207 posts • joined 5 Nov 2008
Re: But is a fluid definition a bad thing?
Incorrect, he's actually written an article saying that absolute poverty IN THE UK is indeed gone. He said nothing about the rest of the world. So no where is he saying that it's now time to address relative poverty. I take that to mean that he's saying that when world wide absolute poverty is gone, we can look to address relative poverty.
As a point, why wouldn't they just cut the cable and then during the few days that the company is scrambling to deal with the outage install their gear at the friendly end of the cable? It would give them plenty of time to do this sort of thing and make it much easier to change later.
Re: Creation and Duplication
Given that, as a private individual, you can buy a ream of really good quality paper for less than £10, and you can also get companies to deliver 100's lbs of goods in the same country for around a score. Do you really think that the dead tree edition of the books that you've got were the main sink for the money you spent on them?
No, the main money sinks were in the time that people took before the book on your shelf existed to create the master copy that your book is a copy of. If you tot up the cost of everyone's time and expenses from the time the author puts pen to paper, to the moment the printing plates have been produced and production is ready to begin you'll probably find that that's a pretty large chunk of cash. Add a small percentage on in case another book doesn't do so well and you're approaching the true cost for the publisher.
Someone else has done the work to analyse these figures here http://ireaderreview.com/2009/05/03/book-cost-analysis-cost-of-physical-book-publishing/
Looking at those figures, you're only going to save around 50% of the price of a dead tree edition book, most of which is the retailers costs rather than the publishers costs. Which when I look at amazon for books that have been out for a while seems to be where their prices end up.
Re: "Refine the fuel from ice".
You can brute force fuel by electrolysis using just solar electricity. If you take up a nuclear power source you can do it faster. If you have some carbon around you can then turn the hydrogen into a safer and more portable fuel using electricity and a catalyst.
It doesn't matter if it's slow as long as it's not too slow.
As a side thought though, once you've got your momentum going wouldn't you be using ion engines to move through the solar system anyway? At which point you need fairly small amounts of actual fuel, and would be using the hydrogen/oxygen for escaping gravity wells that are stronger than your ion engines only.
Re: There are so many problems.
In theory the problem is one of getting to the asteroid belts to mine in the first place as having the fuel to return to earth shouldn't be a problem as soon as you find a few Ice bearing asteroids. Of course you need to work out how to refine the fuel from the water in the first place, but that's something that can be perfected fairly close to earth.
What's the betting that the first structure built outside earths gravitational field is a fuel depot/station with massive solar panels for the refining.
Re: It will only get worse...
How do you know it hasn't
Re: oh but that's just the start...
The problem with international treaties is that if you want their end to be upheld you have to uphold your end. As this is a European arrest warrant, the UK is obliged by treaty to arrest Assangne if he's on their land. There are penalties if they don't.
So it's not the crime that's at stake, it's the arrest warrant and treaty surrounding it.
Re: Missing the point
Because if you censor the source then it becomes impossible to trust that there is a fair, unbiased and not state controlled press. If the source is allowed to stay, but the means of finding said source becomes more and more burdensome as time goes on. Then it protects peoples privacy in a general sense as the article isn't showing up as fresh all the time while preserving it for the future when a relative or researcher may come across it while searching in the archives.
Also, the article itself isn't damaging sitting there in the archive. It's only damaging to the persons current reputation because it has been processed by a search engine and brought into the lime light during a search.
because the published content falls under a different set of laws that applies to publishers rather than data processors.
In this instance google falls under the dataprocessing aspect of the dataprotection act. That means that they have a duty to ensure that the data that they hold and process is accurate and up to date. (This is existing law rather than the new right to be forgotten). News papers, blogs, et al, don't need to abide by this as they aren't processing data they are producing information. Thus the article that's sitting in their archive is the same one as it was when it was published.
The reason for the difference is (I think) to avoid post publication censorship by those in power.
And once it's finished it can be signed with the check sum in a public location so it's easy to verify.
BillG - But what's their profit margin on that? I'm willing to bet that it's less than 10% which is what they could be fined.
So now all we need to do is set up a token ring network around the sun...
As someone above mentioned, this could just be a case of different teams, unknown dependancies on the old functions that mean the new functions can't just be slotted in, or any number of other reasons than those that boil down to "can't be arsed"
Re: Is that a portable access point in your pocket, are you ...
I think the problem with google glass vs using a camera/phone to take photos is that there's no easy way to tell if a glass wearer is taking photos or not, while a camera/phone user needs to go to some lengths to make it not easy to tell that they are doing so.
Re: My network...
@AC - OK, so Imagine that I'm a small "mom & pop" cafe that provides internet access to increase the amount of time that people stay in the cafe, and thus buy more drinks...
Whoops there goes a commercial concern that may have the know how and kit to do one thing but not the other.
Why do you think that, in the UK at least, the major teleco's are providing the blocking software on their end rather than the consumer end?
Re: My network...
Incorrect as the law recognises that you can only take "reasonable" steps to protect your network. It's the same as trying to protect your house. The law doesn't say that because you installed a lock it's your fault for not turning your house into an impenetrable bunker when it gets broken into.
Equally the law doesn't say that it's your fault if someone steals something of your if you told other people to leave.
The same's true in the IT arena. If you block port 25, that doesn't imply that you can block vpn connection 1..300,000 or that you can block traffic from www.kiddyfiddliersare.us without also blocking www.google.com - Infact I'd go so far as to say that there's a fairly high chance that you don't have access to the full black list of sites for kiddie porn. If you're saying, why don't you put a proxy in the way and use content filtering - Proxies don't deal with https very well (at all?).
If someone download kiddie porn over your network in the clear and the police trace it to your network. You'll be in for an arse of a time without your computers for the next 6 months while they go through them looking for any illegal content. But assuming that it wasn't you doing the downloading, then you'll get them back again eventually.
edit to add : Additionally having an auto deny process that monitors who's attached to the network and kicks of those that you've black listed every 30 seconds is very different to putting a proxy server on your connection and firewalling content/ports from those inside the network. They have a very different level of skill set needed to start with. Again it's similar to the difference between being able to fit a new lock to your house compared with being able to fit emergency shutters that are activated when an unauthorised person tries to enter the house.
Re: My network...
@photobod - As the OP is blocking devices, wouldn't that mean that he is responsible for blocking other devices once he finds out they are performing illegal actions rather than blocking content that you and the poster above were implying.
I say this as by blocking a device you're not implying that you can stop devices from downloading illegal content as you've done nothing with the content.
So Basically, the chinese government has been keeping an eye on the snowden leaks, matching it with their own data and been drawing inferences that mean they think that their data is insecure. What's the chances that it's down to not being able to block traffic to a microsoft server otherwise windows 8 stops working (or won't activate) and needing to block traffic to the same server to prevent data leaking.
Re: Sigh ...
These systems usually also have a second password that is hashed normally. It's basically so that if someone's looking over your shoulder they can't get 1 password, and if they hack the database they can't get the other one. It's still not as secure as having an out of band (second factor) 1 time password generated. Either through a dongle or via a text message.
Re: Abstract Mathematics
isn't that what a decompiler's for?
It doesn't produce pretty code, but it does do what you just asked for.
Re: Production Line
Stupid developer here, but as we're talking about systems to control HARDWARE, wouldn't it have been better for the companies that built the hardware to make it so that you could remove the control component and plug in a new one for say £100,000 and around 1 day's down time? You know the good old fashioned modular approach. That way it wouldn't have mattered what the software industry did (even if microsoft went out of business) they could still just slot in a new module with an upto date os and drivers and application support. Hell they could also allow for changing AutoCAD formats. These are all lessons that the software industry has had to learn in order to keep stuff together.
Re: Why lasers?
Number of moving parts.
A space based laser would only need 1 for the solar cells, everything else would be done by moving the whole satellite. If they're using solar navigation (i.e. solar sails) then they may not even need fuel to change orbital location.
Mirrors aren't any where near as light as the laser would be.
Linked to the 2 above.
Given that it's going to be trying to shoot space debris, a laser that can be protected/armoured to some extent is going to be easier to protect and make rugged than a collection of mirrors that need to be able to move around to focus sunlight at a specific spot.
Re: A test case perhaps?
Secondly it would immediately make a lot of on the road police communication illegal due to them needing to use a walkie talkie.
I seem to rememer there here was a case in the UK where the police were trying to convict a lorry driver for using a CB Radio while driving, and when the defence lawyer started the cross examination of the police officer that arrested the driver, he opened with a question like "And once you identified that the defendant was using a CB Radio how did you report this to home base?". At which point the judge interrupted and said that they were going to dismiss the case at that point as they didn't want to be setting the wrong precedent (I can't find the news article now)
Did you see the words "SCADA" or "Air Gapped" as I've looked through the article and can find no mention of "Microsoft". Or were you talking about "McIntosh" who is actually one of the People that was interviewed for the article.
I believe that if you read up on the history of this article with out any prejudgement on why they've got these problems, you'll find that the problem really has nothing to do with microsoft, rather it's to do with custom PCB's with very old firmware controls that were originally installed in an environment where you needed to be fairly close (geographically) to the system in order to make changes to it while now you need to be fairly close (network connectedly) in order to make changes. This means that the security vulnerabilities, that were probably actually ease of use/access features at the time, leave the system wide open to anyone that can breach the outer defences and get onto the internal network.
Re: Fibre or Copper?
The article said that the fibre was cut while thieves were looking for copper cable to nick.
Other commenters have mentioned that when they find there's no copper the thieves can go on a hacking spree.
Re: Damn thieves
They tried that, the thieves left a message saying they needed to check anyway.
Re: Market Target?
I see this being useful in ad hoc production environments where you need to make a one off (or a few) of something and it matters more that you have it now than you have the potential for lots of them. (your Sales prototype is a good example) another example might be an artist that makes one off table ornaments (via someone that has enough money to afford the machine). Or custom mountings for circuitry (hobbyist). Finally as was mentioned somewhere else, with the metal versions, rapid prototyping and development for very small batch jobs where the cost to produce the final version using traditional methods is much higher (in time and/or money) than the cost of using a printer.
Around where I live it's pretty hard to find a telephone box unless you want one of those dial a cab ones.
As for the 2 hours, does she work in central london?
Re: I'm not sure about this
Apart from the fact that if your session is at all linkable to your Google account then the search will still be linked to that. (e.g. you're using chrome)
Google is very very bad at letting people do stuff without recording it against their profile.
Re: Incompetent parents win again...
The hotel's unless the hotel made it clear in the T's&C's that you had to sign when you signed in that all room service requests would be charged to the supplied credit card.
Given that AFAIK this is quite common in hotels, I suspect they've been bitten by that in the past and learnt from it.
Note that one of the complaints is that he's wanting to interview top execs who Apple claim wouldn't have had anything to do with ebooks. This is despite the fact that quite often the people at the top will have an informal conversation and then it will turn into something formal with the right people.
What company is that advert for so that I can avoid it in future?
alternately you'll end up with a high value bitcoin and a low value alternative with a much larger capacity working together so that you end up with bitcoin being the equivalent of notes and the other currency being the equivalent of coins. Then have banks/exchanges being able to exchange against the 2. The only problem I currently have with the system is that there's no expiry mechanism in bitcoin so every bitcoin lost is gone forever. This IMO is the biggest thing that makes bitcoin unworkable into the future. Which is also one of the reasons for inflation in physical currency. If there was some way to version the coins so that they could be upgraded to a newer version every couple of years and eventually the old bit coins would no longer be accepted except in certain locations (same as old notes and coins) then this would work as a truly international currency.
So basically, because the incumbent transmitter operator is price gouging people can't afford to put enough stations on digital to make consumers want a digital radio.
Simple fix, stop the price gouging.
After all, if it costs 16 times as much to run digital as FM then you'd be a fool to want to go digital.
So what you're saying is that the needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many.
In practice that leads to failed civilisations or totalitarian regimes as they need to put harsher and harsher constraints on the many to ensure that the few retain their privileges
In all practicality all this is going to do is make the kids work a little harder to get their porn fix and they'll do it the same way that the did at school... One kid will work it out and tell everyone else e.g. install this program (TOR) and away you go or change your DNS settings to this and it will work.
In general, kids are far more inventive than adults as they're not burdened with the knowledge of what they can't do.
So as the original poster said.
Won't someone think of the adults.
extra judicial killings
Technically they are known as assassinations rather than murder as they are typically perpetrated by someone other than the person that wanted them dead.
Re: Humanoid robots are fine for domestic use...
I think the point of a humanoid robot is that it needs to be of a similar size to a human so that it can be put into a situation where there are humans without needing to make massive changes that may not even be possible to accommodate it.
In an environment where you can cater for a robot what you suggested makes sense as, in theory, it should be cheaper to add an AI brain to a forklift than it is to provide this robot, or the industrial robots on a production line. If on the other hand what you really need is an extra person that can be pulled out of storage occasionally when you need x, y, or z done and then they can go back into storage, this would be ideal.
I think that this is a different system to the one they can operate by cards. The one they can operate by cards being the tracking, prioritising, and routing of planes on the ground and in the air. The system that crashed being the one that enables them to tell the other traffic control areas that they've got a plane entering their airspace.
Re: Did the Patent "Industry"...
Na, the patent industry just pissed off enough of the little people that they started writing letters to their representative, and getting 10 or so letters a day on your desk all complaining about the same thing from different people kinda makes you sit up and take notice. If for no other reason than they have to reply to every letter, so it's a cost in time if not money.
it could also be a planned way for the criminals to expand the use of i2p so that it ends up with a large enough network to matter.
I'm guessing that the reason he's not investing in Microsoft is that he doesn't think they'll listen to him at all. Just wait for there to be a new CEO and I suspect he'll magically get some stocks and try to leverage those against the CEO.
Then again he may also be looking at the fact that Bill Gates, Steve Balmer, and more are large share holders in microsoft so they'll quickly point out any padded whining waffle he happens to spout to try and increase his share value short term.
Re: Is this real?
One thing you'll find is that those attributes that seem to be holding you back from relationships now will hold you in good stead in a few years time once everyone's finished maturing and people actually want long term relationships rather than the hottest guy on the block.
I believe that this article is about they why they are feeling this way rather than whether it's actually expected. I suspect that you'd find that a large number of people feel the same way as the author.
On the other hand I agree with this: "It amazes me the dumb assumption that men have it easy because they are men. Or that women have it hard because they are women. It does reduce the sympathy I can have for the tale of woe." however I feel that it's not actually what the article was about.
To summarise the article - The author has been working all the hours she can to do well at her job, and then at home has been working all the hours she can to have a wonderful family and sacrificed her personal time to do this. She has just realised that she can't keep doing this even though she still feels that she has to and is walking the hard path to a good work life balance.
In many cases of discrimination the control really isn't yours (hence the term). and if you're part of a minority that suffers from Glass ceiling/Glass cliff syndrome you have a work place version of Poe's law going on, in that unless you're happy that there's no discrimination where you work, then you may look at someone else getting a promotion who (in your opinion, and maybe that of some others) is far less qualified for the job than you, and have no way of telling if it's because of something they can do that you can't that makes them a better candidate for the job, they're being promoted out of the way, or you've been discriminated against. Equally when you get a promotion you're never sure if it's because you were actually good at the job or because they needed someone of your minority and you fit the bill.
And what was his diet and exercise regime like? When was lights out? did he do that every single day or (as I suspect) did he actually take quite a bit of time out and make up the studying on Sunday? Back in the early 20th century people tended to a) sleep longer b) need to deal with less things in a day compared to our information overload today c) walk most places. This was true well into the 70's too.
The other point to make is that this was in his 20's and 30's, when did he become a chartered engineer? I bet it was before or very early into his 30's, as again younger people are more able to burn the candle at both ends.
Re: What does this have to do with anything?
"It would be harder for a man to do what she is doing also as women help each other out but won't help out a man in the same situation."
Only because the social expectations for men is that they must be the "bread winner", able to "shoulder their fair share of the load", "don't cry", etc.
Trust me, men have as many problems as women do in the work place, it's just that ours are much less obvious because we live with them. One of those problems is that we believe that we are expected to do it ourselves. If we just asked, for the most part people would be willing to help.
This is also part of the super_______ complex, where we take on a role and get used to it being our role and never stop to say "I can't do all of this", even when life gives us a massive hint like stress related illnesses.
When I was younger I promised myself that I'd do one thing every day that's just for me. Do you have any idea how hard it can be to keep that promise.
Re: "by the time you make contact you’re moving at almost zero speed"
True, however add a laser measure and you can calculate how wide the landing strip/space is which then means you can calculate how fast you need to be going when you hit it.
Privacy - being able to say something to someone else without anyone else listening in.
Anonymity - Being able to say something without anyone knowing who said it.
Surveillance - Monitoring what's been said by everyone
It seems to me that the RSA spokesman is confusing anonymity with privacy.
Re: Why CISPA?
Does this mean that they might be able to say to Google can we have a distinct list of ever to + from email address pair that has ever gone through your system and have google provide list without any fear of prosecution even though a right minded judge would never grant a warrant on that information.
- 'Kim Kardashian snaps naked selfies with a BLACKBERRY'. *Twitterati gasps*
- Crawling from the Wreckage THE DEATH OF ECONOMICS: Aircraft design vs flat-lining financial models
- Pics Facebook's Oculus unveils 360-degree VR head tracking Crescent Bay prototype
- Moon landing was real and WE CAN PROVE IT, says Nvidia
- Apple's iPhone 6 first-day sales are MEANINGLESS, mutters analyst