All of us? At the same time? That's not stopping, that's just a change of direction.
73 posts • joined 27 Apr 2007
All of us? At the same time? That's not stopping, that's just a change of direction.
To add a counter-argument, my general experience is that, yes, trouble is never a single, logical point,but in general there is a single, logical narrative.
Recently, a customer (health service) was infected with one of the encryption scams. No irreparable harm was done, but it did throw up a few security issues they needed to address, and it caused our application a minor wobble, but that was it.
Jump forward a month, and a letter generator suddenly starts crawling and then we start getting reports that saved letters (files) are missing. The entries/links to them are still in the database, but the letters themselves are AWOL. Not only that, but the logs confirm that the letters were created and initially saved.
I said to my boss, "it's related to the virus". He declares (rightly) that that's impossible - the virus is gone. I stick to my guns and keep digging in the system logs, before finally understanding what's happened.
In response to the virus, shadowing had been set up by the customer for the server. And just to be extra safe, they shadowed the server that was doing the initial shadowing. A shame that they had to run different shadowing software on each server due to some AV conflict, and it was probably not a good idea to shadow the second server back to the first server (and to the same directory).
Bottom line, the shadowing software applications got in a fight with each other, and we eventually found the missing letters in a hidden folder for conflicted files.
In fairness to Google (and iirc), they encourage their staff to take on nonsensical job titles, partly as a cheeky response the job-title nonsense we are all moaning about.
Normally I'd agree, but CBS have generally been pretty good with regard to fan-stuff, and the Axanar crew were really taking the piss.
On the bright side, when Axanar challenged CBS to detail the exact copywrite infringements, one of the lawyers did just that, delving deep into Trek lore (history, not Data's brother).
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2757228-Axanar-Klingon.html (page 11 onwards is the fun bit)
As someone else remarked "Depending on where they fell on the nerdiness spectrum, this could've been one of the greatest weeks or one of the worst weeks in some paralegal's life."
I wouldn't be too confident even if your company/family is certified idiot-free. A work colleague was hit after visiting a few sites looking at technical forums.
When you write any sort of function, its form is basically algebraic, even if it's just a bunch of statements and operators.
However, it's arguable that programming is not a bad introduction to algebra, but I wouldn't really expect anyone under 12 to be actually hand-coding (unless by choice).
Regarding the Kia, fun, isn't it? Had mine for over a year and I still get it wrong about 1 in 5 times. To add insult to injury, I now also get it wrong when I drive a 'normal' car.
Well, I think it's a wonderful look - clearly inspired by a classic of interface design:
In fairness, placebos are very effective for pretty much everyone. Bizarrely, it doesn't even matter much if you're told that you're taking a placebo. Oh, and it helps if you're charged a lot of money. Seriously.
Anecdotally, I was given homoeopathic medicine when I was covered in very virulent mosquito bites. It worked brilliantly within minutes, and I know that stuff is a load of bollocks.
Netflix IMHO have got it right. I don't bother trying to circumnavigate the DRM because I don't need to. The monthly price is low and I can watch on pretty much any device in the home. I don't feel I'm 'buying' content, so don't feel aggrieved that it's DRM-enabled.
So common passwords (e.g. 'password') would look the same encrypted?
Could they have also get hold of the salt? If so, this would presumably allow them to encrypt various common passwords and then see which accounts had a match?
Can someone tell me - does each password get its own salt or is there a global salt that's used?
Hmm... I seem to remember a story called, iirc, "Welcome to the Goldfish Bowl". There was a huge time-viewer that allowed you to see the past housed in a massive building, and it could only look back if the event was over 500 years ago or something.
Then someone worked out a) how to make it small and cheap and b) how to get around the 500 year thing (possibly realising it was an artificial restriction). They released the machine to the public, and a very angry man from the government turned up with the simple question "how long ago is the past?" and then left, muttering the story's title. (or something).
The trouble FB faces is that it doesn't really allow any development as a communications medium. No discussion threads, everything dropping out of site after a few hours - it doesn't really support anything more complex than gossip, kittens and promotional pages. Everyone's trapped in an endless loop.
Observing my children and their friends, calls are ridiculously short. They seem to treat speaking as an extension of texting, and employ the same brevity. It can be quite shocking for us old 'uns, as it often (from our perspective) comes across as incredibly rude - e.g.
Daughter: Do you want to come round?
Friend: No (end of call).
1 min later
Mother of friend: I'm sorry - X was so rude. She can't come round as we're just off to see her gran.
Cue agreement from me and the wife, head-scratching from daughter...
I didn't know that - and nor does Wikipedia amusingly...
check out number 7... it's a link to an el reg article about, mostly, wikipedia...
I suspect NASA know that there are a hard-core who will never be convinced even if you rubbed their faces in Martian dust whilst giving them a spacesuit wedgie.
The point is that potential converts (who might otherwise be convinced by a 'no way this could have been taken on Mars' argument) have an alternative - and correct - explanation.
I guess they've learned from all the nonsense that sprung up around the moon landings with regard to shadows and fluttering flags, and so on.*
* what I love about conspiracy theories is how they require the conspirators to be both superhuman geniuses and complete cretins - they build a convincing moon set, but then decide that a gentle breeze and some extra lighting would improve the ambience?
A pair of houses in Greyswood St, SW16 were bombed and rebuilt, but no sign of that either (we used to live opposite, and I was puzzled for some time by the discontinuity in the architecture and design).
Do they give any rough idea of what % of bombs are recorded?
One of the problems with wikipedia - and relevant to this issue - is that the inaccuracy is now verifiable - the article can cite the levenson report (citation is more important than truth).
It's a constant problem with wikipedia - an incorrect or unverified fact is lifted from wikipedia by a lazy journo, and the journo's article then becomes the verification.
See http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/15/tom_melly_wikipedia_comment/ for an example (and for added irony, note that the reg article has become one of the citations).
What worries me is that they seem to be heading towards a "if enough people complain" standard. Mob justice and faux outrage as law... great.
Personally, I'd be happier if they picked the cases they're going to prosecute out of a hat.
Some interesting stuff in the comments (I really must give 2000AD another go - several years since I even looked at a copy), but no one is really addressing the issue of what went wrong for the old-style UK kids comics.
Take the Beano - it was fairly clear picking up an issue even 10 years ago that this wasn't really a comic - more of a magazine with a few strips. Why did that change? Once would assume that it was economic necessity, but I'm not sure where the necessity came from. Both my kids will happily read old Beano annuals, so why did kids stop buying kids' comics?
'Mesklin' was mentioned by another poster...
Mostly correct, but I don't know where you get the 'years younger' bit. At 1G, it will take you about 12 years (ship time), and you will therefore be 12 years older...
Ah, I was wondering who would make the Mission of Gravity connection...
AFAICT if you accelerate/decelerate at 1G the whole way, then you can make it in around 12 years (ship time).
Bono and the boys decide to retire and move to Australia to take up surfing. Anyway, a reporter goes to interview them in their new beach pad. Unfortunately, on the day of the interview, the entire band is drowned in a freak accident, and on arrival, the reporter is greeted by a tearful manservant. The reporter asks if the band is ready to be interviewed, to which the manservant replies, "No, Mister - Bondi-expats U2 die."
... and apparently they're spending their life talking (and thinking) bollox.
... and that's ignoring the fact that 'boring' in this case is referring to experimental evidence that time and space change their relative dimensions in order to maintain a constant value for c.
For a tech-site, I'm amazed at the fundamental ignorance shown by many posters of the basics of relativity.
How can people spend what appears to be quite a lot of time dreaming up nonsense when a little reading would at least give a basic understanding of the principles (which have been proved time and time again in the lab)?
but c is not the speed of light - it is the speed that any particle with zero rest-mass MUST travel at. Actually, and iirc, it is more complicated than that. In a sense, everything travels at speed c all the time - it's just that massless particles travel at c in 3d space as well as 4d space-time.
In other words, to travel faster than c requires you to behave differently from every other particle in the universe.
I don't think it quite works like that (but I could be wrong). Apart from anything else, remember that your propulsion mass is increasing too...
Thought experiment - can the people on the ship measure that they have more mass? If not, how would they explain the sudden need for shed-loads of energy?
I down-voted you and el reg said it was sorry I didn't like your post. This is not true. I loved your post. Still chuckling...
Travelling faster than c (as in "reaching a star x light years away in less than x years") is perfectly possible - it's getting back in time for tea that's the problem...
Point of order (hopefully an interesting one). C is not the speed of light - it is the speed that anything with zero rest-mass will travel at - i.e. light is one of the class of things that travel at C.
Actually, almost all browsers screw up in some way or another when it comes to 'split', and IE only screws up when the delimiter is a regex rather than a string. Not defending IE - I only use it for one must-use-IE application - but cross-browser JS implementation issues are not going to go away any time soon, irrespective of which browser you use.
Mine (from Casting the Runes):
There was more unpleasantness, however. Either an economical suburban company had decided that their light would not be required in the small hours, and had stopped working, or else something was wrong with the meter; the effect was in any case that the electric light was off. The obvious course was to find a match, and also to consult his watch: he might as well know how many hours of discomfort awaited him. So he put his hand into the well-known nook under the pillow: only, it did not get so far.
What he touched was, according to his account, a mouth, with teeth, and with hair about it, and, he declares, not the mouth of a human being. I do not think it is any use to guess what he said or did; but he was in a spare room with the door locked and his ear to it before he was clearly conscious again. And there he spent the rest of a most miserable night, looking every moment for some fumbling at the door: but nothing came.
Which would be fine if they hadn't made it clear that it was to 'protect' their catering staff rather than the pupils. Since she wasn't actually photographing anything but her plate of food, they basically made themselves look like twats.
Anyway, whatever, thanks to the council, she's raised nearly £100,000
Anyone else having problems with today's (?) security updates? KB 2518864, 2572073 and 2633880.
Keeps prompting, installing, prompting again, installing again, and so on...
I don't appear to be alone (http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_xp-windows_update/windows-update-keep-installing/03b79e2b-da93-4e63-99b5-f933e3841036)
No fans of TrueCrypt or PGP?
where does it say that it's only for mobile devices?
Hmm... apart from the sound (and I'm partially deaf) I can't think of any particular reason to buy this.
So... moving on, is it just me or does the special edition suck? (as in "adds nothing, takes away a lot")
The main crimes:
1. The scenes with the colonists
2. Boring shooting gallery scene with the automatic guns in the corridor
Nice, but, if you're going to start referencing XKCD, can we have something more useful?
... because otherwise it makes no sense at all.
You could pay twice as much to have it developed in the UK and it would still make sense not to off-shore. Not only is this tax revenue leaving the country rather than being spent back into the economy, but you've also just increased the unemployment figures...
This is like using your petrol to fuel someone else's car on the basis that they get better MPG than you... (I admit that this fails to include the possibility that we might get some decent software at the end of it, but then how likely is that?)
... would it have killed them to wait for a nicer day?
At the price, the lack of recent releases doesn't bother me so much, and seems pretty much inevitable, and I assume that their catalogue is going to expand.
My two gripes so far are occasional problems with the sound/picture being slightly out of sync and the fact that you can't browse the entire catalogue. The syncing thing seems to sometimes go away if you stop and restart the film, but I don't even understand how modern hardware and codecs even allow that to happen...
I would add some of the categories it offers me to the complaint, but they're more just bizarre rather than a problem ("Dark thrillers with a strong female lead", or something like that - that's a thing?).
Price-wise, netflix seems to be a clear winner - either that or I misunderstood what lovefilm was offering.
Anyway, lovefilm's not an option. We have a good dvd deal with them which their desperate to make us switch from. Every new service they offer requires us to switch away from it. TBH I haven't even used the deal we have (pay-per-disc rather than monthly), but I don't want to cancel it, I want to pass it on to my children when I die....
Indeed. I presume BT pay their PR people and don't just crowd-source them or something. How do large companies keep making the fundamental mistake of thinking no one will find out?
"That computer has legitimately saved my life on more than one occasion."
This is the bit that scares me... I'm tempted to forgive it as hyperbole, but imagine the same statement about, say, smoke detectors saving one person's life on more than one occasion. I'd humbly suggest that they might be doing something wrong...
My job involves a lot of work with the NHS. For all their ICO bollox, they rarely train or provide any encryption software.
We've largely given up the battle of trying to persuade some of our clients to stop sending us unencrypted patient data via email...
... someone managed to trick users into taking the pc into the shower with them by generating a fake error message?
I have to admit that I'm sort of vaguely impressed - although whether by the stupidity of the users or the recognition of that stupidity by the culprit, I'm not sure...
Oh, and it was on a Mac ;)
Any shite-stirring bugger can report you to sony and get you barred, and getting stuff back that you actually paid for is a nightmare.
And what exactly is wrong with P3n1sVanLesb1an anyway?
It's worded very confusingly...
I think it means:
before 10% legit email, 90% spam - eg. 10/90
now 25% legit email, 75% spam - eg. 10/30 (since the amount of legit is unchanged)
or not... no, you're right. It still doesn't make much sense...