289 posts • joined 7 Aug 2008
Blimey - you ploughed through all TEN books thinking that? I'd have binned it after the second one at the latest...
...I got so fed up with morons yelling that I now carry a large machete that I wave at people that whose behaviour I don't care for. It has a range of about 25m, and now I can travel on Public Transport in peace and quiet (once the initial screaming has subsided). it's also useful in meetings, at the cinema or theatre and so on. It's (sort of) antisocial I suppose, but a lot less antisocial than being assailed by the usual racket made by people going about their normal lives in public places.
They should sack everyone involved immediately...
...as a detergent to future saboteurs.
It doesn't make sense because Brisbane isn't a heavily populated metropolitan area by any global standard - it's a poxy 2 million people that's a day's truck drive away from the next market of any significance, which is Sydney. In addition to being small, Brisbane also has high wages and high shipping costs - three things that are anathema to Amazon's model.
I will eat my Amazon drone-delivered hat if Amazon has the slightest intention of moving into the grocery biz in Brisbane. If just doesn't make logistical sense.
"How many commentards have even *seen* a cheque in, say, the last 10-15 years?"
At home, never. At work (not a large office), we probably receive and send hundreds of the freaking things a month. We send and receive more electronic payments than that, obviously.
This article seems a bit...advertorial-y.
Re: A US perspective
"I'm guessing the last is due to recent immigrants' being less able to navigate the odd requirements from establishing themselves as independent operators"
You're having a giraffe, ain't ya? NYC cabbies are all already independent operators (not employees) and Uber/Lyft wouldn't survive if recent immigrants weren't signing providing the labour - just as they have for the last three decades of taxi driving.
Re: What about the unlicensed ones?
Right - Uber says that there is an insurance policy in place, but there's no guarantee that the driver will actually claim on it. When an Uber driver rearended my friend's car (in which I was a passenger), the Uber driver called up and claimed on his domestic policy.
Re: Where do I begin?
"I am familiar with rent control in New York City. This is a very expensive place to live...Rent control is the only way many can afford to live there."
Respectfully, you and the author of the article conflate "New York City" with "desirable parts of Manhattan". There are plenty of apartments in NYC that are affordable or even cheap, but they're in the outer suburbs or in undesirable parts of Manhattan.
Rent Control operates primarily in Manhattan to give a relatively small number of tenants cheaper accommodation. In my entirely anecdotal observation, many of those tenants are middle class desk workers who could afford market rent (although TBF that might just reflect the fact that I mostly hung out with other middle class desk workers). It also creates lucrative opportunities for rent controlled tenants to illegally sublet their apartments to people who pay more-or-less market rate - so the tenant gets the cream for free.
There might be an argument for preserving social diversity through intervention in the market like rent control - but I don't think that rent control in NYC really achieves that and I don't think there has been a real discussion about who pays the cost of that (coz nothing comes for free).
"The former Federal Magistrates' Court, renamed the Federal Circuit Court in 2013, provides an appropriate template, since its purpose is to offer streamlined procedures as an alternative to the Family Court of Australia"
Did you mean that the Fed Circuit Court is supposed to be an alternative to the FEDERAL Court of Australia? I didn't think that the Fed Family Court and Fed Circuit Court both had jurisdiction to hear family law matters.
I don't think the comparison to the budget of the Fed Circuit Court bears much examination, frankly - it does far more than a Federal Pirating Court ever would. But in any case this government isn't going to be very interested in setting up new microcourts - they've only just finished amalgamating all the specialist admin tribunals into the AAT. (And it's a terrible idea to start with).
Re: kmpl? WTF?
Surely the Reg-appropriate measure of fuel efficiency would be how many times a full tank could take you around the coastline of Wales?
Things in Australia can be very far part, but the population is very concentrated in a few small places.
Re: A fair cop
"The ATO has also made it hard to pay employees in Bitcoin..."
It's not hard, you just have to pay tax, just like you'd have to pay tax whenever you pay your employees, surely?
...and this is nothing like a civil war based on religion.
Re: The Alcosense Lite
"I can still see the point of a gadget that let’s you know where you stand viz-a-viz the long arm of the law."
The breathalyzer shoulda been used on the proofreader ;)
"When you're not watching telly, the system can also turn the TV into a digital picture frame, showing photos stored on Google Drive or from the web in a continuously changing background mode."
Re: 10% of Samsung global revenue
"It would be like the government taking your car if you park in front of a fire hydrant. "
It would be more like the courts taking two wheels off your car after you formed a conspiracy with other drivers to make sure all the hydrants in town were blocked by cars.
Re: We need a follow up story
There's an excellent post on Kalzumeus about the assumptions that programmers (and plenty of other people) make about names and how they're often wrong: http://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/
You say "1 word made-up name" but plenty of people in the world only have one name - e.g. about 20%-ish of Indonesians.
You might think that that is a cultural oddity of no real significance but the Indonesian market is 245 million people and its economy grew 6-ish% last year. In my finest South Park ski instructor voice: if your social media can't handle the names of your new user base, you're gonna have a bad time.
You're trying to be funny but it's callous and incorrect to suggest that murder victims brought their deaths upon themselves by engaging in illegal activity. (And it's not even what happens in The Wire).
Re: Decisions, decisions
if it had a built-in VPN client, it would be an AMAZING business travellers' tool - no more crappy overpriced hotel movies and local TV!
That's not so much contentious as incomprehensible.
"Hasn't happened for a long time (certainly not since we went off the "gold standard"). "
S/he knows that, which is why s/he wrote "AT ONE TIME if you took a fiver into Bank of England"...
"The Crown Estate, an arm of the British government,"
As a tedious pedant tosser, I want to point out that the Crown Estate is not an arm of the government, it's an arm of, err, the Crown. http://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/about-us/faqs/
Re: They forgot one bullet-point ...
Not a terribly useful comment - unless the state stops using IT entirely, it's going to have to procure IT.
no, no, no
they mean banoffee.
Re: Original Izvestia article
There is a hidden story but its not the Snowden one. Obscure product + weird supplier + remarkably high price paid = bent government procurement.
Woah! Hold on there!
"Other than Apple's online store, the rest of Russia's trade in Apple kit is through the black market,"
Black market is not the right phrase for the huge number of independent mobile phone shops and online retailers in Russia. Just because they're not official Apple distributors or whatever it doesn't mean they're engaged in any illegal or immoral activity. Grey importing is not a crime.
Re: +1 to Computercenter
You still don't get it. Whether or not Computercentre had "legal reason to assume" the offices were unoccupied (a legal principle which you appear to have invented) is irrelevant when they had actual knowledge that the offices were occupied.
Re: +1 to Computercenter
"Computercenter...had legal reason to assume the property was not occupied. As such, they have every right to do what they wanted to the property."
Assumptions had sod all to do with it. Computercenter knew that there were people living there - that's the whole reason they employed the "consultant". RTFA.
Ma ütlen, ma ütlen, ma ütlen ...
...mul ei ole nina.
I woudn't bother putting too much thought into it, it's obviously vapourware.
Re: @Anon 2:38
"If you've passed through several countries willing to take you in and offer you safety, you realistically cease to be a refugee."
Go on then - name the countries between here and Sri Lanka or Afghanistan that offer safe refuge to Sri Lankan or Afghan asylum seekers. There's a reason why people go to so much trouble to arrive in Australia instead of staying in Thailand or Indonesia, and it's not the Air Miles.
Re: nothing like old fashioned racism
"The obsession with the boats is costing $3.2 BILLION!!! This is plain lunacy!!"
We all know that Labor couldn't manage a PUIAB but it's pretty impressive that the Coalition (who supposedly espouse small government and Australian jobs) are also so keen for a system which shovels quite so much Australian money outside Australia and provides quite so much employment for foreigners.
Re: @Mahatma Coat (Really?)
"I however chose to come here legally rather than arrive on a boat and claim refugee status"
"7.45 per cent from the Ukraine..."
No - not "the Ukraine", just "Ukraine". The definite article is not just redundant but wrong. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18233844
Re: Ban everything
Just to be clear: the bill text didn't prohibit or restrict anyone operating legit Internet cafes - just operating gambling and games of chance. http://legiscan.com/OH/text/HB7/id/852559
Try WhatsApp - it's what my mates use across BB, Samsung, iPhone...
Re: Is there a difference ...
Sure, but if the thief knows they're not going to get $20 for the phone, that makes it incrementally less worthwhile.
New York City is not New York State
This article contains errors:
- Schneiderman is not an "NYC attorney". He is the Attorney-General of New York State.
- Lookout isn't going to advise New York City; it's going to advise New York State.
Is it possible that they're less likely to be reported as stolen in NYC than in London? For example, is claiming on insurance in the UK require a police report whereas it doesn't in the US?
"could you perhaps give me a few examples of people who were randomly stopped and shot by New York Police?"
I can give you 685,000 examples of people who were randomly stopped and searched by the NYPD. Just have a look at the NY Civil Liberties Union website or follow the ongoing inquiries into Stop and Frisk: http://www.nyclu.org/node/1598
It's not a puff piece. It's a serialisation of the juiciest bits.
"I don't really understand what's with the Anglo-Saxons and their hatred of the idea of government-issued proof of identity"
Because mind your own business, that's why.
Re: De Ja Vu?
yeah, but that's not cab operators (neither drivers nor mediallion owners nor fleet companies) that is being referred to. It's black car/limo companies.
TBH this article is a bit of a dog's breakfast - trying to explain NYC licensing by comparison to London licensing is redundant and misleading.
there's absolutely no justification for public money to be spent on putting more sports on the gogglebox (or gogglepad, I suppose). if the zillion commercial sports channels that exist in Australia aren't showing your sport enough, and if no enthusiastic amateurs have popped up to put it on YouTube or Vimeo, then that's probably a pretty strong sign that no-one cares enough to watch it.
Re: Where's the justice here?
"The fact is that law is designed to function in a morality, philosophy and science free vacuum, because this is more profitable for lawyers."
That's misplaced here, though. The whole point of penalising people who refuse to accept perfectly decent settlement offers is to stop them litigating everything to death and then demanding the other side cops the massive legal bills that they have run up. The rule /discourages/ the unnecessary use of lawyers.
Re: Where's the justice here?
The decision on whether to litigate further beyond the offer was the client's. The plaintiff's lawyers should have explained very clearly to her the likely consequences of rejecting an offer. If they didn't, that was improper of them. If they did, they can't help that she ended up out of pocket.
Some people want their day in court no matter what the cost - some people want to be vindicated.
Re: I'm confused...
"1. You cannot get a court order unless a crime is shown to have been committed. Maybe in the US, never in EU."
This is nonsense. Stick to your knitting.
Are you suggesting that the entire Iranian military-theological-industrial complex is in fact a massive exercise in Scifi LARPing?
(Holmes, because Steampunk)
- Crawling from the Wreckage Want a more fuel efficient car? Then redesign it – here's how
- TV Review Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
- Human spaceships dodge ALIEN BODY skimming Mars
- Downrange Are you a gun owner? Let us in OR ELSE, say Blighty's top cops
- Review Xperia Z3: Crikey, Sony – ANOTHER flagship phondleslab?