1634 posts • joined 19 Apr 2007
Look back on it:-
No doubt everything you've called "Fail" over the last ten years has gone on to sell in huge quantities. Damn good thing that Steve Jobs doesn't run his ideas past JP19 for informed approval first, isn't it?
Not another one...
"I have an urge to show that I'm far too cool to bother about Apple, so I'll just resort to name-calling about those who actually use & appreciate the machines".
I suppose you would berate Ferrari on the grounds that their latest offering won't let you fasten a plough to it and ready a field for sowing - and a 'proper' car MUST have a manual advance-retard lever, a starting-handle and acetylene headlamps.
If you think it's unsuitable for your needs - then don't buy it.
The thought that only those who are in accord with your line of thinking are normal, and those who dare to disagree automatically qualify for insulting invective is not something which I would recognise as a sign of mature or reasoned discourse.
Knee-jerk anti-Apple diatribe alert...
If unauthorised charging accessories caused harm to a MacBook, or batteries to self-immolate, no doubt you'd be amongst the first to heap invective upon Apple.
Any excuse, justified or not...
you mean FEWER options? - Or is it that you have the same number of options, but each one is smaller, somehow?
Enough of this, already...
I've just entered my seventh decade:-
I LIKE Star Wars.
I LIKE Clangers.
I LIKE Tom & Jerry.
I LIKE Roobard & Custard.
Growing old is a matter of time.
Growing up is a matter of choice.
Not quite correct...
"How do you think Wall Street sets the target? From info Apple gives them - they're not just picking numbers wildly out of the air"...
It's their interpretation of the info they get from Apple - otherwise every analyst would come up with identical results, and they would be classed as lowly-paid clerks.
You might just as well say that a punter should get everything right, because they can all see the SP & previous form from the racing pages.
Apple are renowned for marching to their own drum, and they do not feel the need to pay servile obeisance to highly-paid guessers (analysts). Quite rightly so.
"This is Mac vs PC all over again, same issue: choose between paying a premium for being locked into the playground or free to roam, more risks but more choice, more benefits and cheaper. And after 20 years of Mac/PC which business model has proven the most popular?"
Pure sophistry old Son.
I've been a happy Mac user for over 20 years because I've always found the MacOS to be IMHO easier to use and more stable than the various contemporary versions of Windows.
"Locked into the playground"???
I haven't yet found anything I want to do with my Macs that I can't, or that would necessitate acquiring a Windows machine. There may be more variations of standard software types written for Windows as a platform, but how many spreadsheets, or word processors do you need to run? 14 of each?
I couldn't care what others use, but a lucid cogent argument would be preferable to the blind tribal rant which does characterise so many MAC-PC discussions.
When these 'discussions' degenerate (all too often) into yar-boo-sucks name-calling, I switch off. As long as I'm happy with my preferred choice, and it continues to be available, I'm happy. I really don't care if others are using Windows, Linux or even nursing CPM/86 machines, or DEC PDPs.
Enjoy what you've chosen, get a life and accept that others might differ.
You gotta be kidding....
"Western democracies are open and fragmented. The Soviet Union was tightly controlled, integrated and closed. Which model is still around ?"
I can only assume you've done a Rip Van Winkle & haven't experienced the same last thirteen years in the UK which I have.
"Anyone who doesn't agree with our pinko liberal bias will, of course, end up dead in a ditch with a bullet in the back of his head. ®"...
...and in common with the other workers' paradise states, will you be invoicing the victim's - sorry, -perpetrator's family for the coust of the bullet?
Of course not..
There will be Monopolies commission which will compete with a Mergers commission, 'cos as any fule kno, competition breeds efficiency & gives the consumer choice...
I prefer 'thino"
"Federal prosecutors decided not to press charges because they found there was no criminal intent."
That must mean they're going to leave Gary McKinnon alone, now...
Yup, spot on!
Everything nasty is the fault of those wicked Tories:
Everything from the boil on my bum to global warming.
Now if only we'd left those wonderful Labour chappies in power, we would have no debt, no financial crisis, HMRC would be incredibly efficient, caring, compassionate and understanding. and all would be peace & love throughout the entire country, planet, and (probably) the universe...
You already said this...
Tosh repeated is still tosh.
You are Steve Ballmer and I claim my prize.
I suppose so - it's only a variant of the oldest profession, after all...
(and sincerely hope) that you WEREN'T joking...
That's no different to saying Ferrarri/McLaren/Rolls Royce have for years lived off Michelin's investment.
Utter tosh fuelled by irrational prejuduce.
The idea was first recorded by one Dick The Butcher in Jack Cade's rebellion of 1450 - Dick's immortal words upon his & the rebels entering London were ""The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers" - at least, according to the Bard, in Henry Vi part II
Since it has been such a popular notion for centuries, it is rather surprising that the idea has yet to be implemented...
"It's just a dog fight out there," a patent lawyer with the business-centric law firm Lowenstein Sandler told The Wall Street Journal....
No doubt rubbing his hands together with glee, beaming from ear to ear, and contemplating ordering his'n'hers Ferraris. a new powerboat and a new Learjet with the anticipated proceeds.
Patent Lawyers - no, Lawyers in general make the Great White Shark look positively cuddly & benevolent.
Yeah, but no, but yeah...
Terrific. Oodles of shiny new nuclear-powered (with dilithium crystals) kit in my local exchange, so fast I can read tomorrow morning's news headlines tonight.
Er, hold on a sec - there's no cable TV in our village, and all our phone lines are above-ground-on-poles aluminium cables installed in the early 1960's when Katanga's attempted secession led to a shortage of, and explosion in the price of copper.
I have BT's up-to-8MB deal, and generally attain speeds of 5.5MB, which I consider to be almost miraculous, given the infrastructure.
I can't see that this will make a scrap of difference to me, with many hundreds of yards of Al cable twixt me & the exchange.
As a long-time Mac user, I am quite used to the diatribes of excoriating invective heaped upon Apple by hordes of Windows Fanboys for every perceived Apple mild transgression, real or imaginary.
The perfect time to dish some dirt back, and indulge in a little schadenfreude, methinks.
But do you know what?
I just can't be bothered - because it seems such a silly pointless waste of time.
Your scenario would happen in Saudi, Iran or virtually any other rigid Islamic paradise...
Red box duly ticked, as requested.
Any tangible evidence or proof to back up your diatribe which appears to be based on personal prejudice & little else?
It's as democratic as the system that allowed us to be used & abused for thirteen years from 1997 by the most Stalinist collection of mealy-mouthed liars - elected by a pathetic minority (well under 30%) of vpters.
I have NEVER voted Labour in my 42 years of voting - so DO NOT identify me with that load of s***.
So what's stopping you?
"..(itunes actually makes me want to hurt myself)..."
Please, feel free to carry on.
We don't mind - nor do we care:- so pray, continue.
Hear, Hear, that man.
I really don't give a stuff about...
...the techie details.
I COULD give a stuff about ACS:Law being hammered, fined, embarrassed, squirming etc. etc.
Haven't laughed so much since Granny caught her tit in the mangle...
Someone had to say it..
"...Steve Jobs is happy - assert that he considers himself, like the rest of us, to be descended from monkeys..."
I assume the phrase "the rest of us" excludes a Mr Ballmer who, based on the evidence of a certain viral video, has yet to descend...
someone had put a rocket under the artist...
You're a secret Ayatollah - obviously!
"We already have too many laws. We don't need any more, we need less."
No, we do not need less.
We DO need fewer.
"Samoan clerics finger homosexuals.." is somewhat misleading.
I thought Mr Mandelson's pernicious influence had spread...
"...Labour's statement appears to be an attempt to re-write history..."
plus ça change,
Leopards and spots,
and a million other apposite aphorisms...
Never let facts...
...get in the way of a good schadenfreudefest!
If it's anti-Apple, facts don't matter;- sophistry rules.
"Started work on a project..."
...is not quite the same as "Monster laser-planes ready to blind US satellites".
Looking for a job writting headlines for that nice Mr Murdoch?
"This whole idea is somewhere on the far side of daft."
As is the government and a majority of civil servants.
Congratulations, Peter 45
You have now discovered Pournelle's Iron Law of Bureaucracy.
"In any bureaucracy, the people devoted to the benefit of the bureaucracy itself always get in control and those dedicated to the goals the bureaucracy is supposed to accomplish have less and less influence, and sometimes are eliminated entirely."
Yes, there certainly is...
Thompson sub machine gun. invented 1919 used .45ACP cartridges.
Doesn't quite work like that: any liberty, once lost, is rarely - very rarely restored.
There isn't, in any real sense of the word, a "different type" of government.: just another side of the same coin.
On receipt of communications
from ACS, refer them to Pressdram v Arkell
not willingly. And definitely begrudgingly
Just a suggestion
Texas for patent trolls, London for libel tourists, the whole legal system is bananas. There ought to be a law against it.
Oh well, it's inevitable...
...that instead of welcoming a responsible attitude & response, the diatribe of anti-Apple invective which nowadays appears par for the course on Reg forums will shortly follow.
Maybe so, but...
...it appears that the Reg staff - or at least the esteemed Mr Haines - is not only very conversant with "smut accessorymonger(s)", but also smut accessories; at least in sufficient detail to select and propose specific items...
I knew the anti-Apple invective of the BallmerJugend would make them go blind/hair fall out (or at least stop being curly). or maybe their fingers will be permanently stuck to the keyboard...
They do, but it's a lie.
If it were true, they could have sex AND have a headache at the same time...
What's the difference?
Well, they're both just ways of having your morning crap...
I'm sure they're wonderful, BUT...
...as I suffer from tinnitus in both ears, I don't suppose I'd hear £25k's worth of difference twixt these and something set at a rather more rational price.
"Seems interesting, but who cares"
If it's interesting, someone cares.
More "Hey. Look at me. I'm too cool to care about Apple stuff" from one who apparently puts the "moron" in "oxymoron".
"Why, is there such a culture in the UK at the present of blaming everyone for your own mistakes.?"
Because years of nanny-state government has removed any sense of responsibility whilst instilling an aggrieved awareness of rights into most of our citizens.
"Everyfink I want should be given to me, 'cos nuffink's my fault, innit?"
"..Not many police officers with criminal record!.."
but evidently several who should have one.
- Review Is it an iPad? Is it a MacBook Air? No, it's a Surface Pro 3
- Microsoft refuses to nip 'Windows 9' unzip lip slip
- Tesla: YES – We'll build a network of free Superchargers in Oz
- US Copyright Office rules that monkeys CAN'T claim copyright over their selfies
- True fact: 1 in 4 Brits are now TERRORISTS