Just as Apple based OS X on BSD are we going to see Microsoft build a future version of Windows on Linux?
144 posts • joined 25 Apr 2007
Just as Apple based OS X on BSD are we going to see Microsoft build a future version of Windows on Linux?
Now how will I know if it starts snowing?
How did we get here? Well, when your business plan depends on people being forced to buy the latest version of your operating system when they buy a new computer and then this happens:
you have to do something to compensate for not actually giving people a compelling reason to upgrade.
Babies in the womb are able to hear music without any extra equipment. Save yourself the £90.
Considering how rational and well meaning everyone is on Twitter I cannot see any possible problem with this.
(I think the icon is suitable for how the internet might look about a week after this is releases)
... because no company has ever rebranded before.
Maybe the comments section on this type of article should come ready populated with posts saying:
1) How much did that cost them?
2) I preferred the old one.
3) Most people probably didn't notice.
4) Obviously a publicity stunt.
5) Who cares?
Not wanting to be picky but if the "project is on GitHub" then why do the links take me to a url I have never heard of?
read the first comment?
It's a fair cop, guv. No I didn't. :-)
How soon before GIMP is moved over to Github?
While they are at it they could change the name.
"... the pathetic belief that renaming something is going to influence rational purchasing decisions."
Maybe they are going after the irrational purchasing decisions.
In other news, a herd of pigs have just flown in carrying news about record low temperatures in Hades.
"I think you are confused with a nail in the coffin."
The last knell in the coffin?
Is the name in honour of the (possible) Scottish independence?
Neither do I. You're putting 2+2 together and getting 94, there.
In which case I misunderstood and I apologise.
As a Code Club volunteer, I am sorry to see Linda Sandvik's resignation. I disagree with her reasoning but respect her decision.
Volunteers may have been teaching coding long before the current media obsession, but so was the foundation of Code Club and I do not recognise it in the description as a "bureaucratic, centralised scheme". I have found the curriculum and material, much of which was written by Linda, extremely helpful but at no time have I felt that it in any way restrictive.
Unless they're going door to door, ...
What you don't know is that they have been stolen by Wowbagger The Infinitely Prolonged who is currently in the process of visiting every person in the universe in alphabetical order and reading them out.
There is no reason to expect Microsoft will "get it right" with Windows 9.
On the contrary, they "got it right" with Windows 7 after messing up Windows Vista (believe it or not, people do actually like Windows 7) so there is every reason to think that Windows 9 will clean up the mess of Windows 8. I predict that this will be the future pattern of Windows releases; even numbers are a complete hash when they try to do something new and innovative and the odd numbers are where they actually make it usable.
..., but stick to one OS."
I quite agree and, personally, I would only ever use this with Android but considering the history of PCs you can understand the reluctance of ASUS to release a laptop without Windows installed. It is a shame that Microsoft still has such an iron grip on the PC manufacturers, even with a product that is so clearly designed to run Android. You still have to pay your Microsoft tax, I suppose.
(Edit) Reading more into this, I realise that getting one of these and only ever user Android would mean having a phone with a very expensive external screen. I think I'll give this a miss.
XP support has ended? Why wasn't there any warning???
I'm not insane but I was not really serious and am slightly amused that my comment has achieved so many "thumbs-up"s and generated such a discussion.
For a moment I thought it might be XP, and Microsoft were hoping that the community would pick it up to fix any security holes that are found after April 8th.
This seems apposite:
Anything sent to an @facebook.com address will now be forwarded to the user's real address so presumably if your page is, say, www.facebook.com/zuck and it is publically visible then anyone can spam you even if you have specifically kept the address private by using firstname.lastname@example.org.
What am I missing here, because it seems like a perfect way to harvest large numbers of genuine email addresses?
Those figures ain't "cherry-picked".
I think you are missing the point.
The comment I was replying to pointed out that "Comments always disabled" on the Vatican YouTube channel while on a randomly selected anti-religious channel "Comments always welcome", the implication being that the former wants to discourage discussion (and, by extension, so do all religions) while the latter encourages it. The "cherry-picking" is that the "fact" that this conclusion is based on is rubbish.
Regarding the numbers of followers on Twitter or YouTube, both are equally meaningless with regards importance. Otherwise, charlieissocoollike should be considered a far greater authority than both the Vatican and DarkMatter2525.
@Pontifex - 3.5 million followers
@RichardDawkins - 0.8 million followers
And your point is what, exactly?
I took the trouble to look up the Vatican's YouTube channel. Yes, it only has 80,000 subscribers. No, most of the videos do not have comments disabled. Read from that what you will but please don't cherry-pick data to fit your opinions.
I cannot remember the last time I even considered using 'goto'. I don't think of them as evil so much as non-existent. It must be an habitual thing.
OK, I was not clear. Sorry. By 'them' I meant specifically the Twitter account rather than the company as a whole. Other forms of communication are available.
The Daily Mail article doesn't mention anything about the change of the DM settings (as far as I can see) and so is not really relevant here. Can you please give us all a break and not turn this comment section into yet another McCann hate-fest?
If it is opt-in then by default there is no change for anyone. If an account is the public face of a company, however, then they will be able to let people DM them without having to go through the hassle of getting pinged in public, replying in public and then following each other. I'm sure that my mobile phone company doesn't really want to follow me as well as 37,500+ of their other customers but currently there is no other way for them to communicate privately.
According to http://www.iancgbell.clara.net/elite/faq.htm#A4 the last step from Deadly to Elite is greater than the whole step from the start up to Deadly.
"CD's as the plural of CDs"
I think you mean "CD's as the plural of CD".
(Running for the door as fast as possible)
"What are they actually giving them? Pressed CD's"
I believe that is what the second sentence of the article says, yes.
How about people who have heard that support for Windows XP is about to expire and, although they may be concerned about this, have no real attachment to one operating system or another? The options are to upgrade Windows for €€€ or try this new-fangled thing that the library are giving out free.
Admittedly, a lot of people would just take it as an opportunity to buy a new computer, which would probably come with Windows 8.
My guess is that LiMux is heavily modified to hook into the government office infrastructure and most of these modifications will be of little use to other people. I am quite happy to use a similarly customised distribution from $EMPLOYER but I wouldn't recommend it to anyone outside of the company.
Well, to keep in line with Ubuntu they will need to go alphabetically, so maybe Terrifying Tarantula and Undead Unicorn (hey, it is the national animal of Scotland so what does it matter if it is fictional?)
Is this the kernel that is going to appear in the "Saucy Salamander" release of Ubuntu? And can we expect similarly alliterative names every six months?
Now I understand why they keep telling me that my profile is incomplete and asking for my phone number.
First rule of Facebook: Don't post anything unless you are perfectly happy for it to become public knowledge tomorrow, regardless of the privacy settings you choose.
It is notable that one of the most memorable lines (Leia: "I love you", Solo "I know") was an ad-lib because the original was so crass. Possibly others as well. Maybe they should have just let Harrison Ford re-write the whole script.
I have had to suffer Symphony for a few years (hey, guess who I work for) and one of the things I actually liked about it was the sidebar. I am surprised that the author of the article missed it after "hundreds of hours in its word processor". My main gripe with it was that (as far as I could make out) they had forked an old OpenOffice build and so was always going to be lagging behind.
I will reserve judgement on whether MS Office compatibility has improved. This was never particularly good in Symphony, and generally worse than the latest OOo.
"A text editor would be more attractive than Microsoft Office"
Not Notepad. Having your eyes gouged out with a rusty spoon is more attractive than Notepad. Perhaps this is why it is the only text edtor that comes by default on Windows - so it doesn't compete with Office.
However, a *proper* text editor with LaTeX. Yes, that is certainly more attractive than MS Office. :-)
"AFAIK, patents last for 20 years. Music copyrights last for 70 years from death of author. Where's the fairness?"
You are not comparing like with like.
A patent is granted to an inventor to give them exclusive rights in exchange for making the details of the invention public for the benefit of all. This legal protection is granted in recognition of the fact that someone may lose out on the benefits of an invention because the idea could be taken up by other people who are better able to market their product. Famously, the Rubik's Cube was only patented in Hungary and so Professor Rubik recieved very little royalty for his invention. A limit of 20 years is granted to give a reasonably time for the inventor to benefit from it but after this the idea is available to all.
Copyright, on the other hand, is a protection against unauthorised pubishing of someone's work and this varies from one country to another as well as for the type of material. The date of death + 70 years you quote is (as I understand it) for written work in the UK, so it would apply to the actual music of Pink Floyd separate from any recording. Copyright for recorded material is normally from the date of creation, and is 50 years in the UK and 70 years in the US. This is what Cliff Richard was trying to get changed a few years ago because his earlist songs are now becoming public domain.
From what I understand, Pandora are trying to circumvent this copyright protection to avoid paying the royalties to the artists that they are legally entitled to.
OK, I've heard strong opinions for and against MySQL that are well thought out and reasonable, but
"He is Swedish, so we can't expect too much."
"Remember that he isn't talking to you and I, ..."
I think you mean "you and me". OK, I wouldn't normally be this padentic but it seemed appropriate here. :-)
I'm also not a Cameron fan and also think he is actually speaking sense here (and will probably also be voted down as a result). You and I know that programming is not a 'modern method' - in fact, you might argue that 'ancient' is a better adjective with regards the history of computing - but he is addressing people who have been brought up on word documents and spreadsheets. In this context, the notion that you can actually program a computer to do anything different is truely novel.
I cannot help feeling that there is an air of "the Tories said it so it must be stupid" about this.
The umpire may have made one mistake but, as he lost, Stakhovsky made dozens so he has no room for complaint. That's what I was told by my coach years ago, anyway.
"Next you'll get happysized"
Do you want fries with that?
I much prefer this to the opposite. For example, I think that 'Vista' is quite a good name ...
As long as they only create female dinosaurs I do not see what could possibly go wrong.
People who use the 'regular' release do so because they want the latest and greatest as soon as it is available while the "security-conscious and otherwise careful" use the LTS version, which still has the same 5-year support. I do not see any logical reason for sticking with a particular 'regular' release once the next has come out. If anything, this change should improve the quality of each release as people are freed up from supporting four or five versions in parallel.
It hasn't been 2 years since his last gaff. Only a few months ago he declared that 'improbable' means the same as 'impossible':
He states this as a 'mathematical fact', which probably had every mathematician in the country shouting obscenities at him.