Re: We are already there
Didn't the Taliban of Afghanistan commit acts of atrocity BEFORE we came storming in, though?
6882 posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
Didn't the Taliban of Afghanistan commit acts of atrocity BEFORE we came storming in, though?
Not quite because many jobs require physical presence. How do you offshore a construction job, for example? And offshoring a manufacturing job entails additional costs for transportation and perhaps tariffs and other customs fees.
And if there's NO ONE there who can do the job, and it's not the kind of job you can do on-the-spot training for?
"If you can't handle it then you shouldn't get the badge."
But you said yourself some people have no alternatives. For many, this is the ONLY way to stay on the right side of the law. Otherwise, as you've said, they'll have no choice but to go to the OTHER side.
"Is it appropriate to draw a gun, if they have a taser or baton at their disposal?"
The problem with your idea is that a policeman has to work with incomplete information. Sure the suspect may have a less-lethal weapon, but if the suspect is skilled with it (or is simply a highly-skilled brawler who can operate unarmed), you find that a gun is not always effective even then as skilled assailants know how to dart and weave to throw off an aim, all the while closing distance quite quickly and taking the fight hand to hand where the gun is less effective. And if the suspect is better than the cop at close quarters, the gun can be turned against the cop, as has happened so many times, usually with fatal consequences not just for the original owner but anyone else who comes along since the suspect can always ambush. Plus there is a pervasive gang presence in America, probably worse than anywhere else in the Western world. We're talking a world where some people's reactions to a cop is to shoot first and forget about the questions. If you were a cop in such a "Sword of Damocles" environment, wouldn't you be at least a little overprotective since you don't want your fellow cops to be the one to tell your widow in the morning.
PS. In some parts of Latin America, there are less gangs and more paramilitary outfits, and these kinds of organizations DO take the fight to the cops. Police stations HAVE been bombed in the past. The US probably doesn't want things to escalate to that level.
Given the natural human tendency to try to weasel their way to an advantage, especially when already disadvantaged, I'd give it at least 50/50.
"Though the question is where should you end the recording of people."
Simple. Any person in a position of elevated trust in regards to society. That is, anyone whose job necessarily gives them power over their part of society. Police have this power because they enforce laws. Medicos have this power because of their knowledge of the human body and their necessary power to act in an emergency. Similar with firefighters who may need to damage property in the performance of their duties.
Frankly, all government facilities (or at least all official chambers) need to be taped while in session. And I also have to question whether a government really absolutely MUST have some degree of secrecy. I suspect there is for the fact that the mere existence of public knowledge of something could instantly jeopardize its very existence. Still, it should be absolutely minimized since, while so important, it's also so easy to abuse.
"When small Cop Cameras were first invented, police actively desired them to 'protect them from false complaints'. It only took about two years for the police to realize that the video evidence was indicting their own. Perhaps not often, but very seriously on occasion."
So they lose either way. Having cams incriminates crooked cops while not having them leaves them open to staged claims like the guy who beats himself up when no one's looking and then claims police brutality, lying while the whole anti-cop block swears by it.
Look, it comes with the territory. This is one thing the cops can't win because haters gonna hate. Some people are culturally conditioned to be anti-authroitarian and you can't fix that at this time since the causes for that are longer-term with no easy fix available.
Trouble with that statement is that people can't physically have a state of morale while they're unconscious. Meaning at some point, in order to have a morale to improve, you have to wait for someone to wake up.
Actually, no. Once you take up a martial role in society (martial in this case meaning you have the capacity to act with force to defend it), your status changes. You're no longer a civilian because you've taken up arms in an official capacity (that's why military and civilians are considered mutually exclusive--police as law enforcers are the former rather than the latter). As Vimes himself once said, that badge doesn't come off even when you're off duty. Anyway, martial power carries intrinsic power (including the ability to influence anything with the power to restrain them), and with it comes intrinsic responsibility.
Only if you can achieve the same thing in reverse and not crush it or its contents.
There's also the matter of their physical dimension (long and oblong) which makes transporting them along an enclosed tube very difficult. Plus cargo transport usually doesn't have a middle ground. If time is important, you normally just fly it. Otherwise, you can be patient which means it's easier just to haul it by freight train which is open-air (so easy to load and unload), well-developed, and already with an existing infrastructure and support system to handle it all: no additional expenditure needed.
(Nods) Especially in the places where new transport is needed the most: big cities. By default, these places are already considerably built up so it poses a real problem regarding transportation: trying to cram the 13th egg in a carton only made for 12. Plus Americans attitude toward trains is mixed, particularly regarding arbitrary transportation needs (which can only be met with a personal car).
" They're currently building a bonkers maglev between Tokyo and Nagoya, and eventually Osaka (Kyoto aren't happy at being missed out),"
I strongly suspect the reason for this connection is due to the fact the route connects quite a few of the major airports in Honshu: Haneda, Narita, Nagoya Centrair, and eventually Kansai. Such a route would also likely put Kobe within reach. Kyoto can complain, but they don't have nearly as much pull.
And regarding intermodal transport, trains have optimized themselves considerably over the last two decades. One of the big changes was the well car which let trains carry two standard transport containers per car (and here's the beauty: with a powerful enough locomotive, you can pull hundreds of these cars; I routinely see freight trains pulling nearly 200 cars at a time, though in my neck of the woods they're mostly ore cars). Combined with improved rail-line communications to track trains and cars and optimization at transfer points, they can easily beat trucks in land transport efficiency under many different scenarios.
I think I get it. The speed of sound IS affected by density (which is why it travels faster in liquid and faster still through a solid), but in a gas this is perfectly counterbalanced by an inverse correlation regarding gas pressure (meaning it slows as the pressure rises). Keeping temperature constant, raising density also raises pressure and the reverse, and the two factors cancel each other out.
Now, under normal circumstances, evacuating a chamber will pull heat out of it, making it colder, so taking temperature into consideration, pulling a partial vacuum would lower the speed of sound, though not by a tremendous amount given we normally hover near 300K anyway and the partial vacuum isn't likely to drop that by more than 10-15% under practical conditions.
"How much for the land and 'right of way'?"
I believe the plan is to build this over I-5 and other lands already owned by the government, minimizing right-of-way costs.
"If I have to spend more money on an appliance I want it spent on reliability and increased life."
But that's bad for business. No repeat pull. There's no profit in a one-and-done.
I don't know about the AC's, but mine is dead serious. Security has a necessary cost, yet it's tough to meet those costs when you're running on a lowest-bidder system.
And yes, we have a clear-cut example of an industry incapable of controlling itself. In a desperate search for something to make itself unique, they're deviating from the job at hand. It's basically a sign the industry is pretty much fully mature and out of new ideas barring some game-changer. At this point, you're right, it's kinda a no-win situation. In capitalism, steady isn't sexy, yet the only instrument capable of reining them in is government regulation proven prone to corruption and therefore untrustworthy. The status quo is bad, but no one trusts any solutions put forth. It makes me feel we're already in the handbasket and just waiting for the lid to come down and the descent to begin.
"When all else fails, a nice charcoal grill works fine."
OK, now try doing it on the same budget as the unit that just sets up a couple dials and is done with it.
Ultimately, what may be needed is a law that declares extraneous functions as "unfit for purpose" and force manufacturers into the KISS principle for the sake of safety. Do what you're designed to do and no more than that. If it requires more than a power cord, it's doing too much unless it's an actual network unit like a switch.
Which is not an option because of budget constraints and the demand for better AND cheaper no matter what. So what now?
"Whatever happened to focus groups and user testing?"
Inherent bias. The only way to get real-world data on something is to actually use the damn thing in the real world under real-world conditions, which includes not being forced to log every niggling little detail (the very act of logging introduces bias).
I'm reminded of a part from Thief of Time in which Lu Tze points out that practicing for an emergency is never enough because one thing's always missing: an actual emergency.
"WHY is two-factor authentication not being used for something like this?"
Because of stupid. WoW players tend to be a technically-savvy lot so dongles are OK with them. Whereas Gran may not be down with this, could be confused with technology, yet banks have to cater to the least common multiple (particularly those with bad memories and no second factor to work with).
So what. So does a paper receipt. The thing is that a signature in and of itself is useless against a skilled forger.
"Whilst flawed, the chip and pin system does actually provide some level of extra security."
Not really when the hackers are already targeting the BANKS. Crims are smart enough to just look for points necessarily OUTSIDE the security envelope.
"Well Charles, how come Apple manage to keep OSX computers up to date and functioning without at the same time pissing off their user base?"
Simple. Apple controls the HARDWARE. That means Apple has known targets. Microsoft doesn't have that option because the PC market matured differently. Part of Microsoft's problem is because of that there are more combinations than days in a decade. There's no way to take every possibility into consideration, yet low-tech users expect perfection every time no matter how unrealistic this is.
"Are you going to stop me from coming back?"
I won't, but Microsoft may demand a toll first. Remember's time's running out on Microsoft's carrot.
"You seem to have a somewhat unhealthy attachment to a particular OS. Try being pragmatic instead, so you might actually see what is wrong with what. Did you even try to get to know the alternatives?"
Actually, I have, firsthand. THEY ALL STANK! Try running Fallout 4, for example. Bethesda has basically sworn off Linux, so it seems Valve's efforts to convince mainstream developers to code for Linux is falling way short. The only alternative is an expensive, underspecced console.
So I'm not a silly fanboy. I'm a cornered rat looking for somewhere to escape or someone to bite.
"How much hacking should anyone have to do to his OWN system just to make it behave in a reasonable way? Oh, I forgot, it's not my own PC any more. Updates are scheduled for me now. I'm just a dumb luser."
The problem with your last statement is that, 9 times out of 10, that is absolutely true. The average user treats a computer more like a car than a sensitive system that needs TLC. As far as they're concerned, maintenance is something for other people. They just want it to get their work done tootsweet. So things like updates and so on are completely over their heads, but if Microsoft doesn't handhold them, their machines get pwned and they get the blame for it for not taking stupid into consideration. That's the thing you have to realize: you're the exception. Microsoft has no choice but to swim in the Sea of Stupid because that's where most of their potential customer base is going to be, and they're sure as hell not going to just give it up to Apple. Sure, Enterprise customers mean big bucks, but they have leverage and options meaning they can come and go; Microsoft needs something steadier, so here we are. If you want to abandon Microsoft, feel free, but then don't come crawling back because 90% of the software people want to run isn't available elsewhere (games in particular).
Sure, you can WRITE it, but good luck getting them to SIGN it. It all depends on who has more leverage: who needs whom more? As for the server room, not everything has to be there. Access points, for example, need to be centrally located to cover maximum area. And clubs can have some clever people in their ranks, so they may contrive ways to maximize their leverage.
But those higher-priced spots can mean more lucrative rewards since they're the ones that go to popular mainstream sites, meaning a big drive-by opportunity. Well-heeled criminal networks may find the price worth it given the stakes.
As for curation, the system's like modern stock trading: too fast for a human to curate. Speed sells in this case.
Even ones with internal ads?
PS, I'm not just talking about any old ads, I'm talking the ones where you click anywhere on the site, and it uses the click to allow those huge popup ads. Those are the more likely to have malware in them. Plus consider which ad networks the different sites are using. I doubt Fortune would enlist an ad network that sells ads for dodgy sexual promiscuity products and so on.
This may be a bona fide block in this case. Increasingly, TPB and its mirrors have been plagued with third-party ads, including ones potentially of a hijackable variety.
Put it this way. A concept of "no ownership" is indefensible because anything that ISN'T owned WILL be owned eventually: by force if necessary.
Because it's a TRUE dichotomy in our way of thinking. If it's not owned by someONE or someTHING, it WILL have an owner soon. It's in fact ownership that allows for protection of property by various laws.
That's why you never use a Class A (water-based) fire extinguisher on a fat fire: because oil (fat) and water don't mix, so the water has no effect on the fat and in fact can allow it to spread. Theoretically, adding a surfactant like soap will allow the water to interact with the fat, but the surfactant could itself be flammable or otherwise bad news in a fire. You have to smother a fat fire to get it out safely, which is why you either put a lid on it (asphyxiating it) or use Class B (foam) or Class C (chamical) extinguishers.
No, what would really happen is that all four of your tires would blow out at once and the portal in question would catch flame. Brakegod will snigger again and coyly say, "Feel free to TRY."
That's the thing about Gods. They tend to hold the trump cards.
Most TV shows only provide 30 seconds for an open, so no it usually isn't worth it, though some shows manage to come up with catchy stuff even with the tight time limit.
"Or WD40, for the same reason (it's fish oil)"
Really? So someone has taken a chemical analyzer to WD40, broken it down into its constituent oils (of which I believe there are six) and managed to identify them one by one and found fish oil to be one of them? I'd love to read the article that describes this in detail.
"Let me guess... the majority of the people who expect Apple/Google to maintain their applications are the same ones who backed Apple against the FBI. Being ignorant and lazy is no way to get through life!"
For some, it's the ONLY way to go through life. Any other way is a one-way ticket to insanity or murderous rampage, with potential consequences for you and everyone else since no one lives in complete isolation.
It also raises the risk of "verification fatigue" (like click fatigue).
But what about the apps already in there? Couldn't they be hijacked by a malicious update?
Nope. They could have an iPhone and not realize it's Internet-connected. People can buy an iPhone because everyone else has one, but what do they use it for? To make phone calls, maybe do texts, PERIOD. And yes, I see these kinds of people every day of my life (usually the older generation), so I know they're out there. These are the kinds of innocents I talk about: those who get devices not knowing any better and not in a position to learn. To do as you say is to go all Darwin on them, which like I said isn't considered very civilized behavior.
"What of them indeed.
A revolutionary concept I know.. But how about..
They do the right thing, or.. They face the consequences.
Actions have consequences.
So do inactions."
The thing with INaction, though, is that sometimes inaction is because they lack the knowledge to make a proper judgment. You could essentially be condemning people for something that is truly no fault of their own other than ignorance. That's frankly a very cold and uncivilized view of the world that's destined to doom innocents.
"I would - better that they learn something from their mistakes than live in ignorance. Hell never mind their mistakes, better just that they learn something."
And if they're not in a position to learn?
"I am so sick of OS and device vendors thinking they know best. Let me make my own decisions and go to Hell in my own way."
And what of the myriad who outnumber you and don't know better? Would you condemn them to join you in your handbasket?
What about a saboteur from within? Remember, STATE-level actors, few things off the table.
So what happens when your critical live system has an in-the-wild exploit and therefore MUST be updated (due to say legal compliance) yet you're told that you CAN'T update it because it cannot be shut down under any circumstances? Now you're caught between Scylla and Charybdis because you're going to be in trouble either way: either you lose compliant because your system's unsafe and prone to sabotage or you break your uptime requirement.
How does that help Microsoft when the normal routine for this kind of world is "buy once, run anywhere," meaning any Android app I buy I can re-download to another Android device and it'll work no problem?
"That's why we need a new system, the old one has broken (assuming it was ever not-broken)."
Only one problem. EVERY OTHER SYSTEM out there's just as bad if not worse when it comes to controlling the instinctive human potential for corruption. As long as a human's involved, ANY system can be corrupted. We can't even turn it over to machines because at some point along the way, a human has to make the machine.
Put another way, how can you possibly build a rock-solid foundation on which to build the world when all you have to work with is sand (as in not even water, just sand)?
You should see a modern digital filming session which not only uses at least 6K resolutions with high color gamut but also sometimes film above 48fps AND have to minimize the compression due to the need to minimize generation artifacts during digital editing (if they're allowed to use any at all). So you have the need for high throughput, high capacity, AND high churn all at the same time. From what I hear, the need for high everything basically restricts them to very expensive,very specialized equipment, and forget about transmitting this stuff over even dedicated fiber. Most of the time, a courier with a hard drive is both cheaper and faster for transport during the production stage.