"corrupt politician" is tautology.
1724 posts • joined 19 Apr 2007
"corrupt politician" is tautology.
...he'd end up in India.
Clearly, he doesn't know Madras from his Elba
to get some "Physical Treats"?
would she want to call it "Aswell"?
..a downvote. Must be a right-on Sociology Grad or a deadbeat Dad with no interest in his offspring/spawn (delete according to point of view)
...who are lucky 'cos they've got a smart Dad.
If only some of our feral hoodies had Dads with even a fraction of your obvious care & interest, they wouldn't inevitably drift into the underclass.
(Awaits flaming from Sociology graduates)
Flight of fancy?
I really don't think I could have expressed it so clearly, succinctly and accurately.
I take my hat off to you.
...and I claim my prize.
"Has he ever really contributed anything other than this and selling BASIC?"
Anyone told the Columbians?
but for you to even think of a George Bush sex doll suggests to me that your medication needs increasing...
They REALLY do know how to keep their customers happy...
That'll teach them to let "The Tech Guys" advise on their website...
An iOS version of "Little Snitch" which I have on my desktop Macs? I have no iOS devices, so can't talk from experience, but I keep "Little Snitch" on my Macs because I'm probably paranoid (which doesn't mean I'm not correct).
Don't forget that the law is made by lawyers (mostly) with the sole aim of enriching lawyers.
Vaguely sensible? - not a snowball in Hell's chance...
I presume that you mean Patent Lawyers are the "gutter dwelling low life"
The newest Ferrarri uses an internal combustion engine.
A variant of 1890s technology.
The F-18 uses a gas turbine engine.
A variant of 1930s technology.
Your point being?
Does that mean anything to you?
try sacking an Islamist for extremist views and see how far you'd get...
Harriet Harthingy/The Grauniad/The BBC would have you pilloried faster than Jacqui Smith could pocket a taxpayer's quid...
Bob Crow RECEIVES over £100k a year.
There is no goddamn way he EARNS it.
Well, Maggie DID pay off the national debt, before the morally bankrupt intellectual pygmies (collectively called the Labour party) dragged us right back into the ordure...
Unfortunately it's already been done.
Petrol & Diesel have a hefty excise duty charged;- and VAT is charged on that excise duty.
I'm sure there are bound to be other examples.
Gubmints AND Revenuers seem to forget that it's OUR money - it is NOT a pot into which they can dip whenever the whim takes them and for whatever they want.
If only there were some effective way we could remind them sharply of this point.
I saw Crow on "Have I Got News for You" - and he attempted a battle of wits with Ian Hislop.
He was not just hopelessly outgunned, he didn't even realise that he was completely out of ammo to start with.
He's an utter moron.
(pint OR a T-shirt) & I won't ask for royalties.
"Mr.Crow does not know much."
Fewer words and says it all.
...is that they inevitably run out of other people's money.
I'm certainly no fan of Microsoft - being sometimes slated as a Mac fanboi - but I honestly can't see what there is to moan aboat:
1) They're doing something about security
2) They're not charging for it
OK, so they're restricting it to legit installations - can't say I really blame them for that, but anything that helps to thwart the ungodly malware/virus producers has to be a good thing.
(Going for the female user...)
You are privy to pricing for as-yet unannounced models?
My word, you must be held in very high esteem in Cupertino.
...to say "Bollocks"...
but I was too knackered.
"Assets and IT equipment relating to the National Identity Register require disposal/destruction"
Can we also apply that to the cretins who proposed/supported the scheme?
I'll happily oversee their secure disposal/destruction,
- heaven forbid!
but the Viet-Cong suspect shot in the head on camera was shot by General Nguyen Ngoc Loan, Chief of local South Vietnamese security services. Nguyen later decamped to the US of A, prior to the arrival of Uncle Ho's lads...
I almost agree entirely, but shouldn't dear old Blighty's entry read UK (1997 - ????)?
It doesn't stop there:- it's also to keep us in a perpetual state of fear, so we know our only chance of survival is to trust in our saviours, the governing classes.
Absolutely no different than parents who use the threat of the imaginary bogeyman to make toddlers behave.
Except most parents are probably brighter than the collective intelligence of almost any government.
And one day, (hope I'm here to see it) sufficient of us will be sufficiently pissed off at being treated as toddlers that we'll collectively do something about it.
are bundles of philanthropic altruism?
..between "fake" software, "counterfeit" software and unlicensed installations?
To use a motoring analogy, you are claiming only those who buy kit-cars and assemble them themselves are proper motorists - unlike those "halfwits" (as you so delicately put it) who buy a ready-made car from a dealer because all they have to do is turn a key & drive off.
"..PC ownership is wholly and significantly much, much, much greater than Apple ownership.." Probably so - but then going back to my motoring analogy, Vauxhall Nova ownership is wholly and significantly much, much, much greater than Jaguar/Ferrarri/Bentley ownership - proving what, exactly?
I don't think the OP would be best pleased to hear his kids described (inaccurately & unfairly) as dumb, any more than I would be delighted to hear my wife described as dumb simply because she drives (and drives very well) but she would not be able to balance twin SU carbs, change the &*^%£$ bypass hose on an original Mini or retime an engine with a strobe lamp.
Most people today want something they can just use without getting their hands (metaphorically) dirty. Just as the days of the sought-after Chauffeur/Mechanic have passed, many of us who do delve inside the box of our computers are finding our talents to be unnecessary, and yes - it's a blow to our egos to find we no longer have the almost hero-worship we enjoyed some years ago, but that's progress. Ranting about it doesn't and won't help.
I switched focus to Macs in the late 1980's for that very reason - I realised that the techie knowledge I had acquired & used since the 1970's was on its way to becoming no longer needed.
My Grandad used to tinker with his car in the 1920's at least every week - frequently more often - just to keep it going. Me? I just take ours to the dealer every 12,000 miles, and I only check the consumables (oil, water, tyres etc.) every weekend.
On the Mac? I just back up the HDs and little else. I can do whatever might be needed should it ever be necessary, but I haven't had to do much else for many years of ownership from my LC to my current MacPro.
You want to travel a different path? That's fine by me and I wouldn't revile you for doing so.
However, I WOULD revile you for heaping execrable invective upon someone else and his family for having the temerity to entertain a point of view not wholly in accordance with yours.
Interesting to note that the later the comment, the more reasoned and rational the discourse, generally.
Initial knee-jerk reactions from the microsofties come first, invariably putting a subjective viewpoint as if it were objective.
"idiot analyst" is tautology.
owned, staffed & run by Apple?
Or by one of the many people whose get-rich-quick approach was found across ALL platforms.
Not unlike the motor trade was - and often still is.
Yes, I have used Macs for many years.
Yes I personally prefer the Mac's OS to other offerings.
Yes I have sufficient confidence to add my name to comments.
No I don't care what anyone else uses/has used/will use.
No I don't find the spittle-laden invective of your tribe either informative or entertaining.
No I don't see that being a Mega-Corporation is automatically intrinsically evil.
No I don't see anything wrong in preferring reasoned discourse to adolescent sophistry.
No I don't expect that the above described preference is likely to be satisfied.
...for nursey to bring on your medication, methinks.
"It might have give a little push to consumer enthusiasm"
That's crap - & you know it. (If you don't, then you shouldn't be commenting on matters of which you're unaware, or which you don't understand).
"if it hadn't been around another machine would have served just as well..."
Your praise for the T40 suggests you would rave over a Ford Edsel, whilst dismissing a Jaguar E type or a Ferrarri 250 GTO as insignificant toys.
Pure sophistry (or absolute bollocks, in the vernacular).
If you have such a crystal-clear sharp perspective on the IT world, might we assume that you're CEO of a company worth vastly more than Apple, and you're one of the world's most influential IT industry movers?
"..Much as I dislike Apple..."
Pretty much sums up your comment.
I suppose your God of Innovation is the other company - the one with the simian CEO.
...have you omitted Anthony Charles Lynton Blair and Alistair Campbell from the list of Nuremberg attendees?
Let's be consistent.
I pictured Ballmer leaping around a stage in the presence of Diana Ross & co.
It quite put me off my cocoa & chocolate hobnob.
..putting forward an idea steeped in common sense?
One that makes perfect economic sense?
One that isn't crippled by partisan ideology?
You'd never get ANY government to adopt it...
"...with some customer accounts having multiple incorrect debits applied..."
No mention of "...with some customer accounts having multiple incorrect CREDITS applied..."
Banks seem the same the whole world over - when they screw up it's never in our favour.
It could equally well be associated with a Sony/Dell/HP/Any-Other-HW-Manufacturer logo.
Or do we ignore facts to indulge in Apple-baiting?
If "utterly pointless" are the first words past your lips at every Apple release, then I concur that your comments are utterly pointless.
Apple's progress & growth over the last 10-12 years can not be explained away in terms of "baubles" - good job they don't rely on the oh-so-erudite proclamations from NB in deciding their development, sales & marketing strategies, isn't it?
Having said that, I can see why Apple might be upset regarding the unauthorised use of the Apple logo, but as the doll itself is not in any way derogatory, I feel the outraged response of Apple to this is a little crazy.
Almost as crazy as those who would part with fifty-odd smackeroonies for the aforementioned.
Fifty-odd smackeroonies buys more RAM, or a 1TB HD, or a reasonable external drive for backup....
Yes, I love and use Macs:- but I'm a pragmatist