So, by extension...
OLED = bidet
(ie. something them furriners have, but we Brits snigger at)
El Reg needs a bog icon, BTW.
150 publicly visible posts • joined 15 Sep 2008
Free stuff LOANED to them, you mean. I suspect even El Reg's budget doesn't run to buying ten routers just for a one-off test.
And the loan thing is why there's no Apple Airport Exteme - Apple doesn't knowingly lend The Register hardware. Recent MacBook reviews suggest they have a covert source.
You seriously expect me to believe relatively small companies like Devolo in Germany, and D-Link and Netgear in the US have so much clout with Ofcom that they can get the anti-powerline evidence supressed?
Gimme a break.
There's no mileage whatsoever for Ofcom in doing anything to conspire against radio users to keep powerline kit makers happy.
And let's say they did ban them. People would still use them, and, like low-range FM transmitters a few years back, there's nothing they can do about it because actually they don't bugger up licenced radio users' spectrum.
Sheesh.
There are plenty of adaptors with pass-through power, from almost all of the manufacturers of this kind of kit, eg.
http://www.reghardware.com/2009/12/22/review_networking_powerline_devolo_dlan_avplus/
http://www.devolo.co.uk/consumer/82_dlan-500-avplus_starter-kit_product-presentation_1.html?l=en
Well, what's your agenda here that you blissfully and uncritically accept Sony's word that 'only a small number' of phones are affected? If any other company said that, you'd be calling them liars.
Or are you really saying that Sony has shipped so few Xperia S handsets that hardly anyone is affected by the problem?
But kudos to Sony for admitting there *is* a problem. Not like a certain other smartphone maker 'i' could mention...
So what you're saying is that the US pre-tax price is the same as the UK pre-tax price, give or take a pound or two? What the heck's wrong with that?
Save your spleen for the many instances where UK pre-tax price is way more than the US pre-tax price - and there's still VAT to pay on top of that.
...very excellent sci-fi series, The Adventures of Luther Arkwright, is now available through Dark Horse's iPad app/digital store.
https://digital.darkhorse.com/profile/1797.adventures-of-luther-arkwright-2nd-edition/
Alternative histories, time travel, psionics, aliens - this has the lot. It's a cracker, and I commend it to the house.
You HAVE ALREADY PAID (your caps) to watch a programme *on broadcast*. You have NOT PAID (my caps) to watch it whenever you feel like it. It's the latter the BBC/ITV/C4/Sky/HBO/whoever is charging you for when you buy a download/disc/videotape.
iPlayer catch-up is provided as a bonus, not as a right. It is there to help you if you missed a show, not so you can keep watching it until the day you die.
Why do so many people here have such a problem understanding this?
BTW, the way to square the circle is to provide downloads for free but hardwire into them the ads that pay for them.
The BBC claims Barcelona will be non-exclusive, so its material will be available to iTunes et al. So it's unlikely to cost much more than those services charge from simple competition logic.
Then again the BBC does rather believe its name is a label of quality - not so, not so... - so may well price more just for that...
I'm with Nigel on this one. Just because you pay a subscription fee (legally enforced in this case) doesn't grant you free and perpetual access to broadcast content after the two-week(?) period assigned you by UK copyright law. Never has, and probably never will. Content isn't free - it has to be paid for when it's made. Creators should be paid - they have mortgages too - and if a new delivery mechanism comes along, they have a right (moral and legal) to a share of the proceeds.
Don't like that? Limit yourself to YouTube.
I buy Doctor Who DVDs and have bought other shows in the past. Buying a download is no different for most folks, and is only so for me because I refuse to buy into DRM. I spent lots on VHS too, now replaced for convenience as much as quality.
Interesting. I have a Kindle (not 3G) and see no reason at all to buy a new one unless this one dies.
Colour? Don't care - text is monochrome.
Better wireless? Wi-Fi is quick enough for semi-regular book downloads.
Battery life? Bloody good, so very happy with it.
Speed? Just fine, thanks.
Storage capacity? You can get a huge number of books into 2GB let alone 4GB, and I'm happy to shift stuff of by USB mass storage if I need to.
Size/Weight? Bit smaller would be nice, but not enough of a reason to upgrade IMHO.
In short, I'm going to wear this one into the ground before buying another.
It'll be a shame if Cell goes. A bloody interesting architecture, and one with far more potential - not yet realised IMHO - than x86. If only Sony had done something more interesting with it than sticking it in a games machine.
Will Cell fans become the Amiga fans de nos jours? I hope not.
...is sadly missing the product I have already purchased. I am therefore very annoyed that you were unable to validate my purchase decision, and therefore give me the warm fuzzy feeling I desperately need in order to to convince myself I bought the right kit.
In future, please preach to the converted, and cover what I already own, not what I don't.
Sheesh, guys (readers not writers)...
Don't have any problem at all with source code being released and - yes - this is good news for the CyanogenMod boys.
What annoys me - and leads to public spleen venting - is the assumption, sometimes questioned by El Reg, never by its readers, that because Google releases source code it must, by that very fact, be a lovely company that will never to harm to a soul and that its motives are pure.
Source code is good. Freely accessible source code is better. Assuming that, just because you've been granted that free access, the company behind the largesse is an ethical one is downright dim. But that's what a lot of folk here seem to believe, if their "Google hate spin" comments are anything to judge.
Don't worry, AC. Larry loves you. So does Sergei. They'll tuck you in to keep you safe and warm with one hand...
...while learning all they can from your online activity with the other.
But, hey, don't worry about that - you can look at the source code. Google couldn't possibly be... nasty... could it? Larry? Sergei? You are not Jobs Juniors, are you? Are you?
Google. Apple. M$. They are all as bad.
Because Google is such a caring, sharing company, right?
http://www.reghardware.com/2011/11/15/wi_fi_privacy_google/
You guys, you'll slurp that Kool Aid right down just so long as you don't have to pay for your software...
Google is not some kind of anti-Microsoft just because it gives its software away. That's called buying market share at loss. But your FOSS blinkers just keep you from noticing...
It is Barry S, isn't it? Sure reads like it.
I loved Halo on the PC. Lots of Xbox 360 owners won't have played this, and will get to enjoy it now. They'll enjoy it.
Mind you, dunno I'd want to buy it again, just for snazzier gfx. Gameplay matters, not gfx.
Can't anyway, it's Xbox only.
Fixed Width a problem?
What, you expect the be able to change the size of your telly to fit different-format programmes? You expect the Times to be printed on different sizes of paper?
Text too small?
Use your browser to change the text size. Or get specs.
Agree with the icons, though. And glad too see their back.
Paris, because she too favours a fixed width (if only we knew what it was...)