Re: @Nick Pettefar
That nice Mr Ecclestone, or Mr Murdoch might take exception to that...
1730 posts • joined 19 Apr 2007
That nice Mr Ecclestone, or Mr Murdoch might take exception to that...
Is this a phishing email?
Not just that, but these arseholes do need reminding that in this country, sovereignty remains with the people.
The assorted denizens of Whitehall and the Palace of Westminster need to be reminded** that their position is that of public servant.
**Reminded by something with a pointy end, if necessary!
just like Dave, I'm rather offended that anyone would assume I'm dumb enough to click on an unexplained link, notwithstanding I know http://http://xkcd.com/ is a stick-figure web-based comic.
Why the "https"??
It's worse than that:- we're now told what we can think. Room 101 if you don't comply.
...and one 'strategic commentard" (me) said: "It would take a remarkable display of discipline [for KAE] to resist" moving into fortune telling & seances. The survey concludes that they would "massively disrupt" either industry she got involved in.
As Powney SHOULD have explaIned -
This uncommissioned spurious research tells us prospective customers (might) perceive a fit where at first glance we would assume our brand could not travel [on the grounds they've never heard of us] This makes us a truly dangerous animal to a startling array of sectors.,
OK, I'll get my doublet
Read the article again.
"David Rankin, boss of the research consultancy behind the study KAE, believes banking is an obvious next step for the computer makers:"
(David Rankin - who he? - ed)
Does anyone at Apple believe this? Has anyone at Apple even considered this? If so, has it even been mooted?
I'm sure that, knowing Apple's very high public profile, a research consultancy would not implement some totally spurious survey just to wallow in the resulting publicity...
Why would you want to explode what is by definition, an explosion?
Does exploding an explosion make it more sexy?
...anyone wouldn't have "Howard the duck" high up in their list...
Also the Stallone version of "Get Carter" was so execrable I watched (in disbelief) only the first 8 or 10 minutes, and then turned it off.
However, not all remakes are bad:- the Bruce Willis film "Last Man Standing" was actually a pretty good remake of "For a fistful of dollars"
I work in the railway industry. Our random booze/dope test policy applies to all - even desk-bound Mac artists like me. This is because :-
a) Can you imagine the conniptions saintly Brother Crow would have, if Drivers/Conductors/Platform staff were tested, but admin/management weren't?
b) In times of need or emergency, any office-dweller can be temporarily re-assigned to 'the front line' - obviously not where specific training is required - so booze-free & dope-free brains throughout the working day are essential.
It ain't no hardship, honest.
"... without interfering with Eastenders..."
But if it could be guaranteed to do so, I'd be all for it.
"All your monies are belong to us".
f400 or, more properly, f/400 would in fact be an extremely small aperture.
The largest commercially-made lens aperture was, I believe, f/0.95 - from Canon, Voigtländer and also Leica.
f/400 is venturing into pinhole territory...
(I'm sure I'll get voted down just for that alone)
One of the biggest problems I've come across in assisting the technologically-challenged has been the user himself/herself.
Even though I'm a Mac user myself, I help friends & relatives who have Windows PCs, too. I have recommended anti-nasty software to users on both platforms, and attempted to drum into their little heads the importance of good backup - preferably cloning their hard drive then executing an incremental backup at regular intervals.
With recommendations for AV software, I attempt to (metaphorically, of course) engrave upon their brains "UPDATE YOUR AV SOFTWARE" but do they do it?
I've just spent some time tidying up an XP system - assisted by my son - and the user asked me in a peeved voice "I installed the AV software you advised - so why is my PC infected?" My reply of course was "Have you kept the virus/trojan defs updated" and was advised "I shouldn't have to do that, should I?"
I thought I'd almost conditioned him to do it when I advised about the AV - BACK IN SEPTEMBER 2010. Apparently, some people think that software produced in 2010 should - by a process of osmosis - be fully conversant with ALL nasties produced since, without they themselves having to do anything about it.
Maybe you should have to have a computer licence, and three endorsements gets it suspended...
It's not a fault - it's a new security feature.
A totally inaccessible service is a secure service.
...unless there's an anti-Simon Cowell somewhere.
Wonder if we could get him to meet our Simon Cowell
I'll take your word for it:- being mostly a Mac specialist, I've never been involved with MS's enterprise/site licences - or the implications thereof.
It will upset many organisations who still have dozens of P4's floating around, though...
Beer? - Why not?
Yup, I'm a Mac man - but I still need a Windows machine at work - Industry specific software written way back in the '90's. Suspicion has it it was the 1890's.
Prior to installing WMWare on my office Mac, I had a Pentium 4 running XP Pro on my desk. I was one of the better equipped staff - Win2000 and lesser Pentiums abound - but so they do in many large organisations who might have their own esoteric S/W - which, if a relic of pre-2k days, is probably not that demanding on resources. Add that to Lotus Notes, a bit of Word/Excel and there really isn't any great need or incentive to upgrade.
With companies still using Win200/XP on a regular basis, I just don't see the huge mass of commercial users rushing out to upgrade.
And you will find your experience echoed in a multitude of companies - large and small - across the UK and elsewhere.
So many IT managers seem to think that installing Macs is a threat to their own little empire, and anyway it's a similar outlook to the one I met so often in the early 1980's - "No-one ever got fired for buying IBM".
You know, if you keep correcting these anti-Apple moans disguised as journalism, you'll probably be banned.
Last thing they want (or care about, seemingly) is accurate factuality.
Every night? Same order? Same routine? Same time?
Totally right - let's have a bit of fining the cretin who screwed up.
No - let's have a LOT of it.
It just might encourager les autres, to coin a phrase...
Not at all - we might point out that Dell etc., etc., also use Foxconn and others, where terms, conditions, pay rates & margins are ALL going to be much of a muchness.
We also point out that at least Apple are doing something - whether it's enough is a subjective matter, not an objective point - to deal with this issue, whereas the actions of pretty well every other manufacturer/assembler are conspicuous by their complete absence.
...it could be a Dell laptop.
...used in hospitals as an emetic?
The right to bear arms is enshrined in the US constitution to protect the freedom of the people.
I accept that the Dep't of Homeland Security is eroding that freedom rather too much, but over-ambitious rulers are kept in check by the thought of an armed populace.
Why do you think our ruling elite here in the UK are so vehemently opposed to any kind of arming of the electorate?
Concern for our well-being? - If so, it would be the first time ever!
To save us from ourselves? - see comment above!
To ensure that armed bad guys can't hurt us? - ask any cop involved in Trident how effective that is.
To prevent a serious rising by a pissed-off electorate? - getting warmer!
I am a free man.
Does it mean though, I'll get a free mini-moke to tax around in?
...until we all have to shave our heads and have a barcode/QRCode permanently tattooed on.
True, we don't have a Department of Homeland Security with their paranoid über-control, but it appears that our plod can just act like them at a whim.
"...its fondleslabs to rich foreigners browsing for overpriced toys..."
More factual, objective and unbiased reporting, I see.
...which will end up costing us £16bn - before they're scrapped due to not working.
Next you'll be telling me that ursines defecate in a sylvan setting...
Winter in the Northern hemisphere coincides with summer in the Southern hemisphere.
And vice versa.
So, - winter where?
I've been around El Reg for ages - I AM the wrong side of 60, but I echo Chrchill:-
If you're not a socialist at 16, there's something wrong with your heart;
If you're STIULL a socialist at 25, there's something wrong with your head.
Await avalanche of downvotes.
are " wunnerful people" - until they run out of other people's money.
...the lefties in the Labour Party and in Auntie Beeb have long since taken to applying the epithet "progressive" to left-wing ideas.
The subtle assumption/implication being that only left-wing ideas are an advancement, and I'm rather surprised to see how many Reg commenters appear to swallow this rather frightening form of manipulative Newspeak.
Especially U2, with sanctimonious St. Bono preaching "Give, give, give" to the rest of us, but hiding his own mazoolah overseas to minimise taxes...
I knew our politicians/civil servants/rulemakers were dumb, but I didn't realise just how dumb they were...
call yourself "Mad Mike"?
One of the most rational comments I've ever read.
Is that why the US has steadfastly failed to return murderers for the last 30 or 40 years?
Claiming that despite scores of dead and maimed innocent men, women and children, these perps were "noble freedom fighters struggling heroically against an evil occupying power".
I refer of course, to the numerous provos who've decamped to the Home of the Brave, safe in the knowledge that their Beaks are in thrall to the misty-eyed Sons of Erin - or at least those whose great-great-great grandpappy was...
I'll call you "Correct", "Asute", and other similar terms.
As to what's wrong with this country? Answer - politicians!
Third or fourth rate individuals with monstrous egos but little comprehension of reality. They're pretty much the same the whole world over.
...get a huge multiple of my earnings for being wrong. Repeatedly.
Guess I shouldn't have paid attention at school...
"Defamation of a District Judge is not jaywalking."
If you have to rely on a law which criminalises comment that you're a dickhead, then you truly are a dickhead.
"I wonder if we are witnessing the start of the next collapse."
We can but hope.
You reckon you can find a member of the UK Judiciary who is not barkingly insane?
Needles, haystacks and The Holy Grail spring to mind...
...but I've been shattered by the terminal verbosity...
...shouldn't judge a book by its cover, but it's one damned-nice looking car.
"... finding a way to activate the processes that would cause the much larger and more aggressive aurochs to develop..."
Just because we can is NOT a valid reason.