Call me humourless
I am no fan of Capita or trade unions, and I don't have a final salary pension.
But I see nothing funny about people going on strike to try to preserve their futures.
984 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Aug 2008
Seriously - why should it ever be a user's job to protect the company from this?
You know, that speaks volumes about your attitude to your job and your employer. I'd even speculate that it exemplifies your approach to life.
"Take some responsibility? No way!"
I'm very glad that you will never be in my team.
Have you actually worked for them? That is *so* accurate!
I once worked on a major programme in which IBM were the prime contractors. The IBM managers spent all their time passing the buck, and ensuring that they weren't responsible or to blame for anything.
I was part of the assurance function, and I quickly learned how to silence a meeting room full of senior IBM managers. Just ask "Who's going to pick this one up?".
"...switching the wallpaper to an image with the desktop icons on it"
I knew someone who did that, deliberately, on their own desktop. He was a security guy, and a colleague had chided him for not locking his machine when away from his desk . (Cos it's always a good idea to score points off the security guys, isn't it?) She said she'd "do something to it" if he did it again.
So he set it up, then left his machine and simply walked across to the other side of the large open-plan office. From where he had an excellent view of her trying to "do something to it", and becoming more and more flustered as nothing happened....
Of course all had boybeards in those days, given average life expectancy of 18 yrs.
Not so. As you say, that may have been *average" life expectancy, but infant and child mortality - right up until recently - was hideously high. Survive your childhood, and you had a good chance of living to a ripe old age.
But was it ever answered whether androids DO dream of electric sheep?
It's years since I read the book, but my conclusion was that the emphasis in the title is not on "do", but is on "electric".
People can afford electric animals, but dream of being able to own flesh-and-blood ones, like themselves.
So what do androids dream of? Electric animals, like themselves? Or flesh-and-blood animals, because they aspire to be human?
Clever title when you consider it.
Except, of course, that they will have that evidence ready long before the auditor rocks up.
Now, if a previous audit had identied the problem and told them to deal with the risk, that would be more useful. Especially if they decided to accept the risk :)
Cuba and America have only recently re-established diplomatic relations after decades of sanctions, and I don't understand why it would be of benefit to Cuba to piss of the Americans again.
So who would want to piss them off? (Yes, I know - who wouldn't? - but I'm being serious for a change.)
I would start off by checking where the North Korean embassy is.
Where does is say that? All I can see is that use of the core apps is free for the first three years.
What El Reg's report doesn't say - but the Autotrader one does - is that Entune uses your own smartphone to connect, so a contract with unlimited data is recommended. You have to register your phone with Entune. I assume you can register more than one phone, for when a vehicle is used, separately, by different drivers.
There are other car systems - eg BMW's - which have their own SIM.
As many have said, Vodafone's expenses regime is nothing unusual.
Therefore I can only conclude that the Register pays for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Elevenses and afternoon tea as well.
Maybe even for the kebab on the way home from the fully-expensed pub night. Provided you can obtain a receipt and find it the next day.
And as they attempt to get back in convoy, in between each lorry is Nissan Micra being driven by a 70 year old petrified pensioner that's terrified of moving into the middle lane...
In the trial they will all be following a lorry with a human driver. I was thinking about what would happen when they are used for real. I just hope it's that pensioner in the Micra they follow, and not the arsehole in the BMW in the outside lane.
“We have what we call a build and buy strategy. In the last 20 years we’ve gone from 1,500 or so people to over 70,000, and there’s almost an even balance between growth acquisition and organic,”
No. They grow by acquisition. Up until they acquired Logica a few years ago, they doubled in size every 4 years. No way could you do that organically. Even they eventually realised that that was unsustainable.
If only there was a quick way of washing the entire submarine, inside and out...
I knew someone would say that. IANA forensic scientist, but I'd be surprised if a short sinking would remove all traces from him and from the sub - even if the sub had completely filled with water.
Sadly I had no vote, becase Cameron reneged on his election promise to remove the 15-year limit on expat voting. I'm sorry you feel that I wasn't a suitable person to be "let loose" with a vote, democracy is hard to live with at times, isn't it.
Let's get this straight.
You have lived outside the UK for more than 15 years. Presumably in France.
And yet, if you had had a vote, you would have voted for the UK to leave the EU.
Why? And why do you think you should have had a vote?
It's many years since I last re-read "The Mythical Man-Month", but I do remember that one of its lessons was that throwing more people at a project which is behind time merely makes it later. The internal communication/co-ordination overhead soon outweighs any gains in productivity.
Even if DEFRA don't read books about IBM mainframe operating systems, surely there must be modern management teachings which say the same thing?
How about the AI just has to obey all human laws of the country it is currently in as if it was a human?
There is currently little consensus about which country an international hacking incident should be tried. Where did the offence take place?
So who's going to tell a distributed, international AI which country it's in?
You didn't say what the 4th and 5th laws would be. Asimov himself saw the need to add a zeroth law, in the later books when he was merging the robots and Foundation series:
"A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm."
Might cover the situation whereby AI use of big data helps the like of Trump to win. And of course gives provides plenty of scope for stories about what the nature of "harm" is, and about whether preventing Trump from winning would be ethical. Even having to choose between Clinton and Trump would make a good robot/AI story!
it would require multipass overwriting of portions of databases, and sections of backups, without disrupting the integrity of the rest of the data
In my last job, exactly this problem came up. We were operating a service for a client, and it had a massive customer database. The client said "How do we delete our customers from the system?". Our f**kwit designers said "You don't, because you never asked for that facility." Of course, the f**kwit designers had never thought to ask if it would be necessary, nor realised that compliance with data protection legislation would make it essential.
So this kicked off a big study, and, yes, one of the findings was that it would be extremely difficult to delete customers without disrupting the integrity of the database. When you have all sorts of links from customers to financial information, to reports, and so on - some of which will identify the customers, but some of which which will merely use customers' data - then you have to be extremely careful not to screw everything up when deleting a customer. No point in complying with data protection legislation if you are now producing false accounting information!
Of course, it would have been easier if deletion had been designed in from the start. There were also other oddities, such as financial legislation requiring maintenance of customer history for x years (where x varies from country to country). Also the paradox that you might need to keep details of a customer, maked with a flag to say that they don't want to be contacted by marketing.
Lots of lovely problems to keep everyone occupied!
... tabloid readers who might be foolish enough to vote for her.
Hopefully there are not too many of them. Her majority in the GE was 346, which in itself is a strong comment on a senior minister. And which should rule her out of any leadership contest when support for the Maybot ends - the Tories would surely not take a risk on having a leader with such a thin majority,
... What happens next? Employee has refused a legitimate order (legitimised by the warrant) so can be fired
I knew that would be a response.
I specifically said "what if all the individuals at a telco on which a warrant has been served refuse to co-operate?" I think it's quite likely that some small ISPs might take that stance. In which case it would be unlikely for an employee to be fired for following what is in effect company policy.
I am not a lawyer, but if I were defending an employee who had been fired - or the company board who had been charged with not implementing the warrant - my argument would be along the lines of "You can't compel someone to do something solely because they are an employee of a company, when they couldn't be compelled to do it if they were not. Even if it's legal."
I'm thinking on the hoof here, so I'd be interested in any examples, from anywhere, that either support or don't support that argument.
... all the individuals at a telco on which a warrant has been served refuse to co-operate?
The duty to comply is only enforceable against a telco. But a telco consists of people, and the compliance of at least one person is required if the telco is to assist the authorities. Thus the duty to comply must be enforceable against at least one person. But it is explicitly stated that the duty to comply only applies to telcos, and not to people.
I therefore conclude that the law is an ass.