Re: Hold on...
If you don't think the overpriced Unix machines don't have their own single points of failure, you've simply not had enough experience in this industry.
2197 posts • joined 26 Jan 2009
If you don't think the overpriced Unix machines don't have their own single points of failure, you've simply not had enough experience in this industry.
This is just an attempt to discourage consumers from buying from companies that aren't under Microsoft's thumb. White box vendor means someone that's not afraid of losing bulk discounts on Windows licenses.
Overclocking is an entirely separate issue.
Yeah. What problem?
My two multi-core machines that run mysql were not effected.
Also, none of the machines at the office were impacted.
If not for these hysterics in the press it would never have occurred to me that leap seconds are anything to worry about at all.
Allowing Gays to marry is nothing more than "equality under the law", "the right of contract", and "separation of Church and State".
Add in a little "mind your own business" for good measure.
All of these are core American values even if Washington or Adams might be horrified by the idea of two guys getting married. They would probably be equally horrified at a Catholic and an Anglican getting married.
Religion and Liberty are orthogonal. Following your conscience and imposing it on others are two entirely different things. One does not require the other unless you are a theocrat.
When I first heard about this idea, there was also this little detail about the various countries in the EU being treated like children and being forced to run their budgets through the federal government.
That is not quite like how the US runs things. States are autonomous and run their own affairs. There's even supposed to be limits on what the Federal Government can do. Basically, it's supposed to be there for things of an "international" nature.
Mapping the US structure to Europe would not stop the Greeks or the Spanish from doing things their own way. If you tried this "the feds must approve your budget" idea in the US, you would likely get a 2nd Civil War.
The graphic is just silly. It's like when fanboys brag about how they own the "over $1000" market. Of course they do because the vast majority of the market is at lower price points. An Ultrabook is like a netbook but with a bigger price tag. Ditch the minaturization and you can get a lot more bang for your buck.
So there is a lot less need to pay that much for your laptop unless you are trying to press the light and thin aspect to the exclusion of all else.
$700? I am not sure I would pay that much for a PC laptop. Just like a $1000 PC.
Microsoft was trying to sell $2000 laptops and $50,000 tables.
They simply weren't targeting the consumer in an environment where normal PCs are already DIRT CHEAP. A useful and usable PC can still be had for as little as $300. It's hard for a $2000 tablet or hybrid to compete in that kind of environment.
Although once you need to actually "compute" something, both these $300 PCs and $600 tablets are woefully inadequate.
An Aston Martin design "protected"?
You really don't know squat about cars.
The only part on an Aston Martin that is protected are the trademarks. That's how it should be.
I saw a Bentley this morning that had a very forgettable design.
Well, actual engineering requires that you can build something that actually works. You have to deal with the laws of physics, and the constraint of costs, and of current technology while also dealing with what clueless people will have to use it. You have to consider things like it might fall apart or catch fire.
Doodling something on a napkin is beyond trivial in comparison.
"Design" does not take as much effort.
The PhoneOS GUI is basically the Windows 3.1 GUI.
A grid of icons. Some menus. How "innovative".
There was a similar tablet in 1994.
The design also showed up in a movie in 1969.
Are you seriously trying to imply that people buy this thing without knowing what it is?
Even if that is the case, they can still RETURN IT.
What everyone is really saying here is that Apple doesn't have any thing that distinguishes itself. The best it can do is compete on looks. There are no real substantive differences. There's no real reason for someone to buy an Apple product.
Otherwise, the fact that the Samsung device is a copy cat is meaningless.
Either the Apple product is good enough to compete on it's own merits or not. If it's good enough, the legal dirty tricks are simply unnecessary. Although they quite nicely demonstrate just what kind of scum Apple is. Just in case anyone had been duped into believing otherwise.
Sounds rather like a homework assignment from the class that teaches you about Turing Machines.
People tend to forget that this stuff exists in the total absence of any hardware.
...which leads us again to the sort of "chick" that you see in this video. You end up with someone that fits into the Glamour or Cosmo mold but just happens to be a terribly geeky doctor.
You end up with Dr. Isles, Queen of the Dead.
"Feminist fashion magazines" are what really set the tone here, not mysoginists or brogrammers.
You don't need the walled garden nonsense. Your false sense of security is equally attainable with Apple's computer products and they don't enforce any fascist platform restrictions. It's only the crapulence of Microsoft that makes the walled garden seem reasonable.
...and that's only if you forget all of those "I'm a Mac" ads.
That kind of argument made sense in 1988, not 2001 or now.
Outlook is not a choice, it's something imposed upon you because it does more than just the little bits that involve real standards. The rest is highly proprietary just like the rest of msoffice is.
Outlook is the perfect example of taking an open standard and perverting it with vendor lock.
It's more of the same Microsoft proprietary lock-you-in-to-our products racket. iTunes functions in the same way.
Plus the house elf would come out to tidy up the body and kick head around.
I've paid $300 for a 750G drive before and I have no interest in repeating that if I can avoid it.
Fortunately, tech moves on. I can avoid it, so I will.
I don't need to be stuck in the past just because I can remember when I spent $400 on a 1G hard drive.
> Looks like you've missed the major reductions in SSD prices over the past 2-3 weeks. 256GB is in the £150-£170 range now
Just got a 3TB spinny disk for about half that.
> that everybody with a grain of understanding would by now know that sequential I/O tests are meaningless
So you never copy stuff? I find that hard to believe.
Not every one's access patterns resemble an OLTP database.
If I decide to move 500G of stuff around, I want to know how long to expect to wait for it to finish. Sometimes this is also known as backup and recovery.
Tape isn't random access. So your little bit of conflation falls apart.
It's been over 10 years and SSD still seems more like an overpriced boutique items for serious users that have revenue generating business that would benefit from a costly speed upgrade.
Optimus isn't a "driver problem". It's a bleeding edge Windows dependency problem.
If it doesn't work on Linux it's because the Windows hack being used is just a little too new at this point.
The scope of this particular "problem" is just a tad wider in scope than nvidia's blob.
Nobody needs Red Hat for "general purpose application servers".
It's the interesting stuff like GPU compute servers that require the kind of buy in that makes a company like Red Hat a more obvious choice. Otherwise, people just go with Debian. OTOH, if Red Hat is willing to leave money on the table companies like Microway will gladly take it from them. They have been providing higher performance Linux machines since the 90s. (It was Alpha then)
The best you can come up with this Optimus crap.
If I have an nvidia GPU, why in the H*LL would I want to put up with Intel crap EVER? Saving a few seconds of battery time just isn't a compelling enough reason.
The Lemming troll has found his corner case but who else cares really?
Intel GPUs are a pile of fail under any OS.
This isn't about the "high end gaming market" and hasn't been for a long time.
That's why there's a very respectable Linux blob to begin with.
The Lemming gamers here are classic narcissists.
> Whilst the Tea Party itself doesn't concern itself so much with social issues, it's supporters do.
Like the GOP itself from which the Tea Party sprang, an organization is ultimately nothing more than the sum of it's membership.
By all means point us to good examples of these alleged fiscal conservatives not acting like the sort of stereotypical fundie busybodies described in "media misinformation".
A link to a Tea Party webpage would be an obvious example.
If there are any such mythical "fiscal conservatives" that are also not Puritan culture warriors, then such an example should be easy to provide. It even could have been included in your original response.
Yes, the role of government should be the minimal necessary. That includes my bedroom too.
> Therefore, as the OP said, it makes sense to use very fast USB3 or Thunderbolt drives containing more capable storage media.
...which just gets you back to the problem of the performance of your actual storage media.
Attaching a fancy over priced external storage bus is not going to make a disk any faster. It's just going to make the thing less portable and more bother to deal with. It might even create an extra bottleneck. An obvious way to get around all of that is to ditch external wires entirely and include really spendy drives if that's really necessary.
Although I suspect you have no clue how fast any of these devices actually are or how expensive.
Of course different people have different ideas of what the tradeoffs should be. That's why it's absolutely essential to have a meaningful array of options and it's rather useful for a device to be user serviceable.
> Yeah, yeah, yeah, stick a USB3 or Thunderbold drive on it, you sniveling ponces.
> What are you going to do, run Win7 or Ubuntu?
That kind of defeats the whole point of the "laptop" thing now doesn't it.
Although I think the whole concept is ridiculous. Who does video editing on a laptop? That's what something like a Mac Pro is for.
Sadly though I will probably have thunderbolt running under Linux before it's on the Mac Pro.
When I am really bored I will have to "horse race" this for myself and see how it goes.
How new of a version of MacOS does this kind of trick need?
> Iphone 3GS is getting iOS 6
PhoneOS updates on older iPhones are actually a dubious prospect. Those of us that don't restrict ourselves to some sort of single vendor are able to observe this for ourselves.
So your crowing is less impressive than you think.
I dunno. I think you need to treat any mapping service with some degree of skepticism. Examples of every service screwing up abound. The criticisms that Tom Tom tries to lay on OSM are true for ANY mapping service. You just have to keep your wits generally and know better than to blindly trust the computer.
YMMV. Seek out the best option for your particular circumstances. Don't be afraid to dump you chosen option if need be.
Corporate servers managed under a change control regime likely already fall under this description.
According to your rationale, we should already being such headlines. Probably should have seen such headlines years ago.
That's a monstrous array that probably has a few hidden gotchas in terms of cost and it's still twice as expensive. 4TB drives aren't even cheap and plentiful yet. Who knows when larger drives will finally hit the market.
I'm still waiting for 20TB of storage of any kind to get down to the $600 price point.
Chances are that it will be spinny disk and that SSD will lag very far behind.
All it takes is one missing comma to turn Churchill and Stalin into strippers.
I dumped my Intel because I was tired of it running hot despite a fair amount of effort expended to prevent that.
While AMD doesn't deliver the best high end performance, it still does very well in terms of heat, efficiency, and price. Also, it's not just the CPU but it's also the motherboard. So the combination of CPU+mobo might fare better than just CPU comparisons alone.
Not everyone confuses their PC with their what's in their pants.
Beyond gamers and video pack rats, most people already have trouble taking advantage of what they have.
They could call it the Raspberry or Rasp for short.
There would be no explicit mention of it being a Hackintosh. It would just be a poorly kept secret.
Rasp 520 looks suspiciously like a Mac Mini.
Rasp 1024 looks suspiciously like an iMac.
Rasp 1000 looks suspicously like a MBA.
Rasp 2000 looks suspicously like a MBP.
Rasp 3000 looks suspiciously like bargain Mac Pro.
Rasp 4000 looks suspicously like a non-bargain Mac Pro.
Some models could even fit niches unfilled by Apple and include better device support ahead of apple. Using USB3. Using new TB based motherboards. Putting in better GPUs, more memory, more storage and whatnot.
Of course they would be price competitive PCs too... (nice side effect)
Never forget #42
...although there is always #451.
Before it jumped the shark with the prequels it appealed to a wide range of age groups.
Perhaps you are simply too young to have seen it for yourself.
The "sweet spot' seem to be about 3 years ago. That's when a certain brand of drive went to crap. Their newer kit doesn't seem to be nearly as bad though.
...so you are basically arguing that much of the demand for bare drives is relatively inelastic.
Businesses are probably have much less flexibility when it comes to avoiding overpriced kit. While they could certainly try to avoid new acquisitions, their purchases are more driven by "need" versus "mere want". So the petrol analogy fits pretty well for the business segment.
It doesn't for the consumer segment. It's a luxury good. If you price to too high people say "why bother" or "I think I will wait a bit".
Thus the the differences in prices.
Although, if my array fills up and I can't afford an upgrade then I stop buying DVDs.
How is the industry's most limited remote control going to help that?
Most modern TVs have a simple menu system that Apple is unlikely to improve upon with the possible exception of making it look prettier.
So the input menu will have a sense of Apple aesthetics but not much else changed.
The only thing that Apple can offer is an Apple-only product.
Anything else suffers from the fact that you aren't limited to one device made by one vendor. That leads to a lot of integration problems as you are basically herding cats. The fact that Apple could get around all of this by ignoring the rest of the industry really isn't terribly interesting.
You could get the same effect by buying any other Smart TV out there.
Ignore sound quality and you don't have to worry about a separate AV remote. Ignore 3rd party devices, and you don't have to worry about those remotes. Ignore cable and you don't have to worry about those remotes either.
Apple just brings more hype and mindless fanboys to the part than Sony or Samsung does.
Chances are that any direct competitor to IBM has precisely the same failings.
As an overpriced but still accessible consumer product, Apple is in a very good position to exploit hype. Other similarly over hyped brands aren't. Some out of work Spaniard can manage to buy and hold onto an iPhone. You can't say the same for a Ferrari. No matter how much "love" they get, their revenue is capped by the population size of suitably wealthy customers.
The same goes for Mercedes or BMW but to a lesser to degree. Apple computing products similarly fall into that category.
That's why the iThing part of Apple's business does so well while their original core business still continues to lag behind the rest of the industry.
Plus phones and media players are much closer to commodity items.
> Spoken like someone who's never driven a Mercedes
The need to buy things (or pretend to buy things) in order to please others is not a universal affliction.
If you want efficient, there are better and cheaper fast food options.
Or you could skip the restaurant markup entirely. I bet that never occured to you.
Why pay for an absurd markup for something I can do better myself?
> it can unarguably be said to be of higher quality than almost all other types of fast food.
You are simply on crack.
McD's is no less greasy or any less likely to be staffed by illegals.