Google have just discovered the hard drive.
Well fucking done.
3533 posts • joined 22 Apr 2007
Google have just discovered the hard drive.
Well fucking done.
He's also immortal, and ready to jump back into the pod even before you've finished scraping his remains out of the smouldering crater left by the last pod. I don't feel that our Playmonaut is quite so psychotically happy about a hypersonic splashdown.
Maybe we should set the Playmonaut's BadS flag to true.
What, you don't like bird jokes?
Well this is hawkward.
Many is not most.
In any case, the April edition of the Netcraft stats is even more interesting to read. Not only is most of the IIS gain due to a single company, but the vast majority of sites hosted by that company are link farms.
IIS: The choice of web server for spammers and black-hat SEO specialists. Hardly a wonderful accolade.
Also interesting that amongst the statistics that actually matter (million busiest sites, active sites), IIS is now being beaten by not only Apache, but in a narrow margin by the open-source nginx. Like I said, that's the new kid on the block. Certainly one to watch.
For instance IIS server is now only 0.15% away from overtaking Apache in market share!
However, amongst sites that actually matter, the story is significantly different. Nginx is the up and coming new kid there, and Apache still enjoys a very strong lead. In fact amongst the top million busiest sites, and amongst sites that are actually active, IIS share is continuing on its long-term decline.
It could be that lots of people start on IIS because it's like building with lego bricks and about as easy. As soon as the admins want to do anything reasonably complex, IIS becomes a pain in the neck, because it's like building with lego bricks.
Try again in a couple of years and we'll see if that one-year rise in IIS share amongst all sites including crappy Geocities-esque personal blogs continues, or if, like every other rise in IIS share, it's been a blip that drops as soon as the newbies discover that IIS isn't all it's cracked up to be.
What you CAN tell is where the packets are coming from and where they are going to. If you couldn't, then the network would be a notwork.
The big blinking LED is a bit of a giveaway.
As for phones, I wouldn't say that a top pocket with a hole in is all that great a length to go to. Somewhat less detectable, too.
There's a "simple" solution to 4G Glass. Replace your drywall with metal lath plaster walls. Windows with triple pane, ultra low-e treatment on the inside and outside layer. Unless those windows overlook a tower, no cellular will penetrate that building :)
That would block any and all mobile calls and data, including, I presume, emergency calls. Fair enough. The thing that gets me the most though is the picking on Glass specifically, when any mobile device can do what Glass does. And, as various people have mentioned, it's not like cameras don't have SD cards.
So yeah, "preventing people from recording artworks" is a bloody piss-poor excuse for "nerr herr I block you, Glass user." Even then, he doesn't block jack shit asides a MAC address that, given the supposed hackability of Glass, might well be a simple ifconfig eth0 hw ether 00:01:02:03:04:05:06 away from being something entirely different.
I think he wasn't loved enough as a child, myself.
...about Glass users connected to the portable access point in their pocket?
Or a 4G-enabled Glass?
Well, I expect some people just have to be like that. Question: Why's he not blocking phones with cameras, if it's really about recording artworks?
Personally I don't think it is, and has more to do with "durr hurr aren't I clever I piss dem Glass users right off". Well, fine. I hope he enjoys his exercise in futility.
Protein-foldcoin mining? SETI@coin?
Might give some people an incentive other than a pretty screensaver and turning their computer into a space heater.
The powder is actually on quite a few weather-balloon popping vids on Youtube. It tends to continue rising upward along with the helium, while the rest of the fragments follow the laws of gravity.
Actually not. You phone up, tell them where you are and where you're going, and ask for the cost.
The price you are quoted will be the price you are charged, regardless of how many times the driver gets lost or what the numbers on the meter say. At least, that's been the case with every private hire I've been in.
Of course, if you ask mid-trip for a ten minute wait at a shop or to nip around to a friend's house en route, then all bets are off.
Buteo Buteo (yes that's really its scientific name) definitely has feathers on its head. There's a few of them that seem to use the fields and woods around here as a buffet bar.
Wood pigeon, mouse or rabbit today? Om nom nom.
For HOW many gigabytes/month?
No thanks. Partying like it's 2004 over at EE HQ are they?
£500 vs £30k and you, having never met me, are absolutely sure I couldn't hear the difference? Stop being a muppet.
What I said was don't be surprised if you get it wrong in a double-blind test. You know, where neither you nor the tester know what hi fi is being used? Double-blind, geddit?
I would also suggest you stop being taken for a ride by the same people who sell £500 USB cables. I've known people with £300 midi systems that have half a kilowatt of RMS output, and yet can turn that box up all the way without the subwoofer even nearly starting to fart and rattle. It sounds good, across the whole frequency range, for £200 less than I suggested.
Yes, I have played with B&O gear along with various other overpriced "audiophile" items. Even B&O is bloody cheap compared with some of the stuff that the Golden Ear Cult comes out with, and I still dare you to tell me which is better in a double-blind test.
What I would like to see is a double-blind study where you can tell a £30K rig from a £500 rig.
Just don't be surprised if you get it wrong.
If you can't tell any difference between 44.1/16 and 192/24 then why go to the extra expense?
Assuming there is any extra expense, perhaps for people who want to create their own music? If I'm recording something for later copying and distribution, it's going to be recorded at 48KHz at least, even if it'll be mixed down to 44.1 later. 192KHz/24 bit means you can normalize, time stretch, do whatever it is you want to do to the original signal, while still filling up every spare ounce of bandwidth in a 44.1/16 stream.
So if you have a choice of a sound chipset capable of 44.1KHz/16 bit stereo, or 192KHz 24 bit 7.1 surround, and they both cost the same or are within pence or fractions of a penny of each other, you're going to choose the 44.1/16 option?
He simply said " I like to hear a recording in it's truest form, & you don't really need that stuff in the middle if you design your system well."
True in theory.
In practise, no two speaker sets or headphones have the same response curve, and some people don't know how to master a track.
Though, it does sound like a nice amp stage for a stacking system. Blinkenlights, sliders and buttons everywhere? Pffft. Volume, on and off. Job done. I can definitely appreciate that.
Trouble is, the DACs on your Asus will suck, badly, like most PC audio DACs.
And yet the only not-music noise I get in the headphones when ramped up to full whack is... total silence. Not even the horrific electronic noises coming from within the PC that Yesteryear's shitty onboard sound chips (and some shitty dedicated sound cards) used to make. Not even the hint of a hiss from a cheap PA stage. The CRT whine from my monitor is louder, and that's when I'm wearing the heavily-earmuffed headphones. The line-in might hiss a tiny bit when you turn it up to clip-the-hell-out-of-a-gnat's-fart levels.
I've yet to feed the output of this thing through an oscilloscope to test DAC accuracy but, for an onboard sound chipset, it really is quite good. Again, whether you can or can't tell the difference, if 192Khz/24 bit costs beans to implement, then why the hell not? It's not like you're being charged a hundred quid for a metre of pure silver oxygen-free USB cable.
Only in mono. Divide by two to get the CD format's bandwidth in stereo. Still heaps better than what came before, mind.
As for why anybody would want 192Khz/24 bit, I have to say "if it costs beans, then why the hell not?" It's cheap enough to make hardware that good that it comes with my (Asus M4A78LT-M) motherboard as standard.
You also mentioned exactly why people would want sampling rates that high: For creating their own masters.
Not unless you can show me how we're going to run out of Megabytes some time in the 2050s and desperately need to turn to green sources of pornography and lolcats.
The only limit to the pipes is how many bytes you can cram down them per second. There is no limit to the number of bytes total. Therefore, pay-as-you-go is a monumentally stupid idea.
Paying per unit of an infinite resource. Really?
"People who use more should pay more and people who use less should pay less"
Because there's only so many bits you can suck from the Lakes before they run out, and we might have passed Peak Megabyte a few years ago, so they're having to get into desperate measures such as disk-fracking and exploitation of Alaska's hidden porn reserves?
I'm waiting for the commentards asking how a site full of techies can find TIFKAM so hard to learn, while conveniently forgetting that the article has little to do with techies.
(And conveniently forgetting how shite TIFKAM is in general, but hey..)
especially backhaul which is always metered.
I thought that depends on the type of peering agreement that has been negotiated? Pretty sure that a few of those go something along the lines of "you carry our traffic, we'll carry yours."
"You wouldn't know injustice if it hit you in the face with a truncheon."
I guess we should give people a lifetime of shit for littering offences or having the wrong type of plant matter in their pocket?
Why exchange for cash when you can exchange for BTC?
Or more directly, for guns, booze and hookers?
(I wonder if any hookers/pimps accept Dogecoin?)
The usual story - Linux / Apache:
I'm sure if they only used Microsoft, they'd be so much safer.
So very much safer.
Whereas simply updating the totally free httpd to the latest version would make no difference whatsoever.
Nope, none at all.
You are Steve Ballmer, and I claim my £5.
If you do put a clipped waveform onto a vinyl
What you're basically saying is that if the master is a bunch of crap, the copies will be bunches of crap. Just that a stylus will act like a low pass filter to disguise the crap. This is not an indictment against CDs, or high-rate digital music files.
I'll just use a low pass filter. Or, perhaps, not try recording past the 0Db mark. If I want the genuine vinyl sound, I understand that some people are making expensive boxes (and the occasional free VST plugin) that put very authentic-sounding hisses, pops and clicks into the recording.
something that will never be possible with any digital format.
Better than 192KHz 24/32 bit non-compressed digital audio? The default VIA HD audio chipset on my motherboard can handle rates that high, let alone a "decent" sound card or ADC/DAC combo.
When the sample rate and accuracy of the digital portion exceeds the noise floor of the analogue portion of the circuit, I fail to see how the ol' spinning black disks can possibly exceed the quality of a good digital reproduction solution.
I also mentioned time-coded vinyl earlier. You should give it a try: The user interface that you're used to, plus all you ever need is two records and maybe a couple of spares just in case something bad happens at a gig. The audio comes from a bunch of MP3s, MP4s, lossless FLACs or uncompressed WAVs, and you can cue, speed up, slow down and scratch about with it just like it was recorded onto the vinyl. You also get the extra advantage that any feedback travelling into the stylus is basically ignored by the computer that's reading the time code.
It really is an awesome thing.
It's got a pretty picture on it! oh...but you already ruined the look trying to get to those hidden tracks.
To be fair, if they've been halfway sensible about it, the "label" track will be etched onto printed/coloured vinyl. Same stuff that gets used to make records where the entire face is a 12" round picture.
Though as for whether sticking a track so far toward the spindle that anything outside of a professional DJ deck won't be able to play it is sensible or not, I leave for the reader to decide.
Somebody didn't really use a tiny needle to scratch all those interference fringes into the master, did they?
Apparently they can be done.
I remember reading about them before Youtube came along, but I could never get a sharp enough needle nor be patient enough to make anything useful. That and old CD jewel cases aren't really the best for the task. Nice that the guy who made the site put that video up to demonstrate how it works more clearly.
I think there's some debate as to whether these are "real" holograms because you don't use a laser to make them; but since they are the same sort of etched-pattern affair that credit card holograms use, just on a larger scale, I don't see why they aren't.
Ah see, some headphones leak a hell of a lot more than others. I have a set of cans that I have for indoor use that I'd never bother with on the bus, partly because they are ridiculously huge, and partly because they seem to double as loudspeakers.
These days there is an EU-enforced limit on the volume of anything you can plug headphones into (which some manufacturers have a magic-hack way around). Generally if your ears are ringing after listening, that's a cue that the sound was too loud. It's still unlikely though, that you're going to be seeing many 18-30 year olds with burst ear drums due to loud headphones.
However, my hearing still goes up to a good 5, 6 or more KHz higher than other people my age and younger, with some teenagers not able to perceive the range of audio that I can. Of course, some have better ears, generally young children, but I still consider myself either damned lucky or just sensible.
Though it is a bit annoying to walk past one of the local curry houses when they've decided to turn the anti-chav "ultrasonic" blasters on. Affects teenagers only? My pasty white arse it does.
Looks nice. Just a shame it's part of JACK. A more fiddly audio set-up I have yet to encounter. "Professional Quality" quite possibly, but also in the same way that 3D Studio Max requires a degree-level education to get past "render a sphere with a texture", and Cisco's IOS generally shouldn't be attempted by anybody who still possesses a shred of sanity.
Anyone else remember being able to hear the CRT scan sound from CRT TVs?
Oh yes. I have frankly amazing hearing for my age, so I can tell if a CRT has been fired up in the next room. Or even, three feet from my face as the case is right now. Probably has something to do with me not habitually playing headphones at full blast or cranking the amp volume up to 12 in my younger days.
And yes, it's an AOC 5glr, TCO '99 compliant as an indicator of age. It works.
Also one cannot skin-up on a MP3.
I hope you were using the record sleeve, and not the vinyl itself.
Though if you were using the vinyl, I would like to smoke your stylus.
Audacity does indeed have such an option.
Select the "RIAA" curve from the little drop-down menu.
Ah, but do they have a 16RPM option?
I miss the 16RPM option.
(Edited to add "RPM", because I'm sure some jokers will come up with some kind of pun based on barely-legal or pedobear)
It has to anyone with a developer account.
So basically, nearly nobody.
I say on a desktop or laptop, it is a program and not an application.
Applications have been around a lot longer than the iPhone. A lot longer than Java - why do you think the preferred term for miniature Java things embedded in a web page is an "applet"?
An application is one or more programs that work together to apply the computer toward a particular task (like for instance, writing a letter, creating a spreadsheet). A collection of applications tends to be called an application suite (for instance, Office suites).
I hope that argument about "but apps are what phones have" is now thoroughly killed.
A tablet client that looks a bit more like the desktop client.
I've always thought that people that allow the "install from any location" option on their droids were a bunch of wankers.
Shame two other people (at the time of writing) didn't.
Microsoft don't inspect your email normally. Only Google do that all the time - and target adverts at you based on the content...
Woo, so some algorithm spots the word "baling twine" and I spend the next two weeks getting Amazon adverts for baling twine via Google's Adwords partners. This is a problem?
So much more invasive than someone manually poring over your emails. Seriously, if you think they aren't all at the Big Data game, you're blind. Google are just up front and honest about it, and seem to get all the bad press and smear campaigns, too.
If you want to worry about Google's advertbots analyzing keywords, then do also worry about Microsoft, Apple, Valve, Oracle, RIM, Amazon, Yahoo, in fact just about any company with any kind of online presence and probably most of those that still exist without one.
Your data is worth money. Business is about money. Microsoft. Apple, Oracle, RIM, Valve, Amazon, Yahoo, Facebook... all businesses. All with access to masses of customer and other user data. All with access to a resource that can positively impact their bottom line. Do the math.
And at that distance and power output, the microwave energy being absorbed by your metallic undies will be getting converted into heat and frying your gonads quite effectively.
And yes, yes I've been hit by a practical joker who wanted me to pick up an illegally-powerful 27MHz FM CB antenna, with the rig still live unbeknownst to me. Then he keyed the thing up. Most unpleasant.