Re: not happy when I said it looked like a great place to get legless in.
Well, I can't imagine they've heard that crack more than about fifty thousand times...
1944 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Apr 2007
I once had a call from a very aggrieved user because I'd messed up her PC so only a few random letters were scattered round the screen. DOS Wordperfect highlighted certain letters, I forget details, but I think it may have been the beginning of sentences. You know the rest.
Its remarkable easy when you have a whole lot of linked systems, all with their own rules. You have to try and work out a set of rules for the web system that make every password viable for *every* downstream system. Unless you can get permission to really relax the rules on the downstream systems it can be suprisingly difficult to do. Ideally you also need something in the ID management that will alert the user if any of the cascading changes fail.
Yes, same this side of the pond. I think its a major problem for our political system. Whereas the other party were once "people with some strange ideas who I suppose probably mean well" now they are "evil monsters who want to destroy civilisation as we know it".
And the result of having two sides who gallop for the extremes can only be bad for the rest of us.
I must admit the arrant hypocrisy is somewhat glaring. The west has shown no hesitation whatsoever in telling other countries citizens how to vote. Indeed I seem to remember a US President stepping in loudly on the UKs EU referendum.
Hell, its probably even the duty of one's spooks to try and influence other nations' voters to vote in a way that advantages their own country. And its interesting (and depressing) to consider how much damage has been done round the world in the last decade or so as a result of the US' rather romantic view of revolutions, which is all tied up with their own self deceiving vision of their history.
This side of the pond we're a bit more aware that revolutions tend to put bad guys in power, even if they are on the right side... and even if they *are* on the right side they are still bad guys.
If you think train travel is any less vulnerable to malign interference... Coincidentally there was a feature on Railway signalling on BBC this am... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/business-41970331/signal-failure-the-train-traveller-s-nightmare-explained Talk about a target rich environment...
Oh how naive we are. Of course it was declared a success by the people responsible for introducing it. Every major project is. The reason you'll often see a strategy change with a changing of the guard is that when no-one who came up with the idea is still there then the ballsups can happily be ditched. If you propose that while the proponents are still there you just label yourself as not having a can-do attitude. Of course that presupposes the alternative will be any better.
But, having worked in local government IT, much as I loathe Microsoft and their deeds, I really don't know how one could avoid them. The hundreds - and there are hundreds - of specialist applications just don't exist on other platforms. The result is that you are condemning your users to half ass lashups and second rate apps. And the IT is supposed to be there to help the users deliver services to the public.
Rather than a fraud by bankers I thought crypto currencies were more of a money grab by those who kick the things off and generate large quantities of pseudo money which then inflates in value... Certainly seems to me that those who get in the ground floor of a crypto currency end up with a lot of "dosh" for moderate effort.
> Google imagines itself, as the aggregator of other people's content,
> as more important than the people creating that content. And, sadly,
> in terms of reach, they are.
Nothing new there. Its the whole big advertising ethos that only silicon valley megacorps are allowed to earn money and the creators can go starve.
Even more depressingly I have had genuine confidential documents from complete strangers out of the blue, not to mention documents from out of the blue that purport to be or genuinely are from people who aren't complete strangers, and I have come across companies who have user names like SomeGuy2748. I can read email headers and readily spot messages that are not what they say they are, but the average user can not.
The end users' front ends simply won't access the fake servers, so no problem there.
You probably don't want them excluded from backup since in the event of requiring DR fake and live will both need to be restored.
And of course you do want to monitor them - that's the whole point!
Dunno, Biomass is almost more important. I'm quite happy with the concept that species A is abundant this year and species B is abundant next year, but if the total biomass is down that means there's something that affects all insects. The car front/bike helmet spatter empirical observation also suggests a big fall in populations.
There are sound arguments for quoting the original content rather than converting it. Would have been nice to list the GMT offset though.
For those who haven't clicked through, the closest approach is going to be over antarctica, so presumably no point in Brits looking out.
To be fair, I don't think we'd hear about those at all. I imagine most cloud hosting sites would rather not let the customers know there had been a problem.
My experience has been that most PHBs I've been involved with would rather pretend there are no problems rather than tell the customer ever time there's been a problem which hasn't impacted the customer. Its the same mindset, I guess, that thinks those 9s come from writing the SLA, not good design and careful planning.
Saving lives, obvious
Expanding mobility - for those who are too young, too old, too ill, too physically disabled or even too mentally disabled, for sure. Consider, for example, an epileptic who isn't allowed to drive.
Congestion - a factor in congestion is often poor driver behaviour, so there really is some potential there.
No, its pretty dumb for government pensions to be self funding. The government isn't going to go away, and isn't going to be spending much less money. If the government puts say 5 billion a year aside for self funding pensions, all that happens is the government puts another 5 billion on public sector debt, and the finance industry has another 5 billion to gamble with whilst paying themselves huge salaries and bonuses for"looking after the investment". If they don't borrow the 5 billion then they still pay out the same money in pensions, but they don't pay the interest on borrowing the 5 billion in the meantime.
Always follow the money. If government pensions are made self funding we tax payers are no better off, but the finance industry executives are. The reason for private sector pensions to be self funding is simply to guarantee the money is still there when the company is gone (Maxwell's permitting). It has no advantage for government pensions.
No problem if its their money. If on the other hand the chief ambition is to blag large quantities of venture capital cash and convert as much as possible into executive salaries while doing just enough press releases and "proof of concept" demonstrations to keep the taps flowing and hope they get lucky then that's another matter.
It does occur to me that the petition signers have got the wrong target. If they feel its unfair that Uber have to comply with all the regulations they find so irksome then there should be a campaign to have all those regulations rescinded. Then Uber could keep their licence and all Uber's competitors would be able to operate more cheaply too and everyone would benefit. (Well apart from the people those regulations were intended to protect, but who cares about them?)
There was a time when I had to rush down to the local Police HQ every now and then to help out with problems with the folks who did the overtime payments. I sort of wanted to get stopped on route but it never happened:
Cop: What's the hurry
Me: problem with the overtime payments at **** ****
at this point I imagined a high speed escort!
Unfortunately the dumb is on the design side. The industry needs to design for people as they are, not as they'd like them to be, and it needs to design for a larger chunk of the bell curve. What was acceptable when IT users were a selected and trained cadre doesn't cut the mustard for a universal utility.
He's on record as despising the academic study thing, and as ensuring that all works in progress were destroyed once the final edit was complete.
He had a point I think, there are a good number of authors (CS Lewis, Isaac Asimov for two) on record as stating that all the analyses of their work that they had seen were utterly wide of the mark. So its unlikely post mortem ones were any better. I particularly liked Asimov's comment to one story which includes a distinctly Freudian image on the lines that he could imagine future critics getting very excited about the hidden subtext of this, but actually he'd done it quite deliberately...
You can quite understand the author not wanting some half arsed slung together lash up of his old work, but on the other hand it would be nice have a little bit more. To my mind though the last book shows distinct signs of having needed another revision by the master's hand, so would I really truly want to have things that were even less complete against his name?
[well if I'm truly honest, I suppose the answer is that I don't think they should be published or made public, but *I* would like a copy]
Well they are if they are counter productive. If the ends can't justify the means, for sure the means can't justify the ends. If I am empathetic about the fears and frights of children being forced to have needles and drugs stuck in them, and ban vaccination, a conspiracy of the evil pharmaceutical companies, am I doing a good thing?
I dunno, isn't one of the lessons of the Internet that there is no moral or philosophical position, no matter how dumb, illogical or plain ridiculous, that you cannot find someone to aggressively espouse? Still, must admit, if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck...
Kinda the point of his "all the stories were boring". In general I think its not so much the plot as the writing around it that makes the thing work.
Although I can think of one author who I've given up reading because every book seemed to have so similar a plot it was getting to me. I shan't name, because if other people haven't found it irritating, but might if it were pointed out, then I'd be guilty of taking away their enjoyment .