a combined consumption figure of 47.1mpg on the optional 20-inch wheels
Just think what the figure might be without this option.
27 posts • joined 11 Nov 2008
Just think what the figure might be without this option.
"The problem is taxis live in a pampered world of regulated profit."
Oh, yes? You should try making your living as a taxi driver in Germany. On my last regular taxi ride, in Schweinfurt, the journey of ~5km usually took 10 minutes, for which I paid a mere 11 Euros (including tip). Given that it's going to have taken another 10 minutes for the taxi to get back to the town centre, that works out at around 30 Euros per hour in the best case, when the driver gets another passenger immediately.
From that <30 Euros per hour, the driver's got to buy and maintain his vehicle, pay for fuel and insurance and if he's lucky, there'll be a bit left over to pay his food and rent. No wonder they all work long, long days (and frequently nights). The service they provided was superb.
If these ratbags Uber get their way, it will be a race to the bottom. The already marginal livelihood of taxi drivers will be crushed out of existence by illegal competition from those who hold laws and social order in total contempt. I'm behind the German courts and taxi drivers all the way.
.... By the word, perhaps? Even the Reg doesn't have such pretensions.
Can we have a little less of the nonsense "....wiping $30bn off its VALUE", please? What has had that sum of money wiped of it is merely its (share)PRICE. Microsoft's value is its ability to produce nearly working software and (to a lesser extent) hardware, and this will be only very slightly different after that announcement (due to random variation).
Everyone is indeed different. I've still got a desktop, but the last MS Windows I had was 3.1.
Please, no more of this "protected" by copyright nonsense! The designs in question are not being protected - they are not in any danger. They are being _restricted_.
How on earth did her lawyers manage to run up such a huge bill? It seems like an "ordinary" sexual harrassment case, not a round of Apple vs. Samsung.
Even if the lawyers were charging $500/hour (which seems excessive to me), that would work out at ~450 hours of work. What, precisely, did her lawyers spend several hundred hours doing?
Any chance of an article written in English?
,... Emacs 24.3 has just been released. It satisfies quite a few, but not all, of Verity's criteria.
Not forgetting "global warning wouldn't have been such a major issue any more.", too. Aren't global warnings exactly what the article is about?
On the contrary, the Earth's tides, generated by the Moon (and Sun), are causing the Moon gradually to move away from the Earth. It's being pulled much the same way as a rope is, when swung around ones head.
"We don't the forums to turn nasty and uncivil." is missing the word "want". Please fix it!
That's a square, 21 x 21 tiles, with one left over. I wonder how that fits in. Hmm.
Or, maybe the tiles are "rectangular" with an array of 26 x 17 tiles.
Sheet music goes out of copyright 70 years after the composer's death. There are some exceptional rules about "scholarly editions" in some places (Germany), but basically, 70 years and that's it. After that time you may photocopy even recent editions. If you want to play a Mahler symphony, download the parts from http://imslp.org/.
I'm sorry Mr/s. Cornz, but you could hardly be more wrong on just about everything you've written.
The diabetic herself decides, from day to day, even from hour to hour, how much insulin to inject/pump. This varies around an "ideal" dose, and depends massively on what is eaten, degree of exercise, degree of stress, etc. The amount of variation can easily be as much as 50%, or even more whilst suffering an infectious disease.
The doctor does NOT decide how much insulin should be given, except by giving individual guidelines.
The whole idea of an insulin pump is for a diabetic to be able to adjust the dose of insulin easily and rapidly, and to give boosts just before (or after) meals.
I sincerely hope you never have cause to discover these things for yourself.
For crying out loud! Please don't say "digital" when you mean "online". CDs are digital too, remember.
For an analog recorded medium, you have to go back to records or cassette tapes. These media, for some reason, don't appear in your graphs.
You do banking with 150 tabs open? Is that wise?
Hopefully not with MS's browser!
I didn't know a gang of Macs could shred disk images. You learn something new every day.
end user productivity? ;-)
Threaded messages could be several thousand back from your current head.
Don't really understand what all this fuss is about - mutt has had the simple key sequences "ot" (sort threaded) and "or" (sort by order of arrival) for decades. With this you do "or", put the cursor on the pertinent message, then "ot" to see it in its thread.
Is this Google monstrosity something you have to configure rather than a runtime toggle? Yuck!
... unlike Eurostar's electric trains. :-)
The real reason for this new card system is that the old Oyster system, based on an NXP chip, has been cracked open, and there's no pearl inside. Sooner or later they'll have to replace the flawed Oyster with something new.
Actually, PPP sounds like the way your modem talks with your ISP. You know, modems - remember them?
How about actually deciding what the problem is before trying to fix it? This son of an almond has, for want of intelligence, decided the problem is "piracy", i.e. illicit file copying. Surely the actual problem is songwriters and musicians not getting a fair return for their efforts?
So, what's the best way for artists to be paid better? Impose a license fee on internet use, something like Britain's (former) radio licence and (current) TV licence. This would entitle each Internet user to download copyright files freely. Somewhere between £10 and £200 a year would surely be OK. You divide this up amongst the artists by sampling the Internet, measuring how much of each song/video/.... is circulating the wires.
Yes, this would be costly and perhaps a bit unfair. But it's got to better, and cheaper than the authoritarian punitive measures proposed by the current copyright holders.
This thing's absolutely barmy, stark raving mad.
Quite aside from the philosophical question as to what degree of control discontent creators (YUCK!) should retain over their readers listeners and viewers, this just won't fly.
There are two workable ways to go:
(i) You keep a log of EVERYTHING downloaded by each internet connection and send a bill for everything which was copyright to the downloader; or
(ii) You make an "internet license" obligatory, much as a TV license is, and divide the money collected amongst the composers, performers, film makers etc.
The British government would clearly love (i). Everybody else would accept (ii). Really, how difficult can that be to implement when people start behaving like adults? People managed it when radio came in.
"This is plainly possible - the sun and all the other stars run on self-sustaining fusion reactions - but achieving it using human technology has had top boffins stumped for decades."
The power output of the sun is less than a microwatt per kilogram of "fuel". In fact, the reaction inside the Sun's core is such a damp squib that it takes several thousand million years before needing refuelling. This is clearly inadequate for a fusion power station.
It would probably be better if the nuclear technologists first built another sun as a proof of concept before going on to the much higher temperatures and pressures which will be required by a terrestrial fusion power station.
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).