Re: HP BC
Perhaps, but I doubt she would be significantly worse than many currently in the senate.
3016 posts • joined 24 Apr 2007
Perhaps, but I doubt she would be significantly worse than many currently in the senate.
You can have multiple faces if you are a master of disguise, just like inspector Clouseau
The classic random walk is exemplified by a person (typically male) who is so drunk that at each step he cannot remember which direction the last one was going.
By saturating the senses with loud noise, combined with the usual quantities of alcohol involved, I would expect that those involved in mosh pits have a similar level of randomness in their motion, especially when adding collisions with other "particles."
I will submit the paper to Annals of Improbable Research for their Scientists now know corner.
Weren't www.beautifulpeople.com previously listed as www.narcissism.com ?
Running around like a headless chicken when the proverbial shit hits the fan is. So yes, it makes sense to have plans in case war breaks out.
Thus, I do not find it at all surprising that there are plans in place for both defensive and offensive action. What is a problem is their constant data gathering on everything. Adding more data to a pool indiscriminately is like wall-of-death fishing: you catch and kill all sorts of stuff you did not intend to. I also do not buy the argument that they have "advanced data-mining algorithms". Data mining is a fancy word for pattern recognition in big data. To stay in the parlance of mining, let data be the ore, and information be the metal you want to extract. As the percentage of metal in the ore becomes lower, it makes less and less sense to extract the ore from the ground in the first place, unless the metal is very very precious. Even then, it is possible to be sidetracked by things that look like the metal, but aren't. Fool's gold (iron pyrite) springs to mind.
Likewise, if you gather data about everybody, looking for a minute percentage of people that actually hate the US sufficiently to do it real harm, the chances are false positive rates will skyrocket. This is a very real danger. It is much better to gather information in a far more directed manner, instead of implicitly suspecting everybody of ill will (which in itself seems to be a self-fulfilling mode of action).
As I have said over and over again: adding hay does not make finding needles easier. In mining parlance, there may be gold in them there hills, but it is better to drive a well-chosen shaft than indiscriminately removing the whole range of hills from the face of the earth, and sifting through tons of worthless rubble.
Given that the earlier leaks were about the far more dangerous data snooping, a cynic (who? me?!), might think this leak is there to distract from the more dangerous issues.
Are you sure it doesn't translate to Skynet?
Mine is the leather jacket
Somehow this reminds me of my parents in law, who (after a career teaching mentally less agile people, to put it mildly) were used to settle every argument by the application of equal parts of authoritarianism and volume (they still go at it hammer and tongs at each other, producing Pythonesque near infinite loops of "Yes it is! No it isn't!") .
They found out the hard way that this did not work on a scientist with a voice that some have compared to Brian Blessed in full spate (but only when I talk enthusiastically about anything or am just plain angry).
Maybe NASA needs to get in touch with the IAU from time to time.
Eadon: Maybe clearer vision of the article topic would result if the head was removed from the place where the sun don't shine.
The duration of the trek has everything to do with not allowing a robot to cheerfully drive itself off a cliff. Besides, if the engineering quality of Curiosity is anywhere near as good as that of Spirit and Opportunity (remember their "three month" missions?), Curiosity has time on its side. It's no Scott against Amundsen race to the pole.
You are about to hear a long story, starting with
When I were a lad, we never had ......
Do you still want to continue?
I only read the Planet of Adventure tetralogy, and quite liked it, but not so much that I dug out more, I must confess. Sad to hear of his passing but he has had a great innings on this planet, just shy of his century.
"Everybody knows dogs don't speak, hey Gaspode?"
"Yeah right, bark, bark"
Ik ben een Brit in Nederland en ik heb geen enkel probleem hiermee, maar ik ben er dan ook geboren.
The Dutch have their own way of creating massive words:
is one construct, but their tendency to create words with an uncomfortable number of consecutive consonants really stands out:
with 8 was long held to be the champion, but
might top that with 9 (jury still out on whether this word is OK. Trust the Welsh to come up with place names that (appear) to consist only of consonants:
Cwmtwrch, Bwlch and Mwnt were all places I have passed on my meanderings in Wales.
In these cases the 'w' is pronounced more or less like an "oo" as in food
Where's that Palm Tungsten T3
Different technology, maybe, but I loved using the stylus on that. My youngest son now thinks it is a cool toy (mainly for recording funny voices).
as long as cricket is being played on earth. I thought everybody knew that
sorry, couldn't resist.
Are they forgetting life and the universe?
Mine is the one with the cassette tapes of the radio plays in the pocket
Mr Eisenberg, are you certain you want to name your son Hagai? You realize you are dooming him to a career of quantum physics?
A real scientist will go on arguing until he or she is satisfied by the proofs/arguments given (and even then could start arguing again as new data become available).
Dead right. Imagine the excitement if the fluid turned out to be alcohol (how easy would it be to get volunteers for a trip to Mars then?).
Alternatively, it was octane, and some Martian equivalent of the Humvee became so popular that they used every last drop (hence the carbon-dioxide atmosphere).
There's a Dutch saying which translates to:
The best sailors are always on shore
I think this is most appropriate.
I am also reminded of Harry Enfield's perennial
You don't wanna do it like that!
The difference is actually made in patent law in most countries.
Most patent laws explicitly exclude patenting mathematical equations (though not necessarily their application). Because any algorithm can be expressed in lambda calculus, it could be (and has been) argued that algorithms should not be patentable. Their application (as e.g. as codec) could be under various laws.
So, as Mr. Slant would say: "This is an interesting case."
With degree of interest being defined as proportional to the amount of money it brings to lawyers.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Mine is the one with "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger in the pocket (very much worth the read!)
The beancounter should have heeded the warning sign:
Danger! Dropping tables! Hard-hat and further protective clothing required.
or the more generic:
Here be dragons
when approaching the BOFH's den
Old git 1: When I was a lad, we never had these newfangled integrated bleeding development environments!
Old git 2: Aye, we had emacs, and we were glad of it!
Old git 3: Emacs! we would have loved to have had emacs, we were stuck with vi, but we were happy!
Old git 4: We did not have editors at all, we had piles of punched cards! Hundreds of lines of FORTAN, one to
Old git 1: Luxury! We had no programming languages at all! Everything was machine language
Old git 2: Machine language!? We would have died for machine language. We had to hand wire connections
in our computer to program it!
Old git 3: Right!
When I was young we had to compute entire navigation table with nought more than pencil and
paper and a hand-cranked mechanical computing apparatus!
Old git 4: And the problem with kids today is that if you tell them they don't believe a word you are saying!
very nice indeed
Stewing the results in beer is recommended
They seem to be getting better very slowly. I have yet to see a real killer app for these, but maybe one will come along.
I will just stick with my current watch. I only ever buy a watch when the previous one breaks in such a way that repair is no longer economical. Given that my current (only my third) watch is a year old, and on average, my watches last about 19 years (OK, N=2 statistics), there could be some really enticing options available when I am up for my fourth watch.
They might be able to claim "Force majeure"
Shouldn't that be:
Mine is the one with the "Das Boot" director's cut DVD in the pocket
Tonight I think I might be serving some portions of monkfish fillet, lightly drizzled in olive oil and some lemon juice, sprinkled with pepper and some fresh sage from the garden, wrapped in lean smoky bacon, baked in the oven at 220 C for just 15 minutes served with pasta and pesto alla genovese, and spinach.
Alternatively, I might just have some pizza. Some beer or wine would go down a treat as well
Pity really, I liked my HTC Desire a lot. I now have a Desire X (in part because the interface was familiar, in part because I got a good deal), but when that needs replacement I may well have to look elsewhere, unless by then telcos are dumping their HTC phones as they too bail out (something tells me living in the Netherlands has influenced me ;-) ).
One thing that the government here in the Netherlands might try (maybe the same elsewhere), is to let teachers teach, not administrate. I gave a few lessons of computer science at schools nearby, to show kids that CS is certainly not learning to work in MS-Office. I was appalled at how much time teachers have to waste on administration during each lesson. And then there are the endless assessments and test that are foisted upon school children here from the age of 4 upwards. Endless assessments to measure outcomes. As one teacher pointedly stated: "A pig doesn't get fatter by weighing it more often". This tendency to measure everything to death has even reached preschool creches we have. I have heard people agonize about the fact that a 3 or 4 year old kid only recognized 4 letters whereas they should know 5 at that age. As if that difference is at all meaningful!.
When teachers are assessed by the teaching outcomes of their pupils, they will train them to perform well at the test, which is not the same as giving them understanding of the subject matter (let alone stimulating them).
Or contains sauce
Darn, I'm hungry now
Just don't cross-connect it to an electric monk, it will try to believe all 16 channels simultaneously.
Mine is the one with "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency" in the pocket
So now, drivers can mess things up with sub-millimetre precision!
OK, stop this sketch it's getting silly
Mine is the one with a map in the pocket
(and yes, sub-millimetre precision is impressive!)
Never? You mean only when they wrench it out of your cold dead hands. In which case you will be passed caring.
which runs linux, allows you to log into your servers. A full keyboard would perhaps be a bit much, bt a small set of function keys with the following functions could be enough:
F1: rm -rf *
F2: kill -9
F3: shutdown -h now
like this one
Suggestions for other keys welcome
Cramming 41Mpixel into such a small format is apparently possible, but only by making the photosites tiny. This means the electron well can only hold comparatively few electrons before saturating. This in turn means that the number of photons detected before saturation is low, which means increased noise and lower dynamic range. By binning multiple photosites together into a much smaller number of pixels, you can counteract this, and no doubt produce some very nifty 8MP images (especially with good processing techniques).
However, this will never match the quality of a DLSR, simply because the much bigger lens of a DLSR gathers more photons, which means better signal to noise. The reason is that quantum efficiencies (percentage of photons detected) of photosites are very high indeed (40% and above) so little can be gained there (and every gain at the phone end can be made equally at the DSLR end). A DSLR lens easily has 4x the diameter of that of a camera phone, meaning it gets 16x the number of photons. A phone sensor would need to collect 800% of all photons (which is clearly impossible) to match a DSLR sensor with 50% quantum efficiency.
So, will these cameras produce nice images, good enough for most purposes? Even when deducting marketing speak: yes. Will they match professional DSLR kit: No; this little thing called physics gets in the way. On the other hand, do I carry a phone with me all day? Certainly. Do I carry several kilogrammes of DSLR kit around all the time? No way!
I do not care whether he is first or second: there is going to be (another) British astronaut. Cheers to him
Put like that, maybe NASA could get sponsoring from Ferrari to up the ante on that front
Share and enjoy!!
"We'll tell you:' Go stick your head in a pig'"
As sung by a choir of robots with their voice boxes exactly one flattened fifth out of tune.
No large, friendly letters available I am afraid
It might have been a scary (or more accurately, very, very sad) person who is responsible for the down vote, or alternatively, it might have been a very clumsy person.
Mine is the one with Jingo! in the pocket
between a beer icon and a helicopter icon.
OK, let's go for the tinfoil-hat brigade:
The government laces drone-supplied beer with truth serum so they can spy on you
In truth of course, beer in sufficient quantities can always let you divulge inconvenient truths
Every time I see the ISS fly over (happens quite often whilst stargazing, I could even spot its overall shape with big binoculars), I just have to give quiet praise to the people up there, and the people who helped put them there. However we bemoan not doing enough space exploration, some people are dedicating and even risking their lives in the name of space exploration.
People like Cmdr Hadfield set a shining example in my book. Cheers to him and all like him
CSP is powerful. The main problem I find is in keeping communication down, especially in terms of how often processes need to communicate. It is much cheaper to have a few large chunks shuttled from on process to another, than it is to have a whole lot of little messages. It is not just the latency in that case (it also plays a role), but it is also the synchronization that costs time (barriers are particularly costly).
Or: OOOK! as the librarian warns you not to land on the dome of the library.