Re: THANK YOU APPLE!
Is that your summer holidays or Christmas?
607 posts • joined 21 Mar 2009
Is that your summer holidays or Christmas?
What's the Cockney Rhyming Slang translation for Merchant Banker?
IE doesn't allow third-party cookies in IFRAMEs. This is Microsoft's solution to security; disallow cookies by default.
(BTW the P3P doesn't always work so you need to implement other solutions for session management if you really have to use this)
Well said. Good summary and very much the approach I take.
AFAIK the Google Analytics cookies are fine. I'm not at all bothered by this as everyone uses them so the information commissioner's hardly going to pick off one site for that.
Also, don't forget that HTML5 allows local storage of name=value pairs and also local databases. I'm sure these also apply in the same way as cookies (which aren't mentioned in the legal text?).
Farsebook copying someone else's work and ideas and branding it as their own.
Here little children, sweeties...
People -- lots of people -- are dying and you're whinging about a little mistake with a graphic.
It's not a video game; death is forever.
Oooh, me please - I'm one of your 900,000,000 special friends who use FB every day.
Special friend. Like me. Be my special friend.
[I can't get the sound of the Inbetweeners out of my head!]
I'm sure Paris would have one. Ooh err
Just about every, no, lets restate that, every Sony telly I've used has a dire User Interface. Simple things like being able to change screen resolution at the click of ONE remote button is absent. Same with simple picture-in-menu channel choices.
So the picture's OK. Ermm, that's what one expects. Lots of inputs; again, it's expected. 3D, OK, I'll pass on that (as have most consumers thus far).
The optional extras are the User Interface and this is where Sony have been dire.
So unless that's improved -- and the remote control -- then why bother with a Sony?
It's pretty obvious why: they studied jernolizm cos they can't do science.
His parents were prophetic in calling him Bob
Can you install that on your work computers?
Oh, you don't work in banking / government / large company where everything is locked down and you're not even allowed to install a non-Microsoft browser "cos of cequritey".
... of people who call their customers "users". One group are drugs pushers...
Reminded me of a Roberts kitchen Radio.
There's a genetic aversion to risk in government procurement which results in the "less risky" big boys getting all the work. Saving money appears well down the list when compared with the possibility -- real or imagined -- of a problem affecting a procurement career. That and the importance placed on process over results.
Hmmm yum yum.
There should be no place for 'office' - at should be part of the English lesson; learning to write. Or drama; learning to present.
BTW what has Microsoft got to do with this?
Bit low-tech, but have a ikkle trigger balloon; when it go bang, launch. Would be lightweight - fill it with some hydrogen and it'll weigh nothing.
And how many are engineers? Management and project managements isn't IT per se.
It's saddening that there are so few female techs. Just attend any technical IT course for proof.
> I'll take IE any day [over other browsers]
I didn't see the sarcasm icon -- as you're surely taking the piss!
Now where's the turd icon for all postings related to Internet Exploder?
The possibilities are endless
Haven't they been fighting over that for millennia?
The thing I hate is those dickheads at ICANN have shagged my nice simple input sanitisation routines used whenever anyone inputs an email or DNS address. A one-line regex now will need to be replaced with a database lookup plus a shed load of maintenance.
Or a message saying "No poncy top-level domain names allowed here. Use a proper name like everyone else."
> HEY YOU LIMEY
Brilliant use of irony and sarcasm befitting of a posting to El Reg. I salute you sir!
Have a warm beer on me. Caution: it may contain alcohol and flavour.
No Windows tax.
Just think with Office you'd have about 200 pixels to do any decent work after all the Ribbon and assorted border cruft is taken off of the meagre 768 height.
Those damnable low resolution 1080 high -- sorry low -- screens are a royal pain in the butt to use. There's no earthly reason for fitting a low res screen in a high-end laptop.
I regularly turn my 24" 1920x1200 monitor sideways to make it 1200x1920 when coding.
It's those proxy shit-for-brains marketing gimps let out of the box again. I don't watch videos on a bloody work machine you utter kretins. I do write code and need to see as much screen area as possible. 1200 high is the minimum.
1080 high IS LOW RESOLUTION. It may be wide - I assume you're running two monitors - but high it ain't.
After reading this I thought I'd download it and spark it up in a VM on my Mac, just to see what you're all going on about. Fine; installed, updated, ran Firefox so connectivity's great.
But now I want to run some other programs. How? I can't see any "Programs" or "Applications" folder on the screen... It's like that damn Windows 8 - what's the bloody point of hiding all the sodding programs?
Let me start gently, then work up my experience as I get to know it better. I expect these user interfaces to be better than this. I want to be able to switch my NON-TECHNICAL family away from the scourge of Microsoft; they couldn't give a damn about the OS and I want something more reliable than Windows.
What a pain.
It's a sad indictment that all IT training courses I attend -- these are *public* courses -- there's a very small percentage of female attendees, frequently there are none.
There's more female project managers and administrators. Just very very few engineers.
Browsers are becoming the shell which users interact with their computers, so it's inevitable that they'll be the main attack vector.
No turning back
I cannot think of any subject more pointless than "sport" at a degree level. A "sports degree" is a complete oxymoron.
OK, sport science, studying to become a medical type person maybe. But sports for the sake of it is utterly pointless.
What's the world coming to?
Can I do a degree in drinking beer?
A keyboard also requires a pointing device close to hand; a mouse, trackpad or nipple. It's just not acceptable to expect to point around the screen whilst, say, editing a document. One's hands are rested on the keyboard; the screen is up in the air; pointing at it is very difficult from this angle, and damn uncomfortable as well. That's why I'm using a mouse as I slide my hand from the keyboard to the mouse.
Alas iOS (and Android) doesn't support pointing devices so this is at best only a half-solution.
Ironically Windows 8 may fare better in this respect as it's more Windows than Tablet OS. Of course Windows 8 doesn't yet exist, nor will it ever run on an iPad.
Given that they've completely missed two markets which they were already operating in, it's amazing if they'll be in those and other markets for much longer.
It's a serious issue of poor strategic thinking from the board. It is astounding that they don't have any significant presence in the smartphone and tablet market. All they have is a version 0.8 tablet and a mess of a smartphone that is anything but cool.
Shocking that the board are still in place.
As things get more cloudy and web-based, there's a massive threat to their core OS business too.
Wonder how Ballmer's feeling? Must be pretty lonely when you can't compete because you were asleep at the helm and sailed right past the opportunity. Wouldn't be surprised his shareholders revolted.
Still, we've a half-baked Windows 8 to look forward to. That'll really worry Apple.
Should one trust Google with my information, or Dropbox, or anyone else?
That's not to say that Google can't be trusted. Or is it?
I'm sitting here posting this from my 17" MacBook Pro.
The guy's talking out of his arse. I suppose he's also supporting the tablet-style interfaces for everything. And single monitors.
Typical of an ANAList who doesn't do real work.
Wonder when the first Twatter or Arsebook firings will be done.
I'd waited thirty years for it and felt quite let down. The plot and screenplay were OK, even the special effects -- I really liked the Vogons.
What really let it down was the really poor casting. Way too 'Merkin for a start. Ford Prefect was never right but Trillian was a complete disaster; they could have replaced the actress with a Barbie Doll for all the character she brought to the film. I'm not even sure that Arthur was that great, just not 'stiff' enough. Marvin wasn't quite right, not robotic enough, to be honest a little silly!
On a positive note, John Malcovich was excellent and Slartibartfast good.
Not the worst film given the intense competition from the typical plotless shite that Hollywood vomits out; Avatar, 2012, day after I wasted my money...
Do miss DNA though.
If one's allowed to think logically, if we fit the ships out with a catapult then they can take both types of planes; the cheaper Carrier version and the more expensive VTOL B version. Not to mention all the other types of carrier landing planes and helicopters.
If they don't fit a catapult then they're condemned to forever using the more complex and under-performing VTOL B version. And helicopters.
A no brainer. We don't need no steenkiin katapult. Can I have my nice job at BaE now?
Odd that as IMHO the trackpads are by far the best trackpads I've ever used. I absolutely don't miss the buttons; I know it'll click if I just press a little harder. I also appreciate the glass pad as it's more 'slippery' than the plastic or metal brethren and doesn't 'stain' or mark with continued use. Size also matters, being by far the largest trackpads around.
Maybe you need to adjust to its foibles a little, just as you'd need to adjust to an itty-bitty trackpad from any of the other manufacturers. You may find that you use your thumb in the same place as you'd expect a button; it works well like that.
So that's a LOW res screen you have. What's the point of working with a letterbox for a display?
1080 high is absolute pants for everything. You need at least 1200 high to be useful - heck the ribbon takes up half of the screen.
All that's happened is the jobs have been shifted from internal to external suppliers. It'll cost much more in the long run.
Alas government IT is specified by one group: the government's agents called civil servants, but delivered by a completely separate group: the suppliers. Add to that mix a bunch of miscellaneous hangers on all pushing for "better value for money", a culture of complete risk aversion, and you end up with more time being spent on commercial aspects than doing the job.
Contracts are all about who's got the best negotiator. Government pays little, suppliers pay a lot. Figure out who gets the better contract negotiator.
The key is ownership. If you have a small internal group responsible for making their own dog food, you often end up with much cheaper results. Of course this then goes off the rails if you don't have people with the right skills.
Until smaller suppliers can get involved, it'll be the same old big dozen or so who keep delivering the same old same old...
Me too. When I challenged them about it they were completely unaware. Nor did their AV find anything untoward. Hotmail hacked?
... share prices can go down as well as up.
In Groupon's case, down is inevitable.
Why anyone would want to "invest" in Groupon in the first place beats me. Speculate maybe, but not invest. What's the number one rule of "speculation"... only speculate money that you can afford to loose and never borrow to speculate.
I still see Groupon's woes as simply a tax on stupid greedy people.
They're doomed I tell ye...
The types of customers that Groupon would likely bring would be mercenary bargain hunters with absolutely no loyalty. Unless you've huge surpluses, or something to sell with massive margins, or some form of loss leader (e.g. hotel stay where profits are made in the bar/restaurant), flogging something for a massive discount is doomed I tell ye, doomed.
The Groupon customers won't be back, nor will they be saying nice things except for the massive bargain they've just had, e.g. by implication how your normal prices are a rip off.
Doomed. I tell ye.
What a surprise, the new company owners must be so pleased they've bought a company that's built upon worthless principles and could easily be copied. Call it a tax on fools with too much money, or is that greed?
Something like Toy Story, but Ballmer can't even do falling with style.
OnDigital's content was so wide of the mark, aimed straight at the mass-market blandness that ITV has always hit (OK, with a few drama exceptions). Add to that phootbawl, limited channel choice *and* their expectation that the punters would pay for it... No surprise OnDigital failed as the Murdock proposition was far more compelling.
I'm delighted with Freeview and the BBC's new channels. And Dave:-) I'm even more delighted that the phootbawl is only available on Sky where people of a certain kind can pay their tithe to Murdock ad-infinitum.
I'll just pay my bargain license fee, configure the 20 or so interesting Freeview channels (i.e. delete the spam/dross channels), record then watch a few programs a week, and get on with having a life.