More chunks, but spread over a wider area, so it's "bigger" and therefore spread out over a wider area.
Also, a lot of the gas that formed the outgassing was probably lost in the break-up (and caused it).
3783 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
Don't know what to tell you:
https://www.androidpolice.com/2020/04/23/ethernet-tethering-arrives-in-latest-android-11-developer-preview/
"To be clear, Android devices have supported connecting to wired networks over Ethernet for years, but now an Android device can serve as the host network as well. The option is greyed out until you plug in a USB Ethernet adapter."
It's that. An old TV with only ethernet connectivity wouldn't work with a tethered phone over USB (if it even had one previously), whereas now you can plug in a USB-C dock (that often has an ethernet port on it) and wire that to the old TV's ethernet port. That part wasn't possible before.
I was just going to say the same. Non-astronomers and astronomers alike enjoy the sight of the ISS going overhead - even capturing pictures of its transit across the sun/moon etc. Iridium flares are cool to observe as well.
But would it be as exciting and fun if that was all we could see, filling the sky? Again - a middle ground required. I'm sure the early days of aviation it was a thrill to see an aeroplane overhead - today living near Heathrow or similar can't be much fun.
https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/02/26/two-commercial-satellites-link-up-in-space-for-first-time/
has much more details. It has a CGI video demonstrating the approach and capture. Even has images of the actual capture beamed back from MEV-1. But yeah, the engine bell.
Impressively, the 5 year thing is just a contract agreement. At the end of the 5 years, MEV-1 can go and capture another dud satellite and keep that one going instead (it's engines are electronic and powered by solar panels potentially indefinitely)
What blows me away is the ability to deduct what happened after the fact, when all the physical evidence was inaccessible - the problems were all in the service module, which gets ditched as soon as they're back in earth's orbit and subsequently burns up in the atmosphere.
Incredible science just to figure all that out.
"Strange world: Arresting and possibly jailing people for not locking themselves away... Given that police are ones at high-risk of being infected, and that jails are highly likely to be large establishments filled with infected and sick people very soon...."
Another way to think of it.
Strange world. People would rather run the risk of being arrested and jailed into a high risk environment, than staying safe at home.
"One can't be too surprised that most of the population are busily trying to lay in 2 weeks worth of food at home; they've been told to do it!"
It's worse than that. The extra week's worth of supplies represents a double of demand on the supermarkets on paper - their supply chains just aren't geared up for that, hence the shelves being empty. My favourite comments have been along the lines of "bl00dy panic buyers! I'm just buying an extra packet of pasta and paracetamol" - well quite, and if everyone is doing that, shelves will be empty in no time.
On top of this, it's estimated 1/3 of the UK consumption of meals come from restaurants, cafes, takeaways, pubs etc. We've been recommended to avoid this. So that's a 50% increase in home food supplies that come from.. the supermarkets.
Then we add in all the people working from home and now the schools closing. That increases the levels of food and sundries required in the household. It's probably fair to say that around 30% of (say) bog roll usage occurs at work or school - so that's another 50% increase of required in the house.
And that's without the people who are gearing up to self-isolate for 12 weeks and don't necessarily have the support network in place to have people do shopping for them.
The measures in place have, at best guess, led to a tripling of shopping demands by consumers.
"Mercury, the closest planet to the Sun"
Mercury is also, currently, the closest planet to Earth. Strangely, on average it's the closest planet to Earth (about 45% of the time) with the rest of the time split between Mars and Venus.
It's also (on average again), the closest planet to all other planets in the solar system, which still blows my mind.
"I thought the advice was to self-isolate when you got the symptoms"
As of Thursday that's the updated advice. Prior to that (when this guy felt unwell) it was only if you'd come into contact with a confirmed case. From what I can tell, he did more than government advice by virtue of being rich and getting access to a private test.
Yeah think everyone's got a "I remember when memory/storage was..." story depending on age. Mine is from mid-90s, wanting an additional 8MB (across two sticks, as they were SIMMS) to take the family machine from 16 to 24 to enable Quake 2 to run in 3DFX mode - around £100 I think.
Similarly wanting a new HDD around the same time - 4GB for near £150. Still got it for nostalgic purposes.
"You'd have to mine it from space, because it would never survive the atmospheric entry. Oh well!"
The whole point of this exercise is to use the space shuttle or similar. It's cargo bay was plenty big enough to hold the platinum moon (the moon is only 3m in diameter), but you're right it may well be a bit of a strain on the landing gear.
I considered that, but as part of my “research” (loose sense of the word) I discovered we mine almost 200 tonnes of platinum a year, so probably not as big an adjustment as you might think. I was particularly surprised by that.
I suppose the other thing to consider is the cost of mining that on earth as a comparison to a shuttle-esque mission. Hard to put a number on it, but some stories suggest platinum mining is barely breaking even at the moment, so maybe the space shuttle to the non-existant platinum moon might be worth considering.
"Commercially viable minerals" is probably the wrong one to measure.
Let's assume it's 3m in diameter and roughly spherical. This would make it 14.14m^3. Let's pretend it's made of pure platinum. This would make it around 300 tonnes of the stuff apparently. Worth of that is around $9bn. Average cost of a space shuttle mission was around $1.5bn.
I guess the problems with this are:
* It's orbiting way higher than the shuttle's range
* The shuttle or anything like it doesn't exist anymore
* It's almost certainly made of a less valuable material than platinum :D
"Space rocks visiting Earth like this are rare. Described as mini-moons, the only other time that one graced our planet (that we know about) was in 2006. A tiny asteroid, measuring a couple of meters in diameter and known as 2006 RH120 was also discovered by folks working at the Catalina Sky Survey."
Presumably it's ruddy hard to spot them though, particularly given they don't stay for long, so do we know how rare or not it is?
"I find I am constantly taking control to deal with situations"
And this is the problem demonstrated in one sentence - there is never a point in the car where you are *not* in control, regardless of the driver aids that are in effect.
This isn't a dig at you, it's likely just a turn of phrase, but it is very much the view of a lot of people.
Yeah I'd echo that - a lot of the French off-lane's are terrifyingly short, meaning you have to brake on the 'autoroute' to make it, or brake very heavily in a very short space on the off-lane.
British roads have a lot of improvement left in them, but their approach to exiting and entering motorways (and major dual carriageways) is superb.
You could also just watch the sun disappear below the horizon while in the UK, then Skype your friend in LA and ponder why it's still visible in the sky where they are. If I hold a light over a dinner plate, there's no way I make it only visible on one part of the plate. If I make it a beam of light and move it around the plate, I can't make it seem to disappear over the horizon.
"Why would there be an extradition warrant when he was holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London while being sought for an extradition warrant to Sweden where the UK courts would have been reluctant to send him to Sweden if there was an existing US warrant that the Swedes would act upon where the death penalty could apply?"
Jeez, not this logical contortion again. An extradition request could have been served to the UK while he was in custody before he absconded. The UK would have had to hold an extradition hearing (like they're doing now) or send him to Sweden. If the US had served an extradition request to Sweden while he was in the UK, the same thing would have applied (but more likely Sweden would have correctly answered, he's not here, you morons).
If an extradition request was served on Sweden *after* he'd been sent there by the UK, then *Sweden* would have held a hearing (incidentally, they're less compliant with the US than the UK are on extradition) but the UK would also have to hold one as a consequence. In this scenario, *both* the UK and Sweden would have to agree to extradite.
"The US, under Obama, were not going to make an extradition request until he was in Swedish custody"
Again, entirely illogical - it was easier to extradite from the UK than it is from Sweden, even without considering that in the latter scenario, both countries would have had to agree to onwardly extradite from Sweden.
"more importantly, Obama's administration tortured Bradley/Chelsea Manning with the intent of getting evidence that Assange/wikileaks actively encouraged and abetted Manning to access, export and pass on confidential information."
I think you mean, more importantly, Obama did the only thing he could to intervene - he pardoned Chelsea Manning. I also don't think there's any question that's exactly what Assange did. The pertinent question seems to be, are those the actions of a journalist? The US thinks yes, the world seems to be split along the lines of whether they think Assange is a colossal tool or not.
An odd story - seemingly positive spin on the (surprising?) news that repairing a smart watch is possible, but following up with the news that it's not as repairable as the market leader.
So really, the story is "new smart watch not as repairable as smart watch from company renowned for not being easily repairable" - I'd say that was a bad thing, no?