417 posts • joined 19 Nov 2008
The only people this will affect are those dumb enough to think that Top Gear is a serious review program. It's enourmously entertaining but most people figure out within 5 minutes that you can't believe a thing they say.
Do people selling Nitrous injection systems sue because the original Stig was killed by a Nitrous powered car falling off an aircraft carrier?
re: extra l
Sorry, I obviously meant "la fond lesbian".
Italian for 'The Bottom Lesbian'
It's an anagram of 'a fond lesbian'.
Sorry, it's a slow day.
Age old saying
"Everything is worth what its purchaser will pay for it." - Publius Syrius
It could cost £5 in parts and be assembled for pennies by children in a chinese sweatshop (In fact that second bit is probably closer to the truth than they'll admit), but you could still sell the things for £100+ because the general public are always willing to pay the money for stuff like this.
I like it!
Forget the space elevator, just have some bloke on the ISS with a bloody long yo-yo string.
He lets it down and you quickly clip a payload onto it as it comes within a few feet of th eground, then with a flick of the wrist it's on it's way orbit-ward.
Largely inebriated nation dare send airplanes yonder
"humanist sans face"?
A humanities scholar without a face? Perhaps a victim of the infamous Helvetica Scenario?
Star Trek already did it
The Enterprise-D would project a forcefield around a fire and let it burn out as the oxygen inside was consumed. Sounds like this is a similar idea.
Any thoughts on what it would do to a person's oxygen consumption? I can imagine this has potential applications as a future 'crowd-control' device.
Much cheaper option
Just slap a Kinect on there.
re: Their kids can sue them...
That's assuming that the child doesn't become depressed and self-hating after failing to completely suppress their 'disease' and commits suicide.
You are a bit
My father is disabled and for a time had a care worker visit twice a day. The idea behind these was that a spare key to the front door was kept in a metal box with a combination lock bolted to the wall near the door.
The care agency have the code to the box so if they arrive and the door is locked, rather than waiting for the occupant to make their way to the door to unlock it (or if there has been an accident or fall and the resident can't get to the door), the care worker can just let themselves in and you (theoretically) don't have the security risk of handing over your door key to an agency.
Plus, if there is more than one care worker who visits (as they work shifts it may be a different person at different times of the day), you don't need to give each one a key, they just all have a copy of the box code.
Don't forget the timestamps
64bit is going to be essential in about 27 years when the 32bit timestamp rolls around in 2038.
The problem is that even that is just putting off the inevitable, according to my (admitedly mostly beer-fueled) calculations, 64bit timestamps will only buy us another 6.3 billion years.
We'd better have moved onto 128bit by then, but again that will only get us some more time. I'm afraid I don't know exactly how much because they called last orders so I had to stop working it out.
This is a 40 year old reactor, its main cooling systems have been damaged and it's backup systems don't appear adequate to control it. You would never get permission to build a reactor like this any more. There are also some reports that maintenance in the power plant may not have been as thorough as it should have been.
Modern nuclear reactors are built specifically to prevent these kinds of problems. Reactors don't just explode because someone trips and spills coffee on them.
Um, you seem to be missing my point entirely
My comment is nothing like theft of bank or card details. That's clearly illegal as it's not public information. I was stating that public property or records suggests that the information is just that, public. Surely if it's a matter of national security then it's not public.
I was arguing that since the information is suggested to be publicly available and all that has been done is to take a copy of it and publish it to a wider audience, then how has there been any theft.
You then go on to attack my question, and me, with some vague comments about my remarks being 'crafted' and then you ramble on about me belonging to some group that has free music and books? What the hell is that supposed to mean? Are you accusing me of being some sort of anarchist pirate? Judging by the number of down votes in your comment history I'm asusming that you're either a troll or just a generally unpleasant person and think you're somehow superior to everyone else here. Either way, your responses to my question are completely useless.
"theft of public property or records"
How is taking a copy of something theft? Especially of 'public property', surely if it's public then anyone has access to it and as long as he leaves the original there no actual theft has taken place?
Did you even read the article?
It says right there that they are also investigating the use of the word unlimited in mobile and fixed data plans. There, saved you the trouble really.
99.9% of germs
Is only used because it's impossible to prove that 100% of them are dead. Unless you've got a really good microscope, a guaranteed sterile environment and a few days to spare checking each and every one. Pretty much any bleach will kill 100% of germs, but if you can't prove it then you can't have it in your advertising, up to 99.9% is, apparently, acceptable as it's not specifying an exact figure.
Agree with you there
"The average shop monkey doesn't even know what a contract is"
When I went into the O2 store to buy a new phone it came with 'unlimited 3G usage*' The * at the bottom of the page (in minute writing hidden under a photo of a happy smiling person using an O2 phone) said that the unlimited usage was subject to a FUP. When I asked for a copy of this FUP before buying the phone/signing the contract not a single person in the store, including the store manager, knew what it was. After about 10 minutes of rifling through papers and advertising they just said "It's probably on the website somewhere".
I still haven't found it yet.
Hmm, I see a potential scam here
Woman swallows drug package shaoped like a foetus, customs think she looks dodgy and x-rays her. 'Baby' shows up on x-ray and they assume shes just pregnant. Woman subsequently sues airport when she 'miscarries' later.
Doubt any grunt working in customs would know how to distinguish between baby and baby-shaped object. Airport doesn't want to draw attention to it's shiny new toy potentially killing babies so settles quietly out of court.
At least this is what patents are actually for, protecting the discovery of independent researchers from being usurped by someone with more money and less morals. Take note America.
First round is on youtube
Starts at about 6:30 in, the first 6 minutes or so are a walkthrough of the servers and description of how Watson work. It's just the first round but gives a pretty good idea.
Sorry, but I'm with Microsoft and the bank here
She entered and saved her card details, then went to the parental control settings and authorised her son to access xbox live. At what point did Microsoft do anything wrong here? You do not require card details to have a live account, you can just buy an annual membership code over the counter from any game store and use that.
It's obviously a problem but she can't just expect to get all her money back when her son has purchased and spent several months using the content.
Missed a trick there
Should have called it 'iConfess'
Not a darwin candidate
Children cannot qualify for Darwin awards as they're considered too young to have learned better. Same goes for the mentally disabled. (Menaing 'actually' disabled, not just clinically stupid)
"there will still be many diehards who simply don't accept that homeopathy or herbalism are sciences"
Because they're not.
Diluting something in water over and over again until there is no longer any significant amount of the original substance left, then selling it at an enourmous mark-up to gullible idiots whilst claiming that the water somehow 'remembers' what was originally in it is not a science. It's a glorified con.
Never been there myself
But my father worked in Mexico quite a bit and always told me that out of all the places he had been in the world (quite a few as he was an engineer who was sent to install hardware at sites in a different country every week for more than 30 years), their food was the worst he had ever encountered. This was in 'real' Mexico too, not the tourist towns. Apaprently a cheap hotel he was staying in served chilli soup at breakfast, which he described as just stupidly hot chilli sauce mixed with warm water.
"Out of this door might come something, or we might send something through it,"
If we're going to send something through might I suggest Jedward? Or would that be considered un-neighbourly to our interdimensional bretheren?
I'm on the 20Mb and don't really consider myself a heavy user. I do use the internet a lot but only really web browsing and xbox live, no big downloads or torrents. Last week I bought a game off direct2drive which was 12GB, 20 minutes into the download they capped me at 5Mb for the next 24 hours, took a full day to download the game. They say that if you are one of the <5% who get 'restricted' that it only stays capped until midnight, that's a blatent lie as I checked again the morning after it happened and was still on 5Mb.
I've never actually seen the 20Mb either, normally hovers between 9-12Mb, but drops to 6-7Mb during 'peak hours' (Which they define as anytime I'm at home)
Not certain, but
perhaps it's because the entire point of the test is to confirm who exactly the father is. If you're taking the test then there must be at least some doubt as to whether the 'father' involved is really the parent. I imagine it's more likely that the mother is known to be the parent.
Not exactly new
I remember accompanying my dad about 10 years ago when he needed a new phone, and the woman in the phone shop tried to convince him to pay extra for one with 'polyphonic graphics'.
He is pretty unlucky
Hit by two atomic bombs and no superpowers? What are the odds?
You get a thumbs up
For the obscure Bottom reference.
Nope, nothing so interesting
The antimatter is just repelled by the Earth's magnetic field
A good start
When can we expect a similar judgement for the guys who charge £1500 for 'Ultra-High Quality' HDMI cables. Ignoring the fact that there is no difference between HDMI cables, I've seen several both online and in stores that claim that they contain some revolutionary new technology that prevents the image data from degrading on it's trip to the TV.
If you look closely at the photo
You'll see quite a bit of charring all around that 'one small circuit'. I'd assume that all of the equipment in the other cubby holes is in the same condition.
Accidentally? Pfft, not likely.
They mean they got caught and so are now claiming that it was an accident.
'Quick Bob, they're starting to notice, turn the bandwidth valve the other way a bit!'
@Crazy Operations Guy
It's not paranoia if there really are government agencies trying to get rid of you.
re: Consumer Credit Act to the rescue?
"I think someone suing their bank for the cost of all consequential damages ought at least result in some heavy pressure being exerted to find the culprits!"
Incorrect methinks, the banks would just add a paragraph to their t's and c's placing all responsibility for the transactions on the customer and increasing their fees at the same time to offset any potential loss they might suffer from the bad publicity.
He'll truely be missed
My name is Sergeant Frank Drebin, Detective Lieutenant, Police Squad.
There'd been a recent wave of gorgeous fashion models found naked and unconscious in laundromats on the West Side. Unfortunately, I was assigned to investigate holdups of neighborhood credit unions.
I was across town doing my laundry when I got the call on the double killing...
That the key point I took from this article is that it's targeted at children. Kids who want to get around the parental filter on their family pc aren't going to have a working knowledge of proxy servers and will just click on whatever promises to do what they want.
Double standards as usual
Pornography apparently "leads men to objectify women". Anyone who's ever seen a diet coke ad knows that this works both ways but they don't seem to want to point that bit out.
@The Original Ash
Except double jeopardy prevents you being punished for the same crime twice, if you refuse to hand over a password and get prosecuted that's only once. If they ask you again and you refuse that's a second offence and you can be prosecuted for it.
They may not have found her
But without Gamble it would have taken almost twice as long to have not found her.
"There would be no obvious application in the case of cats stuck up trees, however."
Depends on how high the tree is.
Much as I hate to defend BT
Wouldn't any construction work like this require planning permission or something similar? If so then wouldn't whomever authorised the construction be at fault here? Or is that BT as well, in which case go ahead and sue BT for all they're worth.
So you didn't actually look at the screenshots then?
Because if you did you'd have seen that they initially spoof the browser 'This website has been reported as hosting malicious content' screens. Which are all red. It then redirects you to the download site to get the 'security update'.
There's also an even simpler response for them
If you can't compete with Virgins fibre network, then stop claiming on all of your adverts that your 'aging' network provides 'upto 20Mb/s'.
What excellent service
It only took them about 9 months to decide to ban the ad, that's quite impressive. I haven't even seen that particular one for months now, they've put out at least 2 or 3 more since the one that's been banned and they all say pretty much the same thing, so will those ones also be banned or will there have to be complaints made about each one and a similar turnaround time to ban each one in turn?
When they complain just point them at the person who brought the court case and say 'it's all their fault, speak to them.'
I've got a better idea
If anyone tries to sue a search engine because they don't like the results they get when searching for their own name, just block their name entirely. If anyone searches for that person they'd just get a page explaining that the person they searched for doesn't want them to do that. See how this alleged model feels when suddenly no-one can find her agents website.
- Leaked screenshots show next Windows kernel to be a perfect 10
- Product round-up Coming clean: Ten cordless vacuum cleaners
- Something for the Weekend, Sir? I need a password to BRAKE? What? No! STOP! Aaaargh!
- Episode 13 BOFH: WHERE did this 'fax-enabled' printer UPGRADE come from?
- Vulture at the Wheel Ford's B-Max: Fiesta-based runaround that goes THUNK