Re: a rock and a hard place
Query: What difference does it make if your player is called "Ryan Giggs", or "Ronnie Biggs"?
3536 posts • joined 22 Apr 2007
Query: What difference does it make if your player is called "Ryan Giggs", or "Ronnie Biggs"?
You can all kiss my winnets. By the way, the crack to make Carrier Command work without "Activation" is quite readily available if you know where to look.
...about the transvestite friend of mine who is making a pretty penny from adult cam sites. Going to remove that source of income, eh?
LiPo batteries are still very much a fire risk, and require charging and use via a kid-gloves treatment.
That said, I notice that LiPo batteries do tend to be used in heavy-current-draw situations. They are usually rated between 15C and 30C discharge rate.
Wouldn't want to short one, though.
I wouldn't say they were heroes.
They just had some actual competition from Digital Research, which they soon killed off by rather more foul means than fair.
Not a lot has changed since then.
I also have to wonder how well these start-menu replacements will work when Microsoft change something and the whole lot needs to be reprogrammed again?
You don't have that issue with Linux. A program wants one desktop environment but you're running another? No problem, it'll just drag in the libraries it needs and work nicely. The OS and UI are separated.
Windows just doesn't work like that. That a 3rd party hack might kludge its way around the problem (for now) is immaterial. Windows is a bloody expensive piece of software, and the people who make it can't even be bothered to keep the start menu from Windows 7, maybe even improve it to Gmome/KDE levels of excellence (yes, KDE's start menu categories are better than Windows 7's dump-it-all-in-an-alphabetical-list approach, even if 7's automatic quicklist is quite nice), despite ever-mounting evidence that People Want It Back.
All to try and make 2013 the Year of Windows on the Fondle Toy.
Sorry to go a little Eadonesque here, but: FAIL. FAIL. And a thousand times, FAIL!
Oh no they weren't. They were the ones accepting the IBM shilling to buy someone else's OS for Big Blue's new "personal computer" project.
Try looking to the people who reverse engineered the IBM PC BIOS, to see who broke up IBM's stranglehold.
"You complain about a much faster system with tons of new features because of a simple UI issue that's fixed in 30 seconds by a free download?"
I complain about the dumb, stupid way by which I am forced to interact with this new, faster system?
Why yes, yes I do.
Nobody is complaining about faster.
Everyone is complaining about the UI.
"Just install classic shell", as I have said before, is something you do on Linux when Canonical have fucked up the UI again. Linux distributions are largely designed for this sort of heterogenous layering between the UI and the OS. They are also free. Windows... isn't. On both counts.
It seems that the amount of Windows 8 machines running some 3rd party start menu is numbered in the millions. If the majority are using Metro, it's not that big a majority.
Will Microsoft pay attention to that for Windows 9 and give you the option to relegate TIFKAM to a thing used for running mobile apps on a desktop? I doubt it, but I can dream.
"Quite. If this is the response they get then they may as well not have bothered with relaxing the agreement."
If they want to piss in their own well, I won't stop them.
No, I think the "bastards" tag was earned several decades ago. This episode is just the latest in a long series of bastardry.
Fortunately it seems some people can still be bothered to kick up a stink about bastards.
Personal experience, even. And too late to use the edit button too.
Damn my fat fingers.
(Maybe that's what someone said shortly after the start of the RBS outage?)
"So all, technicians are incredibly overworked but still infallible, whilst all managers are lazy and incompetent. Procedures are completely unnecessary. Just get rid of all managers and procedures and everything will be fantastic."
And irate operators really do poison their bosses with halon. Oh come on, that has got to be the best rant I've seen in a while. Possibly it might have come from person experience, as far as you know.
Wherever it came from, I think Mike Smith needs to be hired as Simon Travaglia's ghost writer for when he's off sick and a new BOFH episode needs writing up. That was awesome.
...was umpteen levels of redundancy? One CPU "cartridge" goes pop? Fine. Rip it out of the backplane and stuff another one in, when you've got one to stuff in there.
Dual (or more) PSUs, RAID arrays.. and yet this happens. Oh well. Wonder what RBS's SLAs say about this?
They do have SLAs for those likely-hired-from-someone-probably-IBM machines, don't they?
Yeah, I saw that one. That's why you click the button five times to turn it off before stowing it in your suitcase.
Though to have made enough smoke to billow out of the coach, with nobody sucking through it.. that must have been one hell of a vape. Possibly more like the Volcano herbal vapes than an e-liquid vape, especially since the e-cigs and vapes by the likes of VIP and Halo have a 7-10 second safety cut-off. "Health aid for smokers" indeed.. naughty boy.
Did the passengers all stop off at the nearest pizza shop afterwards?
I recommend Halo's "Ultra Tank" portable vape. Forty quid for a kit including two batteries and three refillable cartomisers. Add in some 24mg/ml nicotine fluid and you're done.
It's also neither tobacco, nor smoking.
"Hirsch" vs "Jude".
I can see how there might have been a problem.
<--- Oh god, not again.
Depends on your priorities.
Kill Bambi now, and watch the population bounce right back in a few years.
Or stop Bambi reproducing for life, watch the population naturally dwindle and take quite a while longer to recover.
As a fairly committed rabbit-food-eater, I'll at least mention population control methods that don't involve blowing big holes in things. In the absence of a cervine-targetted Combine suppression field, darts are probably the best option there.
<--- See that?
You bastard. Now I have to find a cloth or something, before some professor walks past and wonders why this lab machine looks pebbledashed.
(El Reg: Better than Facebook, which is what everyone else seems to be looking at)
It's been done before.
Know what's even better?
That datacentre-edition license only covers two processors. A four-CPU machine needs two datacentre licenses. Really?
How many datacentres does anybody know that have two CPUs? Or does Microsoft count "A PC with a whacking big HDD attached to it" as "a datacentre"?
"Easy fix for devs (assuming you're not on some seldom used mirror), just add a # of times downloaded, and give the option to sort by popular. Leverage the crowd."
What would also be nice would be two flags on each package. One for "program", one for "library", and packages can be one, the other or both. Right now, searching (for instance) for games in Linux brings up a whole load of supporting libraries as well. It's a little like doing a search in the Windows 8 store and coming up with stuff like direct3d.dll all mixed up with the games themselves. If I'm developing something I might be interested in downloading lib-something-whatever-devel, but otherwise, let the end-products decide which dependencies to download and hide them from the user unless requested.
Oh my word, did I just criticize the Holy PenguinOS? How unlike me (according to some).
Alternatively, start up synaptic or your favourite GUI package manager and search for "Firefox". That's if it doesn't come as the default browser for your distribution anyway.
A "new user" isn't going to be using the terminal, are they? Or does a new Windows user start to learn how to do things via cmd.exe and regedit?
"No matter what you do on GNU/Linux you *ALWAYS* have to spend time trawling the 'net trying to interpret poorly written and out-of-date guides. It's why people use Windows/Mac. They may offer less choice and be dumbed down - but at least they work."
Because following these tips to make Windows more usable is the sort of thing that every Joe knows how to do, right?
This is not 1991 any more. Please, move with the times. You want to arse about under the hood of Linux? Sure you'll have to know your stuff. Same as with Windows. Same as with Mac OS X. Difference being that if the distro maintainer decides to go all GUIdiotic, it's not hard to apt-get the old interface back in.
Windows 8 on the other hand...
"A normal user will panic when they have to decide what filesystem, what size of partitions, what DE, what..."
Well it's good that you don't need to do any of that on a desktop-oriented Linux. Well, not unless you want to.
Not often I accuse someone of being a shill, but there are an awful lot of ACs with a nasty dismissive attitude toward anybody who fails to love the new bullshit, and a completely brainwashed attitude toward Microsoft. They don't even try to say how I'm wrong.. just throw insults out like "it's easy, you're retarded, stop complaining, get a life" and all the rest.
I guess Metro really is doubleplusgood.
Asides the massive information overload once you install more than a few applications, of course.
Asides trying to find out which TIFKAM apps are running and which ones aren't. Oh, yeah I forgot, Metro magically manages that by deciding for you what stays in memory and what has a few seconds to save its shit before being rather unceremoniously terminated regardless of your wishes. Because that's completely failproof.
Yeesh. I know I can be a sarky bastard at times, but the snark is so thick here you could cut it with a knife. Not that Microsoft Window doesn't deserve it.
And like many genius ideas, it leaves me slapping my forehead and going "that's just so simple, WHY didn't I think of it?"
Well. A bunch of logic gates certainly doesn't understand anything asides its current state.
That said, you could say that a complex neural network in fact DOES understand what it has been trained to recognise, even if only in a protozoan sense of the word.
So while a computer might not "understand", software well might do. Your brain doesn't understand a damned thing either, but I'm sure your mind does.
Y'know, we already have flash-cached spinning disks.
What about DRAM-cached flash cache on a spinning disk? Add in a few 1-farad capacitors to provide emergency "dump to flash" functionality in the event of a power failure (yes, they can be made smaller than the giant tin cans you get in car audio systems).. this is either a really perverse idea or a really good one.
Or perhaps both.
Yep, and so did the BBC Micro that preceded RISC machines.. and as mentioned above, so did earlier Acorn machines that the BBC evolved from. In fact many early micros relied on a ROM to contain their OS code.
Difference is, these are ROM chips. Okay, maybe some of them might have been EEPROM or UVPROM, but it's not like the machine you plugged them into had write access. The software was also vastly smaller than today's wares.
Whether a modern machine can be made with one big flat non-volatile memory space that holds everything, without being a potentially unbootable nightmare in the event of a crash, or a potential security risk... well, I think that's what the article is asking Penguinistas to have a go at finding out.
"The CPU doesn’t understand anything other than memory. It has no idea of the concept of the character 'A'."
You'll find I know more about the internal architecture of a CPU, whether scalar, superscalar, stream/vector or whatever, than you think. If I could really be bothered and had the cash I could probably design a simple CPU out of logic chips, transistors, or relay switches if you like. Maybe have a go at making a hardware Brainfuck/Turing machine. Slow as hell with ripple-adders, but it'd work.
There is still a concept of "memory" and "storage", regardless of what the CPU is doing at the gate level.
Whatever happens with regards stuffing running programs into nonvolatile memory, I just hope I retain the option to say "KILL EVERYTHING AND RESTART YOUR SHIT."
Also how more ancient cart based games consoles worked, where the cart essentially became part of the memory map.
Making a computer where there is no concept of "storage" and everything is just "memory"?
No fucking thankyou. That might be nirvana to some people, but to someone who wants "yank the plug" to mean "forget everything and start again", it's awful.
That said, maybe there's some use for having a flash card in there, and having the option in the OS to have a program "run in RAM" or "run in flash". Just so long as turning it off and on again means a reboot and not just coming back up in the same broken state.
I've just recently been attending a lecture as part of the Mainframe Computing module, courtesy of a guy who I won't name here, but was actually quite good at giving presentations. He went into a little detail about the last RBS cock-up and how it happened.
Wonder if it's the same "let's outsource the work to someone on the other side of the world who'll do it for 50p/hour" reason as the last time? Apparently RBS started looking for more local talent after that.. how far have they gotten with that?
"how about... tire pressure, engine and transmission oil levels, coolant levels, belt life remaining, etc... it would be nice to know my tires are outside optimal inflation range when i'm making my daily plan, so i can alot time to fix the issue and maybe diagnose why the status changed."
I'm sure that kind of tech could be hacked into a car right now with a bit of engineering skill and an Arduino or something. I don't know how it requires a complete drive-by-wire system to work properly though.
Bunch of sensors and a transmitter, surely?
Don't tease me, bro?
Okay, I'm going.
"P.S.: I am also a commercial pilot and it's interesting how much of the approach to "managing" the flight is being adapted to the ground transportation arena."
I have to wonder what your opinion is of the fly-by-wire systems that can, have and will absolutely deny control to the pilot even when the computer is obviously sending you up the creek without a paddle? I think everyone and their dog has seen the Air France flight disappearing into the trees at the end of the runway because the dipshit onboard computer thought "oh.. I'm at a low altitude, I WILL LAND NOW." That's just the most prominent example, though I'm sure you know of enough others.
These things need a damned off switch.
"Not all of them."
The vast majority of them, though there are some dual-carriageway A roads with motorway rules. Usually the ones marked as "A000(M)" on the map.
"I'm not convinced how the system could ever be made secure, and even if there are new laws it it is going to be hard to prove who brought the motorway to a standstill by sending the fake message that they have just done an emergency stop."
Especially if it's some naughty sod who's buried a smartphone in the motorway embankment along with a 24v truck battery powerful enough to last for weeks.
It's called "a horn". And if he carries on, there is the inevitable and rather foolproof method of educating someone about the error of their ways, called the "multiple vehicle pile-up".
That said, motorways have three lanes. You could always just overtake.
I'm wondering what happens after an accident. Veins tend to re "draw" themselves, but not necessarily in the same way.
"There was a UL that entering your PIN backwards at an ATM did this - retrieved your money but alerted the police. AFAIK it is just that, a UL, but the principle is not beyond the bounds of possibility."
It might be false, but that's a damned good idea.
Well, there must be some hackers here with their devious thinking-caps on.
Personally, I'm thinking that as well as chopping the hand off, you find a blood bank and rob a bag or two. Doesn't need to be the same blood group. The blood won't coagulate in time to stop the reading.
Now, make sure your hand is at body temperature prior to placing it on the pad. Now, the main artery is plugged into a pump that pulses like a heartbeat. The pump sucks blood out of the bag, and the main vein is connected back to the bag so you don't end up with a huge pool of slippery claret on the floor.
Of course, rubber-hose cryptanalysis is also a viable attack, but that's just less fun to think up.
I used to work in a shop like that. The alarm system had two codes: A "disarm" code, and a "duress" code. The effect was apparently identical, except the duress code would (theoretically) result in flashing blue lights and sirens arriving minutes later.
Thankfully, never got a chance to test that one.
The difference is that there is no finite reservoir of bits that's about to run out if everyone uses them up. This isn't like dragging a few kilowatts out of the mains grid and expecting the power station to stay fuelled forever.
The problem is, too many people seem to think that there is some kind of bit reservoir. There isn't. The only limit is the amount of data that can be transferred in any given time period. With sensible traffic management and by not oversubscribing your networks with endpoint connections that are way too high for the core network to cope with, then yes, unlimited usage of a mobile network connection is very possible. Three are managing it right now.
2mbit is a bit low, though.