Re: You don't need money to get into Oxford or Cambridge
But if you have money, you can buy your way in. That's the point. That's why Oxbridge is full of the children of rich people, perpetuating the system.
344 posts • joined 23 Apr 2007
But if you have money, you can buy your way in. That's the point. That's why Oxbridge is full of the children of rich people, perpetuating the system.
No, that wasn't sarcasm. Sarcasm involves implying the opposite of what you said, and you made no such implication. You realised afterwards that you were being the class clown, playing up to an audience of idiots, and then decided to pretend that actually you had read it all along.
You're very much part of the problem. Perhaps if you and others like you could pay attention to something that wasn't flashing lights and beeping at you to hold your conditioned, obedient mind in thrall we wouldn't be in this mess.
"Marathon five-knuckle shuffle finishes on the cuff" surely?
Given the way the younger generation is currently being treated by their own, still living ancestor generations, I think caring about generations after that isn't on the table :(
Covered in detail within James C. Scott's "Seeing Like a State". It ends up with unliveable cities like Brasilia, surrounded by zones in which the humans actually get to be humans.
I'm not saying they choose not to make the parts for a decent ballpoint pen because they choose to sell bad ballpoint pens.
I'm saying that they are not capable of it. The manufacturing capability to make decent parts for a ballpoint pen currently does not exist in China. For making decent ballpoint pens, they currently import expensive ball bearings from other countries.
Li Keqiang complained about it on national TV four months ago.
They cannot make the parts required for a decent ballpoint pen.
"It has cemented its hold, in part, thanks to the environment's ease of use"
Are we talking about the same software? It's painfully difficult to use. Everything is hidden away in a byzantine maze of options menus, with vitally important settings given the same visual precedence as the trivial.
" This is the worst kind of sexism as all the women are fully clothed!"
I saw some sexism once in which one gender was effectively considered property, to be traded amongst the other gender. I think that was far worse than this.
"I have a feeling that you would have been standing on the sidelines spitting on the returnees much like certain others did."
In the interests of history, that is disputed.
What do people think this is? Some kind of political website dedicated to being balanced and fair? It's not. The Reg has no requirement to trash politicians in equal handfuls. Some stupid and ignorant people said stupid and ignorant things about technology and the Reg wrote about it.
Why the fuck should the Reg feel any kind of need to then go and trash some other politicians from another political party? What makes the whingers here think that the Reg has that obligation?
"I said powered flight."
Yes you did.
" As in humans powering their own flight."
No you fucking didn't. You said "powered flight", which is exactly what an aeroplane does. For example, like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wright_brothers#First_powered_flight
If you *meant* to say "humans powering their own flight" and you accidentally misspoke, be adult enough to admit you misspoke and correct yourself. Pretending that actually you're using the correct definition and everyone else is wrong so you were totally correct all along is the action of a little child.
"Once you are bored with FPS games, they are all going to look the same, in much the same way as action movies, especially if you ignore the plot"
Maybe that's the mistake being made; the plot.
I don't play much anymore, but I recall finding Medal of Honor (the 2010 one) so dull that I never went back after the first hour, but since then I have replayed HL2 at least once. Spec Ops:The Line held my interest, again because of the unfolding plot.
The differentiator is engagement, which relies on plot and characters and making me care. I don't play FPS games because they look pretty; I play them if they're fun, and eye candy isn't actually fun. Eye candy is icing on the cake, sure, but it's certainly not enough to make up for a game simply not being engaging.
We could do, but why would we? Right now, the human population is not food-limited and peak child has already been reached. What's so special about this new food that means people will suddenly decide to have a lot more children?
I had a run of PRS-505 models for the last few years. Generally replacing them when I broke one; they're a replacement for a stack of novels and get treated much the same. In pockets, rammed in bags, by the pool, all that sort of thing. Buy them second hand, run them into the ground.
I likewise liked the buttons instead of the touch screen, and it simply did what it was meant to; a stack of novels, in a single slim box. The last time I broke one I wound up looking at all the options and got a second-hand PRS-300 for a song. Still got buttons rather than a touch screen, none of the unrequired bells and whistles of competitors (lights, internet access, Amazon supervising my reading etc etc), but it was even better for my particular needs; being a little bit smaller made it significantly more convenient. I wouldn't be without it.
Maybe I should buy a few more second-hand while I still can so I've got a supply in the future when there are no good options for my needs (i.e. a replacement for a stack of novels) being made anymore.
Because normal people have to pay enormous prices for a house to live in during a bubble, and then suffer negative equity when it pops. What's proposed would be a way to damp the bubbles.
By definition, calling 911 is an emergency situation, and thus not normal. There is a higher likelihood in such situations that you would not be able to use your fingers than in non-emergency situations. Like all such situations, we can but play the percentages.
"Blaming our service people for the activities of the enemy is the biggest act of cowardice you can commit!"
I am a reservist of some fifteen years and I have been deployed overseas somewhere hot on active duty in a shooting war. Don't you dare come all Daily Mail / Fox News with me, pretending that to disagree with foreign policy is to somehow be dishonourable to forces personnel.
Second point; bleat about how it's not nice that the bad people hide in amongst innocent people all you like. It doesn't change the FACTS. And the FACTS are that we routinely murder innocent people and in doing so we cause terrorism. I don't give a damn how cowardly it may or may not be for OpFor to hide in amongst innocent people. That's completely irrelevant to the FACT that by murdering innocent people, we cause terrorism.
I could extend your argument to its logical conclusion; these drone pilots are launching their attacks from within the civilian population, so when terrorists turn up and kill pieces of that civilian population, it's the fault of those drone pilots. Utterly ridiculous. Grow up.
Compensation? That's not the price you pay for murdering a dozen innocent civilians. The price you pay is that their friends and relatives are pushed towards terrorism. Every time we murder some innocent civilians going about their lawful business, we strengthen terrorism. We recruit for them (and, frankly, understandably so; if the US was routinely murdering innocent people near me, from the sky, without warning or due process or accountability, I suspect I'd end up damaged enough that I'd want to make someone pay).
We make terrorists. This is how we make them. The price of our incompetence is terrorism. The price of our foreign policy and associated murdering is the death of our own civilians in the future.
The book was a novelty for the first half, but after that it just became dull. Problem, explanation, solution. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. To be fair, given the plot, there wasn't much the author could do about it.
I suspect this is a case in which the movie should be able to improve on the novel. Whereas the novel was for the most part first-person from the stranded astronaut's viewpoint, the movie could make things more interesting with some unreliable narrator devices (or indeed, going insane), and giving us more than just his opinion or perspective.
"Thing is, older people can be hidebound: stuck in ruts."
They can also be brilliantly innovative and experienced. Something that is literally impossible for the young. Sure, sometimes you get some child who sees something because they don't know the literature or history, but to say it's a young person's game because of that? Having worked in the software industry for the best part of two decades, I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of inexperienced programmers I've met who are better than people with many years' experience. It does happen, but by and large the better programmers are the ones with a lot more experience and knowledge.
The exact same thing is true of architecture. Is that a young person's game? Also surgery. Also electronic design. Also journalism. Also medicine. Also music. Also this, also that, also almost every skilled profession there is. The only true exception I can think of is pure mathematics in which the genius steps do seem to come from the (relatively) young, but that is something that can be done with zero knowledge or experience, unlike hammering on someone's network.
If we say that security research is a young person's game, by the same criteria we have to say that almost every skilled profession in the whole world is also a young person's game, and that's just nonsense.
"Security research is increasingly a young person's game"
Statements like that just don't make any sense. The only things in this life that are a young person's game are various forms of athleticism, and some niches that requires skilled people willing and able to work for low wages (usually in fields where experience is mandatory to progress, such that the role is an apprentice role like apprentice surgeon) such that older people deselect themselves from starting out in that niche.
Security research does not depend on particular abilities of the young. Unless, that is, you want smart, skilled people willing to work long hours for low wages,which incidentally brings us around to the UK MoDs effort, the joint reserve unit, who hope to do just that :)
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."
Truly, truly mental. Look what you did, you stupid tory voters.
If you've not seen it, TV six parter "The Game" was more Tinker Tailor than Spooks, and is worth seeing if that's your kind of spy thriller. Set in '72, so proper cold war spying, it stars Brian Cox, lending some gravitas, and being spread over six episodes they didn't have to rush things.
Bingo. I don't have any "loyalty" cards for stores ("loyalty" is something I have towards people, involving giving them the benefit of the doubt in certain circumstances based on my past dealings with them; I will never feel loyalty towards a business, or indeed a government or nation). It's a choice I make, based on what I perceive to be the benefits and the drawbacks and my personal circumstances.
If the senator wishes to liken governments spying on their own law-abiding citizenry to loyalty cards, might I suggest that they create a similar scheme, allowing people to opt in to being spied on?
Not just a funny academic title in a Pratchett novel. It's also a deeply impressive achievement; 李显龙 is ferociously smart.
And what would be the advantage of Singapore becoming a less restrictive society? Democracy isn't some kind of magical higher state that all humanity should strive for.
"Sainsbury's was offering their own brand olive oil spread at £2.50/1kg. Right next to it were 250g packs at £1.50, but on offer (for months) at two for two quid - and yet I watched folk look at both and get the big one."
So, a single-pack kilogram for £2.50, or half a kilo for £2? Getting the big pack seems like the better value.
Maybe you've got your eyes closed. I have found many, many things that are much easier to do in C++ than in C.
He was Senior Wrangler, which is far more impressive than Rhodes Scholar and negates the need for speedos; as I recall, that lot are happy to run the quads naked.
Icon not for pedantry, but for relevance in general :)
They are interested. Maybe not today. Today you're just some punk kid they don't give a damn about. In ten years time, however, you may be someone of interest and they can dig up everything you did online when you were young and stupid and use it to, for example, destroy your political career, or blackmail you, or embarrass you, or destroy your marriage, and so on and so on.
While making a minor correction to some code, you notice a massive flaw in some adjacent code. Do you:
A: Check the blame log to see if you did it, and if not, forget you ever saw it.
B: Having no time allocated to fix it, tell the tester on the sly how to trigger it, so that in six months time when testing comes around it'll get officially found and someone will then be given the hours to fix it.
C: Make a note of it to use as ammunition in the next finger-pointing blame game.
D: Not wanting to have to deal with the egotistical incompetent who wrote it and will take correcting it as a Machiavellian power play, leave it there but write a working version of the same, and change every use of it to your new version.
I have done all of these :(
"Quite amazing this progression, that since we are all supposed to be mature adults,"
We are, but there will always be a number of people who, for example, threaten to rape women with whom they disagree, sometimes going so far as to prove they know where said women live.
From experience, if you don't have a statement of conduct or some such, when you express the opinion that this is unacceptable behaviour, they claim that there is nothing written saying it's not acceptable and that their free speech makes it acceptable to behave like this. A written, unambiguous statement is sadly necessary; it won't stop them, but violators can be pointed at it and excommunicated.
No virgins in a web-based technology magazine's office? A likely story.
"because they continue to retire in their early to mid fifties"
Here's a quote for you: "Looking at Eurostat’s data from 2005 the average age of exit from the labour force in Greece (GRAPH EXCLUDED FROM THIS QUOTE BECAUSE I CAN ONLY QUOTE TEXT) was 61.7; higher than Germany, France or Italy and higher than the EU27 average. Since then Greece have had to raise the minimum age of retirement twice under bail-out conditions and so this figure is likely to rise further."
For many years, they've worked longer hours and retired later. The myths about the Greeks all having short hours and all retiring at age 50 are just that. Myths.
"The Greek lifestyle, for better or worse, is coming to an end. Nationally speaking they'll have to work considerably harder for a lot longer"
They do already work the longest hours in Europe (or at least did back in 2012 when my stats are from). The problem isn't that they're slackers; the problem is that they're massively unproductive.
He explicitly stated that if you do if because you like doing it, that's richness. He explicitly fucking says it.
Given that at the moment you routinely have to put up with idiot meatbags coming up behind you on the motorway at seventy plus, removing meatbags from the equation is an improvement.
"that couldn't be better served by improved public transport"
That's exactly what they ARE. Improved public transport. Here is my wish-list for public transport:
1) Picks me up wherever I am, at my convenience.
2) Delivers me exactly at the location I want to go to, without detours or other stops.
3) Don't have to share it with strangers.
Right now, I am describing a taxi, which is perfect but for the cost. If only there was some way to remove the largest cost of a taxi; the driver's time.
Hey presto, driverless car IS the ideal public transport.
I'd heard internet in the states was expensive thanks to the competition-busting cartels, but 67 dollars a MONTH? For what looks like a pretty basic internet connection? Blimey.
The overriding duty is to promote the company's success. Which by no means is to be taken as "as much money as possible given to shareholders". There are a lot more stakeholders than just the shareholders.
Here is some reading to get started with.
The chaps at OutLaw have a lot more where that comes from. It certainly is not all about maximising money for the company and giving it to shareholders.
" is likely to find themselves down the job centre about 20 nanoseconds after agreeing to do so"
Bullshit. For decades, company after company has senior executives visibly lining their own pockets instead of paying more to shareholders. The shareholders sit there and take it, time after time after time.
"The companies can't volunteer to pay more, because their shareholders would react badly - with a lawsuit."
Under what law? A company doesn't have any legal obligation to maximise shareholder value.
Indeed, it may HAVE helped me out. My suggestion stands, though; I would expect to see proportionally more faces from ethnicity X on Crimewatch if economic opportunities are more limited for ethnicity X.
Given that in 2011 the UK was about 87% white, I'm seeing a lot of non-white faces in that link; it may well be a mixed bunch, but it's certainly not representative of the UK population.
On the other hand, if we had a situation in which white men were routinely relegated to the shallow end of the employment pool, we would see Crimewatch heaving with white faces. Perhaps you've got cause and effect backwards?
Get a life. Exactly. Stop doing what you love and satisfying your own desire to know things just because it's there to be known. Fuck all that shit. Just do what you're told like johnnymotel. Drink what you're told to drink, aspire to copy those you're told are "cool", be attracted to the people the media tells you are atractive. Interested in exoplanets? What a loser. You've been told so many times you're meant to enjoy getting drunk and watching some kind of sport, so do it. Get a dull job like you see on the soap operas you're supposed to watch. That's a proper life.
Your modern PC gamer pays that kind of money on Steam and doesn't have so much as a single cardboard counter to show for it. The hipsters come out ahead if you're scoring purchases in cardboard and plastic acquired.
"can we look forward to the UK ship HMS Queer ?"
You've already had HMS Oberon, king of the fairies :)
"The most we can ask for is that we are not robbed, murdered, or worse."
For crying out loud, aspire to something. Aim higher! This poverty of ambition is likie a disease. We can do better.