Waiting for the swallow...
... because I want to see an ornithopter with a fair load-carrying capacity, e.g. a coconut.
Paris, because of the foregoing.
296 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Apr 2007
He's like a shark who won't even come shallow until there's twenty swimmers on holiday and one of them cuts a foot on a bit of glass.
Can I be automatically notified of Lewis Page's future comments, please?
Paris, because since the inclusion of her icon here I've generally found nothing else satisfies.
When offloading in Afghanistan, could one of these ships fitted with some oversized shopvacs simply slurp up some sand and rock? You'd only be able to unload where the ground is sandy, but that might be plenty of places over there...
Paris, because she'd suffer no such restrictions...
Is this comment title also a reference to the Harry Turtledove novel of that name (0-345-38048-7) in which the main character has intimate relations with his cousin? Or is that a coincidence?
Paris, because I'd sure like to see her try to put on those red boots...
And thanks to my father for giving me this book in the first place. I suppose he had to thin the library and (oblig.) he at least kept the book in the family.
"I wonder how long the reg will persist with the reprisals aimed at Rush... it is most amusing."
I imagine for as long as he'll keep asking for it. If I know one thing about the hacks at El Reg (and I probably don't), it's that they'll write whatever they can at least tenuously link to IT for as long as it keeps paying. (I believe the insider quote I'm looking for here is "We'd cover your mum for a fiver.")
Dear Reg: please inquire of the appropriate police personnel how they recommend one proves half a million in carry-on luggage was legitimately-gotten when traveling. Don't forget to include in your followup article some special cases, e.g. whether being an MP automatically proves it was criminally obtained, and how best to document the money simply being carrying-around cash for a famous heiress.
[[ "non-personal information - data in a form that does not permit direct association with any specific individual," ]]
It all depends on what one means by "direct association." Surely, pulling data multiple times and generating a mode of some values then fetching data from another site mustn't be "direct" to the querying audience member in the story. Perhaps because he doesn't have the app for that.
It might not be able to fly eternally everywhere (it would probably have a hard time making it through a single winter's night over the North or South Pole, for example) but it might still stay aloft indefinitely if it traveled North and South as the seasons change, so it was always flying in local summer. As it's an airplane and it takes months for the seasons to switch hemispheres, it might be able to make the trip.
I suppose that would also give it the record for annual robot migration distance.
Perhaps the huge laser equipment could be mounted in the floor above the shark tank, and light-conductive output cables (and trigger switches) can be dangled to the tank and affixed to the sharks.
Certainly there would be some trouble keeping them untangled, but I think two sharks should be manageable, and that's a good start. I dare say it sounds about right for proof-of-concept.
"There's no such thing as a shortage of fresh water - just a shortage of power."
... and desalinators.
I'm thinking that in some places, give people a single huge desalinator and a power source to drive it, and someone will take both apart for scrap because it suits them.
But give everyone a small, cheap desalinator they can power themselves, and they'll fight to defend it, although that shouldn't be necessary if it doesn't contain any scrappable parts and if it's reliable enough that everyone who might want to steal it already has one. That's where I see this device might be headed.
"HATE the way it says iTablet on the front, totally ruins the look."
Electrical tape fix. I use it all the time for devices with blinding blue power lights apparently designed to keep aircraft from flying into them at night. Should work equally well for non-emissive display ugliness.
Paris, because she's easy on the eyes, isn't she?
Isn't email 98% spam? But for some reason we keep using it. It's almost as if the legitimate uses somehow, despite being outnumbered 50-to-1 by the crap, make it worth struggling on with. Sounds like torrents are in that same area.
Paris, because she's at least as good as email.
For all the readers here who understand security theater, I'm surprised to see multiple comments about how great it is having their water bottles taken away, put in a magical scanner with a beeper and a green light, and being returned to them. You have no idea what that scanner did or didn't do. The US TSA might, and that might be why they don't use that.
Paris, because I'm sure she approves.
(erstwhile) TSA guy: "Haha, just kidding; relax - you can get on the plane, you aren't going to be detained in one of the hidden white rooms here in the airport where we'd strip you naked and cavity search you until the police arrive and handcuff you and take you back to the station where you'd be put in a cell and interrogated for thirty-six hours until they decide to assign you a lawyer who will convince you to plea-bargain for a shorter felony sentence to commence a few months from now during which you'd be intimidated, beaten, and possibly raped by fellow inmates, mercifully culminating in your release in upstate New York penniless, creditless, friendless, homeless, and as an ex-convict nobody will hire.
Yeah, this was just a little bag-of-powder joke me and the guys like to pull, heh."
Paris, because she'd never frighten someone like that just for fun.
[[[... does not yet support videos with ads, captions, or annotations, but Google says: "We will be expanding the capabilities of the player in the future, so get ready for new and improved versions in the months to come."]]]
Sounds to me more like they mean "take this opportunity to enjoy a few months of videos unmarred by ads, captions, and annotations telling you about the other version of the video by the same poster with different also-unlicensed soundtracks". Because as these overlays became possible, I never once found them improving the quality of the video. (OK, except perhaps to tell you what song you are [Ed: might be] listening to on the video so you can go put it on your iPod.)
Paris, because she has fewer ads, captions, and annotations than YouTube.
" ... though it could make an impressive glider, the more so as its props would be able to act as turbines in forward flight, recharging the batteries as the Puffin glided down."
Running the props as turbines while gliding is _not_ going to make the glide more impressive. Unless your definition of impressive is "how steeply can I get to the ground".
Paris, because she has an impressive glide, due no doubt in part to her not running her props as turbines to recharge her etc. etc..
"you'll obey its 'copyright' in an effort to avoid spending the rest of your life wallowing in guilt."
It was my understanding that if you wanted to avoid spending the rest of your life wallowing in guilt, you stopped being Catholic.
I think the actual threat here is you'll have to do penance. Unless violating the Pope's copyright is a Mortal sin...
Paris, because I assume she'll play ball and refrain from wearing counterfeit papal vestments.