274 posts • joined Monday 4th August 2008 22:45 GMT
Where are the tiny monitors?
There's a lot to be said for having a small monitor on a shelf somewhere for general use --- syslog output, portable console, wiring up to a cheapo composite spycam for spying on the neighbours... but they're surprisingly expensive. A 7" will typically cost you about half again as much as a full sized desktop monitor, and while it's possible to get 4" monitors for about 20 quid they're typically 320x240 composite and too small to read text on.
I suppose it's all about economies of scale, and that there are more desktop LCD panels shifted than 7" panels and so the desktop panels are cheaper. But it still makes me cross that I can buy a 7" LCD panel with a satnav bolted on the back for less than I can buy a 7" LCD panel with VGA input.
Re: Model M
The only trouble with the Model M is that if you use one in an office environment, you do eventually run the risk of being beaten to death with your own keyboard --- they're not quiet. I have heard it's possible to get variants that don't have the Incrediclicky(TM) sound, but I don't know if they're any good.
Check out _White Noise_
...which is a fantastic album, and most of it's on Youtube. My favourite track is _Firebird_, which is a brilliant mixture of dated and undateable:
(Music video not original.)
The Mark of the Rani?
Please tell me we haven't skipped over the Master's ultimate least great moment, which is when he gets kneed in the groin by the Rani? (Who, for my money, is a much more interesting antagonist than the Master --- she's not evil, just amoral. And her total lack of patience for the Master's moustache-twirling is a joy to behold.)
...you know, I *so* want an orbital schematic app of the solar system (er, Sol System, that is) which uses the same UI as the KSP map view. Complete with live updates. It's a really nice way to see where the various spacecraft really are, rather than just being 'somewhere in space'.
It's probably not very hard to do. WebGL, plus the Heavens Above database of orbital elements? Hmm...
Oh crap, I feel a project coming on.
Re: Finally an electric car I may want...
...and the power controller. A 125kW electric motor power controller doesn't come cheap --- a quick Google shows one for £9000. I once talked to a guy who did aftermarket conversions of cars; rip out the IC engine, install batteries and an electric transmission. He said that you typically paid 1/3 each for the batteries, motor, and power controller. That adds up to about £30k for this thing, which makes the price not unreasonable for what you get.
Not that I'm willing to pay it, mind, although this thing does tick all my electric car want boxes. I think it looks great, too.
Would be really interested to rent one, though.
Cockroaches have a long and proud history...
...of being used in scientific experimentation; their key value being that nobody really cares about them.
For example, four Madagascar Hissing Cockroaches were launched on Bigelow Aerospace's inflatable space station prototype:
Turns out they can survive vacuum for short periods of time, and in low pressure environments will actively pump air into their abdomens, causing them to swell up to one and a half times normal size. Luckily I haven't found any pictures.
Re: BTW there was other stuff, too
...the globe in the last shot reminds me of the old BBC1 ident, which showed a spinning globe against a distorted map moving in sync. This was generated with the following wonderful piece of lateral thinking:
That's the best shot of the kit I could find, but there's more info here:
Re: Faking CGI
Hell, just go watch the original Tron. The CGI's okay, but the really stylish and striking scenes were just colourised black-and-white shots of the actors superimposed on traditional animation and hand-coloured. Although I wouldn't exactly call it easy --- apparently it was hideously labour-intensive.
Re: Trial of a Timelord Opening Shot
It's a really nice shot, yes --- and a very effective opener for an ambitious story that I was thought deserved better than it got --- but those stars have always bugged me. I assume that they were *supposed* to look like that, given the care and attention that shot got, but I don't know why...
I wonder what happened to the space station model?
Re: Could've Been Worse
I actually just spotted 'em at the supermarket (Tesco's deli counter, 35p each; not Brains', either). I'm actually quite tempted, if I can figure out what to do with them. A lot of the weird old British traditional food can be rather good cooked well.
Re: a guy who's run Linux on a hard drive motherboard:
Sorry, I don't follow you. He has a ucLinux kernel running on the ARM microcontroller on the HDD board (see the video). That's running Linux on the HDD, surely?
Reprogramming USB stick flash firmware?
Does anyone have a reference for how to do this? It's something I've been interested in doing for ages --- a flash microcontroller is typically an ARM SOC, and programming them should be easy. But I've never actually found anyone who's done it. It'd be a very interesting platform to play with.
(It's not as ludicrous as it sounds. Here's a guy who's run Linux on a Western Digital hard drive motherboard:
Re: Haiku's well worth looking at...
You're quite right. Shows how long it's been since I've looked at Ubuntu.
Haiku did it first, though!
It's got wings!
The GOCE satellite actually orbits within the atmosphere --- it uses its solar panels as wings for lift, and an ion engine to counter drag. The wikipedia page has an awesome picture:
So I suppose technically it's an aircraft (although now the engine's out of fuel, more of a glider).
Re: Haiku's well worth looking at...
Yeah, but Linux and Windows both require *different* images for booting off CD and from USB. The Haiku image can be dd'd to a USB stick or burnt to a CD and it works on either. I haven't seen that for Linux yet.
Not so magic mushrooms
The school where I grew up (long story) was in the country in Perthshire; its playing fields were apparently reckoned to be one the the best sources in Scotland for magic mushrooms. During the season there used to be all sorts of weird people lurking in the undergrowth, not all of them pupils.
Eventually the school started patrolling the place with big dogs to try and keep them out. Yeah, that was... strange.
Haiku's well worth looking at...
...if you're interested in alternative operating systems. Won't the article doesn't mention is that it's almost completely Posix compliant; fire up a terminal window and it's bash, and your configure scripts run, and stuff Just Works. There's basic graphical acceleration which makes the GUI nippy, and it's really lightweight, much more so than Linux, making it an excellent way of turning an old laptop into a box for doing ssh from. Definitely worth a look. The installation image can be burnt to CD or booted from a USB stick, which is a cunning trick I haven't seen elsewhere.
That's not to say it's perfect: the underlying syscall architecture is in C++ and dates from the days before C++ ABI standards, so there's quite a bit of mess involved in using a compiler more recent than gcc 2.95; the wireless system is still under construction, and while you can get WPA working on it, I never have; and there are a number of semi-obscure kernel bugs that are still being looked at. (There's a reason why the website firmly calls it an alpha.)
But unlike a number of these alternative OSes, there's an active developer community and even some people who are *paid* to work on it!
Re: @ David Given - @ Gunnar Wolf - At loss understanding Ubuntu
@ Gunnar Wolf
Okay, now try running an application *you don't know the name of*.
Being able to launch a named application quickly is *not* the same thing as good application discoverability.
Re: @ Gunnar Wolf - At loss understanding Ubuntu
I dunno. I had to consult online help to just find the *applications menu* (it's an uncategorised list folded away between unrelated items in the dash). That doesn't seem intuitive to me!
The problem I have with Unity is that it seems to be carefully optimised for use cases which I never want to do, and counter-optimised for the uses cases which I do want to do. Want to run more than one xterm at a time? Want focus-follows-mouse? Want to be able to actually find out what applications are installed? Unity does not make it easy to do any of these, which means it's not easy for me to use.
The only thing I use Ubuntu for these days is a quick and easy way to get the configuration nightmare which is PolicyKit and NetworkManager working --- and even then, I use it with awesome.
It's better than most manufacturer crap
In terms of general code quality and ease of use, it's very much:
Vanilla Google > Cyanogen > ...long gap here... > anything provided by a manufacturer, such as Samsung
I've used Cyanogen very happily on rooted devices, and would do so again. It's so much better than HTC or Samsung's bastardised Androids. Friend put Cyanogen on his HTC Desire and ended up with 30% better battery life.
But I'd much rather have the closed, locked-down Android from Google. (I'm very happy with my Nexus 4.)
Re: *scratching head*
The last Falcon 9 launch did some first stage tests to check out exactly this. (The first stage started to spin longitudinally, which centrifuged the fuel away from the inlets at the bottom of the tanks, and the engines went out. They're working on it.)
It's also worth pointing out that:
(a) the F9 first stage carries extra fuel *anyway*, in order to compensate if an engine dies on launch --- this happened on a previous flight. So a landable first stage doesn't need more fuel. It just lands on the safety margin left in the tank. If you end up using this safety margin in launch then you don't get to recover the first stage. No big deal.
(b) falling through air soaks up an enormous amount of velocity. Instead of having to decelerate from 7000 km/h at mach 6, you let the air do it for you; when you get close to the ground you're only moving at a few hundred km/h. This saves an incredible amount of fuel.
Regarding (b), go get the eval copy of Kerbal Space Program and try it out for yourself.
Re: Awesome soundtrack
I actually found it a little disconcerting the way the sound synced up with the action --- sound is *slow*, dammit, and takes a long time to get from the ground to the camera. I think that's one of the things that contributes to that wonderful air of unreality to the whole video.
I know why they did it, of course. I'm pretty sure the sound was recorded on the ground, otherwise mostly all you'd hear would be hexacopter drone. (At least, up until that scarily close fly-past.)
Do you think we could get them to rerecord it from a hot air balloon? They're quiet.
Re: Good idea
...just tried to post something with astral plane characters and got back 'The post contains some characters we can't support'. MySQL FTW!
Re: Good idea
Back in 2009 I posted a comment to the Reg containing astral plane characters (code points with a value above 0xffff). I got back an apologetic email saying that I'd broken their database and they'd had to remove them from the comment.
Some time later I found a bug in Thunderbird's treatment of astral plane characters. I tried to file a bug. Then I had to file a bug on Bugzilla complaining that it didn't handle astral plane characters properly... which was quite hard, as Bugzilla's bug tracker is also Bugzilla.
(All of these stem from the same underlying problem, which is MySQL assuming 16-bit Unicode. This is why 16-bit Unicode must die. MySQL too, of course.)
There is only one possible choice
Checkerboard red and white on the body, solid red on the wings.
You know it makes sense. (And it's nice high visibility when the inevitable treetop search happens, too.)
Where did the design come from?
...because it's a rather unusual shape for a plane; fairly short wings, the big winglet things on the tips, big canards, and lots of straight edges rather than curves. Was any simulation modelling done, and if so, how well does it fly? Decent flight characteristics through such a wide range of air speeds and altitudes sounds like a challenge.
(Disappointingly, the shape, while stylish, is also rather unfriendly to simulating with Kerbal Space Program...)
...I think I just facepalmed so hard I broke my nose.
I have _Heechee Rendezvous_. It's... not great. While there are a few nice moments, they're rather sparse. Definitely for completists only.
OTOH, _Gateway_ is an utter classic and I must reread it ASAP.
No need to go to the US
...since the UK has its own top secret disease research island! With anthrax! And hookers! (Well, maybe not the last. But it does have sheep.)
Gruinard Island was used in WW2 bioweapon trials. After discovering that anthrax doesn't really make a good bioweapon, due to its tendency to lurk in the ground for decades and then horrifically kill people, it was quarantined. In 1986 an attempt was made to decontaminate by, basically, soaking it in formaldehyde and in 1990 an expendable junior minister was landed. When he survived, it was declared safe. It's now the home of a small flock of sheep, who are periodically inspected by telescope to make sure they haven't died horrifically.
I don't know whether it's still quarantined or not, but for some peculiar reason people don't land there...
Here's the example source for a simple caterpillar style game for MHEG. Decide for yourself whether it's awesome:
One really cool feature...
...is that MIDI cables don't actually make electrical connection --- each cable just completes a loop between the sending device and the LED of an optoisolator at the receiving end. Ground is supplied by the sending end and isn't connected to the receiving end at all. (Some of the cables I've seen didn't bother with a ground and used plastic DIN plugs; they feel really weird.) This means that in the notoriously ghastly electrical environment of a stage, you don't run the risk of plugging together two expensive bits of kit and watching them asplode due to hideous ground loops just before the gig.
You can find the circuits here: http://www.midi.org/techspecs/electrispec.php
A side effect of this is that they're *current* switched, not *voltage* switched. Logic 0 is specified by pushing 5mA through the circuit (in the right direction). The voltage is pretty much irrelevant; I'm sure there are limits, but the specs I've found don't specify one. (Although most people seem to use 5V.)
"You’re first decisions are to select race..."
No, I don't think you are.
Re: Live piccies!
Actually, a bit of fiddling shows that WebP images compress down really, really small. I can get a colour 48x48 image down to 156 bytes. That's got about 20 bytes of fixed size header that would be trivial to strip off. That's at 7% quality so it's fuzzy as hell, but what are you expecting?
If you're willing to use *two* text messages, for a grand total of 320 bytes, you can either increase the quality to 50%, or increase the resolution to a rather fuzzy 64x64 at 20% --- in both cases, in that CHAV thumbnail, you can make out the parachute. That uses twice the bandwidth, of course. What does an Iridium text message cost these days?
Given the CPU in a Raspberry Pi, it would be trivial to write a script that takes a picture and then tries various cwebp options to crunch it down as small as possible before sending.
I wonder if it's occurred to anyone that, given 4-colour greyscale, you can fit a 25x25 image into a 160-byte text message. (That assumes eight usable bits per character. I don't know how much of the SMS character set is usable.) You'd probably be able to get more with compression, but I don't know of any compression schemes that would work on datasets that small.
That doesn't sound like much, and indeed it's not, it's crap; but it would still let you stream live footage of the ascent (and descent) at the rate of one picture every 10 to 30 seconds. You'd at least get to see the curve of the Earth and see the vehicle attitude. Place the camera properly and you'd get to see whether the aircraft had detached, for example...
I switched to The Old Reader, but found it was just too slow and buggy; eventually I found inoreader.com, which seems to do everything Google Reader did and is lightweight and Just Works for me. (It even has an 'open page in background' button!)
My understanding is that they use CO₂ scrubbers to absord the carbon dioxide from the air. I always thought they used disposable chemical scrubbers based on lithium hydroxide, but the Interwebs tell me that these days they use molecular sieves to filter the carbon dioxide out. These can then be regenerated by heating them: the CO₂ is released. This is then reacted with hydrogen produced by the electrolysis systems to produce O₂ and methane. The methane is vented overboard and the oxygen reused.
However there's always going to be losses, which will cause the partial pressure of oxygen to slowly decrease in the station's atmosphere (people consume less O₂ then you think), and it'll need to be topped up at intervals. I don't know whether they ship up a full air mix and then do something exotic to balance the proportions or whether they ship oxygen and nitrogen separately.
My understanding is that for regulatory reasons, open source code for the radio processor is basically impossible (because the regulators require it to be tamper-proof). Is this still true? Or are they planning on ignoring this and focusing on the applications processor only?
(As, I assume, they're also ignoring the closed-source proprietary blobs embedded in the wifi controller, the Bluetooth controller, the GPS, the SD card, the power controller, and probably half a dozen other independent microcontrollers in the device.)
This line: "I think we can do a little better than that," the PFY counters.
Actually the Boss says that. The PFY says the previous line. (Ah, the perils of unattributed dialogue...)
...on a school trip, many years ago.
It is both strangely impressive and strangely unimpressive at the same time. The hardware, the cavern, the trip into the mountain etc are all great (although one of my main memories is off the minibus driver playing tunes on the thyristor-based controller on the early electric bus). But the tour itself is half-hearted and fundamentally a bit dull. It was interesting to compare against nuclear power plant tours; the impression I got from Cruachan is that they didn't really feel like they needed to try, while nuclear plants are so desperate for PR that they'll show you *anything* given the slightest encouragement.
I must go back there sometime and see it with adult eyes (and walk up to the dam, which I didn't get to do).
Incidentally, while you're there, visit Oban (a lovely town) and then hop on the ferry and spend a few days on the island of Mull. You won't regret it.
The only fitting punishment...
...for wearing clothing the looks quite that stupid is to be the kind of person who would wear clothing the looks quite that stupid.
So I reckon we're pretty much sorted.
Re: No video of the release?
Ah, so a cover up it is, then.
That sucks. I wonder if it's cold or pressure the camera doesn't like...
No video of the release?
I'm surprised there's no video of the white-knuckle stratodangle moment itself --- surely that's one of the primary reasons to have the camera aboard the mothership at all? Was there a camera failure, or is this just yet another Tory/Labour/Green/Reptilian coverup of Things They Do Not Want Us To Know?
Absolutely nothing wrong with your code layout there --- good stuff. I wish some of the code I have to deal with on a day-to-day basis was as clear. (Currently struggling with the GNU coding style, grr.)
Just one minor quibble: is this C or C++? It *looks* like C99 (with the .initialiser syntax in structure definitions), but there are also some things that look like C++isms (such as 'GPoint p = GPoint(1, 2, 3, 4)'.
Re: Very stable
I believe this is an artifact of the way the pixels are read off the CCD sensor --- that is, instead of taking a snapshot at a single instant, each column is read off in turn, which means that if the camera is moving, each one sees a slightly different angle and you get those weird wobbling artifacts. I'm sure it can be corrected in post to a certain extent but I doubt anyone will bother.
I'm curious, however, as to why the (undoubtly impressive and congratulation-worthy) CHAV video is glitchy. I'd have thought that if the Pi was working at all it would be recording smooth video, and if it was unable to record smooth video it was fail to work at all...
Also! Wot no undocking video? Or is this being saved for the documentary?
- Xmas Round-up Ghosts of Christmas Past: Ten tech treats from yesteryear
- Special Report How Britain could have invented the iPhone: And how the Quangocracy cocked it up
- Analysis Microsoft's licence riddles give Linux and pals a free ride to virtual domination
- Massive! Yahoo! Mail! outage! going! on! FOURTH! straight! day!
- Bring it on, stream biz Aereo tells TV barons – see you in Supreme Court