etiamnunc in fundo plectrologii
It’s still at the bottom of your keyboard.
1354 publicly visible posts • joined 5 Aug 2008
It was almost exclusively [a] riot for “we don’t want any taxation” after Britain imposed very, very light taxes to pay for a war largely fought to protect the American colonies from the French.
Rather, it was almost exclusively a riot for “we don’t want any taxation without representation in Parliament” after Parliament imposed a series of light taxes without the consent of the representatives of those being taxed (see William Pitt the Elder’s oration in Parliament on this day in 1766, following the passing of the Sugar Act, the Currency Act, the first Quartering Act, and the Stamp Act), to pay for a war largely fought to annex Nouvelle France.
You are correct that the War of Independence would not have succeeded without massive French support, in men, materiel, and money — but that support was in essence revenge for the results of the 1763 Treaty of Paris.
Since the US national debt is denominated in US dollars, and the US retain control of the issuance of US dollars, the national debt can be repaid. (That, of course, is an entirely separate issue from when it would be repaid.)
The mystery is why an industry filled with educated people decided to outsource hiring to the recruitment industry
They’re the same reasons why a cohort filled with educated people decided to outsource finding a mate to the matchmaking industry — viz the convenience of someone else doing the drudgery of weeding out clearly unsuitable potential partners, and the belief that a specialist in making matches can find an ideal partner for someone more readily than that selfsame someone could.
The clients of the recruitment industry want their developers “just so” — possessing every technical and personal skill that is needed for a position so that they can “hit the ground running“ on the first day of work. However, those clients are generally not willing to either (1) offer enough to tempt fully qualified but happily employed developers away from their current positions, or (2) invest enough into mostly qualified but frustratingly unemployed developers to bring them up to speed to the clients’ particular skill requirements. As a result, that industry filled with educated people is perpetually bemoaning the lack of availability of suitable developers — which does nothing to help unemployed developers, be they in chromotrichopause or no. Until that industry realizes that in one way or another they’ll need to use more from those hoards of venture capital to get the employees that they want, the situation won’t change, much to everyone’s detriment.
I could see a decently large, national 3rd Party being a useful force for good in the USA. Just not if it’s a “breakaway Trump Party”.
The most recent decently large, national third party in the USA was the Progressive Party in the 1912 election, when its presidential candidate Theodore Roosevelt finished in second place in the Electoral College, behind Wilson (and ahead of the incumbent Taft). However, one could argue that in 1912, the Progressives were a breakaway Republican party.
[…] speaking generally, it is not, in constitutional countries, to be apprehended that the government, whether completely responsible to the people or not, will often attempt to control the expression of opinion, except when in doing so it makes itself the organ of the general intolerance of the public. Let us suppose, therefore, that the government is entirely at one with the people, and never thinks of exerting any power of coercion unless in agreement with what it conceives to be their voice. But I deny the right of the people to exercise such coercion, either by themselves or by their government. The power itself is illegitimate. The best government has no more title to it than the worst. It is as noxious, or more noxious, when exerted in accordance with public opinion, than when in or opposition to it. If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind. Were an opinion a personal possession of no value except to the owner; if to be obstructed in the enjoyment of it were simply a private injury, it would make some difference whether the injury was inflicted only on a few persons or on many. But the peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error.— John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, Chapter II.: Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion
I'm doubting his crime would even be considered for a Federal Supermax
Robert Hanssen is still in a federal Supermax, serving 15 consecutive life sentences for 15 violations of the Espionage Act: 14 counts of espionage * and one count of conspiracy to commit espionage †. All but one of the allegations for which Assange’s extradition is sought are also violations of the Espionage Act ‡. If extradited and found guilty on all counts (including the non-espionage alleged conspiracy to commit computer intrusions), the maximum total consecutive sentence would be 175 years.
* — 18 U.S.C. § 794(a)
† — 18 U.S.C. § 794(c)
‡ — viz in the second superseding indictment, one count of 18 U.S.C. § 793(g); two counts of 18 U.S.C. §§ 793(b) and 2; four counts of 18 U.S.C. §§ 793(c) and 2; three counts of 18 U.S.C. §§ 793(d) and 2; three counts of 18 U.S.C. §§ 793(e) and 2; three counts of 18 U.S.C. § 793(e).
The US have not withdrawn from the ICC because the US have never been a state party to it, since the Rome Statute of the ICC was never submitted by any US administration to the US Senate for “advice and consent” (i.e. treaty ratification).
The US are in the august company of Israel, Russia, and Sudan, all of which have signed the Rome Statute and subsequently declared that they have no intent to ratify it.
There have always been anni beatum and horribilis
Anni beati and horribiles — the adjectives also need to be masculine nominative plural, to match anni.
Anni mirabiles instead of beati would have been a nice nod to Dryden’s poem:
In fortune’s empire blindly thus we go,
And wander after pathless destiny;
Whose dark resorts since prudence cannot know,
In vain it would provide for what shall be.
There must be a special place out there in the ether that is full of dead, dying or zombie websites.
The Wayback Machine?
I agree regarding security, but can it be presumed that the 25–44 male majority of the FOSS-contributing respondents in this survey are old hands at security? If full-time paid employment in security can motivate some people, then putting money into training newbies from that motivated cohort might not be a bad investment.
What is to be done? The report noted that bearing in mind their motivations, “it is unlikely that simply offering money to contributors for focusing on security will move the needle a great deal.”
Perhaps people who aren’t in the majority in this survey (e.g. people in Africa; women; men under 25 or over 44; people without full-time paid employment — some of these categories could overlap) have different motivations, and offering them money might help to move that needle.
(and goodness, it would make a change from Lorem ipsum)
Ditch Cicero, and use a bit of Catullus instead — Catullus 23 is one possibility. (Translations into other languages are easily located via search engine.)
He did — Canada was one of the major targets of his steel and aluminum tariffs in 2018–2019.
Since the US imports roughly half of Canadian maple syrup exports, and US maple syrup producers aren’t a particularly influential lot in Washington, maple syrup wouldn’t have been a likely target for a tariff. (Curiously enough, Canada is the largest importer of US maple syrup exports, but the net syrup flow is predominantly southbound.)
Black Speech from Mordor?
If I recall correctly, more than one Middle Earth language was written using Tengwar.
Closer to effability and terrestriality, the Mkhedruli letters of modern Georgian and several scripts for languages in India and southeastern Asia are also quite curly.
Huge Danish study showing they don’t do very much. Shadow banned by Google, as it goes against the current narrative.
If you’re referring to the Danish study that was published recently in the Annals of Internal Medicine (see https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817), its findings were nowhere near as general as “[masks] don’t do very much [for anyone anywhere at any time]”. If no other part of the study is read, at least its last three paragraphs should be digested.
Yes, Latin — Latin got hippopotamus from Ancient Greek ῐ̔πποπότᾰμος, but English got “hippopotamus” directly from Latin, not directly from Ancient Greek. Similarly, English “elephant” came from Old French elefant (the Old French spelling was also the Middle English spelling), which got it from Latin elephantus, which got it from Ancient Greek ἐλέφᾱς. (The -ντ- is found in most of the other Ancient Greek declensions, but it’s not in the nominative singular; the Latin word probably came from the genitive singular ἐλέφᾰντος.)
English words of ultimately Ancient Greek origin often arrive through a Latin intermediary, which is why the Latinate “hippopotami” is one of the English plurals, but the Hellenic “hippopotamoi” isn’t. Similarly, “hippocampus” came directly from Late Latin hippocampus, and is also a second declension noun, which is why “hippocampi” is its English plural rather than “hippocampoi”.
As a second-declension Latin noun, the (nominative) plural of hippopotamus is hippopotami. As an English noun, there is a choice of plurals — either “hippopotamus”, “hippopotamuses”, “hippopotamusses”, or “hippopotami”.
Regarding the chosen mammal, see https://www.astepahead.es/elephant-ballet/ , though no shoes were worn by that performer.
jason 7, whatever one thinks of their merits, George W. Bush was first inaugurated at age 54½, and Reagan was first inaugurated a few weeks before turning 70, and both of them were in office for eight years. George H. W. Bush was first inaugurated at age 64, ran for a second term, and lost on economic grounds rather than on his age. For whatever reason, the most recent Democratic president to be at least 55 at first inauguration and serve for eight years was Woodrow Wilson. (My guess is that if Senator Sanders were elected as president, he would not subsequently run for reëlection.)
tom dial, Mark 85’s point was about arresting or detaining someone for something that hasn’t yet happened, not making the charge stick for something that has already happened. In the case of the US, see the Supreme Court case United States v. Shabani, where the court unanimously found that an actus reus was not necessary for a criminal conspiracy charge to stick, reversing the decision of the circuit court.
Mark 85, it depends; any jurisdiction with a “conspiracy to «something»” crime in its legal code could arrest or detain someone because that person communicated with other people about the possibility of doing «something», despite none of them actually doing that «something».
Voyna i Mor, I’m not disputing that a one inch difference is “about the same height”; my disagreement is with your statement that Nelson was “above average” height. The origin of the statistic that I’d linked to was Floud et al.’s study Height, Health and History, which
was based on an analysis of changes in the heights of poor boys recruited by the Marine Society of London between 1770 and 1870, and of men who were recruited by the Royal Marines and the British Army between 1740 and 1914
If there were minimum height requirements to join the Royal Marines or the British Army between 1760 and 1800, then that would skew that source for average heights; those recruits were drawn from the general population, though.
Other data were also noted in that work, including Komlos’ average heights for convicts and indentured servants born in England and transported to North America, which were presented in a table (by decades of birth, 1710 – 1759). Since Nelson was born in 1758, the 1750s data would be of greatest relevance: the average height was 67.79 inches (172.2 cm) for transported convicts born in the 1750s and 66.88 inches (169.9 cm) for transported indentured servants born in the 1750s, with both groups being taller than the 168.2 cm average at that link and Nelson’s height of 166.4 cm.
The heights in my last comment were in feet, inches, and lines (pieds, pouces, and lignes in the French case) because Napoléon’s height was physically measured with those units, and using those units preserves the precision that they represent. Since no degree sign was present and the discussion was about height, I don’t know why you thought that angular measure was involved. Any interested party will be able to use a search engine to find conversion factors if needed.
Why would I comment on your nick? It’s not a Boolean statement like “Nelson’s height was above average”.
Voyna i Mor, Napoléon was 5′ 2″ 4‴ French (= 168.7 cm = 5′ 6″ 5‴ English), and Nelson was 5′ 5½″ = 5′ 5″ 6‴, making M. l’Empereur nearly an inch taller than The Right Honourable Viscount and 4.6 cm taller than the average Frenchman of his day; however, the Vice-Admiral was 1.9 cm shorter than the average Englishman of his day.
JeffyPoooh, presuming that Kieren used the phrase “all European countries” to mean “all EU member states”, given that the article is about a vote in the European Parliament, then it is precisely the longest-standing treaty which would be likeliest to be most advantageous to Snowden, since it would lack coverage of “modern crimes”. Among the EU member states, that would almost certainly be the extradition treaty with Croatia, which is one of the inheritors of the 1902 extradition treaty with the Kingdom of Serbia (via the post-WWI Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes, then through Yugoslavia).
Spaceman Spiff, if this chronology is accurate, then in theory that initial approval could have been made as low in the VW hierarchy as the head of engine development, and his superiors might have known nothing more than “OK, Neußer’s EA189 team has met the EPA and CARB NOₓ emission limits without needing AdBlue — we can start production for the North American markets at reasonable costs”; it would depend on how much information flowed between those levels of the VW hierarchy. That being said, Winterkorn at least seems like someone who’d be interested in engineering details.
Toltec, it is possible to both get more power and better fuel consumption via remapping, but I’d be surprised if they were achieved without also increasing NOₓ emissions. If UK MOTs don’t require NOₓ testing, then that could be a factor in the reasonably common status of remapping there.
Voland’s right hand, if the best proof is in the dates, then look at when the EPA Tier 2 rules were entered into the Federal Register — 10th February 2000, in the last year of the Clinton administration, nine months before the 2000 election. (The NOₓ emission limits for Tier 2 are identical to those of California’s LEV II emission.standard, which took effect on 27th November 1999 for enforcement in model years 2004 and beyond.)
Annihiliator, all emission limits for diesel cars and for non-diesel cars are identical under EPA Tier 2 regulations (i.e. since model year 2007); under the older Tier 1 regluations, diesel cars had higher NOₓ limits than non-diesel cars had. Every regulated emitted substance — NOₓ, CO, HCHO, non-methane organic gases or non-methane hydrocarbons (manufacturer’s choice), and particulate matter — is regulated for both diesel cars and non-diesel cars. Which of these substances are emitted only by diesel engines?
To clarify, US federal emissions regulations are US-wide, and new cars sold in every state must meet them. Because California had state emission regulations before the passage of the federal Clean Air Act, California was grandfathered in to maintain its own regulations; despite that, California’s cannot be less strict than the federal regulations. Each state has the option of following either federal (EPA) emission regulations or California (CARB) emission regulations; I think that 13 states now follow California’s, and new cars sold in CARB states must meet CARB emission regulations. Emissions testing to maintain registration, however, does vary by state, since vehicle registration is a state issue.
Joe,
1. The US NOₓ emissions limit for cars (i.e. manufacturer’s average) is 70 mg/mi (43.5 mg/km); cars can be sold here with higher emissions [up to 200 mg/mi (124.3 mg/km)] as long as enough cars with lower emissions are sold here by the manufacturer to meet the manufacturer’s average. The Euro 6 NOₓ emissions limit for cars is 80 mg/km (128.7 mg/mi); I don’t know if similar manufacturer averages apply under European emission regulations. Diesel cars are much less prevalent in the States because emissions have had a higher priority here than fuel efficiency; the reverse seems to be the case in Europe, perhaps because domestically produced petroleum has traditionally been more plentiful (and less expensive) here than there.
2. How many Russian VW diesel engines would appear in the US market, where diesel car sales are in single-digit percentages?
3. If you’d meant the US eqiuvalent of the MOT, they’re not failing because the engine’s firmware ensures that full emission controls are active only when they’re being tested. My understanding is that the UK MOT doesn’t test for NOₓ; if that’s the case, then it would be a moot point there.