Of course the seaweed-suckers are so much more....manly?
57 posts • joined 11 Mar 2009
Of course the seaweed-suckers are so much more....manly?
Another fuckwit comment.
Think about it: would you want automatic (un-checked) entries to be transferred into the aircraft electronically?
V-min-unstick trials are carried out as certification, yes.
But not for the reasons you state; it's often about flight control laws and performance.
Idiot. Many are ex-bush pilots, but airline flying is a completely different thing. It's about eliminating errors and risk in order to achieve maximum safety.
Don't think flying at 50 feet at 150 knots makes you God's gift, either; far from it. You're at least 500 knots slower than some of the best......
VAT needs to be scrapped and have an individual- or company-wealth tax replace it.
So much easier and will promote buying and selling ("the economy").
Guess the multi-millionaires in parliament don't want that, though the current system is clearly unfit for purpose.
Here are the 10 biggest....
They may have missed The Crusades.
At 130MPH your engine would have been doing over 8500 RPM, so not terribly likely.
Especially with barely more than 200BHP.
Declining LESS slowly? Problem with the title.
Maybe it will be based in Luxembourg?
Or perhaps HMRC will be as tough on them as they were (not) with Amazon?
Time to buy, then!
I agree. There is a direct link that I can think of:
The in-flight moving map for the passengers takes the arrival time from the Flight-Management Computers in the cockpit, no question.
I sure hope that's a one-way connection.....
Here's one that failed as a direct result of a design flaw:
Incredibly rare for mechanical failures to occur these days, thankfully.
However, design flaws can be subtle and indirectly lead to losses, particularly flaws in relation to auto flight/autothrottle.
(Asiana, Air Inter, Air France 400 all come to mind....)
It's TCAS, but you're broadly correct.
You won't have to be moving to do this, either, as ships have a similar system and can generate false returns in aircraft (although they're very rarely at the same level......).
Here's the other famous one with no hydraulics (and hence no primary flight controls):
After the incident, they trialled a similar occurrence with many, many crews in simulators, to see if they could come up with some kind of procedure to cope with this event again. All of them lost control and crashed spectacularly.
Only this and the DHL flight have ever made it. The key was getting the landing gear down; it improved stability through increased drag.
You can spec. iMacs with SSD from the get-go and 16GB of RAM, plus wired keyboard.
That's exactly the spec. of my BTO iMac.
I even have a LogiTech mouse receiver in one of the keyboard USB slots......so it could easily be the machine for you.
Think this will fix it, I think. A proper system-wide firewall, unlike that in OS X.
Check this out. Usually accurate enough to avoid making the wrong decision.
HUDs are used in commercial aircraft.
Standard fitment on 787 and A350, as well as many executive jets.
Quite a few BMWs have them now (M5s/M6s they are standard).
But generally agree; they are useful, intuitive things and I don't understand why they never "took off" (groan) more quickly.
But unfortunately Armourers** take them apart and "service" them completely unnecessarily all the time.
The death of at least 1 Red Arrows pilot(on the ground) was the result......
**The fabled Amrourer's song:
"A....I'm an armourer,
B...I'm an armourer.", etc.
(they're not the sharpest tools in the box).
The engines are set forward of the wings so that if there is an unconfined engine failure, it doesn't wreck the wing. It is a certification requirement.
I hope the rest of the article is a bit more accurate than that part.....
I have to agree. I use Win7 on my 2011 MacBook Pro (seems fine) and bought Win 8 .1 for my new iMac's Bootcamp partition.
The tile interface is a bit weird (I too turned it off) but otherwise 8.1 seems very zippy and stable and actually runs older programs (alright, games; why else would I use Bootcamp?) better than Win 7 does. Win 8.1 cost me just £40 from eBay, which really is not much.
The oxygen levels are not really that low; you are never above 8500 feet pressure altitude, which means about 75% c.f. Sea Level.
The air is partially recycled only; and that is passed through extremely-fine filters to remove bacteria/dust.
The big problem with cabin air is ozone. If you fly on aircraft with no ozone scrubbers, or even old ozone scrubbers, it reacts with organic compounds on your skin and clothes, creating all sorts of irritants. This is particularly noticeable in the eye and nose areas.
Finally, all Boeings prior to the 787 did not do what Airbus have always done, which is to spray what little water was removed by the air compressors back into the intakes. So most Boeings have extremely dry air (way worse than the Sahara) which can also affect the eyes and nose in particular. Using lip-salve in the nose will really help.
Well said, particularly the last two sentences.
p.s. Yes I have landed real aircraft...many types and many times.
No they don't; the vast majority are hand-flown for at least the last few miles.
You'll probably have to fly as freight, then....... 747-8 is also a disaster (that cannot fly within 50 miles of a thunderstorm). Total of 8 passenger variants sold; tells you who good it is.
Now patched by 10.9.2
I've just ditched the Chocolate-factory's Chrome for Aviator and it works well.
I like the "Protected"/"Not protected" flag; pretty user-friendly all round (and compatible with most extensions).
Good job and thanks for the info, El Reg!
What a shame; Camino's a great little browser.
Thanks to all the devs past and present; hope your next project(s) fare better in the long-run.
That's what this is all about.
Surprises you, clearly.
Very true. All the way up to siege mortars and Main Battle-tank guns.
Plastic MBT design next? Would be great fun!
...and then the Brits whipped your butts when you tried to take Canada a few years later.
Absolutely correct. And if it's painted in gun-metal or black, how would the targets even know it's plastic anyway?
Maybe it's not much more dangerous than a replica, but not many people will think it's anything other than a proper pistol.
You have a battery-powered XBox?
Great list, well done; must have been a nightmare to choose.
Yie Ar Kung Fu was the title of the game I've been wracking my brains to remember for years; that really was a great game. You could learn superb moves, but the game learned to avoid them, so you had to save your best moves for the last opponents, making progress through all the levels a self-imposed balancing-act; brilliant!
...that anyone's still with the utter garbage that is TalkTalk.
I left when they set up a second Direct Debit for my "free" broadband. When I queried it, they said it was free....when they got around to modding my exchange!
So I told them to stick it and they tried to charge a cancellation fee, even though I was in the free cooling-off period. Ended up having a stand-up row with the team that was meant to smooth-talk me into staying, over BS like the meaning of "free".
Talk Talk. are utter, utter mouth-breathing, phone-salesman, low-life, amoral, lying, scheming, dishonest shits.
The pollution, noise and ugliness of that place is hellish.
Only when these money-obssessed locusts have eaten or concreted over every thing will they realise:
You can't eat money.
"But these patents aren't broad because they were filed by a troll looking to make money: OpenWave was genuinely breaking new ground and doing things which had never been done before.
But that was a decade ago, and last August the company publicly recognised that its most valuable asset was its patent portfolio. "
Those two sentences are surely contradictory?
Were they just about to release a server-based speech-recognition application? Highly doubtful, isn't it?
OpenWave look exactly like a troll looking to make money out of holding up progress, to me.....
This is complete and utter bollocks from Airbus.
Engines are podded forward of the wing main-spar for a reason (uncontained failures do still happen) and the regulators won't be changing that requirement, probably ever, especially on engines that "need" less servicing.
Formation flying is incredibly difficult in small, manoeuvrable fighters; in large aircraft with masses more momentum, it would be harder still. Again, the regulators wouldn't even countenance it, for sure.
Flying in another aircraft's vortices is not "free lift", it's turbulence...!
Wings already adapt to wind conditions; they use flaps and slats (some settings are specifically designed for gusty or strong-wind conditions) and that's all that's needed, thanks.
At least they are moving towards "flying-wing" designs forms, though; that's a good start.
Funny how the eco-mentalists like to discount the heating effects of the fusion of millions of tons of hydrogen every second......
My understanding is it's called "Black" Friday because it's when retailers generally move into the black (profit colour) on their accounts, due to Thanksgiving's buying frenzy.
So, no racist angle there.
Just bought mine with an SSD and the non-glossy Hi-res Screen and it is fantastic. I got the non-glossy because I can't stand the reflectiveness of the normal set-up and the Hi-Res (1680 x 1050) is a nice bonus, making for a great desktop space.
With the SSD, this thing IS silent and starts up in about 10 seconds. Apps launch almost instantly. I am very happy with it and hope it will be powerful and reliable enough to last 5 years or so, which will make it pretty good value.
What about the size of the pages - is that defined? Apple could just use the required font and use bigger pages :-)
What's the difference between a lawyer and a parasite?
Parasites leave you alone once you die.....
...also fell quickly. Why no mention of that?
...fit an SSD to these, If you can. The difference is unbelievable. Mine boots up in about 10 seconds and programs launch immediately. No more watching the bouncing dock icon whilst listening to the drive click about inside - fabulous!
I went for the 15' because I just can't get along with those reflective "glossy' screens and the extra resolution is a nice bonus - 1680 x 1050 makes for a great amount of viewing space.
I am an airline pilot, so please let me add something to the debate.
No-one runs laptop-based Maintenance Manuals, as these manuals are what the regulators audit regularly and/or use to prosecute licensed pilots/engineers if things go wrong. If they were electronic, they could be tampered with to cover things up, so they won't allow this.
The story is that this aircraft had a huge history of slat/flap problems that the central maintenance computer should have picked up and alerted the engineer controllers to bring it into the hangar and rectify. It did not and here is where the Trojans/OS issue is brought up.
The end result was that the pilots were trying to keep to schedule (long day, close to limits for duty time, etc) when the flaps would not extend. So they taxied back to the stand (more delay) for the engineer to rectify it. He over-rode some of the protections (and warnings) to get the job done, it appears. In their rush to recover the delay, the pilots forgot to run the flaps for take-off, there was no warning any more, people died.
So yes the ultimate blame lies with the pilots, but then the pilots are usually the last line of defence against systemic problems with the operation - an operation in this case possibly affected by Trojans! The Trojans didn't directly cause the crash, but crashes are usually caused by many little errors/conflicts and they were one part of that.
Just so you can enjoy your next flights, aircraft do not run Windows or similar commercial ("non-critical" OSes)
Well that's Chrome un-installed from my (OS X) machine, then!
Would I trust the advertiser Google to "do no evil" with Flash? errr, no.
Flash is just a battery-cooking app. in OS X (and not much else is)
Steve's da man!
http://www.theregister.co.uk/Design/graphics/icons/comment/fail_32.png So are ATC incapable of making mistakes, then? I would not want to trust my life to someone with no flying skills, no threat of death if they make a mistake, nor to a worn-out, low-paid single pilot trying to monitor if there is one! How comfortable would you feel flying through Chinese/Philippine/Indonesian/Korean/Middle-Eastern/African/S-American airspace, with their piss-poor controllers?
Air Traffickers (particularly in the US) have always resented the pay levels of pilots (despite the fact a lot of pilots are now paid less!) and want to replace them. I really hope this experiment gets nowhere, because a lot of people will lose their lives to it.
Of course accuracy was greater, Mr GE-Goebbels, the system works more quickly. But accuracy in current aviation is not a problem, safety is, so stop introducing irrelevances.
One more word for consideration by this muppet blanket-stackers: WEATHER!
Shouldn't that be a "Steam-World" then. at least on the surface?
The biggest distillery yet known to man, perhaps?
...admitting that CCTV is useless for crime-prevention?
No wonder there was no benefit after 6 months!
Compare that with the average of 5 HOURS a day of TV-watching in the US and is it a surprise that the lard-quotient is almost unchanged?
I bet if they stuck to 30 minutes or more a day there would be significant benefits, but I guess Wii Fit is just plain DULL?