split -b10M –additional-suffix=.jpg
365 posts • joined 4 Sep 2006
Get Apple to build it. Taking the thing apart will be impossible.
Ice works because it changes phase. Rocks don't.
A cleverer idea would be 92% filling the inside of a hollow metal (e.g. silver) sphere with water and leaving the rest as vacuum to deal with the expansion. Then you'd have high conductivity, phase change and no dilution. Maybe use an internal matrix structure to help conductivity and add strength, allowing the walls to be thinner.
It's so obvious that I assume someone's done it already and probably patented it.
I'm confused, perhaps the coffee hasn't kicked in yet.
In your Forbes contribution from April...
...you advocate land taxes but not "wealth" taxes. Land is a form of capital, capital is a form of wealth. Income and capital are fungible (since one can extract income from capital appreciation and invest income in new capital).
From my reading (I haven't finished CI21C, obviously) Piketty's most stimulating point is that capital/wealth concentrates until war destroys it. If we want to create a society without war we must find other ways to constantly redistribute capital/wealth or else bad things.
In most of the commentary about CI21C, commentators/ards mix labour income with wealth/return on wealth. Piketty seems mostly relaxed about unequal returns on labour (e.g. nurses vs seven figure bankers). It's not about our salaries, it's about our stuff.
"The reason that paracetamol is prescribed is because it tends not to conflict with other things you're taking."
That's one reason. Another is that's it's fairly benign on the GI system compared to the alternatives.
Or wear gloves.
"It sounds like heaven and should be a piece of piss. It is basically a driver-less taxi that I lease (so much cheaper) and I don't have to engage in small-talk with"
ftalphaville have covered this extensively. The idea is that (for urban use cases at least) you don't need to own one at all, and it can run on leccy for various reasons, e.g. long charging time inconveniences no-one, it just lowers utilisation; batteries do better when being regularly and precisely cycled; replacing and re-processing batteries is easier to manage if you own a fleet.
Using trains for longer distances also becomes more convenient if you can rely on cheap Johnnycabs at the destination.
If anyone should be concerned it's taxi drivers.
I'm fairly sure the mid-2013 13" MBA had a PCIe SSD.
I live in Dublin (IE) where there are no Apple stores.
I recently busted my Retina MBP screen and had it repaired FOC by one "authorised service centre" in less than 48 hours (they needed to order a part) - dropped it in late on Sunday and got the call on Tues afternoon. Another branch of the same company (city centre) wanted it for "up to five days" to assess due to backlog and didn't seem to care what I did in the meantime. So speed and attitude vary.
TBH with the amount I've spent on Apple gear (lots) I should expect 24 hour on-site repair or replace, but I don't think it's an option so we just keep old kit around a bit longer as spares.
Regarding the iFixit stuff, whatever. Once you've sold your soul to the devil there's no asking for a refund.
I have a 2008 Citroen C5. It has the most confusing, distracting and down right obstructive button-based UI imaginable.
Any attempt to locate and use the horn or hazard light buttons whilst driving are most likely to cause an accident. I suspect infiltration by Nokia engineers.
Fortunately the car mostly lives in the garage having expensive work done on leaky struts, pollution control systems, the dual mass flywheel, air con, remote tyre pressure sensors...
No, I'm not suggesting that. Let me try a different tack.
In the 1940s we had Alan Turing and Colossus.
Seventy years later we have Steve Ballmer and Sharepoint.
Maybe this is a PSYOPs campaign designed to breed overconfidence in their enemies.
...is that our Matrix/Minority Report-style tech fantasies are brought down by the crushing realisation that twelve years after 2001 the spooks are using the same annoying point-and-click shite inflicted on the rest of us.
I haven't felt this demoralised since that woeful "THIS IS A UNIX SYSTEM" 3D file explorer in Jurassic Park.
Green screens, 3D gesture recognition or GTFO.
My 2010 Air has 87% capacity 5839mAh vs 6700mAh, as reported by the Battery Health app.
This is a machine that has been used for three years with a casual disregard for correct charging protocol (whatever that is) by several people.
I agree that 1400x900 is just a *little* low res for 13". I also don't understand why my 13" screen sits inside a lid with a 15" diagonal. I want less bezel and more pixels.
I realise there are all kinds of ways this is different, but the idea of one juggernaut of a company developing operating systems, browser engines, scripting languages and applications makes me nervous.
Sure, it's mostly free-as-in-beer, do no evil etc, and somewhat constrained by standards and licences for now, but it still smells bad.
Tell me I'm wrong.
I think you have to ship Steve Ballmer in for a proper song and dance.
Apple just do a long, dull, slideshow that some people make a fuss out of.
New MBAs with Haswell, better battery life and 802.11ac. Available "now".
New Mac Pro with PCIe flash, Thunderbolt 2, dual GPUs, 4k video support and added roundness. Available not yet.
Mega yacht + Nazi ICBM* technology = evil dictator.
* for small values of C.
From the end user perspective, Android is more like desktop Linux would be if Windows suddenly ceased to exist.
Android and iOS represent starkly different world views. Let the market decide, it's all good. Well, apart from the evil stuff.
"$400 a share is still a lot of money"
The shares are $400 because Apple rarely does stock splits (three times since 1980 AFAIK). It doesn't mean much in isolation.
Apple is funding the "capital return program" using debt because it doesn't want to pay tax on repatriated profits.
I wouldn't pay a fund manager either, FWIW.
On topic: Apple is a massive cash generator. Nobody knows if they can sustain it.
Good luck with that.
It's like they rifled through the iPhone spec sheet and picked the worst features to copy.
I think the wider issue is that all smartphone and tablet makers are struggling to develop anything genuinely game-changing at the hardware and OS level, as evidenced by the fuss about phablets being the next greatest thing (really?).
Perhaps that's a positive sign of maturity and stability. The online world still hasn't totally adjusted to the death of the Windows-PC-as-primary-computing device yet. Many websites still don't work very well in a mobile browser, and there are banks (and the Irish revenue service) that still require Java to log in.
There have been many dead-ends in consumer electronics (my attic-crap-boxes are full of things like folding Palm keyboards and Xbox 360 HD-DVD players) but it seems like touch-based smartphones and tablets are here to stay.
Thumbs up for long-lived devices* and incremental improvement.
* unless your battery is glued
Sometimes I wonder whether Facebook is an elaborate ruse to make Google shares look good value.
Ah, the "how hard can it be?" fallacy.
I volunteer to conduct free brain surgery on this idiot, and I will accept any number of flowcharts to assist me in the procedure.
...Facebook appear to have blown somewhere in the order of their entire profits on employee stock options.
Dividends, they've heard of them.
Putting aside the historical meaning of torture-based cattle identification, "brand" is an entirely synthetic marketing concept developed by professional liars which deliberately separates meaningful things (products and companies) from each other.
A "brand" is essentially a substrate for growing lies, and every time a marketing droid uses the word God kills a kitten.
How anyone can trust a "brand" I have no idea.
I wonder whether CompSci might be easier to teach kids than software engineering or whatever, in the same way that F=ma is easier to teach than building a rocket.
I'd really rather see a physical Turing machine in the classroom than a Raspberry Pi.
This, for instance, is all kinds of cool....
tldr version: you're doing it wrong.
Spring is a large framework and provides many nooses with which to hang yourself.
Taking one small part of your rant, the ORM bit, there are several programming models for querying within Spring/Hibernate, including Criteria queries, HQL, pure native SQL, and a sort of HQL-SQL hybrid which allows you to use entity syntax within an SQL query. Each of them has strengths and weaknesses.
Looked it up on Wikipedia. Want.
This is not a recent development.
Q: Are you a benny tied to a tree?
Y -> Hah! You're a benny!
N -> Hah! Benny on the loose!
British secondary school, circa 1980.
I must have missed the golden era of schoolboy tolerance and respect for diversity that Diane harks back to.
"ROS makes extensive use of Java applets in order to keep your data secure."
Oh, the irony.
....would turn Ghandi into a chair-throwing Ballmerite.
(in fairness I haven't used it for a few years, perhaps it's better now)
It's a proof of concept, not a complete app. They haven't attempted to implement the whole of Facebook.
Whilst I don't buy into their central claim that HTML5 is currently in a fit state to supplant native apps (just check out the recommended Android version), it's nice that they've gone to all this trouble to crawl along the bleeding edge and document (albeit subjectively) their findings. The code is open to inspection, at least on the client side.
The login screen hung (infinite spinner) on the HTC One X we have here in the office, but worked fine on the older Moto Defy+. YMMV.
The bottom doesn't move because it's being held in place by spring tension, which is only released when the adjacent coils collapse.
Nice slo-mo though.
Unlabelled Y axis which doesn't start at zero.
Kill it with fire.
If software patents were a socially/economically useful thing then companies which exist solely to fully exploit those patents could not be a bad thing.
To kill the software patent troll we must kill software patents. All of them. Or at least match the patent lifespan to the speed of technology development so that all obvious crap will permanently expire within a handful of years.
I don't buy the story pedaled by Google et al that they're just victims of a broken system forced to fight against their will.
Whether it's "shameful" or not rather depends on how low is "low", no?
FWIW there are some environmental ratings for the finished product here:
...is presumably manufacturing-speak for "we have to chuck most of them in the bin".
Can't be very environmentally sound. Out of sight...
...when you give birth to Magneto.
I thought he leaked a load of low-grade junk that hundreds of thousands of people had access to?
Ho ho, very good.
I guess Raiders of the Lost Ark should now be retitled for YouTube "Ark Of The Covenant unboxing FAIL!".
My point was that the software engineering profession seems to have accepted that having a codebase that can be automatically proven to be no less broken than it was X days/weeks/months ago leads to a lower rate of defects AND greater development velocity, both initially and on a sustainable basis, therefore allowing the alpha finance types to trade, snort coke, shit on each others' desks or whatever else they do to earn their bonuses.
If there's some other approach that Excel hackers use to achieve the same pleasant outcomes, so be it.
"Furthermore, the design and coding of a Java system is always significantly more involved than relatively simple Excel scripting"
Including the tests, right? You do have tests for your spreadsheet? Or do you prove it works by drinking Red Bull and thinking really hard?
...awaits the downvotes as a legion of Register spreadsheet programmers educate me about how to write unit tests for spreadsheets :-)