1867 posts • joined 26 Jan 2009
> THe problem exists with some Nvidia drivers - the company does not provide them
Just use the ones supplied from the vendor. Chances are that there's a nice "download vendor graphics drivers" here button on your desktop. Very easy. Even a Mac user can manage.
Now Windows users get to experience that joy.
The only tricky part on Linux is the DVD DRM. Everything else is handled "App Store" style.
Stuttering on a "recent nvidia card" ?
An Atom can playback BD rips with a recent nvidia card. Never mind DVD.
Even the relatively ancient 6x00 generation of nvidia cards had partial HW acceleration for MPEG2.
Re: "rely on the many quality solutions on the market"
> So, Microsoft is simply removing
Being unable to play DVDs while the MPEG2 decode support is BUILT INTO THE GPU?
That's pretty counter-intuitive.
What I care about is being able to play my DVDs, home movies, and HD-PVR recordings. Don't care about dodgey marketing rhetoric about "improving efficency". Stuff either works or it doesn't. It either works out of the box or not.
If it's not included, then are you left on your own to sort out things yourself without a proper package manager?
Re: Ultimatly true but premature
All of these "innovations" were available to PC users no sooner than they were to Mac users.
The key difference has always been that you don't get stuff crammed down your throat with no recourse. You don't find suddenly that all of your SCSI devices are doorstops and that you need to replace any of your ADB devices.
Apple simply gives you no choice.
You can put what you want on a PC. I could still use a PS2 port if I wanted to. Got USB3 too.
No you are just a clueless n00b that wouldn't know his machine were having any sort of difficulty unless it completely failed to boot.
Macs are just PCs. Typically, they are trailing edge PCs with no good means for upgrade or maintenance. They use the same random spare parts as any other PC. Some models of Dell and whatnot are actually very good for Hackintoshes because of this.
That's funny because the first generation of Mac I purchased had insufficient memory to deal well with the version of MacOS that shipped with it and graphics apps threw up warnings about Quartz clearly indicating that the video chip was not up to snuff.
The missus ditched the Mac I gave her because of how Apple likes to do things that seem gratuitiously different. That and lack of support for legacy Win32 software. Fancies her iPad though.
I don't recall MacOS being terribly optimized in this way. While "startup time" seems to be a great fixation for Windows users and Microsoft.
Sometime when I'm really bored I will have to horse race one of my Macs and my Win7 machine just for laughs.
Re: Apple's Success
Apple has simply ceased to be a computer company.
They are a consumer electronics company. They're like the 80s division of Sony responsible for the Walkman.
What computers they do still sell are PCs pretending to be appliances. Although they are only PCs when it suits Apple marketing. Otherwise they're not PCs. Fanboys go happily go along with all of this.
Their actual PC numbers are miniscule both compared to Apple's own numbers as well as the rest of the PC industry.
Re: Apple's Success
> pay a premium to do away with all the rough edges, half-arsed feature implementations and confusing inconsistent interfaces.
Apple's advantage here is grossly over hyped.
Re: I'll miss it
No one ever tries to pretend that the toaster can replace your PC.
Apple and the fanboys love to advocate that kind of thing.
Now if I have a video appliance of some sort, I expect it to play my home movies or shows I've recorded off of cable. That's a fundemental use case relevant failure. It's hardly comparable to running gcc on my VCR.
Fanboys seek to lower expectations and berate and misrepresent anyone who isn't drinking the kool-aid.
Fanboy Ferrari Delusions
Beyond the fact that no Apple product is really a Ferarri or BMW, you have the very real problem that these are ultimately computing platforms that depend on 3rd party support. The "compatibility" issues that plague computing devices can allow products to become entrenched even when they are completely unworthy.
Many have said that the Mac vs PC thing is repeating itself again.
Apple is living high off the hog for now. That will likely not last.
Unfortunately, computing devices aren't nearly as interchangeable as cars.
In truth, no Apple product is a Ferarri. Although your attempt to claim such just demonstrates the other poster's comments about annoying conspicous consumers.
An OS in a box.
Running Windows in a VM is no escape.
You're still running Windows. You're still managing Windows. You still have to deal with all of the usual BS (especially as a large corporation).
If you're just going to run Windows in a box, you could do that with Linux.
The "it sells, therefore it's good" fallacy.
> Only a fool with their head in the sand thinks Apple are selling hand over fist because people are dumb rather than the products are good.
Re: Commodore PET
The PET did end up on the set of Star Trek. It was in the background of Kirk's apartment in Star Trek 2.
Re: Being able to push content
It makes some sense to use a tablet as a UI but that is the extent of it.
Pushing the actual content is just stupid.
The moment you talk about transcoding or remuxing, you've just lost the argument.
That is the opposite of the sort of "just works" experience that Apple is supposed to be famous for.
Re: but only iTunes fans need apply.
> iTunes will play DRM-free content you buy elsewhere, no problem. It's drag and drop.
No it isn't. Not even close.
It's easy to "hate Apple" when fanboys make up rediculously fraudulent claims.
iTunes does NOTHING for video management of alien video formats and has very limited support for anything.
This is why people jailbreak this device.
Re: He really wouldn't need to transcode them
Remuxing doesn't do you any good if the format inside the container is not supported or it uses features that are beyond the ability of the appliance to deal with.
Needing to remux is no less stupid. Really is just shows MORE contempt for the end user because it demonstrates that the appliance already has the ability to deal with the content in question. It simply chooses not to.
The vendor has made a conscious choice to ignore the wider world and to make the device more inconvenient to use than it really needs to be.
Remuxing n+1 files is still n+1 worth of bother.
Re: Solution for self-inflicted problem.
If these devices were allowed to be treated as the PCs that certain people like to pretend they are when it suits them, then all of these "appliance" protocols would be moot. All you really need is a rudimentary file sharing protocol and the freedom to use it.
Of course you have the problem of limited format support. That's a key "feature" of most of these devices. AirPlay doesn't help that. It just adds another layer of indirection.
A total luddite spouse can control any HTPC running XBMC. The only advantage the ATV2 has is price.
The ATV2 still has decoder limitations if you are using XBMC or player limitations if you are using Plex. You don't need AirPlay for music or photos.
An ATV2 is still limited ARM hardware that isn't fully functional unless you burgle the device so you can install better software on it.
iTunes is not unique any more and is very replaceable.
Solution for self-inflicted problem.
Streaming from your phone is just a stupid parlour trick. It's something to impress the clueless. It's a very limited feature that mainly exists to cover up the limitations Apple artificially imposes on the ATV2. If the ATV2 were allowed to have it's own apps, the idea of using a $500 device to hack around the limitations of a $99 one would be moot.
First your streaming to one device and then to the other on wireless networks that aren't great to begin with. You're doing all of this despite the fact that the overpriced tablet isn't actually any more capable than the cheap little puck by the TV.
Just let the iPad without a monitor do it's own decoding and run it's own apps.
Not allowing the user community to improve the user experience is major fail.
The Usability Paradox
Transcoding everything by hand is really an absurd suggestion. At least something like Plex offers the illusion that the ATV can play everything and doesn't require you do go through a lot of upfront fuss and bother. Plex (and XBMC) also offer superior media management.
This is one part of the process that some people like to gloss over. This is where XBMC shines and most other solutions (iTunes, MCE) tend to fall down badly.
Re: Top nerdery sir!
Back when my bedroom was also my computer room, I hacked my Atari ST to have a separate keyboard with an extra long cable and used to compute from the comfort of the bed.
No projector though. Just a 19" TV.
These days any PC and standard wireless keyboard will do. No challenge in that at all.
Re: Hmm, I wonder what the fundamental particle of rabid control-freakery is called?
> Do you actually know what the Stalinist USSR was like?
You never knew if you, your friends, or your family members might suddenly disappear in the night.
Plus lines to get toilet paper.
Re: Great idea
Any similar TV cabinet will achieve exactly the same thing.
If you're not worried about sound quality, you could just get yourself a smart tv and mount it on the wall. This is a solution for a problem that doesn't really exist.
Re: Too late.
So how much does that 1TB SSD of yours cost?
It must be putting power back on the grid to be able to make up for it's price.
> Is this not akin to taking your child to the supermarket.
No. It's akin to given them a Nintendo DS.
If it is any more dangerous than that then perhaps the "curator" isn't doing their job properly.
Apple has displaced Microsoft as innovator of harmless things being made dangerous in new and interesting ways.
Re: When will parents learn
Consider this a fundemental design problem with iTunes. You're forced to provide payment information even if you have no intention of buying anything. Free content is muddled with adware and these micropayments. Any system where such micropayments can't be disabled across the board is just asking for this kind of trouble.
It doesn't even have to be "misbehaving children". I personally don't want to end up "buying" something I didn't intend.
You force people to be "in for a penny, if in for a pound" and you will create this kind of problem.
It's entirely unnecessary.
Re: Missing the point entirely
Carriers are simply the seaborne extension of air superiority. This is something that is relevant to any conflict. A carrier means that your air power can have greater effective range and can be projected anywhere where British interests or citizens are at risk.
If nothing else, England has an interest in ensuring freedom of navigation on the high seas.
It's not just about misguided American adventures. It's also about hunting down pirates and dealing with natural disasters.
You need a Churchill or Nelson icon.
Cruel and Unusual.
He doesn't need to be paid to be a shill for his masters. Just watch and episode of the Tudors and see how enthusiastic the peasants are about the King.
Your rhetoric about piracy is ultimately irrelevant as current punishments are grossly inappropriate.
Punishment is fine. Just make sure that it fits the crime. Something like piracy should be along the lines of a speeding ticket or a jaywalking ticket. A single infraction or "set of facts" should get you no more than actual shoplifting would.
Re: big screen laptops and airplanes...
If you are in tight quarters on an airplane, nothing beats a tablet. Been using my Archos for years for this very use case. Sure you can get a bigger screen with a conventional laptop but then you have no place to put it really.
12" tablet with a proper USB port might be nice. Plug in the hard drive, pick a movie, copy it, continue on my merry way without the power drain of the hard drive.
Can't just wish away those faults...
...in particular, the ergonomics of laptops are crap. That's one of the reasons that tablets have been welcomed by casual users. You no longer have to hunch over a tiny screen, typing on a crap keyboard while giving yourself a permanent spinal injury.
Compared to a crap laptop keyboard, an onscreen GUI keyboard is not so bad.
If you aren't being productive, you want the controls to be somewhere else. If you are being productive, you still want the controls somewhere else an the monitor at a proper height. Achieving the latter will necessarily require ditching the keyboard.
Sure you can use some sort of "docking station" but that kind of defies the whole point.
Re: Not suprised....
Sure. Why not. You likely get that level of service from your Bentley dealer.
Re: Near SSD performance?
In general, speeds of this range are going to be "peak" or sequential. Even then, the alleged performance advantages of SSD may or may not help you. It's simply not something that you can assume as an article of faith.
ANY decent sized SSD is going to be costly. Doesn't matter if it is "decent" or not.
Peak burst rates for a spinny disk is going to be very much like SSD because you're going to be reading from memory just like an SSD does.
Re: Headed Commodore and Atari yet forgotten
Bringing computing to the masses is a non-trivial accomplishment. Offering things that no one can afford to buy is not really that meangingful. It took the PC industry 20 more years to reach the level of price acessability that Commodore created. Commodore didn't stand the test of time but it did help prime the market and create a generation of computing professionals.
The PC market is built on the bones of Commodore, Atari and the rest.
A highly specious argument.
The idea that personal papers should be muddled with creative works that have been published is an unfortunate consequence of European ideas about copyrights. This includes the daft notion that every scrap of paper is precious.
Private papers should remain as such and any attempt to drag copyright into this discussion is merely clouding the issue for the benefit of a miniscule set of corporate interests and their misguided lackeys.
Any modern discussion on privacy needs to start by rolling back copyright concepts to 1783.
Re: What about...
So the law is null and void then?
The 1st Amendment is about all manner of things. This includes things that are likely to offend or be considred obscene even if it isn't the intent of the speaker to be a troll.
Surely you understood the Mel Brooks reference in the summary. Or perhaps that was wishful thinking.
Re: In other news ...
No. Not mere sea salt. That pink snooty stuff from Hawaii.
The more expensive the better.
Re: In other news ...
I think the number for Apple products is WAY too high. Consider the distribution of percentages across various demographic groups. Some of course are going to have less penetration than others simply because Apple products are "luxury" goods and a lot of households simply don't have the money to waste on products of that kind regardless of what kind of logo is on it.
iPod/iPhone likely represents the bulk of the numbers and iPhones are already being undercut by Androids.
iPads aren't numerous enough yet and probably are secondary Apple devices. Apple's computing products simply don't have enough penetration to be relevant to this kind of study.
Even in the suburban conspicuous consumption demographic, there may not be large enough numbers to justify generalizing 50% to the population at large. The 50% number probably is for the suburban conspicuous consumption demographic most likely to even have Apple products.
Re: But, but, but ...
It's the Troma exception.
Re: is it bullshit Friday or something?
Can I run Android apps on it?
That's ultimately the only thing that matters.
If I can untar a copy of Oil Rush for Linux onto a Gentoo box and it runs, then Gentoo is Linux. The fact that there are a lot of other things that might be different in Gentoo doesn't really matter so much.
One typically defines a platform by compatability. This includes the Amiga, MacOS, Windows, Java, PhoneOS, and yes Android.
The fact that Amazon heavily brands it's stuff doesn't matter so much.
Re: Buyer Beware
Improved performance is the often stated point of SSD. That includes whatever use case you happen to be interested in. Given the price premium of even the consumer gear, anything less is an obvious rip off.
Even for my own "light consumer" use, I would be shocked and dismayed if I shelled out a ton of money for an allegedly faster SSD device and only got 75MB/s of sequential writes out of it.
Clearly, you can't just blindly trust the logo on the box and just assume that it will deliver on it's promises.
Some people just don't get socialism...
This isn't about paying for something produced by Hollywood at the local Tesco.
This about your government taxes paying for something and then someone else trying to make you pay for that same thing again.
Too rich for my blood.
I am by no means a "freetard". I have quite a pile of purchased spinny disks. However, I am not made of money. The prices for BBC stuff on DVD is kind of outrageous. It's pretty much the most expensive stuff out there except for StarTrek. Although classic DrWho even has StarTrek DVDs beat.
That means that BBC material is low on my shopping list. That means that the greedy sods aren't making any money off me. Someone else is.
If it's not priced low enough to be an "impulse buy" then procrastination is the likely result.
Re: Eating your cake and having it there.
If you're British, you were already forced to pay for this stuff. Charging you again is just double dipping. The old stuff should be liberated to the public domain anyways.
If you want to charge the rest of us that have never paid a TV license, then that's another matter.
Rise? Don't you mean Beneath?
> - Rise of the Planet of the Apes (Risible would be nearer the mark)
Clearly you've never seen "Beneath the Planet of the Apples".
No Ape movie can be worse than that one. It would defy the laws of physics.
delete from program where title='Freddy Got Fingered';
> Highlander II or Freddy Got Fingered
This movie is why I use a PVR that can be hacked so that an unconditional black list of shows that shall never be recorded can be created. Some movies need a 4th thumbs down and a little black circle beside their name.
Re: Attack of the Killer Tomatoes!
Doesn't this violate the No Troma exception.
Re: Battle Beyond the Stars
Battle Beyond the Stars? Worst? No. You have forgotten about Star Crash.
...and I am sure you will curse me for reminding you about it too.
Pathetic fanboy excuxes.
If you are advocating buying the extended warranty then you've just admitted that the product is crap and the vendor doesn't stand behind their product.
The $1800 laptop from the "quality" brand should already have a 3 year warranty.
If their stuff is really all that it is cracked up to be then it won't be a burden.
- Does Apple's iOS 7 make you physically SICK? Try swallowing version 7.1
- Fee fie Firefox: Mozilla's lawyers probe Dell over browser install charge
- Pics Indestructible Death Stars blow up planets with glowing KILL RAY
- Video Snowden: You can't trust SPOOKS with your DATA
- Hands on Satisfy my scroll: El Reg gets claws on Windows 8.1 spring update