I did my best...
I spent at least twelve quid on an MK220 wireless keyboard/mouse combo only three years ago!
(And it's all still working nicely, thank you. Though it looks like it's gone up to twenty quid now.)
6254 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Apr 2007
I've had a similar experience from the other side: years ago, I found some information about an uncommon engine control unit. Every now and then I do a search to see if anything new has been discovered about it. Invariably, the search leads to a forum post somewhere that asks 'have you talked to Neil? He knows all about it'...
Indeed. The irritating thing though is that they seem incapable of observing what the hell is going on in the first place; they didn't charge any tax for months in spite of me calling, writing, emailing numerous times. Yet it took my accountant one phone call to get it moving, hence two months charged at 50%.
It was obvious *then* that there was an outstanding amount - no great amount, but still outstanding - so why wasn't that immediately adjusted on *this* year's code instead of waiting a year?
My tax is not particularly difficult: a couple of pensions and a little consultancy. Take my income, subtract the allowances, divide the remainder by twelve, and pay twenty percent of that per month. You could do it in Tiny Basic...
It's everywhere else that they have a problem...
e.g. Charging me double tax for six months, giving me a refund, then not charging me anything for ten months, taking 50% of my last two months, then charging normal paye, and last week telling me I underpaid last year so they're adjusting the tax code next year...
I don't dispute the amount, I just dispute the idiotic way they go about doing everything two years late.
...grammar-checking tools that suggest rewording, predictive text and email auto-reply suggestions – all machine-generated,"
Some of us don't. To me, a spelling checker is a handy *review* tool though its inability to identify the wrong word correctly spelt can be an issue; a grammar check reflects the style guide and biases of the group that wrote it; predictive text is a menace in almost *all* situations; and email auto-reply is an impertinent intrusion into my chain of thought. But maybe that's just me (and yes, as it happens my Master's thesis was based on identifying whether words which are *not* in a dictionary are correctly spelt).
On the main subject: it looks as if computer science classes will devolve from how to write correct code to how to ask the computer to write the correct code for you... and how will you know it has?
How much of this is fashion led development; must have the new shiny?
I have tools over eighty years old; I have domestic electronics pushing thirty years; and I'm embarrassed if a product *I've* designed is non-functional after a couple of years. I know I'm fighting entropy (and the bean counters in the purchasing department) but there's no reason why solid state electronics, used within their stated parameters, shouldn't last pretty much forever - excepting using sensitive parts such as some non-volatile memories and some capacitors.
I'm not surprised that the keyfob can be reprogrammed - or rather, the security system can be told to accept a different fob; I don't think the fob would change its RFID chip value though that's possible for some chips - from inside the vehicle.
Like A Mouse above, my concern is why the access is available from outside a locked vehicle - if indeed I read the article correctly and that is what happened.
That'll be Citroen/Peugot and Renault/Nissan then?
Not happy if they have a 'can connect to reprogram the ECU' with the doors locked (implied but not stated in the article) and I have to admit I'm curious as to how the criminals managed that trick (as well as moderately worried since I own a recent - though poverty spec - Renault).
@Zolko
Amazing. After only sixty years I am obviously losing my ability to communicate in English. I am not an armchair warrior; I've spent a lot of my career in parts of the world either close to war or suffering the results (including as it happen, Ukraine. I rather enjoyed the time I spent in Kiev) and it does not fill me with a delight for combat. Equally I am not an armchair warrior, and do rather take offence at the implication. I've even read one or two history books in my time. So I am sorry that you have completely missed the point of my comment.
I'll spell it out.
Dear Mr Putin.
The way to stop this war is not through negotiation with an illegally invaded neighbour. It is for you, Mr Putin, to issue the orders that withdraw your army back where it belongs - into the country of Russia. No part of Ukraine is a part of Russia - it may have been in the past, but you seem to think that your illegal occupation of parts of it entitles you to call it yours, to occupy it, to kill and maim its inhabitants - and incidentally cause huge property damage to parts of it.
The only way Ukraine can stop this war is to stop fighting, and that looks a somewhat unlikely possibility. But Russia could stop it tomorrow just by withdrawing. How many people have already died because of Putin's vanity project?
No one wants nuclear war (no one in their right mind wants war at all), but what alternative is there?
Umm...not having a nuclear war by pushing hard for negotiations?
Ummm, not having a nuclear war, or indeed any wall at all, by turning round and rolling the Russian forces back into Russia where they belong? With no Russian forces in Ukraine - and I include Crimea - there is no war. There are a lot of other questions to answer, and a lot of rebuilding to do, which I am sure the generous and helpful Russian government will be funding, but *THERE IS NO WAR*.
This is not difficult. For Putin to send his armies into a neighbouring country, and then to claim that Ukraine should be negotiating for piece? Was the vodka harvest particularly good this year or something?
To the 'horrible' side. I can see nothing in this for me nor would I recommend it to a family member; it is beyond creepy.
How much is this funded by the US thanatotic industry, famed for extracting maximum dollars from the families of the recently deceased at a time when they are unlikely to be capable of critical thinking?
Well, in the USA, perhaps, by statute.
But your post illustrates the basic fallacy that there *are no rights* other than those which a legislative body permits. 'Human rights' are a myth; in spite of their adoption and support by the United Nations, look how many places simply do not permit those rights to be exercised. As long as a government - legitimate or not - can usurp those rights for even one of its citizens, those rights may as well not exist.
Hmmm... Those early CDs had limited dynamic range
Those early CDs had exactly the same dynamic range as the later ones; the standard didn't change. The problem was more likely that the mixing engineer was unsure of his medium. Though early _D to A_ converters weren't all that brilliant; a common problem was that they decoded left and right channels alternately instead of simultaneously
Consider: it's a 16-bit uncompressed medium, sampled at 44.1kHz. That's 96dB dynamic range (for specialised signals!) - subtract 11dB quantisation noise (a common broadcast estimation) and leave 18dB headroom and you're still looking at 71dB dynamic range. Later producers would often tweak the levels so that the headroom disappeared, which would give even better dynamic range (though that wasn't what they wanted; they wanted *loud*).
Which is all somewhat better than 15ips half track tape in the eighties, and significantly better than any commercial pressed vinyl was or ever will be.
I'm sure I've told the tale here before: at the Beeb I was asked by a local hifi group if they could borrow a studio for some blind speaker cable testing. I said sure, if they'd like to include one of my cables in the test. That cable had a one ohm resistor in parallel with a 1N4001 diode in one leg... none of the group detected it.
Back in the day when I was designing and installing radio studios for the BBC, mains cable was regularly used for speaker connections.
(Always struck me as slightly odd that, given that an amplifier plus loudspeaker is actually a servo system, there are vanishingly few systems where positional feedback from the active moving element is included... very open ended, they are, and then people wonder why they sound different!)