awesome marketing idea
not Android, i mean KitKat - i'm going to go get one now!
2264 posts • joined 8 May 2007
not Android, i mean KitKat - i'm going to go get one now!
well a single donation is only going to be news for a very short time, and it isn't going to encourage others to donate
this way, as you say, it encourages more of us to put our hands in our pockets too in order to assure the museum gets £2mil to spend instead of just one.
i loved this game when i was a kid. possibly the first game i paid for with my own money?
i spent ages playing it on the mac - no idea what i was doing and i don't think i really got very far. but days and days of going round and round in seeming circles suddenly rewarded when i discovered something i'd previously missed that opened a new area and then i'd repeat the process of wondering what i should be doing next.
i liked the iOS re-release too - i think i instantly seemed to get further in that after a few hours than i ever did as a kid. i feel i've accomplished something in growing up :)
Isn't that the equally genius and disturbing Belgian film?
Must watch that again some time.
kinda important not to get those two mixed up y'know
Well he did say "There is never a perfect time for this type of transition, but now is the right time." so i think you might be right.
El Reg previously revealed
That's a bit of a stretch, isn't it? Surely it was Debra Fischer of Yale University in Nature magazine that previous revealed that, as stated in the El Reg article you linked to. All El Reg did was regurgitate the news.
GCHQ demand data is destroyed, so at the same time, destroy several other old machines that were due for replacement, make the evidence of such very public in the newspaper, then claim the insurance on them to get free new models.
"Hey, kids: can Facebook get you a JOB?"
I would like to challenge the implication that LinkedIn is able to get you a job either. Any company wiht an HR department that is relying on LinkedIn profiles for its hiring policy is not a company i'd like to work for.
that's just what They'd want you to say - your tinfoil hat must have slipped
They can keep their kool-aid, thanks all the same.
Apparently the calculation works out to be about 500 million bucks:
It's a lot of money, but it's not exactly going to cause Apple any pain, considering the mountain of cash they have in the bank.
More painful to them will be the restrictions on being able to enter into similar contracts again in the next 5 years, particularly if they're looking to expand the TV show distribution and iRadio, etc etc.
It can't be because the demand is so great that all their inventory is going to be taken up by those countries that are getting it on release, surely?
if it won't fit in a trouser or suit jacket pocket, then it can't be called a phone. this looks like you might need a trip to the tailor before you can carry it around, and for your own sake, don't dare sit down while it's in your trouser pocket!
Apple's shares have been sliding into the doldrums since the death of its adulated cofounder, Steve Jobs. Its stock price has shed around 22 per cent in the past year
I'm sorry, but THAT is hogwash right there.
Jobs died on the 5th October where AAPL stock was priced at 377.37
Today, the stock is priced at 489.
The "Peak" above 700 that you keep referring to was 6 months ago - well after he died, and well within Cook's reign.
the trouble is the market is too stupid to realise they're being manipulated.
the Apple of the 90's is not the Apple we have now.
and Tim Cook is certainly not John Scully.
the only thing that's the same between the Apple of the 90s and the Apple of today is that Jobs isn't running it. Everything else about the two moments in time is different. And for someone like Ellison, whom so many people seem to hold in high regard, not to realise that, is rather telling.
I suspect he knew that was the only way he'd get any headline action. Nobody reports the uncontroversial any more. Peak Apple? Peak journalism more like.
and i was quite taken with this solution so i don't have to struggle to use keys to unlock the door when my hands a full of shopping or large boxes: http://www.kwikset.com/Kevo/Default.aspx
gotta applaud Netflix for this move.
as a result, i think i shall finally get around to watching this show - been on my "to-see" list for ages. i wish Netflix would allow me to temporarily download the shows to my tablet like you can with BBC iPlayer, so then i can watch it on the train
The dog shall have to cross his legs for an extra hour or so to ensure we head out for his nightly constitutional after sunset.
... i need to make myself a cuppa...
i think the publishers fear is that Amazon are now free to discount books as much as they like, because there's no competition. so the publishers will see all their profits disappear now.
Also, as Apple are now banned from using this model for 5 years, they'll be entering a price war with amazon to get the ebook business, so the two of them will drive ebook pricing through the floor.
great for customers, yes
but rubbish for authors, who'll get even less after the publishers take their cut
really? omg that's awesome
i've been wanting to find a reason/excuse to get a Vita, but so far haven't been able to find a reason to. a bundle with the ps4 could be just the thing - depends how well the 2nd screen is used in the games. could be awesome
but i thought the point of this was that it'll run a full desktop experience when you plug a keyboard/mouse and screen into it, but unplugged, you get a phone interface on it's own display? so that's 700 quid for a phone and a desktop.
but that's the thing. projectors only really work well in a dark room and projecting on a white screen. my friend as one bolted to the ceiling in his lounge. great for watching movies, yes, but a pain in the proverbial to spend the time clearing space, setting it up, to watch, and even then, it's only great for the two people sitting in the right place, for the rest that are off to the side it's like sitting too far near the front at the cinema. takes the fun out of just having a quick game on the playstation.
whereas the screen on your phone/tablet/laptop works in all light conditions and is usable in any room of the house, regardless of the ghastly patterned wallpaper your mum put up.
I suspect this the White House was thinking less of "Apple vs Samsung" and more "America (f$%k yeah!) vs anyone else"
There's not many american voters in South Korea...
Well the iPad2 is still for sale from Apple. And the iPhone 4 & 4S.
But presumable, only until the next iPhone and iPad models are released in a month or two. So Apple aren't really going to feel much pain if the ban goes ahead.
Also, I thought I read previously that it's a ban on importing these items, not on selling the stock currently already within the US.
But yes, if it helps to deter the ridiculous patent lawsuits, then it would seem like a good thing.
is that the iPhone 4S with 3G?
or the iPhone 3GS?
Also, i'm wondering how well your browser copes with a 4gb HD mkv file? and how well does it then mirror that to the tv?
if it performs well then it could be interesting.
but you have to be using the Chrome browser, right?
"What OS are you running?"
"We're all going to die!!!"
In fact, there's an argument to made here that it's a health&safety issue. If we can't watch this clip on YouTube, we may be putting ourselves at risk. So if we suddenly find we have said cancer, we can blame the firm and sue for £cha-ching£!!!!
Mines on the courier truck waiting to be delivered.
As you say, it's probably a gimmick and won't really get used, but I'm looking forward to spending the weekend finding out :)
re: Minority Report? pah! i want to surf the net like in Johnny Mnemonic!!
or perhaps they are just POC'ing a touch screen macbook air?
Well.. that's you.
Me, I do want apps on my watch. I want my phone to be the device that does the internet connection and any heavy processing, and the watch to be my first interface to the phone. if i need more detail than the watch provides, then I can pull out the phone and view the equivalent app on the bigger screen.
charging two devices? I'm already charging a phone, a tablet, a laptop, and my ipod nano which is on a wriststrap and acts as a watch and podcast player, so another device wouldn't really impact my daily schedule. in fact, it'd replace my use for the ipod nano and so there wouldn't be any difference.
But that's me. We're all different.
The later incident was a genuine charger.
No, it was a third-party one as well:
Surely this constitutes a complete waste of the court's time?
And also, for that matter, a waste of my (and your) time in having read, and now commented on, this article. Can I sue him because his money-grabbing antics have caused a drop in my productivity this afternoon?
we need a playmobile reconstructi.... oh wait a minute...
Can we write our name on the surface with it?
You'd prefer another target? A military target? Then name the system!!
marketing now rests with a completely different operation
So the same department for marketing xbox and games is also going to be marketing windows and sql server?
We're either going to get really funky adverts for Visual Studio or very very dull marketing for the next Halo... which'll be bland and devoid of any colour or 3D whatsoever
Steve Balmer with one "l"? Runs the stationery cupboard?
"Yes, I'm Steve Balmer. I will have the penne all'arrabbiata."
"You'll need a tray."
"Do you know who I am?"
this is so funny. it has to be someone trolling M$ to see if they'll flipflop again, surely?
And how exactly do you libel the dead?
Take your time
I wasn't saying that Jobs was being libeled, I'm saying it is the Judge, whose words are being misquoted in the article headline, but still attributed to the Judge as having said them. Actually, perhaps libel isn't the correct legal term there?
But essentially El Reg is declaring that the judge outright said that Steve Jobs is a criminal.
Whereas, from what i've read elsewhere on this comments page, the judge accused Apple's management team, but did not specify Jobs by name. That's not what the article headline implies. So, wouldn't the judge have recourse to claim that El Reg is defaming her by implying she's the type of person to defame the deceased?
But that's the assistant attorney general in charge, Bill Baer, that's saying that. the article headline specifically says it's the judge specifically.
I'm not arguing whether or not Jobs is guilty of attempting price fixing, as the evidence suggests he was, I'm arguing the misreporting of the facts in the headline that suggests the Judge specifically called out a dead person and branded them a criminal.
Indies don't know any better about how to make a better game.
oh i disagree. take the upcoming Space Hulk release. it is _exactly_ what fans of the original board game want to play, and from the gameplay videos, not only captures what it felt like to play the board game, but enhances the experience.
which makes a refreshing change from the Fire Warrior, Space Marine, etc that W40k fans have made do with up until now.