618 posts • joined 23 Apr 2007
Please bring back skeumorphism, all is forgiven.
I remember when buttons where buttons, and floating text was either a heading, a label or content.
All Jonny Ive's fault. From rock star designer to murderer.
The only thing I get from this, is how sad it is that we're basically confirming that Google IS the Internet. Our reliance on it has gone beyond monopoly and entered the realms of God Given Rights (even though it's Man Made and an advertising company to boot).
"Web Search Engine chooses not to list some stuff", would have been utterly trivial a decade ago. Today we can't function without it. That's pretty scary.
I don't see what the problem is.
It's obviously not *that* secret - it even has a nice big X to stand out all the better from Google Maps.
And the rest...I can only second what everyone else has pointed out. It's hardly "hidden from view".
Re: The name...
They did the same thing to Versions (the SVN client), when they implemented their fuck-me-where-is-Save As?? feature.. Nobody batted an eyelid.
Long shadows cover a lot of indiscretions.
I haven't "actively" noticed any Shockwave usage either, yet I often get a "Shockwave plug-in has crashed" report in Chrome (usually when I have way too many tabs open). So I guess it's in use still...but for what? Ads?
Nice try, but Autodesk lost my interest in lining their pockets a long time ago.
The MarkForged is interesting. I've been shopping for a printer with a decent long axis and that's just moved to the top of the "ooooh!" list. I'd be tempted to cancel my next L-series lens purchase and pre-order, if only they had samples to show. Honestly, selling a $5k 200 micron printer and they have zero samples to show - just a video with a guy trying to bend a little printed bar. Why is nothing ever simple?
Lol seriously, you had to post the same thing twice?
Have you ever gone for a haircut and asked to see what it's going to look like before agreeing to pay?
I won't argue that there aren't scam artists; you get them in every walk of life. But you can't tar everyone with the same brush - kickstarter and early access programmes make me a little uncomfortable, but in all honesty I'm glad they exist - I'm enjoying games that might not have been able to exist without them.
There's no shortage of idiots in the world, and they'll always outnumber you. Hang you head lopsided, drool, make moaning sounds and walk with a limp... Blend in to survive.
Re: Also available...
Sorry but the Star Citizen forums are full of people who seem to be completely gullible and happy to believe anything that they're told. Read a Chris Roberts interview... It's always Me and I ... Never, ever We. He gives zero credit to his team. He even named the company after himself.
What a tosser.
Re: I'm Sorry
If you mean the Expansions Pass, that's no different to Season Passes sold for almost every major game now - and slightly better than kickstarter funding as you know by now that the game is actually real, and not just a pipe dream.
Even £30 on top to get into the Beta is reasonable if you consider it's probably going to be more fun than most finished games, and assuming you really love this sort of thing. 2 months sub worth of Eve Online.
If you want to choke over paying for things that don't exist, you should go have a laugh at Star Citizen, which is still peddling $15,000 'ship packs' (oh it says they're out of stock, but you can email them and they're happy to accommodate you). This for a game that so far has only has one hilariously wonky video shown at PAX as proof of goods.
Smoke and mirrors. That game is going to have a lot of shortcomings, with it's 300,000 poly ships. Try imagining you video card crumbling under the weight of a hundred players trying to squeeze into a small space with that lot. We invented normal mapping and cage baking for a good reason...
Well Carmack tweeted that he didn't write any code while under contract to Zenimin, which is easy to believe. He'll have told minions what to write instead. Bet they didn't see that coming when they drew up his contract.
I'm sure it's a great piece of technology, but why put LEDs every ten meters when you can have a perfectly eco-friendly Clacks tower every ten hundred meters?
Utter f*cking idiots. Re. iOS 6.1.6
So you can only download 6.1.6 on devices that can't run iOS7 (i.e. 3GS).
Which is moronic for devs, as we can't download it from the dev portal nor via iTunes nor via device (you can only download iOS 7 via Settings).
We have to keep a range of devices with each OS installed so we can reproduce bugs reported by users, and you'd be amazed how many iPhone 4 and iPad 2 users are still on iOS 6 (even 5). Telling people to upgrade is all well and good, but it's a total cop-out of just letting people use what they want to (and I understand, because I loath iOS 7).
I've had LoveFilm for years now, and get 4 disks at once. Also have Netflix - big bonus, you can watch U.S. netflix on your UK account (just drop in a chrome extension).
I don't order disks anymore simply because I don't have time to watch them - I may get through two or three a month, whereas streamed stuff I'll watch from wherever, sometimes in the background while I'm working.
When Netflix first came out over here I pooh-pooh'd it because of the thin catalogue. Since then they've grown enormously... I finally signed up when Orange Is The New Black came up, and loved the service for about a year. It's easy to get through what you want to watch quite quickly though... there's not a lot on there for me now.
So as a Prime member, I'm up for the Instant LoveFilm. Costs a bit less, and I'll pretty much save double by ditching Lovefilm By Post. Just enough, in fact, to keep Netflix on the go.
Post is good - you can't beat a proper BluRay. But life is changing, spurred on by the times.
These aren't for phones
They're for the next generation of snow-proof shop front glass. Just you watch and see.
Re: @Philip Storry is @MyBackDoor
Pardon me, mistype.
"Truthfully, I'm shocked Apple doesn't allow their OS X to be downloaded for free and installed from a thumb drive."
They do, you can, I did.
More efficient than the BBC then
And costs less per month too
Of course, we still have to pay Auntie to watch Netflix.
Yeah I noticed that too - that's some pretty serious reflection going on there. Stunning.
"what incentive is there for companies to put their patents into standards?"
Without wanting to sound idealistic, I'd say:
Plenty, if you're not greedy and honest.
Not as much if you're greedy and a bully.
Hmm, then again, what category do big public corps fall into?
Re: Why even consult?
$17 billion won't last two minutes in the hands of politicians and lawmakers. It's certainly unlikely to benefit "people", and it's unlikely to change patent abuse... at best this entire scenario will force companies to simply modify their tactics.
As much as it would be fun to see a company that lies pay, the 5 year deal is probably better for everyone: the industry and consumers alike.
Slightly confused. They're doing this to avoid a $17bn fine, yet if they break the rules again within the five years then they'll be hit with a $17bn fine? (or whatever 10% is at the time).
Doesn't that just mean this is a delay tactic? Surely if you commit then break, you should pay *more* than the original fine?
Re: Good grief, I thought the Mountain Lion upgrade was big
At least with OS X updates you can copy the installer before it updates. Such a little thing, yet what an innovation! (I know, I know).
Re: Word is.....
Actually, the opposite can be dangerous too.
I have to work with a guy who is obsessed with learning everything about Word, and this means I'm constantly being handed Word docs with the most fucking awful abuse of layouts and styles imaginable. It's physically impossible to edit anything without destroying everything.
When I think of myself using Word, I'm not too fussed because I don't touch things I don't want to understand. But when I think of other people giving me Word docs they think are 'fancy', that I have to do something with, I want to curl up and die.
Re: A De-strossing Article!
Thanks for the link (why was this not in the main article?). Quite a good read, and his argument is a lot more tangible when seen in the full context of his rant.
It's easy to sympathise with him, particularly when I think of the software I use day to day, which of course is also forced upon me, and I in turn must force it upon young minds who come to work for us - thus the cycle is guaranteed.
Standards are supposed to be a Good Thing. But sloppily constructed standards that lock you in, are Evil. Sadly, you can't run a monopoly with good intentions.
Re: Word is.....
"An excremental pile of unimaginable bloat with 100 times more "features" than anyone is ever going to use."
Unfortunately you can say the same for any mass-market productivity software out there, from Photoshop to 3D Studio Max.
They have to try to be all things to all people, in the hope that they hit that one unique selling point to each individual need.
The irony of course, is that they're so cluttered half the USPs go unnoticed because they're buried under a menu option that is only visible if you have the correct docking panel visible, which is only active if you're in the correct editing mode, where editing modes are to be found under Window->Advanced->Views->Modes.
Re: A De-strossing Article!
Indeed I was thinking the same, or similar.
I'm regularly annoyed by Word's evolution of features - ribbon UI; where'd they put that button I used to use a lot?; why is it such a PITA to do this thing I want to do?; and so on.
But he's talking about file formats. What has that got to do with being a novelist? How many novelists open their Word files in an ascii editor so they can alter...what...XML? And, while not a fan of Word, I do know I can export a multitude of file formats if I ever become dataformatphobic.
Sounds to me like he should write his own, being clever and all that.
Ah on second thoughts, no I'm think of when they first brought in the "things you recently purchased/looked at" feature (which is still there, and still gets me alt-tabbing sometimes...
I think Amazon did it, no? I recall people complaining of Christmas shopping being scuppered.
Re: No MMS?
No MMS sounds like a deal-maker to me. Wife is constantly sending me flicking kitten pictures and crap.
Re: Total amount of
"But your issue was due to other software you chose to install - nothing to do with the base OS...."
When the parts of the base OS at the time the software was written (DirectX, .NET, etc) require re-patching with yet more windows updates to allow it to run, then yes it has plenty to do with the base OS.
Windows is more than it's install didk: it's a whole trove of legacy libraries and frameworks. When you install a Windows OS, you're not installing the "whole" package.
You can say the same for most OS's, but OS X isn't even remotely in the same ballpark as Windows.
Re: Total amount of
Speaking as one who 2 weeks ago installed a clean Windows 8, I spent a whole day installing updates going back years - not for Windows 8, but for all the software and SDKs I had to install to do my job. Framework and security updates dating back to what must be XP days.
To be expected perhaps, but I didn't have nearly half as much of that nonsense in OS X with a clean install.
Also, Win 8 does a wonderful job of hiding the Desktop Windows 8 Update from the common user - the Metro interface options only let you either: Update Automatically, or Don't Update.... No 'let me know' option. Stupid.
Re: Total amount of
Windows vs OS X pricing is pointless unless you take Pro pricing as your comparison.
I have two machines with Win7 Home on them, and had to pay either £60 for an upgrade to Win8 Pro or £179 for a Win7 Pro license. Why? So I could install more than 16GB RAM.
Sorry, but M$ can f$ck off.
Re: run out of cats?
I know where he's coming from.
Eagerly awaiting OS X Goose
Re: If my car leaned out it's fuel mixture to give me 60mpg ....
The car analogy doesn't work here (and when will people realise it never does) because in order for it to apply, your car would have to perform better on specific roads. I don't live anywhere near White Sands.
Samsung's cheat is to use a Plist file that's inaccessible to other applications. The argument 'optimised' falls apart when it's an optimisation available only to them.
Now, if they made it so we could hit turbo mode in our apps then it would be a different story, but then we'd probably have more stories about batteries catching fire.
Which makes me wonder, what would happen if you let one of these tests run and run...
Re: I can see many uses when the price drops
"It would also be lovely to have some sort of scanner, so when a little fitting breaks, you can fabricate another."
They're getting cheaper, and better. Makerbot's is just out, and there are other smaller ones (all the way down to $99 if you follow the kickstarters and don't mind naff quality -- measure to your needs).
Re: Well I would like one ...
Shapeways are really expensive for anything other than odd one- or two-off jobs.
Surprisingly (or not) nobody puts a $/cm3 on their product pages - supermarket style. However, Makerbot did a test not long ago with a 1kg spool, and they got 382 chess pieces from it. At £52 that's actually pretty good.
As for PLA & ABS supplies... this is where it all falls down. There's PLA and then there's crap PLA. I wonder which Dixons would stock.
I think home 3D printing market is too small at the moment...not just number of users, but the technology is still in the discovery phase. It's not about the price, rather the quality of the results. Shapeways may be expensive, but they have serious gear beyond what we can do with a £1-2k printer atm.
Oh the irony.
Not so long ago I was getting major negging here for wanting higher res 15" monitors, and now people are getting upset if they *don't* get them. And I didn't even have anything near 4k on my mind :p
The 5c is surprisingly appealing, especially if you haven't upgraded since 4 or 4S - feels solid yet feather light. Reminds me of the iPod Nanos after owning a classic iPod for years.
In LarsG's defence, all my wife talks about is the green 5c. She can't have one though, I'm saving up for a new dustbin.
Re: Can we PLEASE get to grips with this "Apple are expensive" line?
2TB HDD £209 +VAT. Are you saying that's not having a laugh? They don't even say what make/model it is.
I just bought a 3TB Barracuda from Scan for £92 Inc. Vat.
Bloody hell. Thanks for the tale - that's quite amazing. I'm surprised that hasn't made it into a movie...sounds like they were closer to the plot of Gravity than anyone else has been.
How much damage can come about from a docking cock-up? And how risky is it to have a floating cargo hulk sitting around while the next shipment of astronauts is trying to dock with the station in the meantime?
Just as well it knew to stop when it realised it didn't understand the incoming data transmission.
"If that appraisal appears churlish, it is self-consciously so because all smartphones are miraculous. And that's the problem. Apple's template has now been applied so widely that premium smartphones like its new offerings remain remarkable yet appear mundane."
Beautifully put, in the voice of Jonny "pretentious wank" Ive.
Pickpockets in London? Who'd have guessed.
Some people never learn.
But perhaps if he was one of those who camped out for days, he'll be a bit more aware of his surroundings next time.
Re: Blah blah blah -@AC 14:24
And what happens to that inaccessible black box of fingerprint dat when you trade in or lose your phone?
If someone is able to crack the black box and make a simple web tool (web tools seem popular), then what's stopping someone from thieving your biometrics straight from your handset? No need for snooping.
Not so improbable when you consider how easy it is to recover data from supposedly erased iPhones. I remember giving my sister my old 3GS after thinking I'd erased it, yet lo and behold she started receiving iMessages sent to me (they've patched that now, but took their time).
Fair points, and I actually find the idea of pendants quite interesting (perhaps concealment appeals), but it doesn't say why me. I have money, I want cool stuff; they've messed up what was a really good opportunity - seemingly because they're impatient and would rather be first to market than first to get it right.
That sounds awful familiar to me. Not an iFan, but I seem to recall smartphones were around before the iPhone too.
Anyway. Maybe I'll come back when someone comes up with a u-shadow.
Putting aesthetics aside, and ignoring the geek in me: Why should I want one of these?
Their CEO was quoted as saying Samsung Gear will become a fashion icon, everyone will be wearing them.
I don' t need a pedometer. I don't need a heart monitor. I don't need an address book on my wrist, not a camera nor a dictafone. I sometimes make a point of *not* carrying my phone to some places - why would I want to leave my watch behind as well? (not that it's any use beyond 10 meters in this case anyway).
I love gadgets, even just for the sake of themselves, but when you try to sell it as a lifestyle object, all I can smell is snake oil.
I'll take a smart watch that can offer me something smart, but this is just an ugly user interface to something that's already mobile and pocket sized. Though I guess that can be disputed re. Galaxy Note.
Re: I wonder if it's straightforward role reversal
Every now and then my wife will let one rip that puts my gastric movements to shame.
It doesn't mean much, other than she decided to have beans last night while I went for pasta.
Re: NSA is doing it wrong...
Subscriptions are so last gen. F2P all the way.
"NSA: Your wife is having a bad day and will complain to you for hours after you get home. Would you like to spend 5 Smurf Berries for us to her a text on your behalf saying you have to work late?"
- iPad is an iFAD: Now we know why Apple went running to IBM
- Apple orders huge MOUNTAIN of 80 MILLION 'Air' iPhone 6s
- Climate: 'An excuse for tax hikes', scientists 'don't know what they're talking about'
- Black Hat anti-Tor talk smashed by lawyers' wrecking ball
- +Analysis Microsoft: We're building ONE TRUE WINDOWS to rule us all