"... without interfering with Eastenders..."
But if it could be guaranteed to do so, I'd be all for it.
1717 posts • joined 19 Apr 2007
"... without interfering with Eastenders..."
But if it could be guaranteed to do so, I'd be all for it.
"All your monies are belong to us".
f400 or, more properly, f/400 would in fact be an extremely small aperture.
The largest commercially-made lens aperture was, I believe, f/0.95 - from Canon, Voigtländer and also Leica.
f/400 is venturing into pinhole territory...
(I'm sure I'll get voted down just for that alone)
One of the biggest problems I've come across in assisting the technologically-challenged has been the user himself/herself.
Even though I'm a Mac user myself, I help friends & relatives who have Windows PCs, too. I have recommended anti-nasty software to users on both platforms, and attempted to drum into their little heads the importance of good backup - preferably cloning their hard drive then executing an incremental backup at regular intervals.
With recommendations for AV software, I attempt to (metaphorically, of course) engrave upon their brains "UPDATE YOUR AV SOFTWARE" but do they do it?
I've just spent some time tidying up an XP system - assisted by my son - and the user asked me in a peeved voice "I installed the AV software you advised - so why is my PC infected?" My reply of course was "Have you kept the virus/trojan defs updated" and was advised "I shouldn't have to do that, should I?"
I thought I'd almost conditioned him to do it when I advised about the AV - BACK IN SEPTEMBER 2010. Apparently, some people think that software produced in 2010 should - by a process of osmosis - be fully conversant with ALL nasties produced since, without they themselves having to do anything about it.
Maybe you should have to have a computer licence, and three endorsements gets it suspended...
It's not a fault - it's a new security feature.
A totally inaccessible service is a secure service.
...unless there's an anti-Simon Cowell somewhere.
Wonder if we could get him to meet our Simon Cowell
I'll take your word for it:- being mostly a Mac specialist, I've never been involved with MS's enterprise/site licences - or the implications thereof.
It will upset many organisations who still have dozens of P4's floating around, though...
Beer? - Why not?
Yup, I'm a Mac man - but I still need a Windows machine at work - Industry specific software written way back in the '90's. Suspicion has it it was the 1890's.
Prior to installing WMWare on my office Mac, I had a Pentium 4 running XP Pro on my desk. I was one of the better equipped staff - Win2000 and lesser Pentiums abound - but so they do in many large organisations who might have their own esoteric S/W - which, if a relic of pre-2k days, is probably not that demanding on resources. Add that to Lotus Notes, a bit of Word/Excel and there really isn't any great need or incentive to upgrade.
With companies still using Win200/XP on a regular basis, I just don't see the huge mass of commercial users rushing out to upgrade.
And you will find your experience echoed in a multitude of companies - large and small - across the UK and elsewhere.
So many IT managers seem to think that installing Macs is a threat to their own little empire, and anyway it's a similar outlook to the one I met so often in the early 1980's - "No-one ever got fired for buying IBM".
You know, if you keep correcting these anti-Apple moans disguised as journalism, you'll probably be banned.
Last thing they want (or care about, seemingly) is accurate factuality.
Every night? Same order? Same routine? Same time?
Totally right - let's have a bit of fining the cretin who screwed up.
No - let's have a LOT of it.
It just might encourager les autres, to coin a phrase...
Not at all - we might point out that Dell etc., etc., also use Foxconn and others, where terms, conditions, pay rates & margins are ALL going to be much of a muchness.
We also point out that at least Apple are doing something - whether it's enough is a subjective matter, not an objective point - to deal with this issue, whereas the actions of pretty well every other manufacturer/assembler are conspicuous by their complete absence.
...it could be a Dell laptop.
...used in hospitals as an emetic?
The right to bear arms is enshrined in the US constitution to protect the freedom of the people.
I accept that the Dep't of Homeland Security is eroding that freedom rather too much, but over-ambitious rulers are kept in check by the thought of an armed populace.
Why do you think our ruling elite here in the UK are so vehemently opposed to any kind of arming of the electorate?
Concern for our well-being? - If so, it would be the first time ever!
To save us from ourselves? - see comment above!
To ensure that armed bad guys can't hurt us? - ask any cop involved in Trident how effective that is.
To prevent a serious rising by a pissed-off electorate? - getting warmer!
I am a free man.
Does it mean though, I'll get a free mini-moke to tax around in?
...until we all have to shave our heads and have a barcode/QRCode permanently tattooed on.
True, we don't have a Department of Homeland Security with their paranoid über-control, but it appears that our plod can just act like them at a whim.
"...its fondleslabs to rich foreigners browsing for overpriced toys..."
More factual, objective and unbiased reporting, I see.
...which will end up costing us £16bn - before they're scrapped due to not working.
Next you'll be telling me that ursines defecate in a sylvan setting...
Winter in the Northern hemisphere coincides with summer in the Southern hemisphere.
And vice versa.
So, - winter where?
I've been around El Reg for ages - I AM the wrong side of 60, but I echo Chrchill:-
If you're not a socialist at 16, there's something wrong with your heart;
If you're STIULL a socialist at 25, there's something wrong with your head.
Await avalanche of downvotes.
are " wunnerful people" - until they run out of other people's money.
...the lefties in the Labour Party and in Auntie Beeb have long since taken to applying the epithet "progressive" to left-wing ideas.
The subtle assumption/implication being that only left-wing ideas are an advancement, and I'm rather surprised to see how many Reg commenters appear to swallow this rather frightening form of manipulative Newspeak.
Especially U2, with sanctimonious St. Bono preaching "Give, give, give" to the rest of us, but hiding his own mazoolah overseas to minimise taxes...
I knew our politicians/civil servants/rulemakers were dumb, but I didn't realise just how dumb they were...
call yourself "Mad Mike"?
One of the most rational comments I've ever read.
Is that why the US has steadfastly failed to return murderers for the last 30 or 40 years?
Claiming that despite scores of dead and maimed innocent men, women and children, these perps were "noble freedom fighters struggling heroically against an evil occupying power".
I refer of course, to the numerous provos who've decamped to the Home of the Brave, safe in the knowledge that their Beaks are in thrall to the misty-eyed Sons of Erin - or at least those whose great-great-great grandpappy was...
I'll call you "Correct", "Asute", and other similar terms.
As to what's wrong with this country? Answer - politicians!
Third or fourth rate individuals with monstrous egos but little comprehension of reality. They're pretty much the same the whole world over.
...get a huge multiple of my earnings for being wrong. Repeatedly.
Guess I shouldn't have paid attention at school...
"Defamation of a District Judge is not jaywalking."
If you have to rely on a law which criminalises comment that you're a dickhead, then you truly are a dickhead.
"I wonder if we are witnessing the start of the next collapse."
We can but hope.
You reckon you can find a member of the UK Judiciary who is not barkingly insane?
Needles, haystacks and The Holy Grail spring to mind...
...but I've been shattered by the terminal verbosity...
...shouldn't judge a book by its cover, but it's one damned-nice looking car.
"... finding a way to activate the processes that would cause the much larger and more aggressive aurochs to develop..."
Just because we can is NOT a valid reason.
Afghani marriage ceremonies???
At least they provide a little comic relief.
However, if Ahmadinnerjacket & co. attempt to close the Straits of Hormuz, then apart from a very peeved Uncle Sam, they will find that the rest of the Gulf States will be somewhat miffed as well - to such an extent that they won't hinder the US of A in "re-opening" said straits, and possibly administering a spanking, too.
believe my figure's right...
...that 98.79% of statistics are made up on the spot...
...such a load of heated bile?
If you're prepared to put up with this - go on Facebook.
If you're not, or have any other reason to avoid it e.g. you're still continually baffled regarding the attraction of social networking sites, then don't go on Facebook.
I can't see the attraction - but then I AM over 60 - and I refuse to sign up before I can follow anyone else's urge to view their Facebook offering.
I am therefore, a Facebook-free zone. I'm not smug or superior about it: I accept that others might have a different view and might find it valuable and enjoyable. Just because the reasons escape me is no cause for me to be vitriolic about others.
Live & let live - and respect others' right to think differently.
Beer? - why not? it IS the last day before returning to work.
We'll have nun of that here, thank you.
That's a quote from a PR munchkin. How do you expect it to have any meaning?
Has there ever been such an opinionated piece, with emotive descriptive language purporting to be an unbiased factual report?
You could be either a graduate of the Dr Goebbels school of reporting, or - and I hesitate to accuse anyone of this - a moonlighting BBC news reporter
Referring to retail staff as "sales droids" shows a certain arrogance and disdain for retail staff. Perhaps that attitude is instrumental in determining how you're treated by the retail staff.
The article concerns Applestores - Apple's own retail stores.
It does NOT relate to resellers.
...pile on the agony...
Coat & taxi, please
IMHO we have far more to fear from the state than from private companies.
Private companies - even at their worst - are just after money.
The State, however,.....