@unwashed
Go to the MSE site first. There are form letters there you can use directly - probably quicker than the Ombudsman, who is probably a bit busy right now...
1321 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Apr 2007
..(with a small 'r') used to be filled in by class teachers, who performed the useful function of checking the state as well as the presence of the individuals. Dehumanising such simple tasks early in a child's career doesn't bode well for their later socialogical development, I fear.
"accelerating global warming"
Well it might if it was a major contributor to it, but the last time I checked, CO2 was responsible for about 5% of the greenhouse effect, and a doubling of CO2 levels has less impact than a few percent change in relative humidity, something we have virtually no control over at all!
More here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4419880.stm
"Everyone who wanted a Wii already has one"
I don't think so - plenty of youngsters (including one of mine) are raiding their piggy banks as I write (or pinning their hopes on Santa). The current shortage in the UK suggests that demand is pretty high. I got the last one in our HMV today, and Argos, Game and Woollies were all out of stock.
Oh, and since PS3's and Xboxes sell at a loss, Nintendo seem to be the only ones who actually did their sums right!
How about a 'fairtrade' label for record companies that provide more than a minimum royalty for their performers? I buy CD's but only when they are a reasonable price (everything else I get from eMusic). The official excuse for CD prices years ago was that they were costly to produce, but then the old ratchet principle kicked in and they never came down, even though they now cost a few pence. I'd pay a reasonable amount if I knew that the artist was getting more than the suits.
Worth shooting down one of these, just for the camera, I'd have thought...
FWIW, I think they're missing a trick. The chopper is moving in something approximating a straight line, so the camera only needs to view a wide but thin line across the path, as with a desktop scanner, but on a larger scale. Still, that might save money, and we wouldn't want the military doing anything on the cheap...
At least it sounds like MS is attempting to verify their code. IIRC, Steve Ballmer was asked about this a few years ago and (like Gandhi when asked what he thought of Western civilisation) he replied that it would be a good idea.
AFAIK, Excel's arithmetic has never been officially verified - everyone just seemed to assume that it had been properly programmed...
"we can claim that we're as good as Google"
That must have been said through gritted teeth! Even if true, why would I want to change to something that was merely 'as good as'..?
In any case, I imagine that part of Google's superiority relies on the scalability of Linux - when MS does the same, I might sit up and pay attention!
"Currently many non technical users don't even realise that 'Windows' isn't just part of the hardware."
Indeed. In fact, a lot of people end up disappointed that it doesn't actually 'do' anything useful, and that the office applications they have seen on other computers are an (expensive) extra. This is the main reason that MS is so damned rich - people have been suckered into buying a computer that needs more money spent on it to make it work, and are almost invariably 'advised' to spend it with MS. Or they 'borrow' their work copy, which only reinforces the habit...
Cust: What's Vista?
PC Planet It's a bit like XP..
Cust: Will all Windows software and printer etc work.
PC Planet: Maybe, Maybe not
Cust: Maybe?
PC Planet: Well you can download xyz to get abc program working. But you can get a code to make it work like Windows XP. Oh and the video card you have doesn't have any Vista Drivers yet, but someone will write some RSN.
Cust: I'd rather have XP, how much is it?
PC Planet: We don't have that anymore.
Cust: What else is there?
PC Planet (through gritted teeth): Well, there's Ubuntu, which is 99p
Cust: Why didn't you tell me?
PC Planet (having given up all pretence): It doesn't help our sales targets.
I know it's not in keeping with the tone of most El Reg commentators, but I'm pleased about this. Someone on R4 this morning was rooting for extra space funding from our Science and Academe-phobic government, making the (to me) arresting comparison with our national spend on shampoo, which is, apparently, greater. Puts it in perspective, I feel...
..oh well, never mind.
"SCO offered Boies and Co. a 20 per cent stake as payment "
The fact that this was turned down suggests that B&C knew a sinking ship when they saw one and (like all sensible rats) made haste for the shore.
So, do those who were daft enough to pay SCO a 'licence' for Linux now get their money back? That's a rhetorical question, BTW.
"This is just a typical non-issue stirred up by a Murdoch lead media to try and force the UK away from Europe."
And the less well-known reason for that is because the EU wants to harmonise tax law, and the Dirty Digger currently avoids paying most of it...
Oh, and I approve of miles (as on UK roadsigns) and pints (as in every pub). It works and it doesn't need fixing. Even the French sell stuff in livres.
"They are crap and still are!"
Well, there speaks an expert, obviously. Dpreview, whose opinions on cameras count for rather more, concluded that "the Casio EX-Z750 [was] the best ultra-compact 7 megapixel on the market today for the serious photographer"
WRT the timing, I was quoting in milliseconds, too. That's what 'ms' is short for...
For once, I seem to have ticked (or in this case, unticked) the right box. Plusnet offered me their spam filtering service a few months ago, and, tempting as it seemed, I had a feeling that it might throw the baby out with the bathwater, so I declined. You'd think they'd have learned to be a bit more careful by now, though...
"Your 500kW radar in a MiG claims are still implausible though"
It's pulse power, which is how most radars are rated. Not especially large for a ground radar, but quite impressive for a fighter, even if it did weigh 30 tons (the plane, not the radar). Air traffic control radars are well into the Megawatt range, and a leaky waveguide (the signal 'pipe') will kill you if you get too close to it.
Maybe the distance has been exaggerated, but believe me, the radar was powerful enough to blast through any attempt to jam it (the original intent) and it was a criminal offence to turn it on when the plane was on the ground. It was rated at 500kW, thanks to the use of valves rather than feeble imperialist western transistors - much laughed at initially, until it was realised that they were much more resistant to EMP and thus better able to survive a nuclear attack...
WRT visible light, I think UV is still susceptible to dissipation by fog. The point I was trying to make was that laser beams can be interfered with relatively easily, which is not what you want in a weapon. I think the US military takes Hollywood science too literally.