and a TLS-based protocol is the best option we have that's in wide use. Also, HTTPS has the big benefit that it's already in use, unlike Berners-Lee's proposal which is over 15 years old (RFC2817) and requires browser rewrites to support a protocol that doesn't exist yet (which may not be an option for old-but-still-in-use programs).
But Mozilla has a point. How do you get some stubborn sites to switch if they're not willing to take the carrot?
It may interest you to know they've been trying Berners-Lee's approach since 2000 (RFC2817), but no one's been listening.
"It would have been great for my kids to have the Wii play DVDs, rather than attach ANOTHER device to their TV. :("
But as the PS2 showed, using a gaming console to play movies tends to wear the drive out faster, and once it breaks, you can't play games OR movies.
PS. News to me on the Japanese Wiis. I'm pretty sure this was the exception, though, as Nintendo made the lack of movie playback very clear otherwise.
"Free or paid for, it's still the same version of Win 10. The only difference being you'd have a disk with the retail version, so would presumably be easier to do fresh installs."
And if what I've read is correct, even that can be dealt with if you have a burner and a blank disc (like with Win8.1, an ISO is supposed to be obtainable).
"Vulkan (glNext) is going to offer the same performance improvements as DirectX 12. It's also likely to be the more tempting development target, given that it will be freely available on every OS, including Windows 7, Linux and the Mac, fully open-source, with no Microsoft licensing or lock-in."
Perhaps, but it's not ready yet. Plus Microsoft still has the institutional momentum and is willing to directly back winners since it also sells consoles. I think if Valve and the like want to get their foot in the door, they're going to have to get MUCH more aggressive with Vulkan support in order to convince developers to code multiplat (which to this date they haven't had as much success as they would like). Even stuff you would think would be easy to port like stuff on UE4 don't get ported as much in reality.
"Well ... they use free in reference to FREEDOM."
But when you're in an environment where a word can get confused (in this case, one where a free lunch can easily be confused with free speech), then one or the other words should be changed in order to distinguish between them. Now, as it happens, there aren't too many easy contextual synonyms for free lunch (complimentary, cost-free perhaps) vs. free speech (unrestricted, unfettered), and the latter are in more common usage. So, rather than mince words, say what you mean, mean what you say, and say it so others know which way you mean it.
Trouble was "suitable" was a moving target. And given the broad spectrum of hardware it was meant to run in, trying to set a hard-and-fast specification for "suitable" was a pipe dream.
Your CDs are fine. It's DVD playback that's broken due to the MPEG-2 license issue. It's like how Wiis don't play DVDs nor did the orignal Xbox without a dongle (the dongle had the license price attached). They're physically capable but legally incapable because they don't have their licenses paid for. And since many people don't use their PCs as DVD players (why wear then out when you can use dedicated players hooked up to the TV is the noted justification--many times PC DVD drives are used for ripping, not playing), it means like a decent amount of bucks a copy Microsoft has to pay for something that doesn't get used.
""Free" has at least two meanings. One is zero cost. The other translates into French as "libre" and means "at liberty" or "not confined" or "not restricted"."
By my reckoning, the first definition (the one further up the dictionary) is "free". The second one is what I normally call "unrestricted". I've learned early on that it's very important to be very concise and precise in one's oration else one gets easily misinterpreted.
"Microsoft free is not like Linux free."
Free is free is free? Am I able to get it at no cost to me? Yes, so it's free. End of.
Ever thought they may be realizing that an App Store model may be the better way to go, a la iPhone and Android? Besides, it gives them an incentive to keep people from jumping to a Linux distro (since they now have free to counter free combined with the advantage of familiarity and better compatibility).
Well, as long as they don't nag you and you can make the icon go away once you've made your decision, then it's just a friendly by-the-way, and I don't mind that.
That said, when I ran the update check, it noted the common Broadcom Bluetooth Adapter isn't on the compatibility list as of this time. Now a deal-breaker as the checker notes, but it still raises an eyebrow as to what other types of hardware aren't going to make the cut.
"With all of the snooping technology available to the FBI, who are supposed to investigate cases of RICO as part of their actual remit, they can't find the owners/operators of scam telemarketers and shut them down (with a few notable exceptions of course)."
Aren't most of them based OUTSIDE the country?
Multiple lenses, easy to do and recommended anyway: one IR-capable (and probably ONLY IR-seeing for night vision and laser resistance), one IR-filtering. Plus drones don't have to see to steer. They can use GPS and accelerometers to fly as well. IOW, they can fly on instruments, meaning they can effectively fly blind.
As for detecting the false signals, you can't do that without at least three antennas. Most cell phones only know the strength of a tower signal; location tends to come from other sources and a fake tower can fake that info. Put it this way, anything private enterprise can do, the government can outdo because, unlike the former, they can legally go outside the limits. They can do things the private folks can't and do it in such a way as to make them indistinguishable from real stuff.
Ever thought some people CAN'T think BUT still have loving relatives? These relatives have a hard enough time trying to make him/her come around, especially if things like an intervention fizzle or even backfire. And note that if you tell them anything that portrays them in anything but a sympathetic light, you'll make YOURSELF into their enemy.
Pled not guilty then was convicted by jury. So no, crying crocodile tears now didn't help him and in fact hurt him because he now looks like the kid with his hand in the cookie jar trying to curry sympathy. If he really were sorry, he would've pled guilty from the start.
Well, Compassionate Release was how Al Capone finally got out of Alcatraz. Then again, he WAS terminally at the time, out of his mind, and barely lasted a year afterward.
"Honest question: How many times have you heard your .fav Shaman refer to it as "the books of the bible" (plural), as opposed to "the holy book" (singular)."
That's nothing new. People normally refer to anthologies (which the Bible essentially is) in the singular even today. Only when multiple specific books are referenced to we switch to the plural (such as in "The Gospels").
It could be either, as it's a corruption. It could be a corruption of "biblion" (singular) or "biblia" (plural), unless you can show the specific etymology that can rule out "biblion".
If you can rewrite the EFI firmware and bypass the signature check, you can install your own checks to make it nigh-impossible to remove, meaning you either go about with a pwned machine or consign it as a brick. As for checking the hardware, the thing about a low-level hack is that it's low enough to lie to the OS unless the OS itself can go straight to the metal.
The editions being priced as of now are enterprise versions not eligible for the free upgrade.
Whatever happened to MNG and ANG? Why are we sticking around with a patent-encumbered format that only supports 256 colors?
"I'm not saying get rid of it, or censor it, just that humanity needs better education on this topic."
And if people don't WANT to learn? That trying to drag them kicking and screaming will bring their buddies and start a riot?
But can it be done at the same power levels? That's always been the 6-billion-human question. Because last I checked, very few are going to volunteer to be culled just because the cleanest tech available only provides 10% the power of today.
But the age-old trust issue has a caveat. You have to trust someone at some point. If you go into full DTA mode, you've basically isolated yourself.
Furthermore, that phrase "And there was evening and there was morning, the first day." reinforces the Hebrew tradition that days don't start at sunup but sundown since night came before day.
I've been trying to find a specific episode of a TV show. It's no longer on the air. It's not on disc. It's not available through any download sites, black or gray. No torrents, no P2P sources. The ONLY sources I've found CHARGE for the privilege, and they're ALL DRM'd. So far, I've resisted the temptation and have simply gone without for now because I won't take it with strings attached, but it highlights the fact that, for some people, it really is a Take It Or Leave It proposition.
And if none exists (trust me, I speak from experience)?
It's an interesting thought, yes, but the capacities are just too small to be practical at this point. BluRay has fallen behind the times which is why I'm eyeing Archival Disc with some anticipation. Not only are the disc sizes closer to what's needed for large consumer backups in the terabyte range, but they're designed for "cold" storage.