Re: If Jobs were still alive ...
"...he would be busty..."?
1722 posts • joined 19 Apr 2007
"...he would be busty..."?
There are comments describing DC's style as "Smug", "Cynical", etc. etc.
Possibly with a degree of justification, but if he's smug it's because he's been there, done that, got the T-shirt - AND survived.
If he's cynical, it's because he's realistic and pragmatic, rather than being wrapped up in some touchy-feely "let's all be buddies" philosophy - which would (commecially speaking) be somewhat akin to painting a target on your back.
Experience is worth more than theory: Cynicism IS realism...
Phishing for info regarding a bank which won't let its legit customers get at their loot even with all the passwords etc. etc.
Doesn't strike me as the brightest option...
"Since the rich were targeted..."
Wouldn't be a very successful robber if he targeted the poor, now would he?
Let's hope it's not a case of "Like Father, like Son"...
You could well be right:- next time I feel moved to dissect a tyre, I'll tread carefully.
"...I'm not sure that you can blame the latest OSx if you only feed it 3GB..."
I'm damned certain he can't. I too have a two-year old Mac Pro - except mines 8-core. I took it to 12GB RAM and she flies. I use CS5, MSOffice, iMovie etc., and run Win7 through VMWare Fusion.
Not a problem.
You need to get a Scientologist iWife...
She'll be quite at home with the iRon...
iCoat & iTaxi, please...
...Apple isn't really a business desktop company...
With most of the non-graphics business users I've seen over the last few years, It's surprising how many of them are still using elderly Dell/HP entry-level machines, running XP.
Who really IS a "business desktop" company these days?
"...bigger but meaningless numbers..."??
Like 1,000,000 Android activations per day?
30,000,000 per month??
Nearly 400,000,000 per year???
Seems it's not only Apple owners to whom the epithet "dumb" can be applied...
Not exactly 'new' Mac Pros:- this is just a minor update:- New Mac Pros & iMacs probably late 2012 or early 2013
Next they'll be slating Jaguar, Bentley, BMW etc. 'cos they don't have an entry-level model at the same price as a Ford Ka.
It's so true that if there's one thing the British seem to hate more than failure, it's success.
...anyone who was an early adopter of the interwebs is also a mucky pervert since the interwebs is a delivery vehicle for smut.
What a load of childish illogical crap and non-sequitors.
Someone, please tell Ms Leach that she obviously isn't cut out for a career in proper journalism (except maybe with the Sun, or Desmond's Daily Star), and terminate what I assume to be her work experience placement with El Reg...
"...Politicians and the people involved should have a special exception when giving answers - they use a lie detector so we know they are not supporting perjury..."
There's a simple lie detector that's infallible. If a politician's lips aren't moving and no sound is emanating from them, then they're not lying.
If their lips ARE moving, or sound IS emanating, then they're lying.
Simple as that!
...keep Balmer in office furniture...
You're wasting your time looking for sense and reason:- it's just El Reg having one of their regular anti-Apple trollfests.
Fast becoming the IT world equivalent of "The Jeremy Kyle Show"...
Obviously you've never been to my last place of work...
Quite, Dan: and well expressed.
I'm a long-standing Mac user (since the late 1980's) and I own an iPhone4, which I suppose would be sufficient for some to contemptuously dismiss me as a fanboi - whatever that is.
I know many Mac users:- some are delightful, and some less so. Very much less so, in some cases.
I know many PC users:- some are delightful, and some less so. Very much less so, in some cases.
There appears to be no correlation with their system of choice.
Or rounding off the Pentagon, perchance? Maybe copying the Coliseum?
I've never read such utter tripe. And that's saying something, with El Reg's regular Apple-bashing seminars...
Appropriate, perceptive and so beautifully barbed.
Jai, I take my hat off to you.
Pint? - your phrase is worth it.
Jai's comment earlier "... Reuters-rebrander Anna..." almost required me to get a new keyboard.
There is so much anti-Apple invective, diatribes and downright childish name-calling which is served up as serious journalism by El Reg. I know you guys have had some history with Cupertino, but you're in danger of drowning in bile & sour grapes.
Perhaps it's not so clever on GM's part to have forked out $10Million: Most of my friends don't use Facebook, but their kids - aged between 10 and 20 do.
I just wonder how sensible it is to spend such a lot advertising to those who won't be buyers for some years yet...
Let's change ALL our numbers to binary - only two digits to remember, none or those confusing 2,3,4,5,6,7,8 & 9 figures...
"some people's CDO*", please.
*In alphabetical order, as it should be!
Well, I use rail & bus mostly. My best beloved has the car and does around 4,000 - 5,000 miles annually.
Yes, she needs it, as she would be housebound without it (arthritis). However:-
Our current car is "V" reg, and with a genuine 35k on the clock, cost us £600. When I retire (within the next 5 years, due to age & health, I add - definitely not wealth) our next vehicle will probably be of a similar vintage/price/type etc. etc.
So unless it becomes law to retro-fit these gizmos to anything actually on the road - which would be prohibitively expensive and political suicide for the proposer - I can't see it really affecting us.
"...nearly picked up a October revision base 15in i7 Macbook Pro for an excellent price a few weeks ago..."
So why didn't you, if it answers your needs?
Is it a matter of life-and-death to have the latest spec? If Firewire is omitted from new systems, does it mean the Firewire on older systems suddenly stops working?
Yes, I'm a Mac user, but I use what I need, rather than chase every new development...
Undoubtedly Hanlon's razor is appropriate here...
I'd let you have mine, but I've vented it rather too frequently - sometimes in these forums - in the past few weeks...
Amazing how much worse kids' behaviour has become since the fluffy touchy-feely brigade were allowed to hold sway.
Kids today are told (and believe) they have a plethora of "rights" but absolutely no responsibilities.
When my son (now 26) was a nipper, he had no "rights" other than the most basic and fundamental. Anything else was a privilege which was earned by obeying the rules, and as he got older, shouldering responsibilities (small at first, but increasing with age).
Result? He's a thoughtful, responsible and caring adult now. I'm as proud of him as much as I love him, and we have a great relationship.
Erudite & well expressed. Good man!
@deadlockvictim:- "...There aren't that many more macs around than before (or so it seems, at any rate)..."
Probably not in the room(s) where you live & work.
Many homes have eschewed Windows machines for iMacs - iMac sales show this.
Many executives now use a MacBook - look in any First Class lounge, Starbucks etc. Again, reported MacBook sales would indicate this.
MacPro machines DO sell well: sure it might be a lower percentage of a greatly increased sales volume, but they're still selling - even if overdue for an upgrade to new Xeons.
The fact that ever-increasing sums are spent on iPhones and iPads appears to overshadow Mac sales shouldn't detract from the fact that Macs are selling increasingly well. There will inevitably be an increase due to the halo effect of iDevice sales, but these can often lag a year or so behind, but they will happen.
Apple have just made sure they have a few more baskets into which they can put their eggs.
"Personally I don't get the Apple hate"
At one time, Apple was very much the underdog, loved by some and appreciated by a few more. Most of the PC world, then having fun with bright green command lines on a black screen, were even unaware of Apple and if they vaguely remembered the name, didn't know anything about them.
Now for a variety of reasons (I'm not going to get into any spats about these) Apple is the Wunderkind of the mainstream media, and few companies have a higher public profile.
It does seem to be that one of the less pleasant aspects of human nature is the desire to see an underdog really built up, then to take a perverse pleasure in knocking them down again.
Then there is the willy-waving (generally by those with metaphorical shortcomings in the appendage department) who cannot see ANYTHING becoming popular, without showering it with contemptuous disdain proclaiming that "If it's popular, it must be because it appeals to sheep and I hate it 'cos I'm too cool & special for all that".
Then again, like with cars, there are those who will knock any car which is different to the one they've bought, as they have to justify what they are tied into, and in denial that they might have made the wrong choice.
The again there's also simple jealousy & sour grapes...
No doubt I'll be buried with down votes for sussing out some commentaries whose denial runs deeper than I thought.
It never ceases to amaze me - the number of people whose incisive insight is so vastly superior to that of those who run these companies. Are these commenters very high-up in the IT world, and therefore have knowledge AND experience to validate their claims?
There is an awful lot of cars in the world right now. Only a very small percentage of them are Ferraris, BMWs, Jaguars. Don't see those companies wearing sackcloth & ashes and wailing "We're all doomed".
It's telling that the commenter states "...smug bastards who want to wave their new shiny shiny in everyones faces to say hey look at me, I have it and you don't type of people.."
Would that be as opposed to smug bastards who want to forcibly grab my attention and say "Hey! Look at me. I'm far too cool and intelligent to fall for any marketing crap - I'm one of the élite über-techies who's way too superior for all that"?
And everyone is just accepting the cost of 5 coders, at £30k pa each. So the biggest overhead is £150k in pay.
Are you seriously asking me to believe that some of the £0.69p apps I have (and enjoy) took five man years of development?
Were they ALL products of Redmond?
"...which is why I don't use it for sharing photos..."
You've found a different use for it, then?
Previous post was in reply to (and agreeing with) AC who posted Friday 20th April 2012 20:39 GMT.
Header could suggest otherwise...
Couldn't agree more. I don't use or visit Facebook - or photo sharing sites. I do however, accept that other people have a right to a different view, and a different course of action.
I'm not arrogant enough to castigate others for not thinking my way.
One man's meat etc...
...to make a clean breast of it...
Coat 'n' cab, please.
but the said Ms Alba as a pole dancer in 'Sin City' was quite exciting to this 62 yr old...
Now if only I could remember WHY I was getting excited...
But a REALLY savvy user (of any platform) would be like BOFH and sell someone else's body parts.
...then you haven't come across very many Mac users then, have you?
Every Mac user I know (including me) has AV installed - if only to avoid inadvertently forwarding a Windows virus to a windows-using friend.
Some of us Mac users DO have friends who use Windows - and we STILL talk to each other and remain friends...
That nice Mr Ecclestone, or Mr Murdoch might take exception to that...
Is this a phishing email?
Not just that, but these arseholes do need reminding that in this country, sovereignty remains with the people.
The assorted denizens of Whitehall and the Palace of Westminster need to be reminded** that their position is that of public servant.
**Reminded by something with a pointy end, if necessary!
just like Dave, I'm rather offended that anyone would assume I'm dumb enough to click on an unexplained link, notwithstanding I know http://http://xkcd.com/ is a stick-figure web-based comic.
Why the "https"??
It's worse than that:- we're now told what we can think. Room 101 if you don't comply.
...and one 'strategic commentard" (me) said: "It would take a remarkable display of discipline [for KAE] to resist" moving into fortune telling & seances. The survey concludes that they would "massively disrupt" either industry she got involved in.
As Powney SHOULD have explaIned -
This uncommissioned spurious research tells us prospective customers (might) perceive a fit where at first glance we would assume our brand could not travel [on the grounds they've never heard of us] This makes us a truly dangerous animal to a startling array of sectors.,
OK, I'll get my doublet