3104 posts • joined Sunday 22nd April 2007 18:21 GMT
Re: M Gale "It's called free speech"
And then starts publically slagging you & your company off ?
A few years ago, I was a PC World employee.
Try "suck it up and get on with it"? There is a marked difference between criticism and abuse. Actually, I kept my job there for so long despite not having the best sales figures because dammit, I had so few complaints. Customers liked me. Tended to come back more often because of that. Partly because I didn't respond to criticism with "right, fuck off, out of the shop, you." In fact, in many cases I would agree wholeheartedly with some of the stuff that customers came out with. Why act like a pissy jobsworth? Life's too short, and the company certainly isn't going to reward blind loyalty anyway. Yes sir, you are absolutely right, that is a terrible price for a USB 1.1-rated cable. Unfortunately there is little I can do about it, however my figures for today are not too bad. If you're buying a printer and ink, I can probably discount it for you.
Professionalism. Something an Easyjet employee or two might do well to learn about.
Re: "Oops. Did hitting that mess something up for you?"
A Windows keyboard - smells less than pouring your beer into the fan but not as nice.
Power buttons on the keyboard is something Apple Macs had first. It's just as fucking annoying on them, too. Think different? Yeah, right.
Amusingly, the keyboard I'm using thankfully has no such retardedness on it. Model? Microsoft Wireless Keyboard 800.
Security theatre aside, wouldn't a bit of yellow tape strung across the entrance kinda indicate that this is not an entrance for unauthorised personnel?
Really. Couple of $ worth of yellow gaffer tape to tide them over until the airport can afford a barrier. Emergency vehicles can still plough on through, and you'd have to be exceptionally, undeserving-of-a-driving-license thick in order to not notice it.
There. No need to thank me. Just get it done before some lost driver collapses some undercarriage and makes a few hundred people go splat.
Re: "It's called free speech"
Typical, a lawyer trying to scare people to get what he wants.
Typical, a pissy employee of a substandard airline trying to play God because someone had the temerity to not worship the ground they walk on.
Take a look at what happened here. The guy might be a shark, but he's also incidentally happened to defend your rights as well as his own. Or, do you think that somehow a shit airline should not be criticised?
OH GOD I'LL NEVER BE ABLE TO GET ON AN EASYJET FLIGHT NOW!!!!
Sega Vs Nintendo
Of course, now there's Sonic games on the Nintendo (3)DS. Never thought I'd see that happen.
I'm now waiting for the Marylin Manson & Cliff Richard concert to be announced. Think they'd make a nice duet?
First they insisted on Google+ to rate or comment on an Android app.
Sorry, Android devs, but you'll never get another rating or review out of me, and that's why.
And now they're integrating the shit into Youtube comments? Gee, I wonder what I'll be doing about that then? What I won't be doing, is having anything to do with Google+.
Note to the chocolate factory: If I wanted a Facebook, I'd have a Facebook. I don't, so I don't.
Re: same or similar on Windows Phone
What would anyone do with a Windows 8 license?
Inflict it upon an innocent victim with neither mercy nor remorse.
There's some sick fuckers out there.
Re: By the time kids today are old enough to be pilots
Not just that, but a catastrophic loss of remote control could possibly end up with the aircraft making a dead-reckoning (assuming GPS has been jammed) return to safety, all by itself. It only needs to be so accurate to get back to a friendly area, then either command can be restored, or the aircraft can self destruct upon depletion of fuel. Or, just maybe, the aircraft can crashland somewhere flat and open and at least be partly salvageable.
It's not like a few people with some garden shed engineering can't build a small-scale craft that can return to base under autonomous control. The current SPB project seems to be shaping up in exactly that direction.
Re: Nintendo are fucked.
It has a joystick? Control pad? Buttons? Mario Kart?
Not so fucked, then.
As I've already said...
...who cares if the phone can be unlocked? Who even cares if it can be switched off? One or two tools, and you've popped the case, ripped the battery out, and have the screen, sensor and any other salvageable spares either on Fleabay or winging their way across the seas to be sold in other territories.
Any phone "anti theft" measure is not so much anti theft, as preventing random bods from peering at your data.
Re: still waiting
Mogul base eh? 300W? High pressure sodium perchance?
Methinks you'd be more interested in clusters of PAR-matched red and blue LEDs, you naughty boy, you.
Re: @Duncan Macdonald I'd be happy with ...
Every colour scanner I've used (though granted my last one was a while ago) used RGB lights. They look white because all the lights are firing. Try doing a greyscale scan. The options will usually allow you to select all, or either the red, green, or blue light as the illumination source.
Re: @Duncan Macdonald I'd be happy with ...
But if lit by R+G+B LEDs, the paint will reflect nothing, and will appear black.
If that was the case, colour scanners wouldn't work.
So long as that base has some kind of ZIF-type mechanism to keep the bits attached, that looks like it could be a truly awesome platform. And, actually innovative.
Calling Google "The Borg" while bigging up Microsoft? That would be some irony right there. Or cluelessness. Or perhaps both.
Really, you think Microsoft won't be ad-tracking you to within an inch of your life as well?
Although it must be said, roughly zero of those viruses are present on devices that haven't been rooted or have a bunch of dodgy APKs sideloaded from Pirate Jimbob's Warez Emporium.
Now, being able to re-lock a rooted build with your own damn key, that would be something.
I could say the same about anybody suggesting a Core i7 lap-scalder for doing letters and spreadsheets with. The Fujitsu Lifebook T731 is not exactly cheap either, unless you want a decrepit "refurbished" one.
So sure, if you have unlimited funds and the desire to throw unlimited amounts of them at some kind of shiny, then you might just barely, so long as you're not using it too hard, get 8 hours out of an x86 Windows tablet PC. Really, well done.
Now if you don't mind, I have a years-old TF201 here to play with. Cost £500 when it was brand spanking new. Goes all day. Like the Duracell Bunny of convertible tablets, it is.
Actually I think, now Microsoft have made the idiot decision to try and turn the desktop into a phone and get the general public used to "duh hooge squares and pretty pictures" phone interfaces, Android could go through just a few modifications to be mouse and multiple-window-friendly and stand a good chance at taking Microsoft on, on their home turf. Wouldn't that be something?
Duo 13, i7 variant. £1725, before you even go on about the prices Sony will charge for an extra battery, a car charger... well, it doesn't come with it. I also see no battery life figures.
So, we're probably talking somewhere north of two grand, all in. For a jumped up netbook. To write fucking Office documents.
Now what was that I said about extortionately priced? Not to mention that the huge PDAs that we now call "tablets" have a battery life that approaches or exceeds all-day heavy usage already, without any mucking about swapping batteries halfway through.
Re: Speech recognition
int main (int argc, char *argv)
std::cout << "I can see speech recognition working really well here." << std::endl;
#define SORRY "I just had to"
Re: Related topic...
All of the above, plus keyboard construction. The chiclet thing on a Transformer TF201 is passably decent (even if not Bluetooth). The membrane keyboards straight out of Spectrum 16-land are most certainly not.
That's not passive aggressive. It's just aggressive.
Just take the thing apart and sell any salvageable bits. Unlock codes won't stop someone with a screwdriver.
I don't think these measures as so much anti-theft as anti-letting-some-scrote-perv-over-your-selfies.
Crikey, that thing's still going? Mind you, from what I remember it's an actual honest-to-goodness DTP program as opposed to Illustrator's "good for making glossy leaflets" approach.
Quickoffice files save into Google Drive
Ah. Never mind, then.
The real reason for the laughing
Yeah, what are you gonna go to instead? The GIMP? Paint Shop Pro?
That's right. You'll pay per month to use the same old shit, and you'll thank us for it, you bitches. Now bend the fuck over and spread those cheeks.
Re: Why do you want my personal details for this?
First name: Micheal
Second name: Mouse
Email address: linuxfoundation@someDisposableWildCardDomain.com
Company: Ha Ha No, Inc.
Job title: Other.
Re: at this rate
I figured the whole point, if you're in a position to be hugely bothered by the kernel size, is that you can turn off a shitload of options in the kernel headers and compile your own teeny-tiny version, with support just for the hardware you're running it on?
Or just download Ubuntu or some other preconfigured distro where about everything sensible has been switched on.
Would a microkernel end up any smaller after every single driver (sorry, Service) for every possible bit of hardware out there has been included in with the distribution? Don't forget, Windows is a hybrid kernel that does a ton of stuff the microkernel way. Hardly a size 0, is it?
I thought that was round corners?
This is like Web 8.1, surely? And about as welcome?
Hypertext! Is! Your!
Re: Backed themselves in to a corner
because Android isn't anywhere near flexible enough support anything but the one form factor.
Sure seems like a single form-factor to me.
Xperia Arc S here, from when it was "Sony Ericsson". Still working, though a bit long in the tooth now perhaps.
Not a perfect phone, but still damned fine. Dual GLONASS/GPS before the Applistas ever thought of the idea, and the ancient, replaceable battery still gets me all day if I don't hammer it. Camera's awesome for a 2011-vintage phone, pretty good even for a bleeding-edge new smartphone, and it can actually make calls while being held like a phone, unlike the iPhone 4 that it went up against.
I'll probably be getting a replacement in the next year or two, simply to take advantage of multiple cores and stupidly high-res screens (as if the current phone isn't high enough). However, this ol' Arc S still gets appreciative comments, mostly on the size and clarity of the screen. It really is eye-searingly bright and razor-sharp.
Oh, and it seems to play almost every video file I throw at it. All without being tied into some PC-based bloatware.
Re: Exactly - with a modern multitasking OS this would do really well
I think you're mistaking pre-emptive multitasking with cooperative multitasking. Coop multitasking was what Mac OS had all the way up to OS X, and Windows up to 3.11 (up to 9x for 16 bit apps). It is, to use the crap analogy, the equivalent of leaving a bucket of money out and asking people to only take from it fairly. The program hogs resources until it gives them back to the OS.
Pre-emptive multitasking on the other hand, is where the OS decides how much CPU time each process is having, and rations timeslices accordingly. Unix has always had it, right back to 1969. Linux has had it since its inception in 1991, and since Android is based on Linux, well, Android has had it since day 1, too.
Strangely, pre-emptive multitasking works, regardless of how much an individual process wants to hog things. The only remaining argument is the best type of rationing policy - round robin, least-used-first, priority-based or other?
Ignorance, eh? It's everywhere.
Re: Impossible sites?
No, but a whole bunch of people replacing their name with "Cockmeister McFuck", and their profile picture with dongcopters and other such loveliness might prompt the site owners to allow deletions. Even if not, it's a funny form of protest that leaves the offending site in an awesome state for future viewers.
Of course if it's a site where the owners are not likely to be offended by such imagery, you do a bit of research and find something that will offend the site owners.
Just how offensive or pornographic (or offensively pornographic) can you make your content before you get the banhammer?
More than one way to skin that cat.
Re: Exactly - with a modern multitasking OS this would do really well
OSX is proper Unix. Not Lunix.
GNU's Not Unix.
Never has been, never pretended to be. Why does it have to be?
Re: But... but... but...
It also states "as part of a well-regulated militia", but it's funny how many people forget that part.
Re: Where Next?
Unless all you do is write letters and other not-very-demandingt stuff, 64 bit CPUs do provide more of an advantage than just accessing more RAM. Being generally faster for the same clock speed would be the main one.
For example, the iTunes Music Store gave the major labels the long overdue kick up the bum they needed
Wasn't that Napster?
Now there's a useless start button that does nothing, what's going to happen with the start menu replacements that put their own start button in?
Aha, now I think I see the plan. Well fuck you, too.
What is it with crap analogies?
It isn't a car. It isn't a house. It's a router. Lots of routers in fact. That were left in public mode. The public used them. This is not difficult to understand.
You want another crap analogy? You just bought a bus, stuck "10A Liverpool" on the front of it, painted it up in Arriva's livery, stopped at the bus stop, opened the door, shouted "don't worry everyone, it's free today", and now you're acting all surprised that you got a boatload of passengers expecting to find themselves in Liverpool City Centre via Rainhill.
Unencrypted routers are public routers. Get that through your skull, and encrypt yours if you don't like that. It's not hard. As for exploits, that's a different kettle o' fish, and quite clearly a case of trespass if you've done anything more than ping the thing and ask for its capabilities (which is, duh, just what Google did). Encrypted routers are private routers.
Why the hell do idiots make things so much harder than they need to be? And why are so many supposedly smart people acting like complete fuckwits over this? Kick Google because it's Google? Yeah, real smart move, that.
Because unless any enterprising and rather ballsy Somalians get a bit daring with lawn chairs and weather balloons, it's rather unlikely?
For some reason, I'm looking at that poster and thinking of the original Mercenaries game.
Except this isn't a house being burgled. It's a router that has been left in public mode.
Surprise surprise, the public used it. Victim my arse. Encrypt your router. No ifs, no buts, get it done. Why the hell should the courts back you up because you've thrown your network open to the public to use and they've used it?
Re: Are all Americans this dumb?
However, sticking an antenna out of the window, setting your CB rig to channel 19 and hoovering up every transmission in a 5-10 mile radius is not illegal.
And neither should wardriving be.
See that would assume that I regard wardriving as inherently wrong in some way. I really don't see what they did that's so awful. Drove around with a boatload of cars running Airodump? Well fuck me, lock 'em up, throw away the key.
Or alternatively, lern 2 WPA2. It'll stop Google from snarfing your passwords, AND the hackers that are probably already raping your unencrypted connection.
Re: RE: If Dyson is so rubbish why do they sell so much ?
Judging by the couple of broken Dysons that a friend has had, it's certainly bollocks of some kind or another.
Also Dyson did not invent bagless vacuum cleaners. The guy did however, take an already-existing technology - that of using cyclones to separate stuff - and stick a hose on the end. There's plenty of bagless designs that are basically a solid dust container with a filter at one end. While some manufacturers might have had a razor blade business model with the bags, nowhere near all did.
I still remember le Mother's old Goblin quite fondly. Of course, now it's a Henry.
Re: I really dislike dyson
If you are British why on Earth would you want some South Korean knock off company to destroy a British company?
A British company that shut up all its UK manufacturing facilities and shipped the whole lot over to Asia?
I don't see the difference, myself.
Would have been nice if the court would have said something like "just delete the data and we're happy."
I can see this turning into something similar to PPI and whiplash injury claims, where an increasingly small percentage of claimants were actually mis-sold PPI or really do have whiplash. Really, you just shouted your unencrypted username and password into the street with a megaphone, and it's Google you want to sue for it?
To anybody that does: Get a brain.
- On the matter of shooting down Amazon delivery drones with shotguns
- Review Bring Your Own Disks: The Synology DS214 network storage box
- OHM MY GOD! Move over graphene, here comes '100% PERFECT' stanene
- IT MELTDOWN ruins Cyber Monday for RBS, Natwest customers
- Google's new cloud CRUSHES Amazon in RAM battle