So, might it be time to go back and check what vulnerabilities a ~2013 model Mercedes C250 Coupé could suffer?
65 posts • joined 22 Dec 2008
So, might it be time to go back and check what vulnerabilities a ~2013 model Mercedes C250 Coupé could suffer?
Hi Reg - sorry, I'm sure someone's put a lot of effort into this, but it's a distinct step backwards for me.
The site is now a generic and indistinct wall of words and even on desktop here, the new top layout feels like it's pushing content way below the visual fold. It feels visually like the top third of my browser space is being wasted.
I get the logic underpinning the decision to put the primary banner before the masthead, but it draws away from your 'tabloid newspaper' riffing, leaves redundant space on either side, and totally borks the flow for me. Above all else, this change is the most visually-unsettling for me.
I do like your new dropdowns, and the polished flat graphics are neater and a bit more pro - but readability-wise, I feel this is a retrograde step.
detritus, a pompous ex-graphic designer type :)
I know it's a really poor point of comparison, but I excitedly downloaded the templates to cut and bought the widgetry to make a Google Cardboard so that I could get at least a taste of VR after ..what?.. 20+ years of hungrily wanting a go, and was horrified to feel nausea kick in after mere minutes of using it.
I appreciate there's a vast gulf in tech specs and latency and refresh between a homespun cludge and a well-honed end-platform, but it's very apparent to me that instantaneity and high refresh is absolutely necessary to ensure an enjoyable and engaging experience that can last for more than a few minutes.
I can't even begin to imagine how bad the Virtuality experience must've been for people like me who, apparently, suffer from mild motion sickness. I'm kind of glad the thing was offline when I finally got a chance to see a machine in person, in Trocadero, back in the late 90s...
I'm not wholly sure you understand what art is.
Typical self-important commentard who can't see through the fug of their own spectrum haze to understand when likely clued-up posters are making jokes outwith some need to exhibit how much they, as uninvolved observers, think they know about a subject.
This is ElReg, smart people say daft things, in the process belying what they do know.
Oh if only it were practical for me to go fully open source for my job, sadly I need Illustrator on a daily basis (waaay better than CorelDraw for creative working with paths for laser and CNC output...).
I don't mind paying for that so much (although I do philosophically loathe that this cloud subscription mechanic essentially locks me in to an annual upgrade, whereas beforehand I could get away with upgrading every two/three versions).
What really pisses me off though is that I intermittently use PS and FW, but with the tiering system deployed by Adobe, I'd then be locked into a ~£50 per month subscription, wherein I get a load of software I would literally never use nor care about.
What's more, having just checked the prices again, there's a 6p — £0.06 — difference between an annual commitment, monthly-billed, and paying 12 month up front.
I like Illustrator, and have used Photoshop since version 3, but I'll be veering away from Adobe for raster editing in future, as I'm sure as heck not paying through the nose for upgrades there.
As soon as any competition comes up for Illy, I'll be looking there too.
Now if only I could possibly convince my clientbase to send me files in another format... :(
Oh, and just to point out to our American cousins - we pay almost twice what you do in the states in an almost $ = £ conversion, so I'm not just being a cheap-ass here.
I'd probably not care if it were ~$50 a month either.
I trust 963,000m³ of helium isn't a huge amount in the grand scheme of things, given our increasingly limited stocks of the stuff...? Anyone know why they don't just use hydrogen?
Would make for a nice stratospheric WHUMP! when the rocket ignites...
Some of us are British over being either English or Scottish, thanks.
Frankly, I'm fine with virtual Virtual Reality — the idea of a fully-immersive, comprehensive experience frightens the bejeesus out of me.
I'd go in and never come back...
Nearly 8 years since the Wii was released globally, and they're only just noticing?
Can't've been all that important to them beforehand, then.
I kind've hoped a company like Philips would be above this sort of bullshit.
Perhaps they're slinging mud to divert attention from their own internal grubbiness after the recent Justine ‘Going to Africa. Hope I don't get AIDS’ Sacco disaster?
You're richer than most people on the planet, RISC OS — I trust you follow your own advice?
I can't find a reference, but I coulda sworn this was mooted at least a couple of years ago?
...or did I dream the idea and have been sitting on a potential gold mine all this time?
Say it ain't so!
Hey big guy — try swapping around the letters in ‘ginger’ and see how you get on with that idiotic witlessness.
Mine was — “Crikey, *of course* a Martian civilisation would be able to see our moon! I wonder how their early philosophers would have wrapped their heads around that one?What conclusions would they have reached in their own time?”
(I am aware that there isn't actually a martian civilisation, at least not in terms of what we'd consider one!)
Aurally too — I still, every few months, stick on the GODS theme tune on YouTube ( v=zJ26QY0A_aQ ) and crank it up loud. it blew my tiny little mind back in the Early 90s.
Although I can't actually remember the game being all that good...
“Into the wunderfuh...” (whatever the hell that's supposed to mean)
Oooh - Ronda, eh?
There's a town I'd love to tear around in an Ariel Atom!
As much of a sci-tech space nerd as I think I am sometimes, I snese you're vastly over-estimating the audience's tribalism where competing rocket engines are concerned...
Aye, I recall reading they were changing the tenantship status to reduce costs fairly recently. Every new mote that comes out about this deal puts Nokia's long-term thinking in a better, saner light.
Sad to have to mourn the passing of an iconic brand - but it doesn't look like there's as grand a future in phone hardware production as there is in the software and infrastructure that keeps the wee bastards ticking along...
Gosh, that was easy - thanks for that!
I'm now able to send SMS texts to short-form UK numbers without Google trying desperately to correct my attempts - yaay!
Hi - Nexus 5 owner and total 'Droid newbie here...
May I ask what third party SMS text app yu'd recommend, please?
The sodding G+/Hangout interaction's driving me spare.
You irked me with your pessimism, then enraged me with your delusion that their steam moniker has any relevance to that distinctly self-regarding and ultimately generally-quite-unimaginative and tiresome Steampunk aesthetic. I can't think of a quicker way to turn off huge chunks of your consumer base than by putting too much niche character into a design.
This is beta test kit they're announcing here - it needs to be intrinisically practical and dull so as to focus on the internals, which may well get swapped around, which certinaly do need to be breezy and cool. After all, much of the hardware production will end up being done by third-party actors, all featuring their own design requirements and conceits.
Regardless of that - no design team in their right mind would give away cues to their end-game at this stage.
Currently mulling over buying a Z30, despite BB's ever-looming demise.
The thought of future FB ownership sours the idea entirely.
Glad to hear my own frustrations about the appalling input echoed in your article - this is my first touchscreen phone (Yes, I'm a luddite) and I've very nearly hoyed the damn thing across the street a few times.
Before text-input even, the presumably-simple act of calling a number in the phone book is frustrating beyond belief - I'm still unsure exactly how many microseconds I'm supposed to keep my finger depressed for the unit to register that I want to call, not edit a number.
And then - drizzle. Don't even try to use the screen if there's even a speck of 101% humidity on the damn thing.
A shame, as i could forgive every other fault if I could just use the damn thing without frustration.
My hopes of fart-arsing around and developing a wee HTML pseudo-App are long-gone. Just not worth the red mist...
Also - did anyone else here get copied in, twice, to a couple of emails from ZTE proudly declaring that they value privacy.. whilst CC'ing in 300+, then 700+ names of other handset consumers?
Ah, I posted a confirmation of your observation in giddy haste (subsequently deleted).
The thing's still running like a dog with more than one Reg tab open.
DON'T MAKE ME USE CHROME, ELREG - POR FAVOR!
Aye, I'm a great believer in doing the little I can to support the sites I regularly visit by keeping their advertising visible and, when appropriate clicking on them to have a look (I even try the occasional Reg survey, but as a self-employed demi-nerd who doesn't have need of gigaquads of server infrastructure or cloud-based data nodes, my feedback is less than useful!).
Anyway, yes - this is the first time I've considered ad or flash blocking software.
I'm just surprised no one from ElReg appears to have noticed - does the whole world use Chrome these days?
btw - I'm on Win7, with plenty of HD space, 12Gb RAM and an i7 running Firefox 24 (although it was doing it on 23 too).
Hallo Reg - I've been suffering from really slow running on Reg for a while (couple of weeks?) now too - something to do with these Blue full page o2 adverts you've got going on. If I have a couple of Register tabs open, the whole browser chugs to a stop.
I had simply assumed it was something to do with my running Firefox beta, but having [in a fit of exasperation] tried to check some stories in Safari (apologies, it was the first icon I clicked on) I see your site's running just as slowly there.
HOW THE HELL IS ONE SUPPOSED TO TYPE ON THIS WRETCHEDLY TINY THING?!
I have tiny, almost effeminate hands, which've spent decades typing on all manner of interfaces and I'll be damned if I can use this thing.
My understanding from the video here and from what else I've seen (here on Reg in some BAE rant? :) is that the laser needs to maintain an amount of time on the same, or at least proximate, spot. The area at target is probably less than an inch, so I imagine that the accuracy of which you speak of at the turret's end could also apply to the drone, which has a lot more control over its immediate domain.
Once these lasers can burn a hole within a second or so, of course what I'm saying is moot - but these current systems aren't *that* powerful, no?
An array of heat sensors, coupled to logic that makes a drone capable of high G manouevres dart about, should be enough to get around this and the next couple of generations worth of offensive laser turret.
Given the extensive trading networks and 'gift sharing as a means of peace offering' culture in that part of the world, how do the researchers in this instance know that the source location of the swords is the same as the source of the teeth?
To be fair, El Reg is in good company... http://www.technologyreview.com/view/512381/astrobiologists-find-ancient-fossils-in-fireball-fragments/ , and it's not like most of us come here expecting the editorial staff to have fully-fledged astrobiologists ready to pick apart such stories. It is predominently an IT rag, after all.
Although, perhaps a little less credulity would've been in order...
...or investigating ways to surreptitiously undermine/break SpaceX's progress.
The cynic in me wonders whether you guys are trying to hint at me to buy something today..?
You're somewhat conspicuously ignoring the Apple-shaped elephant in the room you just made that statement in.
Jesus Christ, I rescind everything I've ever said about everyhing!
I thought the Norks had a good rep coding mobile apps and games for Fox network and such?
Or did I just imagine that?
And then some - I have to keep a copy of CorelDraw on hand for laser cutting purposes.
The shame is, although it's a grossly outdated piece of software, it has a couple (practically literally) of nice features and still, after all these years, represents Illustrator's only real competition out there for vector design packages.
Adobe really could use a little more competition...
I'm only tech support to friends and family (*sobs*), but..
Years ago, in the days of Windows XP, an anally-retentive friend of mine phoned up in a fluster, complaining that his new computer had stopped working. Working through what the start up sequence was doing over the phone didn't really highlight anything and was simply confused matters, so I enquired what (if anything) had happened before he turned it off last time. “Nothing — I'd just tided a load of files away and then turned it off - nothing was wrong” was the reply.
“What do you mean you ‘tidied a load of files away?’”
Turns out the overly-fastidious numpty had decided he didn't like how his C:\ drive was organised, so made his own file system, moving around Windows folders and such 'til it looked neat.
A little knowledge is a terrifying thing.
May I ask what you would suggest instead, Richard 12?
I just agree with your assertion is all — AutoCAD is useless to me with the way I work.
I clearly need a proper cup of tea this morning—my brain hung when reading ‘unionized labor’, trying desperately to work out how on earth one might strip ions from effort.
Am I the only demiGeek out there who thinks this is a pointless waste of effort? I appreciate the endeavour isn't quite as simple as ‘strapping a rocket engine onto wheels and letting rip’ but the functional end result is as good-as.
A ‘car’ entering a land speed record should have directly-powered wheels, at least.
I guess, by that measure, tiny rockets affixed to trims a la Catherine Wheels would count. A lot prettier too.
Both this and the BBC article linked-to are light on details of the plans - Dassault are visibly mentioned - but no word on the British partner(s). Presumably not BAe, so then who?
Wait.. what? We haven't actually any proof of the existence of any exomoons yet though, right?
Or have I missed a fairly amazing announcement sometime recently?
This page (August 2011) seems to imply not..