Cloud Office Evolution
AKA hotdesking. That worked really well for everyone who's tried it in the past, right? Well, for the managers, at least; they tended to build their own little empires at the same desk every day. Everyone else, not so well.
6265 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Apr 2007
Analog was one of the original pulp magazines (though with several titles: Astounding Stories of Super-Science to begin with) and it's still going reasonably strong. It also accepts unsolicited submissions and to be honest I'd expect them to be an obvious target for this statistical vomit. Though I wonder about the chat-gpt training: if it is informed by the quality of freely available material, it won't be too hard for the editors to tell the difference. And noting that many of the early SF stories _are_ available, it's likely that the output will show the same cultural mores as the authors of the time presented. That should work well!
I think it was Analog who published a story in which a computer took over writing for an author, getting better and better until every book published was by this 'author'... book event horizon?
A quick search tells me that Meta has around three billion users as of last year, and that they had four and a half billion in income for 2022Q4 - so say, eighteen billion dollars income for three billion users, or six bucks each per year.
And they'd like users to pay twenty-four times that amount? And presumably still get the six bucks from advertisers (because a billion here, a billion there...)
And in the meantime, require said users to submit copies of government provided ID? Can we say 'hackers paradise'?
But in Germany, the estate agents charge so much from both the buyer and seller that they only need to sell one or two houses a year to keep them in shiny new BMWs...
We've had agents insist on seeing bank account details before they'd make a viewing appointment, and we've told them where to shove it. They give a very definite impression that actually being an agent and selling something is really disturbing their peace of mind.
Oh you do care. You care very much. You care that it attracts enough eyeballs for long enough to sell advertising space.
You don't care what it means.
I am getting really fed up with an internet that exists largely for people to monetise with a method popularised eighty years ago: with very few exceptions, there isn't a TV or Radio broadcaster out there who cares about anything more than the bottom line. They certainly don't care about the material being broadcast as long as it keeps the views/listeners amused between the adverts; without a doubt the corporates running the bullshit clickbait websites have exactly the same cares.
Remember when the internet was going to be the sum of all human knowledge?
A plague upon all their houses!
Yes, a thousand times yes! I want two things from a music player: either play a complete album all the way through and then stop, or play randomly from the whole collection. Possibly excluding classical music; that should always be in the right order.
My rips are carefully organised by band or composer, then by album title. But ripping programs tend to decide that artists are the definitive descriptor so if I'm not careful I can find one album rips into two or more directories because some tracks have more than one artist...
Well, the tidy approach would be some sort of tagging file system: "here is my wonderful photo.jpg" tags: horse, dog.
There are systems out there; I played with one for Linux which generated hidden metadata per object. I suspect a faster way would be to maintain a central database somewhere... but in either case the snag is that if you have to categorise tens of items, it's a pain. If you have to categorise tens of thousands, you really need a librarian. Perhaps there's a real use for Artificial Stupidity: a local AI that can recognise with a reasonable degree of accuracy what is in a picture? (heh: category portraits, overexposed...)
(Not quite sure how this works with other files, though...)
I agree with Shade here: I know where I put things because they're categorised - and replicated one layer down, for example, in project directories.
The whole thing of searching for a file? Particularly an application file? To this old C20th fart, that's just wrong. Even more wrong when I have to remember that the Document Viewer is called 'evince'...
Those struts, however, are perfect for resisting off-centered forces that will tug at EXCITE's SUV-sized payload while airborne.
Hmm. The testing could be interesting. I am all too sadly aware of biologically designed structures - like my back - that appear not to have finished evolving yet...
And while the interface is being upgraded, perhaps they could get the spell checker sorted out so that it actually uses English English when that's selected; it appears to choose US 'English' for everything (along with its parent, Firefox). I've given up trying to persuade it to do the right thing.
One can't help wondering if rather than a micrometeoroid, the damage was caused by a bit of the untracked man-made junk up there... Perhaps LEO is getting a bit too hairy to sit in for any length of time, even without a Kessler event?
I did wonder about the relative numbers of Starlink satellites and Russia's ASAT capabilities. Anything ground launched is both heavy and expensive and probably designed more for something like a governmental surveillance satellite present in relatively few numbers, no?
They could hardly do otherwise; to ban AI generated pages would have been to put themselves in the embarrassing position of being unable to show their own home page.
FFS guys: if I use a search engine, it's because I'm looking for something, not for a machine generated statistical blurb about what the something might be. Gimme sources, not bullshit.
Are the developers of these models aware of the old saying 'garbage in, garbage out'?
It takes ten or more years to train a human to be even vaguely critical of what it is being taught - and even then, some of them never make it... why would one expect statistics to do any better?
They're ridiculously cheap. Round here, half a Euro for a CD and a Euro for a DVD which will have cost significantly more. That's cheap enough to pick up a handful, watch them, and take them back to the shop next week if you don't want to keep them - keep the goodness going around and help the charity too. What's not to like?
Why? I guess because, hey, everything's streaming now, granddad. You want a Dolby with that?
But some of us remember that unless the medium is in your hand (or on your shelf) you're playing it at someone else's pleasure...
I just asked (because right now I need to know!) 'Is there a suitable replacement for a Microchip ENC424J600-I/ML' both to Bing and to DDG, which I believe is driven by Bing anyway.
DDG produced the list of sites you'd expect: Microchip and the big suppliers (Digikey, Farnell etc) while Bing produced the Microchip site, a short list of largely irrelevant 'Explore Further' links (Recommended to you based on what's popular) and, er, the big suppliers. But it started with Mouser.
So far, not greatly inspiring... it did find a number of drivers and a very general stack exchange thread, but nothing actually useful. Changing 'suitable' to 'compatible' didn't make any difference.
Oh well, back to looking at datasheets...
I love the way the windows seamlessly blend into each other in that edgeless way so you can't see which you're on; joining a meeting with a window too small to display the join button; the Fisher price UI. Notifications that don't go away until you needlessly click on the correct window (see above) are a mere courtesy detail.
</sarcasm>
If instead of all this feelgood posturing, they actually fixed a few of the basics? Y'know, like cut and paste which behaves completely different on Excel from any other MS application? Or sorted out what modal windows (looking at you, 'find') do when you have multiple windows open on different spreadsheets?
The value of your investment may go down as well as up. Your house is at risk if you do not continue to make mortgage payments. Consult your doctor or pharmacist for information regarding side effects...
Am I misunderstanding completely? These professional gamblers investors believed Musk's tweet, and instead of holding their shares for the four hundred buck payout, they sold because the price suddenly dropped? And now they want compensation for *their* decisions? Imagine my sympathy!