46 posts • joined Friday 27th April 2007 15:47 GMT
A better solution
I reckon they should have fitted a rectal scanner. Much more secure. Or do I mean retinal? Can never remember the difference :-)
Re: No talk of the known issues on this device?
It's the kind of "in depth" review you can write by googling and looking at some pictures :-)
Not so simple
It's not just about traffic shaping. The end user experience depends on contention, exchange loading, backhaul capacity, peering, CDN arrangements and more. Most of these things mean nothing to the average user who looks mainly at the cost, and in any case is using a cheap N150 router sat next to the microwave.
That would be capitalism and market forces at work. Something which city dwellers should be all too familiar with and supportive of :-)
Why should BT rush to install FTTC in an area that already has cable? Particularly given that they are investing heavily in rolling out FTTC to the vast majority of the country ignored by cable companies.
That's just ridiculous. Fossil oil (as is pretty much anything else that comes out of the ground) is a finite resource. Yes, we can cut down rainforest and plant biofuel crops on it, but if you think that's a good idea you must be mad. If we have an alternative to burning it, that's also sustainable and low CO2, then we should do that. You don't work for an oil company, do you?
We use petrol chemicals for virtually everything, from medicines to food. Burning it is pretty stupid. It will run out or become prohibitively expensive at some point.
What a depressing set of comments and upvotes/downvotes. The balance of commentards seems to be towards not believing in climate change, and encouraging the status quo. So we carry on burning limited resources instead of doing something useful with them, pumping out CO2, radiation from nuclear power stations, and shit in general. Hopefully the planet won't end up like Coruscant in my lifetime.
Re: Spamhous must really be hurting those parasites
You forgot to mention DKIM and SPF :-)
Difficult to get working, but can be done. Also, it helps if you choose an ISP which doesn't segregate its home and business IP addresses into different ranges. It's not supposed to be easy though.
One ISP I used in the past would only open port 25 once it had tested the configuration of your mail server to make sure it wasn't an open relay.
Re: I heard 90% of all statistics are made up. So, is that you're only source?"
"The weird/annoying/puzzling thing is that, no matter how many times these retard errors are pointed out , people"
If there's one thing that really winds me up, it's adding a space between the end of a word and the following comma.
What a load of pointless fuss
So Java is rubbish because the browser plugin has the odd vulnerability or two (which could in fact be due to integration with the browser rather than anything fundamental to Java itself). Chrome and Firefox seem to get patched every five minutes and no one bats an eyelid. Known M$ vulnerabilities can hang around for months before they get fixed.
Anyone would think that someone has got it in for Java. Maybe it's Oracle that is spreading all this FUD and hatred?
Personally, I love Java and hate Oracle. I don't want the Ask toolbar, and it would be nice if the documentation didn't have lots of broken links to the Sun websites, or pointless links to top-level pages. However, I think the language is great, and is still a brilliant way to produce functional cross-platform applications (client or server) using a proper strongly-typed OO language.
Not a sucker
Following two Dyson suckers that didn't work all that well, made a lot of noise, and then packed up, I bought a Miele vacuum cleaner. OK, so I have to buy bags occasionally, but at least I don't have to buy a new cleaner every couple of years. And his fan apparently whines a lot.
But he's totally right about the roundabout.
Re: if only...
Couldn't agree more. I made a couple of edits regarding the town I've lived in for twenty years (including fixing an out of date link to a website I run), and the page owner (who lives in Thailand, I believe) reverted them. I sent him an appropriate message, put the changes back in, and strangely they stuck the second time.
If you're going to resort to describing colours for the hard of hearing or whatever, you could at least use the universally accepted X11 colours...
Your mauve looks more like "hotpink" to me, and teal is definitely nearer "turquoise. Or, of course, you could use the RGB values, which would be clearly understood by at least 90% of the Reg readership.
Re: Skype takes the user experience very seriously
Same thing happened to me. £10 cleaned out in a couple of hours, with calls to Yemen, Belarus and somewhere in Africa. Yes, I had a strong password. No, I didn't leave myself logged in a public place. Skype kindly spotted that my account was subject to fraudulent activity and suspended it when there was 13p of credit left, necessitating various hoop jumping to get it reactivated. No refund though, needless to say. I then got an irritating set of alerts informing me that my credit was low.
Re: My main gripe with Metro/Modern UI
It's the latest thing. Apparently, removing punctuation, capitalisation and spelling improves legibility... just like removing 3D effects and colour from the icons in Windows 8.
Worth pointing out that holding a camera far enough away to see the LCD screen (assuming it's not sunny, in which case you probably won't be able to see it at all), leads to a naturally more wobbly stance. Not good for your obscene telephoto lenses. However, you don't eventually end up looking like Patrick Moore.
Three Cheers for British Telecommunications
People have been "BT bashing" for as long as I can remember. Personally, I reckon they're doing a good job. They have to make a profit, same as anyone else, and rolling out FTTP to the whole country sometime in the next fortnight (which appears to be what a lot of posters to this forum require) is infeasible from both a technical and an economic perspective.
Compared with Virgin, who will only invest where there is a sufficiently high number of potential subscribers per square metre (PS/M2, you heard it here first) and won't open their network to anyone else, I reckon BT are pretty good.
BTW, I don't work for BT, but I do have no cause for complaint (FTTC 80/20).
I am now donning fireproof underwear in anticipation.
Reg gone American?
So that will be "Really Soon" then?
Before you know it, we'll be dropping apostrophes and using "like" at least three times in every sentence. Not that you'll be able to differentiate one sentence from another, of course, because there won't be any punctuation.
Or maybe I'm just being picky :-)
Re: The Year of Linux on the Desktop? Not yet.
I'm forced to use Office 2007 at work. The novelty of playing "hunt the function" wears off fairly quickly. A fine example of change for change's sake. Just like Windows 8, perhaps?
The problem with adoption (or lack) of Linux on the desktop is driven by the fact that central IT departments are often either too scared or insufficiently knowledgeable to do anything other than shove in Exchange Server and Sharepoint. I work for a small employer without an IT department (but loads of highly qualified techies), but for reasons I don't fully understand we pay for outsourced Exchange and a Sharepoint CRM system. Copies of Zarafa or Zimbra and SugarCRM on one of our own servers would do the job nicely, and require very little maintenance.
I think the key is that the Microsoft way has always been easier for management to understand and justify. However, there might be a sufficient head of steam built up by dislike of Windows 8 (and allegedly Windows Server 2012) for some organisations to take that leap of faith. Who knows?
Or maybe they'll just buy everyone a new Dell or HP tablet :-)
The Year of Linux on the Desktop?
There, I said it first!
Actually, Linux Mint 13 (with added Cinnamon) is pretty good. Making the slightly-crap Gnome 3 look like the tried and tested Gnome 2.
Personally, I'll be sticking with Windows 7, but if I had to make a choice between Windows 8 and the penguin, it would be the penguin for me every time.
Re: Tap? TAP?
Yeah, I sat there tapping my non-touchscreen 24" HD vertical stand-mounted tablet, and it just completely refused to do anything :-)
Re: Note for GCHQ:-
Or even just using webmail over https on servers located in some country which is less than friendly to the UK (Argentina, France, somewhere like that). And of course persuading all your <insert terrorist organisation of choice here> buddies to do the same.
Wait... they already do that :-(
Completely agree. Site works perfectly well without enabling the cookies. Maybe you need a button on that popup that says "don't bother me again". Just need to set a cookie to stop it being displayed every time :-)
Re: Noise? Heat?
Velociraptors, being 10K rpm, have a more pleasant (ie. less noticable) seeking noise. Also, they use less electricity than even the green 3.5" drives.
I have a system with a 60GB SSD, a 600GB Velociraptor, a cheap Scythe cooler on an Intel i5, and an unbelievably cheap (and quiet) eBuyer-special PSU. It sits under my desk at home, and is inaudible even when the house is completely silent.
I keep all the "bulk" data and applications I rarely use on the Velociraptor, because I don't trust SSDs (yet), and couldn't afford a big enough one!
Re: Not a Be User...
For me, BBC iPlayer means hi-def streaming, with no drop-outs or buffering at all (Zen Internet). Works a treat. The HD streams are as good visually as BBC HD over the air (at least, on my puny 32"), but the sound is not as good. Maybe you need to move to where you can get 21Mb/s out of an "up to 20Mb" connection, like I do!
Skype good, MS evil?
It wasn't so long ago that people were bemoaning Skype for its proprietary closed protocols. So now there's a prospect of it being subsumed into Windows Live Message Network MSN Explorer (or whatever it's called) that's apparently a bad thing?
At least the various other (open source) chat clients I use can successfully interoperate with MS (e.g. my Jabber gateway, Adium, Pidgin etc etc). So maybe this marriage (or rather adoption) will be a good thing?
Works for me
My understanding is that HomePlug AV (200Mbps) uses 2MHz to 30MHz, and doesn't transmit when idle. I've got HomePlug AV in my house, and various DAB radios, and never had a problem. Also, I believe that HomePlug AV is notched on the main shortwave bands, and in any case only interferes within a range of about 30 metres anyway. I can't see any big masts or beardy sandal types within a 100 metres of my house, so I'm probably OK.
The faster (500Mbps and 1Gbps) units that were tested use a wider frequency spread, and hence are more likely to interfere with DAB (and anything else).
Given that I live 500 metres from a TV and mobile phone transmitter, I'm not too worried about the additional RF that my system generates, although when we finally get BT Infinity around here (or maybe even NTLVirginWestTele Cable) then I'll probably pay an electrician to ruin my walls for me.
What about Zen? PC Pro's best broadband provider for the last 10 million years or something?
Just looked at Be's website... unfortunately I typed in my phone number and it reported that their availability checker is broken :-)
Think I'll stick with Zen. Reassuringly expensive.
I was initially excited by "the race", and actively lobbied my friends and relatives in Malvern. I even entered into the true spirit of the competition, by voting on someone elses behalf. At the end of the day, Malvern was never going to win.
Back in the good old days, we were one of the first exchanges to get ADSL. Hooray. However, we are still waiting for the ADSL2+ upgrade. That's now 18 months behind its initial target date, and allegedly going to happen in the next four months. The nearest cable is in Worcester, about 7 miles away. Maybe we should ask the good people of Blewbury to come and dig a trench for us?
Maybe I'm just a sore loser. Malvern is in a better position that many of the small rural exchanges (or even those on the limit of the ADSL range), but it doesn't make me any less p*ssed off.
A bit too weedy!
I have a Core i3-530, 4GB of RAM, and 1TB disk. On this, I'm running for virtual machines under Proxmox VE. And all for a tad under 25W at the plug, when everything is idle.
Oh, and I forgot to mention it's bloomin' fast when it needs to be. Much faster at virus scanning email, for example, than my previous Via C7 setup.
Gigabit copper rolled out to house in Worcestershire
Big announcement... I am willing to offer gigabit ethernet to anyone who wants to lay a cat 6 cable into my house in Worcestershire. Oh, almost forgot to mention the slight contention issue of the 7.6mbps ADSL connection, but hey, that's not important.
The point is, when Virgin cable covers the whole country, stories like this one will have some significance. Currently, they don't.
What's stopping cable companies
Part of the reason BT has a "virtual monopoly" is that NTLVirginWest only bother to cable high density areas, as far as I can tell. I'd gladly sign up for cable if it was an option. I'd even dig my own trench up my drive. I'd even promise to rent a movie every month.
Presumably there was nothing stopping TeleMediaWestVirgin bidding for the EU money, other than the fact that there isn't enough profit in it?
Don't need setup
Most Homeplug AV kit (this WD stuff included) has a button you press which syncs the device with existing devices on your network. You never need to set the encryption key. In any case, they all use the same Intellon chipset, and I'm pretty sure there's a Mac version of the software available.
I am getting fed up with the "these should be banned" fraternity. The original BT Vision equipment was noisier than standard Homeplug. However, Ofcom have investigated this and have not ruled them illegal.
Firstly, they only radiate when they are transferring data. Secondly, I don't have any radio hams living nearby. Thirdly, if I did then I'm sure they'd have some kind of equipment to be able to work out it was me. Fourthly, if they complained I would cease and desist. Or maybe I wouldn't, depending on how unsightly their bloomin' great aerial happened to be.
I personally don't like the fact that my semi-detached neighbour has a DECT phone and a Wi-fi router bombarding me with unwanted RF 24 hours a day, but I'm afraid I have to put up with it.
Lead-lined underpants, anyone?
That's great. Not only do I get irradiated by 40 mobile phones whilst stuck in a metal box, but a whole load of wi-fi too.
According to Japanese "boffins", we should be very afraid.
Why can't people just look out of the window at the magnificent British countryside, or read the Sun, that's what I want to know.
Before the Olympics, please
If the world is going to end in 2012, why don't we cancel the Olympics and spend all that money (some of which is mine) that the government is wasting, on having a huge party instead? Or giving an 8-core Mac Pro to everyone called Dave (preferably a couple of weeks before disaster strikes, so that I can have time to marvel at Saint Jobs' wonderful creation).
You're all idiots, except me
The level of erudite commentary in this thread beggars belief.
I've got a Mac... that runs Leopard and XP. I've got a PC... that runs XP and Linux. I've got a Linux box (it could run XP, but no point without a monitor or keyboard). They're all equally good. The browsers are all equally good too. OK, so some render pages better than others, but they all operate with varying degrees of slight wrongness. The question is not really one of "what's better". They all get the job done.
Going back to the original subject, the Internet is basically a dangerous place. You could use an analogy with cars. Give a learner a Ferrari, and he's likely to crash it quite soon. The fact that it has fantastic levels of grip, and phenomenal brakes, is not going to stop them ploughing off the road at the first available opportunity. You can give some PC users anti-virus, anti-spam, anti-phishing, anti-spyware, but it's not going to stop them ploughing off the road at the first sign of a tempting 419.
When I surf the Internet (with Safari on Mac by preference, but I'm not particularly partisan), I drive slowly, look well ahead, and keep my equipment regularly serviced.
In defence of A level physics, 1983
I don't think I've read any article or web page that attempts to distinguish between zero gavity and zero-g force, in the context of parabollic flights. To quote the never wrong Wikipedia article on "zero-g":
"Often, the term 'zero gravity' or 'reduced gravity' is used to describe weightlessness, but these are scientifically inaccurate."
Personally, I find the concept of 'scientifically innaccurate' and the world's greatest living scientist (which I'm not disputing) to be a source of some amusement.
Perhaps Prof. Hawking was refering to his greatest yet-to-be-published discovery, having proved that "G", the universal gravitational constant, is in fact zero and not 6.67*10-11 m3 kg-1s-2 like Newton thought.
Alas, irony is lost on so many people.
I've got an 'A' Level
It's a shame that one of the world's most eminent physicists doesn't understand that plummetting at the same velocity as the aircraft you happen to be floating around in is not the same as zero gravity. "I could have gone on and on" he said... presumably, right up to the the point where the "zero gravity" caused him to hurtle into the ground.
Or perhaps he's trying to popularise science.
Mind you, I didn't understand "A Brief History of Time", so who am I to criticise?
- World's OLDEST human DNA found in leg bone – but that's not the only boning going on...
- Lightning strikes USB bosses: Next-gen jacks will be REVERSIBLE
- Pics Brit inventors' GRAVITY POWERED LIGHT ships out after just 1 year
- Storagebod Oh no, RBS has gone titsup again... but is it JUST BAD LUCK?
- Two million TERRIBLE PASSWORDS stolen by malware attackers