345 posts • joined 26 Nov 2008
Something about the wavelengths of the language gives me pause; Mr. AO is the usual suspect, I agree, but let's not forget this upstart ADabbs person--noob-kids-on-the-block do try harder...
First, world problems...
Only as far back as the 4S! Sue the bastards!
Re: Human flea instead?
>good to have quick release to then dump it and move on.
And, to prevent a net accumulation of those same booster packs on the backsides of the current enemy, drone tech built in to giddy-up the nearly-depleted-of-fuel boosters back to lines, where they can be lathered, rinsed, and repeated.
I generally agree with comments about dronifying gun barrels: that's much more efficient, militarily, as guns don't have stomachs. However, DARPA is doing the sensible thing in funding research of this kind: you never know what kind of consumer shiny might come out of it, ultimately--and wars are fought to ensure that civilians have something to live for.
00.15% is probably enough
for Apple to pay for the bonking gear that they'll foist onto retailers globally after making 'an offer they can't refuse' i.e. 'use our kit or the money gets it'.
>you and your peers insist on telling us, over and over and over and over again, at tedious fucking length, how much you "don't care what others think"
Bingo! I suspected that there was a pattern here, but until now I've been unable--you know--to put my finger on it. Thank you, endlessly, STB!
(I'd use an icon displaying a very different digit, flipped in the direction of the twitcherati, if one were available--but no such luck. Anyway, I'm off to the agora so that I can posture and flash my Apple tat. I'd add 'and to wind up the twitcherati', but apparently they never need winding, never need winding, never need winding. Tah!)
Regulations, regulations, regulations...
"Apple Watch has not been authorized as required by the rules of the Federal Communications Commission. This device is not, and may not be, offered for sale or lease, or sold or leased, until authorization is obtained."
Re: i dont understand
>why would you cover your nipples in a selfie
Personally, I do it so as not to let my market cap slip--which can happen if you start giving the product away. I can't speak for others, though.
You. are. not. alone.
Re: and to think that ...
>... just one guy created all this in six days, 6000 years ago ...
Or so it is claimed. There having been apparently no one else around at the time to vouch for him, though, leaves me a little suspicious of the claim.
You think you're astounded, do you? You are deluded, my fellow commentard, deluded.
Re: And we're still...
Relatively safe here, IOW. Right?
Re: What I don't get
>Who has nude pics of themselves anyway?
And why? Are the pictures more real, or something? What?!
Re: It's all a matter of perspective
I think he meant: "from a great height..."
Would that be the "YOY-phone", or the "WOW-phone" you've just created?
>I never want to be on the same roads as him.
All roads lead to Rome.
Re: I had a home version Atari trackball
>does anyone remember the original Sun optical ones that required their own specific metal pad with a pattern on it?
I once saw something like this--an optical mouse with required grid-equipped metal mousepad--running on a Mac Plus (and no bullshittin'). Large WTF? factor at the time. The system in question, though, must have had at least six (6) complete systems (System plus Finder, pre-System 7) installed in various places on the hard drive, which tended to make it a little 'wobbly'.
Re: How many fingers am I holding up?
>But why did they keep churning out one-button mice when everyone else had a three-button.
One of which did nothing whatsoever, while the other had only very limited use, you mean? Jeez, 'dunno. Maybe they designed the interface so that it only required a single button--rather than graft someone else's mouse onto the system and call the second rarely-used button, and the third never-used buttons "features". Could be. Could be.
Re: New browser names:
Re: It's that featureless mouse thing again!
>Apple have instructional videos built into the mouse's Preference settings that show you how to use every gesture.
Bastards! Evil bastards!
Re: so just like...
>i once put the flywheel counter weight in 180 degrees out on my single cylinder honda 100 motorbike. i know all about haptic feedback...
>why the fuck would
anyone design a drive train so that it was even possible to mis-install a single part--let alone the flywheel counter-weight--incorrectly at all?
Re: "they would release the name of the daughter of St Louis County’s police chief"
A good principle to apply, even if you're a vigilante, is 'measure twice, cut once'. Another relevant principle is to stay on task.
No more turning over a USB thing, then turning it over again to plug it in: Reversible socket ready for lift off
And so, sooo very ...
user-serviceable. In a pinch, I mean. Like the sockets. And the cables will cost the moon at the outset. The sockets the earth. And they'll both be fragile. However, Sum Won Somewhere will make loads o' cash selling barely-functioning facsimiles. Unless, of course, someone else comes along and decides to put a cap in this whole USB madhouse, which would be the preferred outcome in a rational world.
Re: Happier Days
>It was a nice article until I got to the point about the “pompous series” of Apple ads.
I can't agree more. That line is the current low point in the writing on The Register. It's gratuitous and contemptible, as it appears to be the only reason the article even appears on this otherwise-IT-centric feed at all. An apology from the author and the editor(s) is reasonably expected.
Re: Mork Calling Orson
>Sad news. When will we take mental health seriously?
When will we take the pharmaceutical industry out behind the shed for a long and serious talk?
Re: Market Share means nothing!
The trade-off is between market and margin. Apple does have the option of making a move here: squeeze hard and some of the other players will drop out of the game. Squeeze harder, or for longer, and the market changes even further...
Re: This sounds so wrong...
Considerate of you to think of Siri's emotional well-being, but it's much too early for that. Eventually, though, you'll have to preface every command/request/activation with a "Siri, may I touch you?" or a "Siri, do you mind if I put my finger(s) right here?".
I expect that voice control is inevitable, and it will improve iteratively, eventually evolving into a portable personal AI-like assistant you can invoke from any computing device (bearing the relevant logo, anyway). The one thing I'd like to see guaranteed--in the near-term at the very least--is that that Siri, or its descendant agent, neither tolerate, nor resort to, uptalking.
>It is surprising how many people don't twig when they meet the rarely used left hand thread on a piece of hardware.
Almost everyone--even the generally-competent, and even those who are aware of the existence of that class of threaded objects and who attempt, informally, to enumerate and catalogue them--will fail to twig if such a thread is used and its use violates the principle of least surprise. An example: an inexplicable, never-before-seen instance of a reverse-threaded bolt in a bicycle's stem/quill.
>I always thought clunge was a word used to describe the everyday discharge from the female vagina that, when not cleaned regularly, turns into some kind of orange crust.
There's another kind of vagina?!
Re: Barry Rueger - Robertson Rules!
Never heard of Robertson? It's a 'square socket' done right, before the square made the scene; the Robertson has a Morse taper that allows the driver, holding the screw, to be held vertically, downward-pointing, and to be used one-handed (left or right, according to taste).
Re: those ... sofas ... seem ... well-polished
>...the same team that developed W8
Nah. Dogfooding is big at Google! And Android is (based on) open source, isn't it? There's your answer, right there.
Oh! Oh! Teacher, teacher!
>The device could also use sensors to detect arm or wrist motions and perform actions accordingly.
Brain bleach, please.
Nah, let's call it the iWaffer--it will almost certainly hit the market a few tenths of a millimeter thinner than something else.
Re: Remember what happened to transparent keyboards?
Opaque aluminum! When did they invent that?
Re: The internet is now ... closed for business
>Get rid of all instances of this and we're back in the days of Gopher and newsgroups.
You make it sound so easy. If only... If only...
That aside, it seems to me that the outrage is necessarily constrained to the question of permission/notice/consent; Facebook is built almost entirely on emotional manipulation as it is, so their formally undertaking research to make the tool sharper isn't much of a reach. Offensive that Fb couldn't content itself with the impetus of the juggernaut it's created--fueled almost entirely by people's insecurities about their social position-but not a surprise. Probably the bean-counters or the shareholders put the fear into management about 'are you doing enough?'.
Re: I'm sure he'll end up in court over this one.
Upvoted that, in spite of it being a groaner.
Re: Magnetic "connection"
>Either that magnet is so strong that the phone will break when I try to remove it, or it's weak enough that the first time I stray off a velodrome it will jump off and smash under the wheels of the following truck.
Or there's a pair of neodymium magnets, with appropriately-positioned poles in each of the bracket and the phone back that, when lined up (and possibly constrained by nesting rings) means that the phone can be released only with a twist about an axis centered on the bracket and mount point on the camera back. Nature doesn't do twisting like that. Not anymore, anyway.
Re: @Jan 0
>He might be Australian. We use "c*nt" colloquially, the same way Brits use "bastard" and Americans use "asshole", and it isn't intended to be misogynistic.
And context should have told you that, Jan0. "cunt", as used by non-antipodeans, doesn't usually convey--and isn't ever intended to convey--'meany', 'bastard', 'bad person', 'Doctor Evil', etc., so your interpretation of its use as misogynist suggests that you perceive the word to be wholly appropriable, or to have a particular or singular use, and to have a narrow definition. I've found myself reminding a visitor from 'down there', though, that the word is used in these parts differently, when she was expressing anger at having had her bicycle stolen and referring to the thief as a "cunt". Different strokes...
Re: Install the free Sophos AV for home users ...
And don't forget to uninstall Sophos, with prejudice, then install clamXav and configure its sentry to stand guard.
read textbooks (any field) linearly, for interest's sake.
Re: What Apple needs is someone...
Or spread the wealth and hire a charm of magpies.
Re: Worth every penny
>I'd hope that the interior circuitry / connectors would be more rugged in the lacie
They're counting on you doing just that. Vain hope.
That can't be right!
3-5 million a month! That would mean shifting, at most, 60 million of these things in a year. The shareholders are gonna freak! Eyes will bulge out! Heads will roll!
>"sufficiently advanced "
Aye, there's the rub!
"Sufficiently" will almost certainly create a vacuum of power in the management (read: control) of traffic lights: the self-driving cars will be working, cooperatively, towards an ideal or an optimum, somehow defined--and that, I think, almost of necessity requires that the programming of the cooperating vehicles involve communication of information to, and receipt of information from, the programming that goes into the traffic lights. Once such a channel is open... resistance is futile.
Re: yeah whatever
>You know where else you see very few women? Garbage collection.
But when you do, you know they're serious. And, incidentally, they're almost always pretty buff.
Re: Interesting points above but...
>My other half will be graduating this year and I doubt we will be able to afford the official photos so we will be taking our own before returning the gown.
Brilliant! Absolutely fucking brilliant! And inspiring, too. Why, I'll bet you could even ask a friend who owns a camera to do the photography for you. The possibilities are suddenly limitless!
On the horns of a dilemma
If you apply the .reg file, and a hack-aware MS subsequently attempts to lock out others from adding their XP machines to the unholy host via a patch, you'll likely continue to be protected by virtue of hiding in the midst of the flock of POS machines, right? If so, then the time to apply the hack is immediately. However, MS might also go to some lengths to carve out the genuine from the non-genuine POS machines, and expose those machines to the wolf they deserve. On which subject: it's tempting to give this a shot on the lone ewe I'm aware of still burdened with XP (you know, for the added security), and not expect much blow-back from MS, but I'm more concerned that the updates (especially if visible to the user of said machine) would lull the user into the false sense of security *cough* they've enjoyed for more than a decade.
Re: It would appear
there's going to be a problem (at least in) securing the means to detonate it--which makes the cure at least as bad as the disease.
>Other bugs cropped up as well, including several that would cause the installer to fail with a variety of cryptic error codes.
Imagine that: "cryptic error codes".
What a time to be alive!
Referring to KJ-u as "chubby" is politically incorrect: he's going to develop a complex if you don't stop. And if he does develop that complex, how will that make you feel, hmm?
- Analysis iPhone 6: The final straw for Android makers eaten alive by the data parasite?
- First Crack Bloke buys iPHONE 6 and DROPS IT to SMASH on PURPOSE
- First Fondle Register journo battles Sydney iPHONE queue, FONDLES BIG 'UN
- Early result from Scots indyref vote? NAW, Jimmy - it's a SCAM
- TOR users become FBI's No.1 hacking target after legal power grab