53 posts • joined 12 Aug 2008
I'd always figured I'd end up getting a conceal and carry permit so I can defend myself from the coming "thief drones" with a fuselage mounted cannon... DRONE: "This is a stick-up. Put the lotion... I mean, wallet in the basket, or I'll shoot".
I figure I have a split second to drop and roll and fire, yet, I realize now all I'll need is either signal blocker or a chain mail glove to just grab it out of the air. Or, perhaps, a netting launch gun... or maybe a really big fly swatter...
More of a (knee) jerk reaction to marketing always getting its frickin mitts into centralized data/tracking systems. That sucking sound ain't from you getting *content. <snort> It goes deeper than that, but I'll stop now before I...
Re: Net neutrality: the already solved problem
"S.I.P. traffic has a QOS tag so that it always wins over torrents. Netflix could also get a QOS tag so that it doesn't start lagging when a download is started. "
And where does VPN (ie. unidentified) traffic fit in all that?
Re: Class of Service and Pandora
Those differences themselves may be the value delivered for difference in price (cost of running a 24/7 customer service center + employees awaiting asleep or watching late night telly/Netflix while endless pizza's arrive) but it doesn't explain the reduction of bandwidth to businesses for the price. Since they can generally anticipate a consistent usage from the business side, they can reasonably "guarantee" you won't have any service degradation (or certainly won't notice it). COS management has already removed most any "net neutrality" from application... pretty much everywhere. Treating it as Title II is just opening the court doors for judges (mostly lawyers, tho) to bring definitions of "unjust or unreasonable discrimination in charges, practices, classifications, regulations, facilities, or services" into the 21st century. That quote describes the pandora's boxes which have already been opened. I'm not saying I wouldn't welcome *neutrality... seems a bit late. It would create a hell of a lot of govmnt. jobs to attempt to enforce it, tho. <snicker>
Re: "Akamai and other CDNs accidentally outlawed"
20000+ expectations of ego gratification... all attempting vpns through a single wifi so they can wank off their latest video kit. Nothing *summit about it.
Societal progress by definition can't be uneven
I question the suggestion that the progress of society has prosperity at its core. Plain and simple: "richness" is subjective. A decent-quality democratic political system is clearly not attainable when capitalism is a driving force. I don't see society-as-a-whole being supported when the polarization of politics (as I prefer to call it "classholism") is seeking to maintain the status quo of those divisions. This has clearly manifested in the aforementioned quick rise to the 10 to 50 times in global inequality as well as the inequalities that exist in the same (quite efficient) structures (eg. the mailroom and the penthouse). It doesn't seek to progress things from a social perspective. Individual freedoms and private property's are obviously not inherently society building. I'm not saying they couldn't be or never are.
I'll order a round for the bar
It's all about pronunciation.
How is one s'posed to spell punctuation, ashdav?
Define the definition of is.
"...true malware, which is something you never intended to install or didn't install but it happened through a remote/web exploit."
Don't we need a coupla two tree more parameters for this definition, cuz with just *those it seems quite equatable to a "virus"?
I challenge that the *only difference is that a virus just spreads without you/your machine *doing anything...
... like I just did by opening Pandora's box (snicker).
Oh..... actual Football! (not handegg)
"So" protective of... definitions of right and left, perhaps.
"But you have to agree that Obama has taken warrantless & illegal surveillance to an unprecedented level."
No, I don't. Obama is just the current figurehead.
"...who are absolutely loath to criticize a Democratic President."
I'd have no problem with it if he actually was Democratic. Way too centrist.
"I don't think there is a conspiracy to overthrow the first democratic president in a while..."
Irrelevant. Nobody does. Scahil (et.al) is just trying to suck cash out of a controversy... just like most of what Fox news "journalists" report. It's fitting in his picture he's shadowed by a big puppet/statue.
BTW... the rest of the quote is... "more than twice as many as all previous presidents put together." The suggestion that this, as a "policy", is somehow different than any other administration is *bullpuckets. This is bringing the tools available together to do a job, more specifically successful... and pseudo-transparent. Previous presidents would just "disappear" people (wink).
"Seven criminal prosecutions for national security leaks were instigated during the first five years of Barack Obama's presidency."
Explain the relevancy of this statement without offering a comparison time span of a different presidency.
Re: OED is tickling you
Took 'em long enough... OED is the original listicle.
Re: A small step in the right direction
"I remember once plugging my laptop in a switch on a customers' desk, and having IT stand next to me within 15 minutes. Good times..."
A reason to not run a DHCP server? <wink>
A bag of rocks by any other name...
"...solutions to handle what are now called Big Data problems..."
More bile from the spawn of satan
Marketing trying again to justify their shite attempts at back seat psychology, claiming the one or two successes a year they have as potential ROI gold. If they only had 100,000 times the data available they could somehow prove they're worth the original 1/100,000. Can't you see the potential?
Also, the tech sector infrastructure bubble needs a coat of paint on it because all that unused bandwidth and storage capacity is going to waste... maybe if it was a different shade of mauve. Why won't they just let us all watch movies on another screen at work... and then not only will ad rates go up, we'll have the pedal to the metal... full speed ahead... and trendy, to boot. We do have an unlimited data plan, don't we?
As the BOFH once said (I paraphrase) "Are you listening to the screaming of the fans"?
... how much of the actual beach is included. Surfing up to but not onto the beach would be a bit restrictive.
Here in Chitowne...
... a hooter is an Owl, famous for large *eyes.
I was thinking it had one large eye. <blank stare>
When it's convenient.
Does anyone really think that the CIA and the FBI don't (or haven't over their histories) "play well" together? Not that they like to let on to it...
I use T-mobe here in the US. It would save me charged min. against a plan, 'cept I get unlimited as most do. WiFi calling works fine when sitting around the house, but in transit calls have quite a difficult time maintaining continuity... to put it mildly. I don't see that issue being fixed very soon.
What the.... who wears a watch these days?
Some of the worst are ACH users.
One would think it's in the bill of rights here in the US that you get access to "television". We may have some directive to provide education here, but the percentage of broadband being use for educational purposes is miniscule. Too many morons think knowing what happened to *Batwoman (for the millionth time) is part of the educational process.
... and I just can't wait for the tighty rightys to claim net neutrality toward securing an even share of throughput for creationism videos. When Jimmy and Tammy can't get all 500 million viewers on a Sunday morning to watch anything other than "handegg"... it'll seem like freedom of religion has lost it's importance in the grand scheme of things. <sarcasm>
It's all luxury... and a very large % of people are classholes. The Finns just know how to keep the yelling at each other to a minimum.
Functions -vs- Functionality
Point taken, MH. A bit of a knee-jerk reaction, of course.
However, when corporations overshadow smaller companies from either product or personnel perspective, I can't help but anticipating, based on historical precedent, that Fitz-Gibbon's Law is in action.
I think its a product of consolidation in the fashion industry
It is most certainly NOT "product consolidation in the tech industry". That, in itself, is marketing BS. Stop calling all things about data, storage, processing, transfer, security, integration, production... (the list is quite long)... one subject = "technology". It's not that simple simply because you simplify it to approach a consumer relationship. e.g.The difference between data and its processing has been intentionally blurred by marketers who know very little about the significance and/or applicability of either, but are just trying to sell "cool".
The term is being even further "dumbed down" and turned into an all encompassing "buzzword" by being applied to the simple use of a device, proffering "technological savy" or a certain sense of accomplishment, identity or even knowledge with/of things technical. Leveraging a tool displays one thing. Dependence on a tool, well... quite another.
Following trends is all that is left when you lose the difference between the definitions of "functions" and "functionality".
Driven by the spawn of satan itself (read 'marketing') it just irks them to the core that they can't correlate a time, demographic, location and deliver a freakin ad while you are participating in an enjoyable, self chosen event. They couldn't give a flying fark about copyright... the corp exec's need ad revenue. It's what will get them the golden parachute.
It's why we don't do BYOD here.
- Supervisor - "why did it take 3 hours to get that information I needed?"
- Worker Bee - " Well my iMate had to down load 3 updates one OS patch, one security definition, and 19 app updates, and on each restart there was a 60 second ad I couldn't get past. My ePad was real slow because with the new security patch it was running a full scan and the two sites I went to get that info made me sign up to stop ads from coming up every 5min. I immediately got 13 emails from a hell-spot of vendors, which I sniffed out were all trying to sell me access to same information which I just assigned to... and it took me forever to swim thru the maze of seemingly appropriate content to find the security code the original company sent. At that point I had to register my iTele and wait for them to...
The only thing(s) you really need to test is the fresh launch processing *equipment, maybe some new fuel and the RC (lol) steering wheel of the weapon. All done within 4 seconds... Oh, and so *enemies can record it happening... just so they know where yall stand.
Appointed (certainly not democratically elected) hierarchies of money, power, politics, *intellect, weapons and <ahem> "self-control" will inevitably have organizational leaks (let alone logical ones) to reveal the bullpuck that *such creates. I wonder who's getting fired over this one. Can't police officers be terrorists?
(on loudspeaker from behind) "Pull over!"
Officer walks up to your window
"What seems to be the problem, sir?"
"Your taillight is broken"
" I had no idea, it must have just happened"
" Terrorists. They all say that. Step out of the car..."
"“music” includes sounds wholly or predominantly characterised by the emission of a succession of repetitive beats."
I say it's anything I damn well want to define it as... so, who am I to say it doesn't have any specific definition anyone can give... I mean, if this was a democracy of some sorts, then a whole different *story applies.
Re: The police are WRONG
As will your relatives, neighbours and their relatives.
And (apparently) anyone who heard and/or read about you saying it.
That leaves Kevin Bacon about " " this far away from being a terrorist.
"But given the hissy-fit Google seem to have been throwing about this, the only logical conclusion I can draw is that Google want to provide erroneous and irrelevant search results."
Or not want to fork over $ to do it when it costs (basically) nothing to not do it.
Yet another BS comment...
"It is a "right of passage" of gangs to kill a cop or some bystander."
Yet another piece of blanket.
Re: What happened to the principle of...
"Everytime Obama gets criticized, someone pulls out the race card to hide behind because he can't stand the scrutiny."
Another idiotic blanket statement from a reactionary. When will it ever end.
Re: Joking aside
I thought the phrase went:
"Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean that they aren't out to get you".
"At least in the US, the legal system governing personal information has become so convoluted that it is virtually impossible for to assign accountability."
Just wait until the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) agreement (being negotiated in Brussels this week) "enshrines" the investor-to-state dispute settlement (ISDS).
That should clear some things up.
"...if trade barriers are put up for entirely political reasons, that detrimentally affect importers, then they should have some recourse."
Not to hinder the definition of "political" too much (lol)... it's the only reason(s) to put up trade barriers.
It sounds like the EU is blindly following the bs of their litigist, capitalist overlords here in the US. Don't you guys value any "sovereignty"?
It's a sad day for individual rights in general. No, corporations aren't people because 5 out of 9 appointees think that has "justice" written all over it. More tax money going to corporations.
I can see this... not so far in the future... creating more monopolies and undetectable insider trading gone rampant.
How about... along with that law... the capital gains tax should (increase to) be the inverse of the national growth rate. How else are *governments gonna pay out the flood of new national debt?
Security as a consumer product
Gene - Please talk to some people 1000 miles away in two land based directions. I have a problem with it. All the people I talk to have a problem with it. It's clearly not primarilly about protecting from an attack. If we actually had a democracy I'd be more than willing to offer service to defend it. It's about controlling the consumer and protecting them from being further educated with ideas and/or ideals that arent capitalist and support the status quo... as if *that's more democratic than religiousness, sexism or racism <sarcasm>. It's all about that special friend of the industry of military... the "spawn of satan" as it's known 'round these parts: marketing. So if we can all just remove all prejudice from a system, assign each of us a number, then we only have to worry about the relative value of the currency or resources from which we garner data... and here we are.
When more than 50% of the population actually vote for something (not 50% of that miniscule number that turns out to vote) we'll start having something that begins to represent a democracy. Until then... "protection" (not security) will just go to the highest bidders.
Feint and counterfeint - got any spare change?
All the time they are doing this they are also meeting to decide what the "ground rules" (sic) will be to allow drones to fly over US soil... and not just military ones... corporate, law enforcement, delivery vehicles (need your drycleaning brought to the office?)
It will, as is predicted by many, become man-vs-machines... right after it becomes man-vs-man controlled machines.
It's becoming even more obvious how power corrupts under the guise of "but this is the definition of success". Unfortunately, this is only the maintenance of status quo. "Change" my arse.
This is AI
Let's look to the future. C'mon we are already up to 14 shots!
The year is 2200 2100. Everyone has the ability to build anything. Once the need to purchase physical things is removed (for the most part) and reduced us to "equals", and economies will colapse and it'll just be about food and shelter (clothing is a shelter). Why wouldn't they make it so I can "print" a bar of soap? I don't think we'll be so quick to accept the printed "apple slices", but, eh!
The fact is that your printer is on the "internet" and when I think you need a shower, I'll print you up a bar of soap and throw in some deodorant <hint>. Better yet, the government will know when it's time you had a shower and just keep the doors locked on all the places you like to go to in the "public sector" until you get that stench of cigarettes and booze off of you... because we can't have anyone sueing the government because we are responsible but didn't protect them from the deadly *cancer molecules emminating from your filthy "orra".
Yet, you no longer have to go to school to learn how that "do-hickey" works or what kind of tollerances are need to make sure the "thing-a-ma-bob" on the end of that "whatcha-ma-call-it" spins freely... but not so free as to self-destruct and pieces fly off withy deadly force. Your job: just make sure the bucket is full of lubricant. You know the lubricant that was administered by the automated drop-delivery system, which of course has a computer monitored never ending supply of pre- packaged, shipped, conveyer-blelted, knozzled buckets ready to be automatically installed behind it in line. If that bucket becomes empty then the automated supply chain has failed and the system only has 15 more days of droplets before those ball-berrings dry up.
We won't even need to educate somone on how to change the bucket, just find out where along the supply chain something failed. If it was a human who failed, well, we either mark the job for replacement with a (better) machine or replace the human with a better human (we of course shoot that human in the head with the gun we can print). As the amount of steps/processes become more specialized and a lot more of them, and as more humans being replaced by machinery, eventually there will be a time that the *bigger humans in charge (think Matrix) will create systems to eliminate all the humans in between, and of course, turn that job over to the machines.
There is, however, still hope because it'll always be a human on both ends that has "will(s) to live". Even if we can already see that everything in between is already a form of artificial *intelligence.
Just having fun.
The US government's planned "freedoms"
The status quo is still selling the bullshit line that using the internet makes you smarter... they've clearly been successful making idiots feel good. It's quite rare (for the most part bullshit, as well) that you can get an education using a computer interface. You may be able to gather facts, and have it "compute" for you, but people learn from people and the most important thing they learn from other people is how to learn. They actually called it a "smart phone" for a reason, not a smart person tool... the achievment for technology is already there. The only reason for more bandwidth is to make the internet dumber (i.e. keep pushing pretty pictures and advertisement)... more and more in "motion picture form". They have to keep a certain % of thier own populace dumb... who else would continue to buy the poop culture produced? Or continue to vote for either of the two halves of the same basic "capitalist" party and still believe there's a significant choice? C'mon... don't you also want to be cool?
I can do 3500 hours in my sleep!
What... no C64?
It's a shame about the curtains.
My sensors are getting snarky with me
"The first personal computers, the spreadsheet, the Walkman and the iPhone didn’t arrive on the planet as norms boiled down from Big Data."
It wasn't called that, but conceptually that's exactly where they came from.
Just another attempt to discover "the meaning of life". Unfortunately I see the suicide rate... ok, maybe just depression on the increase because of some of the answers that'll be delivered... *answers that will suggest "paths of health and productivity", but at that point the premise will be so bought into that not choosing the *suggested path will make you a social criminal. "How dare you ignore the facts, ma'am?".
However, I feel like there's yet hope for the world since reading the previous comments here!
Let's get the EPA(s) to stop government(s) from creating what is and will be the environmental scourge of this planet for many, many, many, many.... etc... years. The waste from nuclear fission.
Then we can re-concentrate on the air.
....or deprecate on me.
You'll have to build it yourself and implant it in yourself, then.. and, of course, tell none about it.
Also, make sure your third party translator isn't cognitively associated with your second party browser... or your first party search engine... or your keyboard direct-to-display interface. Keep your voice recognition programing far away.
I feel lazier already.
Irrelevance is for nobody.
It does seem as if a touch screen environment is a further move toward providing (exclusively) a content delivery system... with considerable less options (or ease) for user input... into the realm of a basic user navigation of a predeterminacy. This is only my simple observation from the outside of the user paradigm. I'm not "living the dream" of cloud for others to relive on their handheld devices. Maybe I should, but, maybe my fingers are too big for that. Although dealing with "computing machines" for over 30 years, and enjoying most all of my experinces, it seems to be slowly fading. The "computing machine" paradigm, that is.
Some security issues seem moot as actual enterprise access (because of interoperability) is remarkably reduced with BYOD. Are we really spending company money securing someone else's paid for daily schedule app or their internet access use and history on BYOD? Why? Because the users talents aren't being leveraged (for the company) without that provision? Methinks not. Your CRM isn't delivering the kind of data you are used to? As much as some may not think... it's just a different kind of machine. As applications are delivering non-work/enterprise supplied information, it's up managers to set use policys and point out relative applicability for business. The lines are blurring as fast as managers are allowing themselves to become *users, and claiming actual business applications for what really is divided attentions. I'm not saying there aren't productive work from home applications that need enterprise speed, security and flexibility. The technology clearly isn't really there yet as blanket provisions... that's why there's this discussion I'd guess.
To not develop interactivity is a bit non-progressive and let's not get all control freak on the users... but those aren't the IT department's responsibility. Suppliers/developers need to build and sell a product that works and allows for system and users growth. I believe the user knows (if you tell them) when a decision is there to protect and grow business for you and them... and don't let users redefine the work process to include IT providing them with *unrestricted 24 hour access to an "advertisement device's" delivery connection. I'm not supporting/delivering CableTV on their desk... for the same reason. IT managers are not generally productivity managers, we should be enablers. Users need to offer actual productivity increases, not "I'm not using all my talent if I don't feel like I have the newest technology." What % of advertising inside content starts erroding productivity? I suggest that's a pretty small number. I feel it.
Yes, I realize I'm asserting "nobody" is developing backward compatability (which I assume is not true). Consumers are not leaders here, just demanders. Touch screen environments don't seem to be (designed as) enablers, however, from the enterprise perspective. To claim irrelevancy in any case seems foolish.
This is about national sovereignty and defining what is truly "international". As per usual, by controlling the conversation (of course).
Making people play by capitalist "rules" isolates progressive thought, obfuscates truths and hinders freedom even further. Don't draw us into your squabbles over money. Supply and demand could have a real relationship if there weren't third party(s) trying to pull the strings.
If one country really doesn't like what the other is doing, start a war and take it over so you can go impose your own personal hawks and boneheads. Sounds like the story of everything pre 21st century... (not that we've progressed far in stopping that). Idealism has a place... often it's not your version of what's practical.
When you drive a car in a different country, be prepared to follow the rules of the road there... or have your driving privileges revoked.
Don't call this democracy...
Other than Fox News (and its minions), nobody here blames the Obama administration for the "Great Recession". We know 8 years of Bushish war fighting, Clinton's mistakes sleeping with the banking *industry (ha), Regan and... well Regan's puppet handlers, allowing gamblers to run the system(s)... (sic)
Capitalism and Democracy will never work together consistently, they have two separate ultimate goals.
Face it, we here have to level the playing field... not just with ourselves, with the whole world. Stop NAFTA and reinstate US tarriffs and we'd be well on our way.
Or more likely...
they just want to own the patent for something that is/would (probably already) be(ing) used against them and their advertisers... to keep it out of the "legal" hands of consumers.
- Product round-up Coming clean: Ten cordless vacuum cleaners
- Product round-up Too 4K-ing expensive? Five full HD laptops for work and play
- Review We have a winner! Fresh Linux Mint 17.1 – hands down the best
- 'Regin': The 'New Stuxnet' spook-grade SOFTWARE WEAPON described
- Worstall @ the Weekend BIG FAT Lies: Porky Pies about obesity