Apple and Italy ...
... share one horse. Who gets what; not sure
850 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Aug 2006
But as you all know, it's a love that dare not speak its name because if it did Law Enforcement would have to call what large multi-nationals do "Fraud" instead of "Innovation", and they'd have to pay taxes on offshore earnings, and they'd have to obey Asian Labor Laws, and they'd have to drown kittens, lots of kittens.
Pay no attention to ICANN and IANA, think of the kittens.
I think. If she was able to prove an allegation true after the fact, say in a counter-suit, then the problem for the Plaintiff's Lawyers is that they abetted a fraud and the counter-suit against both them and the Plaintiff should have treble damages. However her source would not be engaged in fraud if they made a little side agreement to split the treble damages 50/50. So if she and her source could have their honor satisfied for $3.75m each, everybody would be happy.
A journalist can't run this scam, hence the protection.
The Time Servers at the US Naval Observatory (The US Authority) are famously named "tick" and "tock" and have been for at least 12 years.
I know this because when Y2k came around, their moon phase calculators went willy because of Microsoft's attempt to embrace, extend and extinguish javascript. I let them know, and they replied "Thanks, Microsoft" One would think with a sailor's legendary vocabulary for such eventualities they could have done a lot better than that. Must have had visiting Flags that day. Irony lovers will note that the Vice Presidential Mansion is on the grounds of the Naval Observatory inhabited at the time by Al Gore (one last "inventor of the Internet" joke).
Of course Finance has been doing this since the 16th Century. Their solution was to say only 'return' (retrograde motion) mattered, and quadrature of the transcendental functions pushed all the leap days to the end of time. Since the actual doubling period for this 'interest' was far outside the lifetime of humans, bankers convinced us that value was fractional, interest was fractional, time was fractional, but currency was discrete. Pay up or we're taking your car. This was the original Leap-Year-Smear.
My advice, which unfortunately few will take, is to ignore Google's cute trick - smoothing Longitude - and to recognize the social damage done over the centuries by Latitude based exploitation of employees (Labor-For-Hire). It's clever to fool a Network to the tune of ~1000 milliseconds a year, but to fool by coercion generations of slaves is not so clever.
Here's how it works: "The Latitude Effect" http://tinyurl.com/white-nights-forever
"Jeff Sandquist, senior director of developer relations for Microsoft and self-confessed car nut, said he loves the app because he can follow his daughter around remotely while she drives her VW Beetle."
"El Reg hopes for his sake Sandquist’s kids aren’t picking his retirement home."
But thanks to the new Patricide 1.0 app announced jointly by a consortium of Google, Apple, Oracle, Yahoo, IBM and a bunch of other people who can remember being teenagers, they won't have to!
'The NSA believes this may be of interest to government and health care operations and other outfits concerned with privacy. It acknowledges, however, that the access labels do not constitute a "complete security solution".'
Might work. I think a "complete security solution" regarding personal privacy would have entailed apprenticing Eric Schmidt to a Plumber or Carpenter many years ago. Seems a bit late for that.
"Lastly, do you need to be told I'm a real person? if I act a dick, ..."
I've actually been a Dick for 57 years. In spite of what Eric The Stupid says about his 20 year thought experiment, believe me when I say that people who want to correct "bad names" are much more evil than the shallow, uncritical thinkers.
I agree with the rest too. Good rant :o)
<rant>
<p>All these comments based upon a Shit Happens graph mislabeled as Adoption Curve or some such. What is up with that ? Don't you people have a neighborhood stores to burn down or something ?</p>
<p>Warren Buffett was absolutely correct (about taxing the wealthy) - the assumption that the 'winners' need special advantages to thrive (let alone that they actually notice, or appreciate) is crazy. They don't need fans, because they did it all themselves because they are brilliant, just ask them.</p>
</rant>
Thank you for your time. Resume misguided hero worship in 4...3...2...1...
"Google said preventing some data being accessed through search engines "would have a profound chilling effect on free expression without protecting people’s privacy,” according to the report.
Both the right to a private life and the right to freedom of expression are guaranteed in the European Convention on Human Rights."
Let me paraphrase: Google said ... would have a profound chilling effect on free expression <i>of Google, Inc. as a Corporate Person under American Law</i> without protecting <i>Human</i> people’s privacy <i>under the , European Convention on Human Rights.</i>
"as we publish this from the Vulture Central insurrection-proof London bunker complex."
Nice.
Been trying to tell my fellow Merkins all morning that the Gun Lobby lies and that the (Western) Gun Culture is lazy and forgot to mention something: The reason 'self-defense' works is the law of Castle Doctrine (not available in the Washington, DC area), which removes uncertainty in self-defense. If I find an intruder in my living room at 3am, I can take whatever necessary steps to defend myself without further legal repercussions (excuse the pun please). In my case, that would be running like hell, because I don't own a gun. Nonetheless, there is no uncertainty in what I must do. The police have to assess, not me.
London merchants need Castle Doctrine, not guns. And after they have run like hell, the police have to handle it.
In the 1880's or so it became impossible to completely read the literature in a Natural Science discipline. By the time I graduated from College in the 1970's, my education was at best 5% rote memory, 95% Library. This is not new.
But what if the Library moved every 12 hours ? And, worse, what if the Card Catalog was not indexed to the new physical location, but rather ranked by original physical location ? How many times have you "found" a link only to forget to Bookmark it ? That is worse.
World-class cynic that I am, I cannot help but see this as an overt attempt by Google to lure the SEC (stock watchdogs) into a turf war with the FTC (anti-trust issues).
"We just can't be bothered with anti-trust right now because some rogue engineer only told insiders that the privacy of Google+ was shit when she should have told everybody, and that was wrong and our stock might plunge a dime or more any day now and for god's sakes won't someone think of the children, etc. etc. etc." or something like that.
Maybe it's just me.
That is much as I thought (and hoped). American Civil Servants, especially in IT, play a much different game, and the web has had a different effect. The "old" tools marginalized the poor, who weren't allowed to starve as that was considered bad form. The "new" BigTable tools, proffered by a Civil Servant's future employer, marginalize the least-economically-active, swapping one bad form for another, hence an exchange of failures.
Having a powerful Civil Service does not look like a good thing to Greece, at the moment, but having a governance scheme based upon unproven engineering might be worse in the long run.
'It also stressed concerns about British citizens being left behind because of the Cabinet Office's bold "digital-by-default" plans.
"The government plans to move more public services online and, rightly, to stress the importance of designing services around the needs of the user. However, approximately nine million people have never used the internet, and they must not be excluded," it said.'
This is creepy to me as an American. I had assumed an "MP" was a Politician. Apparently they can cross-breed with intelligent life. Probably does not happen often, but still; creepy.
I think "digital-by-default" has the same marginalization danger which those away from the seat of political power have always had. "No taxation without Representation"; Americans tried to tell Parliament that once.
Commercialization leads to a digital map missing some colonies:
- The Irish type "Bad Market" (i.e. unEnglish people here.)
- The Newcastle type "Bad Market" (i.e. don't buy as much coal as they should)
In principle, the solution is simple - just make sure you do not mistake "digital-by-default" for "good-markets-only-by-default". Beware Private Sector requirements as they are incomplete.
The Corporate behemoths are willing to take in (and lock-in) the poor saps stuck in No-Man's Land. Standards Authorities make a huge extinguishing mistake when they seek interoperability at the 'You' level. Their domain is No-Man's Land. When they give 'You' up, there is no further point.
Google employs all the 'rogue engineers', Apple has all the 'holding it' experts. The rest of us don't need Safe Harbor, we need Sanctuary. Data security is not weather driven. The rules for The Cloud are no different than for taking a thumb drive out of the office. Sooner or later, the data **should have been** redacted, before you stored it on the external media.
If you weren't smart enough to figure out, a priori, what would get you into trouble, this may be of some help ...
http://www.rustprivacy.org/2011/pii/cnpii.xml
The key point is that if parties unknown are picking through your data, you need not have any guilt sending them off to chase their tails.
http://purl.org/pii/terms/
The pattern you recognized in haystacks is called "Enumerating Badness".
The pattern I recognized in Apple, Facebook, Google, MS et al. (props to Eric S., again, and again, and again) is called "Bull Shit". Remember 'You have the right to be forgotten' ? In a secure world, obviously not. I'm doubting that 'You have the right to be forgotten after 15 years' would have made the Press Release.
As a US Citizen, I would like to know what the Crown would do if the Names at Lloyd's insured against the risks of getting caught smuggling.
I'm quite sure it would not be very pretty.
Profits from overseas trading are merely untrustworthy reports of profits from overseas trading until the Crown has it's share. That's not changed since the 18th Century. The communications are just faster.