Look around you - it came to Britain some time ago...
1722 posts • joined 19 Apr 2007
Look around you - it came to Britain some time ago...
Silly me, getting Moderatrix & Dominatrix mixed up...
Seriously, SB, good luck in your new venture and our very best wishes always wherever you go & whatever you do**
**Unless it's joining the LibDems, of course.
"...average Apple user..."
Pure sophism - or, as the 'average PC user' would more likely say, utter bollocks.
I've had four new Macs (Beige G3, Sawtooth G4, G5 Tower, and recently an 8-core MacPro) in the last 13 years, got my first iPhone 3 months ago, and have had nary a problem. My 6-yr old G5 tower is still in daily use and is a damned sight more usable than any 6-yr old PC would be...
"...constraint on channel bully..."
Taking a factual report on availability, spinning it, introducing unverified and unverifiable gossip re something as subjective as perceived attitude - and then presenting it as unbiased objective journalism.
I presume there's a masters in sophistry somewher in Mr Kunert's CV.
Await avalanche of downvotes and a diatribe spittle-flecked anti-Apple invective...
in XXX terms, you lose points for coming first...
it will stop all the rabid anti-Apple mob whining about the cost of the iPhone.
...that irrespective of the validity of their filing, that a US Trade Commission is likely to find in favour of a Korean outfit and against a US ultra-success story?
I have to admire their confidence.
but bang goes the opportunity to sell "BNIB" meeces on ebay...
"He may be totally innocent.
He may have been used as 'cannon fodder'.
He may have been set up - yes it really does happen."
Yup. All are totally true,
"He may have been put upon for years by the authorities and just wanted to hit back."
The Brit hierarchy accepting their activities as a mitigating circumstance?
An interesting idea, but I'm sure the establishment would never permit it.
"We can all sit here in our cosy homes secure in the knowledge that it could never happen to us."
Well, those who still have homes can, but those who are a casualty of aberrant bankers possibly can't. As regards it "could never happen to us", I recognise your irony but the likelihood of, and the powers for, the state inflicting similar upon us has grown exponentially over the last decade-decade & a half.
Mostly presided over by that nice Mr Straw - you know, the ex-commie who was such a staunch libertarian in oppostion.
Why do lefties become so draconian when given just a smell of authority?
Patent squabbles... only became a huge problem with the involvement of lawyers:
Divorce... only became a huge problem with the involvement of lawyers:
Human Rights Act... only became a huge problem with the involvement of lawyers:
Libel... only became a huge problem with the involvement of lawyers:
Is it just me, or is there a pattern emerging here?
I believe that this woeful fashion did indeed start behind bars:- and little scrotes adopt this 'fashion' to show "I is a hard gangsta, innit".
However, the drooping strides are generally considered to be due to having had one's belt confiscated (self-toppings are not really wanted on the Governor's record file), rather than an invitation for a little recreational buggery.
Having your undercarriage out is not conducive to smooth flying...
...but I bought a MacPro (April 2010) for home use, so I could work at home - we use CS5 and I was up til then carrying on with my 2005 G5 dual2.0 and CS3 - I still have that and I do use it..
The MacPro works very well; it's been upped to 12GB RAM, and had an additional three 1TB drives added and a second optical - a Samsung with Lightscribe capability. It will, I believe last me for at least another 3–4 years barring anything really wild happening with software and rendering it not usable but I do think that's unlikely.
In around 4–5 years time I will be at normal retirement age, and with the cash part of my pension I might think about upgrading to whatever is then cutting edge but until that time, I really can't see any benefit to upgrading other than being able to say "I got the newest".
Every woman I've ever met has had a mind of her own.
With one or two, it was in mint condition, 0 miles on the clock, never been used...
(await severe ticking off from Ms Bee)
You can count on people from Norfolk....
...up to 12 if you use all their fingers...
I just prefer females with at least a modicum of intelligence & personality. Those who are attracted solely by a flash motor are generally lacking in both. And it's not a sexist thing - the male sex has its share of vapid shallowness as well.
Can't think why anyone would consider it worthwhile to even study such a thing.
Yes, you can pull some girls with your wallet (See WAGs) but they're generally airheads/bimbos.
Beer? - well, it's Friday.
So you have to be beautiful AND stupid?
"...I hate Apple with a passion..."
How pointless. How stupid.
You don't use their products but "hate them with a passion"?
Whoa - an anti-fanboi here - just another side of the same coin?
I use a Mac not a PC.
I don't hate HP/Dell/Acer/Anyone else "with a passion"
I use OSX in preference to Windows
I don't hate Microsoft "with a passion"
Reasoned discourse has more value than blind bigotry, but I guess it's less dull. Must be another effect of the tabloid culture pervading society...
Beer? - Have one, bro - and chill.
They're definitely NOT passé!
I'd love a quality 27" IPS screen for when I'm working at home.
My budget wouldn't allow it - so I got an NEC EA232WMI 23" IPS. Can't fault it for the price, but I'd still love an equivalent quality 27".
Drug dealers love BMWs.
They're not the only ones who buy/drive them though.
And Masters, at that...
Check your dictionary:
Respond is not the same as Reply.
A stimulus might provoke a response without provoking a reply.
Deleting it is one response.
Training your Spam Filter is another.
Blocking the sender's email address is yet another - and that's just for 419ers.
Bad Tom. Naughty Tom. Telling Teddy off without checking...
...then I hope they're dealt with, with the customary tenderness & gentleness associated with far-eastern legal systems.
Although I'm over 60, I still spend a lot of time advising those older than me (and a surprising number who are younger than me) on how to respond to the variety of 419ers and similar ungodly who blight their time online.
A pox on them, a plague on all their houses, and I'm glad to see that some police forces still retain their cojones, unlike ours in the UK who have been metaphorically de-nadded by a proliferation of liberal-lefty judiciary and legal politicos, few of whom could count their fingers and come up with the same answer twice running.
...commentards on El Reg who seem to find a way to blame Apple/Steve Jobs for everything from Herod's kiddy-cull to the four horsemen of the apocalypse.
Frequently the most unlikely subject is diverted into an anti-Apple whinge...
...that this will somehow end up in a diatribe of spittle-laden invective against Apple from the usual suspects...
All I can think of saying is to quote the esteemed Miss Mandy Rice-Davies:- "He would say that, wouldn't he?"
Old farts like myself will remember her - kiddies can no doubt Google her...
My advice? - grab 'em while they're there.
I'm fully Apple - but if these are the right price then it's got to be god news (for once) for the poor beleaguered user...
"...by allowing iOS devices, finally, to communicate directly with the cloud, it is hastening the irrelevance of the PC or Mac..."
So I'm going to continue my job as a heavy CS5 user after my MacPro becomes out of date by using my phone or tablet.
I really don't think so...
Speed cameras have one, and only one purpose.
To extract even more cash from drivers.
...by the pervasive Facebook and it's acolytes.
Everything I seem to look at has "like" buttons somewhere on it - and I have no desire/interest in becoming a Facebook member.
I have no intention of imitating the rabid spittle-laden invective of the anti-apple brigade:- I just ignore all such references and I'm quite happy for those who worship at the altar of Zuckerberg to continue doing so.
I'd just like them to allow me the freedom to NOT do so. Perhaps it IS that things are tailored for the majority but I, for one, would be quite happy for my Macs & my iPhone to continue to not constantly badger me with "like" and other Facebook references.
It's a PLAN !!
was there the army of Ted Heath-alikes muttering "if they did it, I'm agin it!!"
Must be almost unbearable to have your razor-keen perception & wit.
...is there a proliferation of and extremely long history of this crud aimed at Windows users?
Surely it can't all have been so unsuccessful because of Windows' inherent security and the average Windows user's tech-savvy that the ungodly thought for years and years "I'll just keep trying...Just in case"...
So you've described my local community. Lucky guess – or do you really know something?
...all you'll get (at least from the big banks in Britain) is the by-rote repetition of the mantra "There is no problem with our system. Pin & Chip is infallible. You must have disclosed your pin,"...
...it's odds on it meant to publish "aunt", "hunt", "punt" or anything else vaguely similar...
And might I add that I haven't read such snobbish patronising bollocks in one hell of a long time
Well expressed and unfortunately true.
You deserve one Sir (or Madam) for a succinct truism.
they were, but were logged as "Coarse details" and have thus been held in abeyance awaiting something more refined...
...thinking "Mr Ballmer" and "intellectual" in the same sentence...
That somewhere there's an anti-matter Simon Cowell?
If so, can we get him to meet with the one we've got?
It's a little-known Chinese criminal gang, as exposed & publicised by The Goons in "The Ying Tong song"...
Coat & Rickshaw, please
More PC posturing by management who have almost certainly committed far more heinous sins...
Par for the course these days...
Anyone remember common sense?
I believe it became extinct in the mid-late 1980's
Uncle Sam has discovered a chink in his armour...
Security researcher finds 'cookiejacking' risk in IE
And I quote:-
'From its point of view, Microsoft doesn't see much real-world risk to cookiejacking.
"Given the level of required user interaction, this issue is not one we consider high risk in the way a remote code execution would possibly be to users," Microsoft spokesman Jerry Bryant said in a statement sent to CNET.'
Natch, MS users are far, far too savvy to follow instructions from a mal-site...
...to reply, but on reflection, I'd probably be better waiting until you have regained touch with reality.
Not sure I could face all that wild-eyed spittle anyway.
But having thought about it, I can see SOME people who might find Facebook useful:-
1) Party gatecrashers
2) Your friendly neighbourhood burglars.
Ok, I'm the wrong side of 60, and have been involved in IT since the late 1970's. I'm not slow to pick up on new technology when I can see its benefits, but for the life of me I STILL can't see any benefit to Facebook
...not with the kit or OS.
It's with the user. And I've said the same thing regarding similar nasties on Uncle Bill's platform.
If you've a nice petrol-engined car, and you fill it with 14 gallons of diesel, would you expect the manufacturer to sort it for you, and fix it under warranty?
If you would, then you're not entirely reasonable.