Re: @jeebus
Oh dear - pot, kettle and all that.
He does have a point, which is why I think it's a bit early to tell if Apple is no longer Apple. The first thing that happens after you take over from a control freak is that you discover the bits he/she/it (to keep it generic) has been shoving under the carpet because it didn't agree with their "vision". The predecessor has to first remove those bumps from under the carpet, and in such a way that it does not diminish the past glorious leader or the shareholders do a runner (it's not like they're not nervous already - the stupid ones still think they "missed out" on Facebook)..
First job (pardon the pun) is to keep the ship going, the *next* time is when I expect to get an idea where the new captain is taking the company. That's the point where you can judge if the company has a future, or becomes a slow leaking version of the Titanic (i.e. becomes Microsoft under Ballmer).
IMHO it's still too early. Steve's ghost is still lingering, which will not be helping as everything Apple will do will still be somehow attributed to Jobs, for or against. It needs to lose that shadow. The problem is that it may need to lose the shadow, but show new strength in vision. Not quite sure Apple has that yet. As I said, too early.